logo
3 BritBox shows to watch on HBO Max

3 BritBox shows to watch on HBO Max

Tom's Guidea day ago
Great news, Anglophiles: TV fans stateside can get a taste of 15 popular British television series this summer as part of a short-term 'programming pop-up' between Warner Bros. streaming service HBO Max and BritBox, Britain's leading streaming service, which was founded by BBC Studios and ITV.
From Friday, August 1 through Monday, September 29, U.S.-based HBO Max subscribers will have access to a great selection of BritBox favorites spanning mystery, comedy and drama genres, with titles including 'Sherwood,' 'Luther', 'Silent Witness,' 'The Office,' 'Blue Lights,' 'Shakespeare & Hathaway,' 'Father Brown' and more.
Access will come at no additional cost to HBO Max users, who will be able to find the British gems in a dedicated section of the platform entitled "The Best of British TV by BritBox."
'HBO Max viewers seek premium entertainment they can't get anywhere else. Through this partnership, we are excited to offer them a premium collection of distinctly British series to complement their viewing experience, including acclaimed series, fan-favorite franchises, standout performances from celebrated talent, and exceptional storytelling across mystery, crime, drama, and comedy,' Robert Schildhouse, President, BritBox, said in a statement.Given that you only have a few short weeks to enjoy your BritBox titles, here are three new-to-you series that you should add to your next HBO Max streaming session.
One of the best British shows you can watch on the U.S., the Idris Elba-led British crime thriller 'Luther' will be available to stream on HBO Max, with season 1 on the platform from August 1 to 30, and season 2 available through the month of September.
A Golden Globe-winning Idris Elba plays Detective Chief Inspector John Luther, a brilliant but tortured homicide detective (is there any other kind?) who has a knack for getting inside the minds of serial killers, including the psychopathic murderer Alice Morgan (played by Ruth Wilson), who becomes both his nemesis and unlikely companion. It is unconventional professional methods like that, as well as his own lingering personal demons, that put Luther at odds with his team. Watch 'Luther' on HBO Max now
Long before there was Michael Scott (Steve Carell), Dunder Mifflin's 'World's Best Boss' and protagonist of the U.S. version of 'The Office,' there was David Brent (Ricky Gervais, who also created the comedy alongside Stephen Merchant), the hilariously insufferable manager of the Wernham Hogg paper company.
Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
Like its American remake, the British original follows the relatable, mundane but downright hysterical day-to-day lives of office employees, with a cast that includes Martin Freeman, Mackenzie Crook and Lucy Davis.
The first two seasons of the genre-defining mockumentary, as well as the Christmas special, are available to watch on HBO Max as part of the summertime programming pop-up. Watch 'The Office' on HBO Max now
Seasons 1 and 2 of 'cozy crime' favorite 'Father Brown' will be available to HBO Max subscribers throughout August and September.
Based on the character created by English author G.K. Chesterton (featured in 53 short stories published between 1910 and 1936), the period-piece series centers on the titular Roman Catholic priest slash amateur detective who uses his keen powers of observation and his sacred intuition to solve mysteries and crimes in 1950s-era England.
Along with Mark Williams as the crime-busting clergyman Father Brown, the cast features Sorcha Cusack, Nancy Carroll, Alex Price, John Burton, Jackie Deam and more.
Watch 'Father Brown' on HBO Max now
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ad-supported streaming is the future. So why is the experience so bad?
Ad-supported streaming is the future. So why is the experience so bad?

Los Angeles Times

time2 hours ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Ad-supported streaming is the future. So why is the experience so bad?

