EXCLUSIVE What a bloomin' liberty! Sadiq Khan is ridiculed for handing out 12,000 wildflower seeds to commuters - after saying London's Green Belt should be built on
Part of his plans for Climate Action Week he launched a new Green Roots Fund to invest £12million into neighbourhoods so make them 'greener, healthier and more climate resilient'.
In the video posted to X Sir Sadiq can be seen chatting to commuters and helping hand out 12,000 free seed packets, as he says: 'The benefits of nature should be for everyone and we are committed to making this a reality for everyone.'
However, his comments have now been slammed by the deputy leader of the City Hall Conservatives Emma Best who labeled the move 'astonishingly hypocritical' as just weeks ago he was 'sending in the bulldozers' to London's green belt.
Speaking to MailOnline, Ms Best said: 'This is astonishing hypocrisy from the Mayor and greenwashing of the highest order.
'With one hand he is commanding bulldozers to demolish a country park and with the other he is handing out flower seeds as though that balances his actions.
'Sadiq Khan says the 'benefits of nature should be for all Londoners' but clearly that excludes those whose parks and green spaces he intends to build on.'
In May the Mayor used a speech to argue that brownfield site alone cannot meet the capital's needs.
He suggested 'low-quality' green belt should be released to developers with conditions such as providing affordable homes and transport links.
Up to now Sir Sadiq has argued against permitting the use of such land before previously-developed brownfield options have been exhausted.
However, the Labour government has set a tough wider goal of building 1.5million homes over this Parliament.
London has a new target of adding 88,000 new homes a year, but the city's current plan is delivering only around 40,000 a year.
Meanwhile, rents in the capital rose 11.5 per cent last year and councils are spending £4million a day on temporary accommodation amid increasing homelessness.
Sir Sadiq has now launched a consultation on the next version of the London Plan, which will set out his vision for development in the capital over the next two decades.
City Hall has already begun a review of green belt land in line with the Government's policy of building more on low-quality parts of the green belt, so-called 'grey belt' land.
However, other possibilities will now be explored for securing enough land to meet London's housing needs.
Sir Sadiq speaking at the event in May said 'the truth is we're still far from fixing housing'.
'The green belt can often be low-quality land, poorly maintained and not really enjoyed by Londoners. Only around 13 per cent is made up of parks and areas that the public can access,' he said.
'So given the quality of parts of London's green belt and the extent of the housing crisis, I believe the current position is wrong, out-of-date and simply unsustainable.
'Development on carefully chosen parts of the green belt – done in the right way – would allow us to unlock hundreds of thousands of new homes. This would not only go a long way to ending the housing crisis but provide a huge boost to our economy.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
16 hours ago
- The Guardian
Councillors who revoke 20mph limits and LTNs risk being held liable for road deaths
Re Sadiq Khan's article (Dear Britain, it's now clear: 20mph zones save lives and don't slow traffic. Implement them, 12 August), many people are unaware of the outstanding success of 20mph limits and low-traffic neighbourhoods (LTNs) in saving lives and preventing injuries and crashes, because the research and statistics are only being reported consistently by the BBC and the Guardian. People who rely on some of the other media outlets will have seen these policies characterised as unpopular, 'hated' or a 'war on drivers'. The failure to report impartially is a distortion of the truth that is misleading the public and politicians, and leading to pressure to revoke these life-saving measures. Highway authorities have a statutory duty to promote road safety, a duty to have 'due regard' to the needs of elderly and disabled people, and a common law duty of care to all road users not to be negligent. On top of this, councils have duties relating to public health, and policies relating to active lifestyles and the prevention of obesity, all of which are supported by creating safer streets. Councillors are obliged to ensure their decisions are reasonable and based on relevant considerations. While councillors and officers are protected by statutory immunity, this protection does not extend to deliberate or reckless wrongdoing. The science and evidence are totally clear: revocation of 20mph limits or LTNs will lead to crashes, injuries and deaths. Councillors and their advisers who pursue such actions risk being held personally liable for the harm that ensues. Robert HuxfordDirector, Urban Design Group Sadiq Khan describes the safety benefits of 20mph limits in urban areas. Hopefully, the increased carbon emissions from the petrol and diesel cars being driven at inefficient speeds will be balanced out by the smoother overall traffic flow and the much greater efficiency of electric vehicles at low speeds. There are even greater