logo
EXCLUSIVE What a bloomin' liberty! Sadiq Khan is ridiculed for handing out 12,000 wildflower seeds to commuters - after saying London's Green Belt should be built on

EXCLUSIVE What a bloomin' liberty! Sadiq Khan is ridiculed for handing out 12,000 wildflower seeds to commuters - after saying London's Green Belt should be built on

Daily Mail​4 days ago

Sir Sadiq Khan has been ridiculed for handing out wildflower seeds to commuters just weeks after announcing that London 's Green Belt should be built on.
Part of his plans for Climate Action Week he launched a new Green Roots Fund to invest £12million into neighbourhoods so make them 'greener, healthier and more climate resilient'.
In the video posted to X Sir Sadiq can be seen chatting to commuters and helping hand out 12,000 free seed packets, as he says: 'The benefits of nature should be for everyone and we are committed to making this a reality for everyone.'
However, his comments have now been slammed by the deputy leader of the City Hall Conservatives Emma Best who labeled the move 'astonishingly hypocritical' as just weeks ago he was 'sending in the bulldozers' to London's green belt.
Speaking to MailOnline, Ms Best said: 'This is astonishing hypocrisy from the Mayor and greenwashing of the highest order.
'With one hand he is commanding bulldozers to demolish a country park and with the other he is handing out flower seeds as though that balances his actions.
'Sadiq Khan says the 'benefits of nature should be for all Londoners' but clearly that excludes those whose parks and green spaces he intends to build on.'
In May the Mayor used a speech to argue that brownfield site alone cannot meet the capital's needs.
He suggested 'low-quality' green belt should be released to developers with conditions such as providing affordable homes and transport links.
Up to now Sir Sadiq has argued against permitting the use of such land before previously-developed brownfield options have been exhausted.
However, the Labour government has set a tough wider goal of building 1.5million homes over this Parliament.
London has a new target of adding 88,000 new homes a year, but the city's current plan is delivering only around 40,000 a year.
Meanwhile, rents in the capital rose 11.5 per cent last year and councils are spending £4million a day on temporary accommodation amid increasing homelessness.
Sir Sadiq has now launched a consultation on the next version of the London Plan, which will set out his vision for development in the capital over the next two decades.
City Hall has already begun a review of green belt land in line with the Government's policy of building more on low-quality parts of the green belt, so-called 'grey belt' land.
However, other possibilities will now be explored for securing enough land to meet London's housing needs.
Sir Sadiq speaking at the event in May said 'the truth is we're still far from fixing housing'.
'The green belt can often be low-quality land, poorly maintained and not really enjoyed by Londoners. Only around 13 per cent is made up of parks and areas that the public can access,' he said.
'So given the quality of parts of London's green belt and the extent of the housing crisis, I believe the current position is wrong, out-of-date and simply unsustainable.
'Development on carefully chosen parts of the green belt – done in the right way – would allow us to unlock hundreds of thousands of new homes. This would not only go a long way to ending the housing crisis but provide a huge boost to our economy.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

With friends like Andy Burnham, who needs Jeremy Corbyn?
With friends like Andy Burnham, who needs Jeremy Corbyn?

Telegraph

time3 hours ago

  • Telegraph

With friends like Andy Burnham, who needs Jeremy Corbyn?

Former Labour MPs, now safely ensconced in powerful positions in local government and having little to do with benefits, can taste blood in the water. They are using their national profiles to make life as difficult as possible for their party leader and the Prime Minister. Last week we had London Mayor, Sadiq Khan, encouraging Labour MPs to rebel over the cuts. And now that other aspiring party leader, Manchester's Andy Burnham, has helpfully put the boot into the Government too, urging his former parliamentary colleagues to continue their rebellion. This is despite last week's humiliating U-turn by Keir Starmer, who agreed to water down the cuts in the face of the prospect of more than 100 Labour MPs voting against the Bill. Starmer must be wondering if the last Labour Government's (and the last Tory one's) eagerness to set up powerful mayors across the country was wise after all. Both Khan and Burnham are not accountable to the Labour whip at Westminster, and neither has any power to impact on the levels of benefits paid out by the Department of Work and Pensions, yet both are keen to burnish their soft-Left political credentials by jumping on the anti-cuts bandwagon and making life even less comfortable for Starmer than it already was. With friends like these, etc. Any kind of genuine benefit reform – reform aimed squarely at those who have given up trying to get a job and have decided they would prefer to rely on benefits long-term – requires a degree of consensus, not just across the political spectrum but within the Labour Party itself. Starmer's majority in the Commons is higher than the total number of Conservative MPs, so it is Labour who will decide how serious the current appetite for change actually is. The problem for the Government is, firstly, the Treasury. Any reforms worthy of the label will initially cost more money than they save – for example, moving wholesale to face-to-face interviews. The benefit to the Government would be obvious in terms of the number of claimants who would develop cold feet and choose not to press ahead with their application based solely on their reluctance to defend their claim face-to-face. Yet for the bean-counters at the Treasury, any increase in costs, even in the short term and even if such costs would pay for themselves within a year or three, this would be unacceptable. It is this kind of change that is missing from the Bill currently set to go before the House and which would reduce the benefits bill – in time – far more effectively than the piecemeal and miserly short-term cuts currently planned. There are others that could be enacted even without legislation, for example, the scrapping of monetary bonuses to staff who get through a high number of claims in as short a period as possible, which only encourages approval of claims without proper assessment. But even these changes would meet political opposition from within Labour, including from the King in the North and the Bus Driver's Son in City Hall. The key to progress lies with neither of these ambitious men, but with Rachel Reeves herself. Consider this quote from the Chancellor: 'We are not the party of people on benefits. We don't want to be seen, and we're not, the party to represent those who are out of work. Labour are a party of working people, formed for and by working people.' Granted, Reeves said this long before the burden of responsibility for the nation's finances was placed on her shoulders. In fact she said it ten years ago when she was the shadow work and pensions secretary under Ed Miliband. But as her leader continues to struggle with what he actually believes about welfare reform and grapples with his more recalcitrant parliamentary colleagues, perhaps some of Reeves's erstwhile radicalism could help rescue her party from the quagmire it has constructed for itself. Aid is certainly not going to come from those who left parliament years ago to grandstand from afar.

