Rs300bn ‘windfall': NA panel seeks sugar mill directors' names
Officials from the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) informed the panel that at least 14 FBR officials, allegedly involved in the illegal release of sugar, have been suspended and are currently under investigation.
The Additional Secretary of the Ministry of Industries and Production told the committee that millers and dealers manipulated prices following the expiry of the sugar export deadline, earning approximately $440 million from these exports.
NA panel to probe Rs300bn sugar windfall
He briefed the panel that in the 2024-25 crop year, sugarcane cultivation increased by 1.11% compared to 2023-24. However, due to climate change factors such as heat wave and crop disease, sugarcane yield and sucrose recovery declined. Consequently, sugar production fell to 5.862 million metric tons (MMT), around 1 MMT less than the previous year. Adding carryover stocks of 0.5 MMT, total sugar availability for 2024-25 was estimated at 6.362 MMT, roughly equal to domestic consumption in 2023-24.
'This tight balance between supply and demand led to price increases by the industry from January 2024 onward, following the exports,' he added.
The committee, led by the Deputy Prime Minister, held several meetings with key stakeholders including the Pakistan Sugar Mills Association (PSMA), emphasizing price stability. They agreed to cap the ex-mill price at Rs 159/kg and the retail price at Rs 164/kg for one month, until April 19, 2025.
'In May 2025, the committee extended the status quo until June 15, 2025. However, PSMA did not comply and continued to raise prices,' he added.
The Ministry of Industries summoned sugar millers, warning them that their actions were unacceptable, but the mills disregarded the ministry's warnings.
A track-and-trace system was installed on sugar stocks in November 2021, whereby every sugar sack is stamped with a scanable mark revealing its details, according to FBR officials. However, some sugar bags were released without stamps, allegedly involving officials deputed at the mills. So far, the FBR has seized several trucks carrying unstamped sacks. Sales tax on sugar is deducted at 18% GST rate, amounting to Rs 1,485 per 50 kg sugar bag.
Fourteen FBR officials have been suspended, and the Prime Minister has formed a special team including intelligence officials to monitor FBR operations.
Sales tax collection from sugar has increased to Rs 100 billion from Rs 65 billion last year, despite a reduction of 1 MMT in sugar production.
'We might not even need to import sugar. The current stock is sufficient until November 15, 2025,' said the Additional Secretary of the Ministry of Industries and Production.
It is estimated that only 200,000 tons of sugar may be imported, if any. Notably, 70% of sugar consumption is by industries, not the common man.
Officials from the Ministry of National Food Security and Research stated that sugar imports are planned to prevent price hikes and avoid artificial shortages amid concerns about price could rise further in November 2025.
After detailed discussions, the panel decided to summon SECP officials to obtain a list of sugar mill directors holding at least 20% shares, which will be shared with the media to reveal any political affiliations. The committee also resolved to review the Public Accounts Committee minutes where the Auditor General of Pakistan claimed sugar millers earned Rs 300 billion in profits within three weeks.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
32 minutes ago
- Business Recorder
Notification of TY25 return form sought: IRIS still facing technical glitches: ILA
ISLAMABAD: International Lawyers Association (ILA) has conveyed to the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) that the IRIS e-filing system continues to suffer from serious technical and functional issues, pointing towards immediate notification of final income tax return form for tax year 2025. In a presentation to FBR Chairman, the ILA has observed that the Federal Board of Revenue, through SRO 1212(1)/2025 dated July 8, 2025, published the draft Income Tax Return under Rule 34A of the Income Tax Rules, 2002, which requires final notification within thirty days. However, despite the lapse of this statutory period, the final return for Tax Year 2025 has not yet been issued. This delay is causing serious uncertainty and operational difficulties for taxpayers and tax practitioners, and is likely to impede timely compliance with the statutory deadline of September 30, 2025. To make matters worse, the IRIS e-filing system continues to suffer from serious technical and functional issues, including but not limited to Non-Adjustment of Tax Withheld under Section 235 in the Case of AOPs. In cases where the declared tax liability is fully met through tax withheld under Section 235 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, the system correctly shows 'Nil' tax demand. However, upon submission, it issues a Inconsistent Treatment of Tax Withheld under Sections 148 and 154: While both regimes are deemed to discharge minimum tax liability under the amended provisions, the system allows editing of income for imports (Section 148) but does not allow such editing for exports (Section 154). This inconsistency creates confusion and unequal treatment among taxpayers operating under similar mechanisms. Non-Opening of Return Forms for Non-Resident Taxpayers: When 'Non-Resident' status