We all need to stop getting mad about the fact that our favorite streaming series are now full of ads and focus on how awful those ads are. Yes, it is infuriating that streaming platforms sold a product they could not reasonably hope to sustain. The promise that, for a small fee, viewers would be granted instant access to a vast array of TV series and movies that they could watch when and where they desired, all at once and without the irritant of commercial breaks, seemed too good to be true. Which, of course, it was. Having lured millions of viewers away from cable and broadcast television, subscription services were first able to raise their rates and then, on top of that, introduce advertising. Far from freeing us from commercials, they now demand, just like cable, that we pay for the honor of watching them. Judging from recent reports, millions of new subscribers to Netflix, Prime Video, Hulu, Disney+ and HBO Max are OK with that. According to the research firm Antenna, ad-supported subscriptions hit 100 million this year; according to Omar Karim, director of brand and video products for Amazon, that number will double by 2027. (Free ad-supported streamers like Tubi and Pluto TV are also seeing remarkable growth.) Commercial-free viewing is still possible for a higher-priced rate. But like business class on planes and Magic Key passes at Disneyland, those tiers may become a VIP experience (i.e., absurdly expensive), if they don't vanish altogether. With the cost of multiple streaming services already outstripping the much-maligned price of the cable bundle, ads on streaming are here to stay and will, no doubt, be increasing. So instead of wasting perfectly good outrage over the fact that, once again, a few technocrats have managed to get very rich by destroying the economy of a billion-dollar industry only to return to that industry's own earlier business plan, let's focus on the ad-supported streaming experience. Which is universally terrible. It's not just that so many of the spots are low-rent — and we are beyond being surprised by the graphic symptom/side-effect description of pharmaceutical ads — it's that they are often repeated several times during a program. For a single hour's viewing, this would be an annoyance. But streaming was built on the binge, which means a person can see the same damn truck commercial a dozen times in a single sitting. At which point it feels less like advertising and more like brainwashing, with the unintentional effect of ensuring that if I were in the market for a truck, I would literally buy any other model than the one that was 'Clockwork Orange'-d on me while I was trying to watch a murder-mystery series. Or, God forbid, a movie. If anything sends viewers back to the cineplex, it will be ads for depression meds in the middle of a rom-com or a sophisticated chase scene. And when I say middle, I mean middle. Subscription streaming was not built for ads and it shows: On Netflix, Prime Video and others, ads will more than occasionally appear midscene, often cutting off dialogue and almost always providing maximum narrative disruption. This is especially true for streaming shows made before ad-supported streaming became commonplace. In the old days, writers fashioned scripts to accommodate ads with scene breaks and fade-outs. Streaming promised to free them from this, which is one reason so many writers ran around calling television 'long form' and claiming each season was like shooting a 10-hour movie. Imagine watching a 10-hour movie with commercial breaks shoved in every 15 minutes or so. Not great, Bob. And it's not like you can fast-forward through them. We willingly relinquished the power of the DVR, which, when wielded properly, was essentially a DIY ad-free streamer, and put ourselves in the hands of people who think having a little countdown clock telling you how long the ads will last somehow makes up for the fact that they just interrupted a monologue. Again, it is difficult not to instantly hate whatever is being advertised, which, as I understand it, is not the point of any commercial. Even if you pay for the ad-free tier, series are often interrupted by weird little blips where, presumably, ads appear in economy seating. Presumably, creators are now factoring in the need for ads, but the current rhythm of streaming ads is maddeningly inconsistent — sometimes there are a bunch of spots at the beginning, sometimes wedged in the middle, sometimes scattered throughout. How's a writer supposed to cope with that? One can only hope that these are growing pains, that as with early dubbing fiascoes, the streaming services will realize that writing and editing around commercials is an art form in itself. Film and video editors and postproduction teams have a long history of prepping theatrical films for presentation on ad-supported television. For the love of God, hire professionals. According to Ad Age, this is the year to invest in streaming. Given the information-sharing and consumer-targeting tendencies of the digital universe, this is a bit worrisome — no one needs their last Amazon search for, say, pimple patches following them around as they try to watch 'The Summer I Turned Pretty.' But presumably, more advertisers will force the variety and quality of the ads and ad placement to improve. At this point, unless we're willing to fork over more and more money to chase the dream that once was streaming, that's the best we can hope for.

