logo
British strength was built on steel, net zero is emasculating us

British strength was built on steel, net zero is emasculating us

Telegraph12-04-2025

If the sinews of war are endless money, its skeleton is steel. Although steel has been used for edged weapons for many centuries, it was far too expensive to be used in large quantities. Only with the discovery of cheap production methods could steel became one of the basic materials of all modern life, and indispensable for modern weapons.
It was the Crimean War in the 1850s that stimulated a British inventor, Henry Bessemer, to invent the first method of making cheap and reliable steel by blowing air through molten iron to burn off impurities, making Sheffield a world centre of steel-making.
Prussia soon copied British technology, and its fateful victory over France in 1870-71, creating the German Empire (and annexing France's iron-ore fields), had been largely due to the development by Krupp of breech-loading steel artillery. Within a decade, the French, then the British, were building steel warships with steel boilers for high-pressure steam generation.
So steel is not an ordinary product. Although cheap grades were soon being used in vast quantities for railway tracks, bridges and high-rise buildings, its higher grades were always crucial for artillery, ships and a vast range of military hardware.
Many millions of tons were used by all combatants in both world wars. Britain's steel production was only about half that of Germany by 1914, and steel had to be imported from America and Sweden, as it did from the US again in the Second World War, increasingly after British production peaked in 1942. At that time, America and Germany were the biggest producers. Now, of course, it is China.
So Britain has long since ceased to produce all the steel it needs, but today's situation, in which it risks becoming completely dependent on imports for even the most crucial strategic items – including high-grade 'virgin' steel for submarines, aircraft engines (one of our biggest exports) and nuclear reactors – is unique in our history and unparalleled in any other advanced country. It has clearly panicked the Government into last-minute intervention.
This is necessary, but that we have reached this point – not least in that our last manufacturer of high-quality virgin steel was sold to China, which has an interest in closing it down – is proof of extraordinary fecklessness by successive governments. There have been several steps on the way.
It was decided to shift our remaining steel production to electric arc furnaces – which only produce lower-grade steel from scrap, and also require vast amounts of uninterrupted electricity. The present government ended the plan to open a new coal mine for coking coal – essential for primary steel production.
All this, perhaps needless to say, is due to the net-zero fantasy, which has also raised energy prices to a level at which many industries, not only steel production, have been made uncompetitive.
The Government pretends it can run a 21st-century economy with medieval technology – wind power. And by importing steel and other products that can no longer be made competitively here, we are merely relocating the emissions they create, having no positive effect on atmospheric pollution, and undoubtedly making it worse.
So far, the Government has made only the smallest and least-effective gestures, such as slightly delaying the target date for electric vehicles, and now desperately trying to postpone the closure of the Scunthorpe furnaces.
This is nowhere near being a serious industrial strategy or a credible defence policy. Unless it is abandoned or postponed, net zero will not only impoverish us, but make us more vulnerable than we have been since the Dutch fleet sailed up the Medway in 1667.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Key points announced ahead of Rachel Reeves' spending review
Key points announced ahead of Rachel Reeves' spending review

South Wales Guardian

time35 minutes ago

  • South Wales Guardian

Key points announced ahead of Rachel Reeves' spending review

The review, which will set out day-to-day spending plans for the next three years and capital spending plans for the next four, is expected to see boosts for the NHS, defence and schools. But it is also likely to involve squeezes for other departments as the Chancellor seeks to keep within the fiscal rules she has set for herself. Her room for manoeuvre has also been further constrained by the Government's U-turn on winter fuel payments, which will see the benefit paid to pensioners receiving up to £35,000 per year at a cost of around £1.25 billion to the Treasury. The full details will be revealed in the Commons on Wednesday, but several announcements have already been made. They include: – £15.6 billion for public transport projects in England's city regions; – £16.7 billion for nuclear power projects, including £14.2 billion for the new Sizewell C power plant in Suffolk; – £39 billion over the next 10 years to build affordable and social housing; – An extension of the £3 bus fare cap until March 2027; – £445 million for upgrades to Welsh railways. The Chancellor is also expected to announce changes to the Treasury's 'green book' rules that govern whether major projects are approved. The Government hopes that changing the green book will make it easier to invest in areas outside London and the South East.

Emergency workers to get greater protection from racial abuse in house calls
Emergency workers to get greater protection from racial abuse in house calls