is selected based on the duration of stay in Pakistan, the system fails to open the return form, and even the 'Review and Submission' option is disabled, effectively preventing non-residents from filing returns. The ILA pointed out that many users are unable to log in at all, and even when login is successful, the system responds extremely slowly or hangs midway, causing delays in filing and unnecessary mental distress to taxpayers and professionals alike. In addition to these substantive glitches, we are facing widespread technical issues: The IRIS portal frequently hangs or becomes extremely slow after login, and in many instances fails to log in at all. Pre-filled data from withholding statements is often incomplete or inaccurate, leading to mismatches. The system updates to return forms and schedules reflecting legal changes are delayed. Carry-forward losses and refunds are not properly reflected. Unjustified discrepancies in wealth statement reconciliations arise even in genuine cases. The helpdesk capacity is inadequate, causing prolonged delays in complaint resolution. Despite repeated representations by the legal and tax fraternity to the relevant PRAL and FBR officials, the problems remain unaddressed. The persistent malfunctioning of PRAL's software is now on the verge of paralyzing the return filing process, risking a serious loss to the national exchequer and further shaking public confidence in the country's tax administration. The FBR should immediately issue the final Income Tax Return for Tax Year 2025 in compliance with Rule 34A. The FBR should rectify the identified system glitches, ensuring proper tax adjustments and consistent treatment under relevant sections. The FBR should also resolve the non-resident filing block without delay. The department should strengthen IRIS server performance, especially during peak filing days. The FBR must ensure accurate and timely updates to pre-filled data. The FBR should also enhance taxpayer and professional support services for swift resolution of issues, ILA added. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
32 minutes ago
- Business Recorder
Stocks stay strong
KARACHI: The Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX) navigated a turbulent session on Tuesday, closing at a record high despite heavy profit-taking by investors keen to lock in recent gains. The benchmark KSE-100 Index ended just 75.48 points, or 0.05 percent up at 147,005.32 points, as compared to the previous session closing of 146,929.98 points. The index touched an intraday peak of 147,977 points and a low of 146,895 points before ending at record close. BRIndex100 closed at 15,035.17, down 37.65 points or 0.25 percent, with a total volume of 543.26 million shares. BRIndex30 fell 103.75 points, or 0.24 percent, to 42,521.63 points, with 259.14 million shares traded. According to Topline Securities, gains in BAFL, HBL, and SYS added a combined 295 points to the benchmark, partly offsetting losses from FFC, MARI, OGDC, PSO, and BAHL, which together eroded 527 points — underscoring sectoral divergence and investor caution. Market breadth remained negative, with 208 scrips advancing against 242 decliners and 32 remain unchanged in the ready market. Turnover in the ready market rose to 691.65 million shares from 611.20 million in the previous session, while traded value inched up to Rs 44.58 billion from Rs 44.00 billion of yesterday. Yousuf Weaving led the volumes with 46.27 million shares, closing at Rs 6.09. Kohinoor Spinning followed with 39.94 million shares at Rs 6.47, while Invest Bank finished the day at Rs 9.68 on 34.39 million shares. Among the top gainers, PIA Holding Company surged Rs 156.85 to Rs 29,000, and Khyber Textile Mills gained Rs 69.71 to Rs 1,477. On the flip side, Nestle Pakistan fell Rs 88.57 to Rs 8,762.79, while Unilever Pakistan Foods dropped Rs 79.40 to Rs 32,020.61. Sectoral performance was mixed — strength in banking supported the index, while oil, gas, and fertilizer stocks weighed on sentiment. The Oil and Gas sector remained under pressure amid selling in OGDC, PSO, and PPL futures. Market capitalization edged down to Rs 17.524 trillion from Rs 17.529 trillion a day earlier, reflecting the limited net effect of the day's choppy trade. The BR Automobile Assembler Index closed at 23,639.61 points, up 154.78 points or 0.66 percent, with a turnover of 3.12 million shares. The BR Cement Index rose 124.58 points, or 1.1 percent, to 11,483.55 points, on 41.59 million shares. The BR Commercial Banks Index gained 269.64 points, or 0.62 percent, to close at 43,604.32 points, with 92.97 million shares traded. The BR Power Generation and Distribution Index slipped 96.50 points, or 0.42 percent, to 22,765.22 points, on 35.82 million shares. The BR Oil and Gas Index dropped 206.53 points, or 1.54 percent, to 13,197.93, with 56.19 million shares changing hands. The BR Technology & Communication Index added 32.17 points, or 0.98 percent, to 3,329.63, on 42.18 million shares. Ahsan Mehanti of Arif Habib Corporation said the market's strength was underpinned by a robust earnings outlook and rupee stability, while speculation over Pakistan–US trade and investment deals, government moves to secure additional export tariff incentives, and rising business confidence acted as catalysts for the record close. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
32 minutes ago
- Business Recorder
Public choice at work? The end of EFS?