F1 Is Brad Pitt's Biggest Movie at Global Box Office Now
F1 Is Brad Pitt's Biggest Movie at Global Box Office Now

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

F1 Is Brad Pitt's Biggest Movie at Global Box Office Now

F1 is reaching a major milestone at the global box office as it enters its seventh weekend in release. After weeks of strong international performance, the racing drama has now surpassed World War Z to become Brad Pitt's highest-grossing film of all time. With new titles debuting and overseas momentum holding steady, attention now turns to how far F1 can climb in the weeks ahead. F1 beats World War Z's box office to become Brad Pitt's biggest movie Brad Pitt's F1 has overtaken World War Z to become the highest-grossing film of his career globally. As of the latest box office report, F1 has reached a worldwide total of $545.6 million, surpassing World War Z, which previously held the top spot with $540.4 million. F1, an Apple Original Films production distributed by Warner Bros., added $17.2 million from 78 international markets in its most recent weekend, bringing its international total to $372.3 million. Domestically, the film has earned $173.3 million, with a domestic opening of $57 million (via Box Office Mojo). The movie saw especially strong performance in markets like South Korea, where it increased 36% in its sixth weekend, reaching a local total of $18.5 million. In comparison, World War Z, released in 2013 by Paramount Pictures, earned $202.8 million domestically and $337.6 million internationally. It held the title of Brad Pitt's top-grossing film for over a decade. The movie had opened to $66.4 million domestically and had a production budget of an estimated $190 million (via Box Office Mojo). F1, directed by Joseph Kosinski, features Pitt as a retired Formula One driver returning to mentor a younger teammate. The film's strong overseas performance, particularly in Asia-Pacific and Europe, contributed significantly to its global lead. South Korea, the UK, and France were among the film's top-performing international markets. With $545.6 million worldwide, F1 has now become Brad Pitt's biggest global box office success to date. The film continues its international rollout and holds a PG-13 rating, with a runtime of 2 hours and 35 minutes. Its global momentum remains strong, despite new competition entering theaters in multiple regions. The post F1 Is Brad Pitt's Biggest Movie at Global Box Office Now appeared first on - Movie Trailers, TV & Streaming News, and More. Solve the daily Crossword

Tom Holland Breaks Silence On James Bond Rumours With Intriguing Comments
Tom Holland Breaks Silence On James Bond Rumours With Intriguing Comments

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Tom Holland Breaks Silence On James Bond Rumours With Intriguing Comments

There's been an interesting development in the ongoing speculation about who the next actor to play James Bond will be. For the past year, it's looked like Aaron Taylor-Johnson has been the frontrunner to land the role of 007, following Daniel Craig's departure from the franchise at the end of No Time To Die. Aaron himself hasn't exactly always (or, indeed, ever) been keen to talk about the rumours, but his name has repeatedly come up in press reports about which star will be cast as Bond next. However, back in June, Variety published a piece citing 'insiders' who claimed that the team behind the iconic spy franchise is looking to cast a 'British actor under the age of 30', in the hopes of showing a new side to the character, throwing doubt on Aaron's casting for the first time (as well as that of other rumoured contenders like Henry Cavill, Regé-Jean Page and Aaron Pierre). Variety's article specifically mentioned three names, Jacob Elordi (who, of course, is Australian, but that's seemingly not an issue), Harris Dickinson (who is now probably best known for his role opposite Nicole Kidman in the erotic thriller Babygirl) and Spider-Man himself, Tom Holland. Tom has now spoken out about the rumours for the first time, and he's not exactly issued a denial. During a conversation on, of all places, Gordon Ramsay's YouTube channel, Tom was asked about the Bond rumours, to which he responded: 'Listen, there's speculation at the moment. We'll keep it to a minimum for now. We will get there one day.' 'Every young British actor [would love the opportunity],' he continued. 'It's the pinnacle of working in our industry. 'I already consider myself to be the luckiest kid alive. I could never have dreamed [of having] the career that I have.' Tom is currently shooting the latest Spider-Man movie, while Variety's article suggested fans shouldn't expect to see the next Bond film until around 2028. Oscar nominee Denis Villeneuve will helm the next instalment in the James Bond series, once he's completed work on the third Dune movie, which is about to go into production. The writer of the next 007 film was also announced last week, and it's exciting news for fans of prestige British drama. MORE JAMES BOND: Who Will Play James Bond Next? 17 Actors Who've Been Rumoured For The Role Aaron Taylor-Johnson Fuels Bond Rumours With This Awkward 28 Years Later Red Carpet Moment Pierce Brosnan Has 1 Stipulation For The Next James Bond Amid Major Behind-The-Scenes Shake-Up

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store