Uefa POSTPONE decision on Crystal Palace's Europa League fate indefinitely with club left in limbo
Uefa POSTPONE decision on Crystal Palace's Europa League fate indefinitely with club left in limbo

Scottish Sun

time4 hours ago

  • Scottish Sun

Uefa POSTPONE decision on Crystal Palace's Europa League fate indefinitely with club left in limbo

CRYSTAL BALL Uefa POSTPONE decision on Crystal Palace's Europa League fate indefinitely with club left in limbo Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) CRYSTAL PALACE'S agonising Europa League limbo has been indefinitely extended. The Eagles place in Europe next season is under threat due to Uefa's multi-club ownership rules. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 1 UEFA have once again delayed the ruling over Crystal Palace's future in the Europa League Credit: AFP John Textor, who is selling his majority share in Palace, also owns French side Lyon who have qualified for the competition alongside the south Londoners. Palace bosses have been in talks with Uefa's Club Financial Control Body to argue their case and were expecting a resolution this week. However, with Textor's financial trouble at Lyon having seen the club relegated to Ligue 2 the chaos drags on. The seven-time French champions have appealed against the relegation but will forfeit their place in Europe should they fail. In a statement on Monday, Uefa said: "The CFCB First Chamber has decided to postpone its assessment of the multi-club ownership case involving Olympique Lyonnais and Crystal Palace. "This postponement relates to Olympique Lyonnais' compliance with the settlement agreement concluded with the CFCB First Chamber for its breach of the financial sustainability requirements. "As part of this settlement, Olympique Lyonnais agreed on an exclusion from the 2025/26 UEFA club competitions should the French authority (DNCG) confirm the club's relegation to Ligue 2. "Further details on this multi-club ownership case and this settlement agreement will be communicated in due course." MORE TO FOLLOW THIS IS A DEVELOPING STORY.. The Sun is your go to destination for the best football, boxing and MMA news, real-life stories, jaw-dropping pictures and must-see us on Facebook at and follow us from our main Twitter account at @TheSunFootball.

US President Donald Trump to visit Scottish golf courses in coming weeks
US President Donald Trump to visit Scottish golf courses in coming weeks

Edinburgh Live

time7 hours ago

  • Edinburgh Live

US President Donald Trump to visit Scottish golf courses in coming weeks

Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info Controversial US President Donald Trump is set to visit Scotland for the first time since starting his second term. The 47th US President is allegedly set to embark on a trip to his Scottish golf courses at the end of July according to the MailOnline. Trump has a meeting with King Charles pencilled in, with rumours swirling the encounter could take place at Balmoral or Dumfries House. However, it is understood their diaries clash, the Record reports. Trump was invited for an unprecedented second State Visit likely to take place in September. MailOnline reported that in the final two weeks of July, security services are preparing for Air Force One to fly into Prestwick Airport with Trump having a ring of steel thrown around him amid anticipated protests. During his first stint in office, thousands of Scots took to the streets in Glasgow, Edinburgh and Aberdeen to oppose the former Apprentice TV star's visit. Join Edinburgh Live's Whatsapp Community here and get the latest news sentstraight to your messages. The US president will likely visit Turnberry, which was vandalised by pro-Palestine protesters in March, and his Trump International controversial course in Aberdeen, which has had claims lodged against it that it destroyed one of the world's rarest sand dune systems. It's also thought that Trump may visit his new Aberdeenshire course, the MacLeod Trump International Golf Links course - named in honour of his Lewis-born mother, Mary Anne MacLeod - which is set to open before mid-August. Trump has repeatedly asked Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer about hosting The Open at Turnberry, which he bought in 2014 for £46 million, but the organisers have yet to concede to his demands. His son, Eric Trump, said recently: "Turnberry is considered to be the best golf course in the world by the players, the writers, the spectators and the entire golfing community. "If we get the call, and I sincerely hope we do, I promise the Royal and Ancient that we will be the best hosts The Open Championship has ever seen." Sign up for Edinburgh Live newsletters for more headlines straight to your inbox After Trump was invited for second State Visit, the Scottish Greens launched a 'Dump Trump' petition, claiming the president was not welcome in Scotland as he presents "a clear and present danger to our climate, peace and human rights around the world". It was signed by over 6000 people. First Minister John Swinney condemned the president following his heated exchange with Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky in the Oval Office earlier this year.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store