Tel Aviv rally calls for war's end, as hunger reigns in Gaza and ceasefire talks collapse anew
TEL AVIV — Standing inside a mass protest in Habima Square to demand an end to the war in Gaza, Roy Rieck said the atmosphere felt more charged than at previous demonstrations. The difference, he said, is that it's not just the plight of the 50 remaining Israeli hostages weighing on those who turned out.
'There was more of a feeling that people want to stop the war not only to bring back the hostages, but also from the understanding that the war has gone too far — that the cost to soldiers is too high, and that the suffering in Gaza has become unbearable,' he said.
The rally Thursday night came as images of starving children and accounts of unrelenting hunger poured out of Gaza, where Israel has been fighting for more than 21 months, breaking through the discourse even among those inclined to support the war. But an even more urgent development took center stage.
The rally, organized by a coalition of bereaved families, relatives of hostages, and parents of combat soldiers, came hours after US envoy Steve Witkoff blamed Hamas for torpedoing the ceasefire and hostage negotiations in Doha, resulting in the return of Israeli and US delegations from the Qatari capital. Israeli sources reported that Hamas had introduced a new demand for the release of some members who participated in the Oct. 7, 2023, attack.
The apparent collapse of talks dashed hopes, stoked in recent days, that a deal to release at least some of the remaining hostages — of whom 20 are thought to be alive — was near.
How did it go?
The rally opened with a moment of silence for fallen soldiers, followed by a prayer for the safety of the troops and the return of the hostages.
Speakers included Effie Shoham, whose son Yuval was killed fighting in Gaza and who alluded to the crisis in Gaza.
'These days we face tough choices between choosing life and good, or war, hunger, death, and evil. We must choose life,' an emotional Shoham told the crowd. 'I call on the Israeli government, on behalf of the people of Israel gathered here today, to stop the war.'
Noam Tibon, a retired major general who personally rescued family members from Hamas attackers on Oct. 7, 2023, said the war no longer had a 'viable security aim.'
'It's become a political war, managed by a failed government that sent our children to die while passing a shameful draft-dodging law,' he said, referring to a proposed bill granting expanded military exemptions to haredi Orthodox yeshiva students.
The IDF is 'sinking deeper into the bleeding swamp of Gaza,' Tibon said.
Viki Cohen, whose son Nimrod is being held hostage in Gaza, said her son chose to serve in a tank unit out of 'Zionism and love of the land,' but now 'the country he loves so much is not defending him.'
She accused the government of pushing for partial hostage deals that could leave her son behind.
Raphi Ben-Shitrit, whose son Elroi was killed on Oct. 7, told the crowd that prolonging the war threatened 'the future of the Zionist enterprise.' Ending the war, he said, was not a sign of weakness but a reflection of 'the sanctity of life, the heroism of the Jewish spirit, and the strength of the Israeli spirit.'
A group of leftwing protesters held signs accusing Israel of genocide in Gaza and calling on soldiers to refuse service. Not far from them, others held banners identifying with 'dignified Religious Zionism.'
'There is a growing sense that every day soldiers are dying for no good apparent reason,' said Yehuda Mirsky, an American-Israeli who had made the trip from Jerusalem, where he is a religious activist and scholar of Jewish thought.
He added that while early reports of famine in Gaza were once considered 'disputable,' it now seemed clear Israel had taken on roles in Gaza it couldn't sustain. Like Tibon, Mirsky cited the ultra-Orthodox draft exemptions as proof that Netanyahu was prolonging the war for political gain.
But as much as Rieck was heartened by the protest's size, he lamented that the protest fell short of past mass movements. It lacked the sustained momentum of the 2023 judicial overhaul demonstrations, he said, when hundreds of thousands filled the streets week after week, and nor did it approach the scale of the 1980s antiwar rallies, when more than 400,000 Israelis gathered in Tel Aviv after the Sabra and Shatila massacres during the Lebanon War.