SRO 1395(I)2025 is not the end of the EFS. It is certainly the end of the beginning of the end of the EFS. SRO 1395(I)25, July 29, 2025, excludes 'Raw cotton, yarns, and fabrics' from the purview of the EFS. Imported cottons, yarns, and fabrics will now be at par with local produce and attract a 'refundable' 18 percent GST. The Public Choice Theory provides a framework about how private, material, bureaucratic and even ideological interests, of bureaucrats, politicians etc., work their way into full-blown public policies resulting in stunting and killing public goods and policies-like the inevitable demise of the EFS. EFS, July 2021 was launched, recognizing that the domestic fiscal constraints must not burden exporters as they compete internationally with competitors with no such baggage. The EFS intended to immunize exporters from the chronically 'kadak', cash-deficient FBR's penchant for meeting its revenue requirements by illegally denying refunds to EFS registered exporters. EFS meant no pay-ins, no refunds. Exporters and few in Islamabad were happy. However, many in Islamabad had different thoughts. FBR, like all, would like to retain control over the refund pipeline. EFS had blown that 'Nordstream 2' of coveted refunds which FBR would tap during lean days when these funds could buy the Republic a day or more. Via denial and delay of refunds, FBR perhaps got away, when needed, by passing off the cash thus withheld as 'revenues' to the 'gullible' multilateral overlords who often took it with a soup ladle. The good FBR was thus doing a sacred work. There is, however, reportedly another cohort who had seen slammed shut doors and tunnels to the cavernous corrupt bowels of the 'refund industry', i.e., the bad FBR. Oddly such officers doing a sacred work saving the Republic are no different from accountants in 'kadak' corporates who routinely stretch payables to meet 'priority' financial commitments. There is, perhaps, no daylight between 'kadak' cadres in public and private worlds. Kudos, however, and now commiserations, to the Ministry of Commerce and the few good men at FBR who had enacted the EFS SRO in 2021whose unravelling is an education in itself. How do you dismantle a scheme which is wildly popular with exporters and the Ministry of Commerce? Public Choice offers a possible explanation. A few quarters after EFS' enactment, the press had suddenly started carrying stories of EFS frauds. Must not FBR be apprehending the fraudsters? Many exporters' associations approached FBR to work with them to make EFS more robust, but to no avail. The 'good' and the 'bad' FBRs were at least indifferent or positively upset with EFS. Here is one way this fraud might have happened. Those who imported 60s yarn under EFS, made a killing by illegally selling it locally, pocketing the unpaid GST and then exporting some 20s yarn-based product claiming it was a twisted/tripled 3×60s! Local 20s was purchased GST free, under EFS! Fraudsters made a killing. Industry wanted to plug the leakage, FBR instead blew the pipeline. It was in this backdrop, last year and literally out of the left field, FBR rendered local yarn purchases ineligible for EFS. If an EFS registered exporter wanted to purchase local cotton yarn, it had to pay GST while it could import the same product GST free! EFS fraud tales-many, even most could be true-set the stage with a sinister hum of expectations. A few rent-an-associations also played their quisling parts. Local yarn manufacturers cried at this obvious miscarriage of justice. Exclusion of local yarns from EFS created a genuinely aggrieved party who just wanted re-inclusion into EFS. They were dragged, stomped on, slapped around until the aggrieved confederates sued for peace and on July 29 were served the textile equivalent of the Treaty of Versailles. Now, many are happy at their own defeat. Imposition of GST on cotton yarns is not a victory for spinners and not for the value-added champions. All exporters are losers. All manufacturers are losers. It is like on account of few purse snatching incidents, the city police banned pillion riding. Spinners and a few more, in their desperation — they were hurting bad — were offered Hobson's choice. They had to take it. Today it is yarns and fabrics tomorrow it will be something else. The real losers, however, mostly textiles exporters, continue to congregate in a motley crew of cults and associations whose chaotic best has never been good enough. The unravelling of EFS is the latest epiphany of the 'Entrepreneurs as Chor' creed which the tax collectors, ageing accountants and highly paid bankers who enjoy a revolving door access to the top echelons continue to believe and mean. Still, EFS, has perhaps been the most notable success that the Ministry of Commerce had notched in its long history of lost battles with the FBR. In Islamabad, tomorrow always trumps the future. EFS is not the first pro-exports government initiative to go down. It is high time that FBR evolved into a learning organization, learning by doing, driven by data, in perpetual consultation with entrepreneurs whose competitiveness depends on lifesavers like EFS. FBR can then use data to 'Rank and Yank' exporter population. For now, it is curtains for EFS. Textile exports of USD 1.5b per month or so is our fate. On a good day, that is. This tactical victory for some in the textile value chain is a strategic rout for the entire textile value chain. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
