40% of parents borrowed money to provide essentials for their children
It found that a significant number of parents are struggling. Of 1,000 parents across a nationally represented survey, 19% had to cut back or go without food over the past six months. Some 40% of parents said they skipped meals or reduced portion sizes so their children would have enough to eat, while 28% felt at some point they didn't have enough food to feed their children and 12% used a foodbank.
Due to insufficient income, 18% of parents cut back on or went without heating and 17% on electricity in the past six months. One third of parents (32%) went into arrears on energy bills due to insufficient income.
As the cost of living continues to rise, more than half (52%) cut back or went without social activities and 41% cut back on clothing. One in five parents said they went without or avoided medical appointments.
The vast majority of parents (78%) said cost of living problems negatively affect their children, with 19% saying it significantly does. Only one in four parents said they did not need to cut back or go without essential items.
Seven in ten parents said they sometimes or always worry about not being able to provide their children with daily essentials. One parent that took part in the survey said: 'I have turned the heating down in the house to reduce the bill, meaning the kids now sleep with extra blankets and wear jumpers or hoodies around the house.
"I never want my children to go cold or hungry so I'll often try to sleep to stay warm and keep lights off to reduce bills also.' While another said: 'There's not much left for any pleasures in life. It's grim and not getting any better. It just keeps getting worse and worse. Dreading next winter's bills.'
And a third commented: 'We are just barely getting by. My in-laws buy us fuel each week we couldn't afford it otherwise. I never have money in my purse or account. We are worse off than before.' Barnardos CEO Suzanne Connolly said the report shows that parents and children across the country 'are still going without or having to cut back on basic essentials'.
She said: 'Parents on the lowest incomes are really struggling, as well as those just outside the threshold for welfare support. They are continuing to try everything to give their children the necessities for a decent quality childhood, but unfortunately at times failing.'
Since this annual report began in 2021, Ms Connolly said things have 'remained static', despite repeated once-off Government cost of living measures. She added: 'There must be targeted permanent support introduced, otherwise more children will go without essentials next year.
'At an absolute minimum every child in Ireland should live in homes with adequate heating and electricity, sufficient nutritious food and appropriate clothing, as well as the opportunity to engage in sporting and cultural activities. Parents should not be at risk of constant financial distress in order to provide their children with these essentials.'
The charity is recommending that the government increase the child support payment in line with inflation. This would require increasing the payment for children under 12 by €6 per week and for children aged 12 and over by €15 per week in Budget 2026.
For the one-parent family payment in Ireland, there is an income disregard for the first €165 of gross weekly earnings. Barnardos recommends that this income disregard is increased, enabling single parents to retain more income.
It says this would better protect children in these households who are at disproportionate risk of going without essentials. In Budget 2026 the charity is also asking for fuel allowance to be extended to those on this single parent payment, and that vulnerable families using prepaid metres should be placed on fuel allowance.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
19 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on Ireland's wind energy: a fight for funding
Ireland is making slow but steady progress towards ambitious renewable energy targets, but challenges remain – including a more competitive market for attracting private investment. The latest report from Wind Energy Ireland shows that wind energy supplied 24 per cent of the country's electricity needs last month, the third best performance for July on record. According to the Government's offshore renewable energy targets, the objective is to reach 37 gigawatts of wind energy by 2050, which would be enough to cover by a factor of six the current peak demand for electricity in Ireland. There is a lot riding on reaching these targets. The goal of a secure, cost-effective supply of energy remains some way off. Senior multinational companies have warned that future investment relies on this. Moreover, if Ireland does not meet EU-agreed CO2 reduction targets from 2030 onwards, it could be liable for billions in fines. Some of the challenges are homegrown. For example, according to the latest report from Wind Energy Ireland, roughly 14 per cent of the electricity that could have been generated by wind last year was lost due to limited grid capacity. Also, several important wind energy developments have been delayed by planning logjams. READ MORE The Government has earmarked €3.5billion to upgrade the energy infrastructure and reforms to the planning system have improved timeframes on planning applications for wind developments. It is important that there is continued improvement in both of these areas, as one of the main external challenges is access to funding. Recently, the Danish government had to backstop a $9.4billion rights issue by Orsted, the renewable energy developer, as it needed capital to complete US developments. Donald Trump's 'drill baby drill' approach energy policy has caused many investors to switch from renewables back to fossil fuels. Ireland needs billions in investment to develop its offshore wind potential. An efficient infrastructure and planning system is essential to attract future investment in a competitive marketplace for funding.
RTÉ News
a day ago
- RTÉ News
British racing to go on strike over betting tax rise
British racing will stage an unprecedented one-day strike on 10 September in protest at a proposed rise in taxes on horserace betting. The four scheduled fixtures at Carlisle, Uttoxeter, Lingfield and Kempton will not take place after agreements between the owners of the courses and the British Horseracing Authority, making it the first time the sport has voluntarily refused to race in modern history. The BHA set up the 'Axe the Racing Tax' campaign in response to proposals to replace the existing three-tax structure of online gambling duties with a single tax, with fears the current 15 per cent duty on racing could be increased to the 21 per cent levied on games of chance. Brant Dunshea, chief executive at the British Horseracing Authority, said: "We have decided to take the unprecedented decision to cancel our planned racing fixtures on September 10 to highlight to Government the serious consequences of the Treasury's tax proposals which threaten the very future of our sport. "British racing is already in a precarious financial position and research has shown that a tax rise on racing could be catastrophic for the sport and the thousands of jobs that rely on it in towns and communities across the country. "This is the first time that British racing has chosen not to race due to Government proposals. We haven't taken this decision lightly but in doing so we are urging the Government to rethink this tax proposal to protect the future of our sport which is a cherished part of Britain's heritage and culture. "Our message to Government is clear: axe the racing tax and back British racing." The four tracks involved are operated by the Jockey Club and the Arena Racing Company, with both backing the move. Jim Mullen, CEO at the Jockey Club, said: "We hope this pause for reflection will enable the Government to truly understand the economic impact of horseracing and its cultural significance to communities across the UK, as well as the world-class racing festivals we host. "After this period of reflection, we hope the full implications will be understood, and we can prevent the irreparable damage that threatens a sport the nation is, and should be, proud of." Martin Cruddace, CEO at ARC, added: "We have always been taxed and regulated differently, and it is imperative for our future that we continue to be so. "If the Government wants Britain to be a world leader in online casino and a world pauper in a sport at the heart of its culture, then tax harmonisation will achieve that aim." While the four meetings will be rescheduled, Paul Johnson, chief executive of the National Trainers Federation, underlined the "sacrifice" in calling a halt to the sport for a day. He said: "Cancelling fixtures is a huge sacrifice by racing and should serve as a stark reminder to the Government of the impact its tax raid will have on our sport.