South Wales Guardian

time36 minutes ago

  • South Wales Guardian

Emergency workers to get greater protection from racial abuse in house calls

The Government said it would close an existing loophole that allows people to get away with racial and religious abuse towards police, fire and ambulance workers making house calls. The measures were tabled on Tuesday as amendments to the Government's Crime and Policing Bill. It is currently illegal to racially or religiously abuse anyone in public, but this does not extend to behaviour within a private home under the Public Order Act 1986. The gap was originally designed to ensure that laws allowing police to keep public spaces free from serious disorder did not overstep into private conversations held in homes. The Home Office said the law has left 'emergency workers vulnerable and unprotected to racial and religious-based abuse and harassment during house calls', and 'unable to hold the perpetrators to account for their behaviour'. The department added that 'reports of emergency workers being abused for their race or religion while in private homes have increased'. Under the change, those abusing emergency workers in any setting could face a maximum sentence of two years' imprisonment. Policing minister Dame Diana Johnson said emergency workers 'should never have to tolerate abuse due to their race or religion while simply doing their job'. Dame Diana added: 'By closing this loophole, we're sending a clear message that racial and religious abuse directed towards those who serve our communities will not be tolerated.' Health and Social Care Secretary Wes Streeting said the new measures would 'crack down on perpetrators'. Mr Streeting added: 'Our emergency workers carry out lifesaving work every day and deserve to feel safe from violence or intimidation. 'Anyone who violates this core principle brings shame on themselves and will feel the full force of the law, wherever they are.' Andy Rhodes, director of the National Police Wellbeing Service, said the amendment would 'better protect officers and staff who are there to protect the public'. Mr Rhodes added: 'Sadly, the role they play means they can often be faced with some incredibly challenging and hostile situations, especially in private homes, and over time this can take a toll. 'The protection of our officers and staff is a clear priority for all police chiefs. Hate crime has a devastating impact on individual victims and racial and faith-based discrimination against officers or emergency workers cannot be tolerated in any form.' Minister for Fire Alex Norris said the Government 'stands firmly behind emergency service workers and will not tolerate abusive behaviour towards those risking their lives to keep us safe'.

Planning reforms ‘critical' to 1.5m homes pledge delivery clear Commons
Planning reforms ‘critical' to 1.5m homes pledge delivery clear Commons

South Wales Guardian

time36 minutes ago

  • South Wales Guardian

Planning reforms ‘critical' to 1.5m homes pledge delivery clear Commons

MPs voted by 306 to 174, majority 132, to approve the Planning and Infrastructure Bill at third reading on Tuesday evening. Housing minister Matthew Pennycook said the Bill, which aims to improve certainty and decision-making in the planning system, will help to tackle the UK's housing crisis. Meanwhile, shadow housing secretary Kevin Hollinrake described the draft legislation as 'dangerous' and warned it could lead to 'rows of uninspiring concrete boxes'. Speaking in the Commons, Mr Pennycook said: 'This landmark Bill will get Britain building again, unleash economic growth and deliver on the promise of national renewal. 'It is critical in helping the Government achieving its ambitious plan for change milestone of building 1.5 million safe and decent homes in England in this Parliament. 'When it comes to delivering new homes and critical infrastructure, the status quo is patently failing the country and failing the British people. 'We can and we must do things differently, this Bill will enable us to do so. It is transformative. It will fundamentally change how we build things in this country, and in doing so it will help us tackle the housing crisis and raise living standards in every part of the country.' Mr Hollinrake argued it is not possible to 'concrete our way to community', adding: 'This Bill, in its current form, is not just flawed, it is dangerous. It risks eroding trust in the planning system and widening the gulf between government and the governed. 'We need homes for first-time buyers, for young families, for key workers, for the next generation. But we need the right homes in the right places, shaped by the right principles. 'What are we being offered instead is a top-down model driven by arbitrary targets and central dictats. The result: solar settlements, identikit developments, rows of uninspiring concrete boxes that bear no relation to the history, the heritage or the hopes of the communities they are building.' This comes after Labour MPs rebelled on Monday over the Government's plans to change current nature protections in the planning system. Campaigners have raised concerns the Bill will allow developers to effectively disregard environmental rules and community concerns, increasing the risk of sewage in rivers, flooding and loss of valued woods and parks. Mr Pennycook said the 'suboptimal status quo' for the environment and development is not working, as he pledged to introduce a nature restoration fund to bolster conservation efforts. He added: 'We want to take forward a new strategic approach across wider geographies, ensuring that Natural England bring forward plans that go beyond offsetting harm to driving nature recovery as well as unlocking development.' During the Bill's report stage on Tuesday, Conservative former minister Robbie Moore accused the Government of permitting 'absolute theft' in its compulsory purchase order (CPO) reforms. The Bill will allow an inspector or, where there are no objectors, authorities to remove 'hope value' from land when a CPO is made, meaning any uplift calculated on the basis that a developer could be given planning permission in future is ignored. The MP for Keighley and Ilkley said: 'So-called 'hope value' is not a capitalist trick, it is not a racket, it is not unfair, it is simply the true market value of the property. 'Property rights matter. They are the foundation of our society. 'If the state chooses to use its powers to confiscate property of a law-abiding person and then they must stipulate on how that land must be used, and then tell the landowner how much they are entitled to receive from the state, that is wrong and in my view is an absolute theft of private property.' Labour MP Chris Hinchliff urged the Government to go further, calling for it to remove 'hope value' for any land or property which is being compulsory-purchased for the purpose of delivering housing targets. The North East Hertfordshire MP said his amendment 68 would 'give councils the land assembly powers necessary to acquire sites to meet local housing need at current use value, and so do away with speculative hope value prices, which put taxpayers' money into wealthy landowners pockets'. 'This would finally make it affordable for local authorities to deliver the new generation of council homes. That is the true solution to this nation's housing crisis,' he added. The Government has previously said it will ensure that compensation paid to landowners through the CPO process is 'fair but not excessive' and that development corporations can operate effectively. The Bill will now be sent to the House of Lords for further scrutiny.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store