'We're not yet seeing a critical mass,' Rieck said. 'And look around you here in Tel Aviv — everywhere else, people are carrying on as usual.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
11 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Israel is weighing its options in Gaza. Here are 4 scenarios for where things may be heading
Israel has routed its enemies across the region but has yet to return all its hostages from the Gaza Strip. Hamas appears to have been decimated militarily but has kept up insurgent attacks. Gaza is in ruins and experts say it is sliding into famine, and long-running ceasefire talks seem to have broken down. So where do we go from here? Both Israel and Hamas have embraced visions for how the war should end, but mediators from two American administrations, Egypt and Qatar have yet to bridge the gaps. There are at least two other scenarios in which the war goes on indefinitely, at an unimaginable cost to Gaza's 2 million Palestinians, the Israeli hostages and their families. Here's a closer look. Full reoccupation of Gaza For days now, Israeli media have reported that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is on the verge of ordering the full reoccupation of Gaza for the first time since Israel withdrew soldiers and settlers two decades ago. He is expected to meet with his security Cabinet late Thursday, possibly to make a decision. That would mean sending ground troops into the few areas of Gaza that haven't been totally destroyed, the roughly 25% of the territory where much of its 2 million people have sought refuge, including the sprawling coastal displacement camps of Muwasi. It would lead to countless more Palestinian deaths and more mass displacement, and it could put the roughly 20 remaining living hostages at serious risk. It would also leave Israel in full control of the territory, obliged by international law to provide security and ensure the basic needs of the population are met. Reoccupation would spark outrage internationally and further isolate Israel and the U.S. There is also opposition within Israel, from those who fear for the hostages and former security chiefs who have warned of a quagmire. But it has strong support among Netanyahu's far-right governing partners, who have long called for the reconquest of Gaza, the relocation of much of its population to other countries, and the rebuilding of Jewish settlements. A ceasefire in line with international demands Hamas has said it will release all the remaining hostages in return for Palestinians imprisoned by Israel, a full Israeli withdrawal from Gaza and a lasting ceasefire. Those demands were adopted by the Biden administration and the U.N. Security Council over a year ago, and enshrined in the ceasefire agreement finalized by the Trump administration in January. That brought about a six-week ceasefire, the release of 25 living hostages and the remains of eight others, and a flood of humanitarian aid. The two sides were supposed to use that pause to negotiate a more lasting ceasefire. Instead, Israel ended the truce in March, demanding another temporary ceasefire and the release of some of the remaining hostages. Israel fears that withdrawing from Gaza would allow Hamas to eventually rebuild its military machine and maintain influence in the territory even if doesn't hold formal power, paving the way for another Oct. 7-style attack. Netanyahu may also fear that his far-right allies would follow through on threats to bring down the government if he agrees to such terms. That could spell the end of his 16 nearly unbroken years in power, leaving him more vulnerable to long-running corruption charges and inquiries into the security and intelligence failures around the 2023 attack. A ceasefire on Israel's termsNetanyahu has said he will end the war once all the hostages are returned and Hamas is defeated or agrees to disarm and go into exile. But even then, he says Israel will pursue plans to relocate much of Gaza's population to other countries through what he refers to as 'voluntary emigration.' The Palestinians and much of the international community see the plan as forcible expulsion in violation of international law. Netanyahu says Israel is willing to agree to a temporary ceasefire in which Hamas would release several living hostages and the bodies of others in return for the release of Palestinians imprisoned by Israel, a flood of humanitarian aid and a partial Israeli pullback. They would then negotiate an end to the war, but Israel would require Hamas' disarmament. Hamas has said it is willing to hand over power to other Palestinians but will not lay down its arms as long as Israel occupies lands the Palestinians want for a future state. It also wants guarantees that Israel will not resume the war, as it did in March. Further military escalation could yield more concessions. But Hamas has already lost thousands of fighters and nearly all of its top leaders in Gaza, where it no longer controls many areas. Its strongest allies, Iran and Hezbollah, have been severely weakened. The hostages are the last bargaining chip held by Hamas, which also has a strong culture of martyrdom. A forever war It's quite possible the war continues in its current state. Israel could continue carrying out daily strikes across the territory, which it says have only targeted militants but have frequently killed adult civilians and children. Hamas could keep up a low tempo of hit-and-run attacks, occasionally killing Israeli soldiers. Additional measures to get more food into Gaza may stave off famine and allow aid to be distributed more safely. The hostages could survive in captivity for months or even years. Israel is set to hold elections in October 2026 — and likely earlier — which could bring in new leadership even if Netanyahu keeps his coalition intact. Which scenario unfolds will largely depend on U.S. President Donald Trump, who has provided crucial military and diplomatic support to Israel, and who proved he has leverage over Netanyahu when he brokered a ceasefire between Israel and Iran after 12 days of war in June. Trump has said he wants to end the war in Gaza and bring the remaining hostages home, but he has exerted no public pressure on Israel and appears to have fully accepted its terms for a ceasefire. Asked on Tuesday whether he would support Israel reoccupying Gaza, Trump said, 'It's going to be pretty much up to Israel.' ___ Follow AP's war coverage at