Irish Times
a day ago
- Irish Times
Dropping cost-of-living measures is key pre-budget minefield for Government to navigate
What happens when the once-off cost-of-living measures people have become accustomed to over a series of giveaway budgets suddenly stop, as is expected this year? The Government has already got a taste of the anger that can ensue. After Minister for Higher Education James Lawless signalled that €1,000 cuts to third-level student fees seen in recent years may not be repeated on budget day there was a backlash. It caused not just a political storm, but also led to a flood of written complaints from parents and others to the Fianna Fáil minister in the days after his remarks during a radio interview at the end of June. Here's a flavour of the reaction: A mother of two students wrote that she was 'absolutely appalled' at the possibility the fees would revert to €3,000, saying that was 'massive to the squeezed middle'. She added: 'Why are ye crucifying us? Why?' READ MORE 'A national disgrace' thundered another parent. 'Six votes in my house will be going elsewhere [in] the next election if it is not overturned.' [ Student fees: Minister gets barrage of complaints after suggesting €1,000 cut may not happen Opens in new window ] There were many more in a similar vein. While a spokesman for Lawless stressed he is 'acutely aware of the financial pressures facing students and families' and will be 'fighting hard' for budget measures that reduce the cost of education, it remains to be seen what these measures will be come budget day in October. In one sense it should be no surprise that the once-off measures – brought in as part of recent budgets to respond to rampant inflation and a cost-of-living crisis – are to end; it was flagged by sources within the Government less than two weeks after its formation at the start of the year. Throughout the year senior Coalition figures stated publicly there would be no once-off measures amid the need to reign in spending in the face of huge economic uncertainty over US tariffs on EU (including Irish) goods. In late July in the summer economic statement an overall package of €9.4 billion was announced as being available for spending increases (€7.9 billion) and tax cuts (€1.5 billion) in the budget. Will the Government's big projects survive the next downturn? Listen | 36:20 There has been no talk since by those who control the purse-strings in Government of topping this up with billions in once-off measures as previously happened. But 'once-off' is also a complete misnomer as many of the payments were repeated in some form over three budgets. And getting rid of them in one fell swoop is fraught with political risk. The pre-election budget last year featured a €2.2 billion cost-of-living package including two €125 electricity credits and multiple double welfare payments and lump sums. These included extra payments of the fuel allowance, disability allowance and working family payments. For parents there were two double child benefit payments at the end of 2024 and other measures included reductions in school transport fees and State exam fee waivers. If such measures must be dropped, it makes sense politically to do this at the start of a government's term with an election expected to be years away. However, doing so also has the potential to create divisions within the Coalition, as happened with the student fees controversy of recent weeks. More importantly though, there is the anger that scrapping once-off payments may well spark among the public. Meanwhile, with many costs, such as food and energy, still high the Government can be sure Opposition parties will seek to exploit any public dissatisfaction after budget day. Sinn Féin has already made demands for a cost-of-living package a running theme in public statements over the summer. It appears the Government is not for Finance Paschal Donohoe was asked about people in arrears with electricity bills during a visit to Clonmel, Co Tipperary, this week. He said such issues will be considered as the budget approaches. But he also reiterated: 'We will not be bringing forward the kind of one-off measures that we've had in the past.' [ Paschal Donohoe defends decision not to repeat cost-of-living payments in upcoming budget Opens in new window ] He added the Government is 'very conscious that the cost of living continues to be a challenge for so many', but said: 'We now need to ensure that measures that we bring forward, in light of the economic uncertainty that is there, are ones that we can afford and ones that will be sustainable.' He advised people having difficulty paying bills to engage with electricity suppliers on measures such as alternative payment plans. His stance appears to be at one with Minister for Public Expenditure Jack Chambers who said last month that, rather than once-off payments, Budget 2026 would be about decisions on 'permanent', 'sustainable' and targeted measures that 'protect the most vulnerable'. Chambers indicated that the social protection system will still be used to help the least well-off in the budget. Indeed it would be highly surprising if increases in the State pension and other welfare payments – as in recent years – do not feature in the upcoming budget even in the absence of once-off measures. On the tax side, scope for income-tax cuts is likely to be limited by proposals to bring in VAT reductions for the hospitality industry at some point next year. Dropping once-off measures – and what will be done to ease their loss in people's pockets – is the key political minefield the Government must navigate as budget preparations ramp up from the end of August. Lower-income households will have to be protected but ministers will also have to remember – as the student fees controversy showed – that hell hath no fury like a voter scorned.