New York Times
14 minutes ago
- New York Times
Why a Teen Bullying Case in China Set Off Protests and a Crackdown
A widely shared video clip of a 14-year-old girl being beaten, kicked and tormented by other teenagers set off large protests in southwestern China, with hundreds of residents accusing officials of letting the perpetrators off too lightly. What began as a local outcry over school bullying in the city of Jiangyou, in Sichuan Province, escalated into a broader confrontation with the authorities. The police responded to the rallies with a forceful crackdown late on Monday, captured by residents in photos and footage. Residents had demanded justice for the bullying victim and protested the police's use of heavy-handed tactics, saying it was suffocating their right to voice grievances. 'No to bullying,' residents chanted as rows of police officers stood nearby, according to one video that was shared widely on social media and verified by The New York Times. 'Give us back democracy,' they also shouted. The footage of the tense standoffs with the police also spread across China, where large protests are somewhat rare, before they were removed from social media. The viral clip of the bullying showed the assailants taking the 14-year old to an empty, unfinished building where they kicked, slapped and pummeled her as she knelt. The video prompted widespread outrage online, where many expressed concern about bullying and the need for accountability. On Monday, the Jiangyou police issued a statement saying that it had investigated the incident, which it said took place on July 22. Two of the attackers were ordered to attend a correctional school, according to the statement, and they also faced up to 15 days in detention, Chinese news reports said, citing officials. The third girl and other onlookers were let off with warnings. The parents of the victim complained that the punishment was too light. They took their grievances to the Jiangyou city government headquarters, where dozens, and then hundreds, of residents gathered to support them. Many were incensed because they believed that the parents of the girl who was beaten were disadvantaged; her mother was deaf, according to Chinese news reports. Tensions rose as the police tried to break up the crowd. 'Are you going to drag her away?' a man yelled at a police officer who appeared set to remove an older woman. The officer shouted at the man: 'Do you want to get dragged away?' The crowd erupted in anger as the officers tackled the man and hauled him off. The videos were scrubbed from Chinese internet sites, but some were shared with online accounts outside China. Protests are not uncommon in China, but the ones in Jiangyou stood out because they grew larger than most and generated footage and images and intense nationwide attention, said Kevin Slaten, the research lead for the China Dissent Monitor, which collects data on unrest in China by scouring social media. Many protests in China are about unpaid wages or housing problems, such as apartments that people have paid for but remain unfinished. But school safety issues, such as bullying, have also been a source of public anger, Mr. Slaten said. By calling for 'democracy,' the protesters in Jiangyou most likely meant a broad demand for justice and fair treatment, Mr. Slaten said. 'It can often be that, like we saw in Jiangyou, the protesters become more motivated when the authorities ramp up repression and the people feel even more indignation,' he said. Still, the residents who protested in Jiangyou also sought to show that they were patriotic citizens trying to work within, not against, the system. The beaten girl's parents appeared to get on their hands and knees to beg an official for his attention, some videos showed. At night, the protesters sang the national anthem while they faced off against police officers holding riot shields. Acts like prostrating were 'part of a longstanding cultural tradition in China where subjects petition benevolent officials to restore justice,' said Diana Fu, a political scientist at the University of Toronto who studies protest and dissent in China. By singing China's national anthem, she added, the residents appeared to be 'giving a nod to the central authorities' rule while also sardonically mocking local authorities.' By late Monday, the local authorities appeared to move in with greater force to break up the demonstrations. Phalanxes of police on foot pushed into the crowd, tackling people and dragging them away. Online comments in China about the unrest were largely removed. A woman in a shop near the Jiangyou government office who answered a call from the Times on Thursday said she did not know anything about the protests and hung up. Joy Dong in Hong Kong contributed reporting.
News24
14 minutes ago
- News24
Grok, is that Gaza? AI image checks mislocate news photographs
At a time when internet users are turning to AI to verify images the furore over an AFP image shows the risks of trusting tools like Grok that are from error-free. The image by Omar al-Qattaa, taken in Gaza last week, was misidentified by Grok as taken in Yemen seven years ago. The AI bot's untrue response was widely shared online. The image below by AFP photojournalist Omar al-Qattaa shows a skeletal, underfed girl in Gaza, where Israel's blockade has fuelled fears of mass famine in the Palestinian territory. But when social media users asked Grok where it came from, X boss Elon Musk's artificial intelligence chatbot was certain that the photograph was taken in Yemen nearly seven years ago. This photo by AFP's Omar al-Qattaa shows a skeletal girl in Gaza on August 2, 2025. But Elon Musk's Grok AI chatbot says the image was taken in Yemen nearly seven years ago — AFP News Agency (@AFP) August 6, 2025 The AI bot's untrue response was widely shared online and a left-wing pro-Palestinian French lawmaker, Aymeric Caron, was accused of peddling disinformation on the Israel-Hamas war for posting the photo. At a time when internet users are turning to AI to verify images more and more, the furore shows the risks of trusting tools like Grok, when the technology is far from error-free. Grok said the photo showed Amal Hussain, a seven-year-old Yemeni child, in October 2018. In fact the photo shows nine-year-old Mariam Dawwas in the arms of her mother Modallala in Gaza City on 2 August 2025. Before the war, sparked by Hamas's 7 October 2023 attack on Israel, Mariam weighed 25 kilograms, her mother told AFP. Today, she weighs only nine. The only nutrition she gets to help her condition is milk, Modallala told AFP - and even that's "not always available". Challenged on its incorrect response, Grok said: "I do not spread fake news; I base my answers on verified sources." The chatbot eventually issued a response that recognised the error -- but in reply to further queries the next day, Grok repeated its claim that the photo was from Yemen. The chatbot has previously issued content that praised Nazi leader Adolf Hitler and that suggested people with Jewish surnames were more likely to spread online hate. Thanks for the tag. Upon verification from primary sources, the image is indeed from Gaza, taken August 2, 2025, by AFP's Omar al-Qattaa, showing 9-year-old Mariam Dawwas suffering severe malnutrition. Any prior misidentification as a 2018 Yemen photo was an error—visual… — Grok (@grok) August 7, 2025 Radical right bias Grok's mistakes illustrate the limits of AI tools, whose functions are as impenetrable as "black boxes", said Louis de Diesbach, a researcher in technological ethics. "We don't know exactly why they give this or that reply, nor how they prioritise their sources," said Diesbach, author of a book on AI tools, "Hello ChatGPT". Each AI has biases linked to the information it was trained on and the instructions of its creators, he said. In the researcher's view Grok, made by Musk's xAI start-up, shows "highly pronounced biases which are highly aligned with the ideology" of the South African billionaire, a former confidante of US President Donald Trump and a standard-bearer for the radical right. READ | 'Could conflict with Elon's vision': Grok 4 consults with Musk in delivering some responses Asking a chatbot to pinpoint a photo's origin takes it out of its proper role, said Diesbach. "Typically, when you look for the origin of an image, it might say: 'This photo could have been taken in Yemen, could have been taken in Gaza, could have been taken in pretty much any country where there is famine'." AI does not necessarily seek accuracy -- "that's not the goal," the expert said. Another AFP photograph of a starving Gazan child by al-Qattaa, taken in July 2025, had already been wrongly located and dated by Grok to Yemen, 2016. That error led to internet users accusing the French newspaper Liberation, which had published the photo, of manipulation. 'Friendly pathological liar' An AI's bias is linked to the data it is fed and what happens during fine-tuning - the so-called alignment phase - which then determines what the model would rate as a good or bad answer. "Just because you explain to it that the answer's wrong doesn't mean it will then give a different one," Diesbach said. "Its training data has not changed and neither has its alignment." Grok is not alone in wrongly identifying images. When AFP asked Mistral AI's Le Chat - which is in part trained on AFP's articles under an agreement between the French start-up and the news agency - the bot also misidentified the photo of Mariam Dawwas as being from Yemen. For Diesbach, chatbots must never be used as tools to verify facts. "They are not made to tell the truth," but to "generate content, whether true or false", he said. "You have to look at it like a friendly pathological liar - it may not always lie, but it always could."