benefits to be had from a lower national speed limit of 55mph as road transport decarbonises, but that does not have a champion since the idea was recommended and then inexplicably dropped by the Climate Change ScharfAbingdon, Oxfordshire I congratulate Sadiq Khan on the excellent progress he has made. I would ask, though, whether more speed cameras can be installed. There is a road from Putney to Wimbledon which is 20mph along its whole length, with just one speed camera. Once past this camera, cars speed up and overtake drivers who are maintaining the speed limit. Sadiq should ask councils to install more cameras with the carrot of letting them keep the ensuing PritchardWimbledon, London As a reluctant pedestrian, following a stroke, I have to walk miles along urban roads, using a robust walking stick. It's essential – not for balance but to vent my anger at threatening drivers who speed past and often instinctively veer towards the pavement away from oncoming MorganPoole, Dorset Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
Daily Mail
17 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Sadiq Khan continues his feud with Donald Trump by claiming US President could be 'radicalising dangerous people'
Sir has continued his bitter feud with Donald Trump by claiming the US President is 'not a force for good' and could be 'inadvertently radicalising people'. During his visit to Scotland last month, Mr Trump branded the London mayor a 'nasty person' who has 'done a terrible job' in his latest blast at the Labour politician. Speaking at an event at the Edinburgh Festival Fringe, Sir Sadiq dismissed the US President's jibes as 'water off a duck's back'. The London mayor added he sometimes felt like he was 'nine years old again' and 'in the school playground'. He told the Political Party show with comedian Matt Forde: 'Somebody who has views like he does about black people, about women, about gays, about Muslims, about Mexicans, thinks I'm nasty. 'Really. He is the leader of the free world, arguably the most powerful man in the world, and really.' Sir Sadiq said records showed, since the middle of January this year - when Mr Trump began his second term in the White House - and last month, 'there have never been more Americans applying to British citizenship and living in London'. 'So I think Americans have got good taste by and large,' he continued. He also said he hoped Mr Trump would come to London during his state visit to the Britain next month, with Sir Sadiq stressing the 'diversity' of the capital was a 'strength, not a weakness'. 'I think it makes us stronger not weaker, richer not poorer,' the London mayor added. 'And when President Trump says some of the things he does, it brings from the periphery to the mainstream, views that are potentially dangerous. 'He inadvertently - I'm not going to suggest he does it deliberately - he inadvertently could be radicalising people with views that could lead to them doing things that are dangerous.' Sir Sadiq voiced fears that minorities 'could be treated less favourably because of the views of the President of the USA' as he accused Mr Trump of 'using London and our diversity as a political football, as a proxy for a culture war'. He added: 'On a personal level, it is water off a duck's back, but we can't run away from the fact that there are some really serious challenges we face as a western society and President Trump, in my view, I speak generally, isn't a force for good.' But the London mayor insisted that he would be 'more than happy to meet President Trump'. He said he would seek to show him that it is 'possible to be proud to be a westerner and a proud to be Muslim, that it is possible to be British, and proud to be British, and be of Pakistani origin and be a law abiding citizen and we aren't three-headed monsters'. He said: 'I suspect President Trump may have formed a view of Muslims because of the actions of a small minority of really bad people who are terrorists and use Islam in a perverted way. 'What I would want President Trump to know is that is a very small fraction of Muslims across the globe. 'So if there was an opportunity to meet President Trump, I would be more than happy to do so.' There has been a long-running feud between Sir Sadiq and Mr Trump, who previously called the London mayor a 'stone cold loser' in 2019. This came after Sir Sadiq allowed a giant inflatable 'Trump baby' blimp to coincide with the US President's state visit that year. In 2016, Mr Trump challenged Sir Sadiq to an IQ test after Mr Khan said his views on Islam were 'ignorant'.
The Guardian
a day ago
- The Guardian
Labour 2-0 down but has time to turn things around, says Sadiq Khan
Labour would be 2-0 down were its time in government a football match, one of the party's most senior figures has said, as he admitted its first year in office has been difficult. But Sadiq Khan stressed Labour still had plenty of time to win round the public. Speaking at the Edinburgh festival fringe, the London mayor said Labour supporters would be 'delusional' if they did not recognise the difficulties the party had had since winning power in July 2024. 'It is really important now we really pick things up because I think we are 2-0 down.' Continuing his analogy, he said only 15 or 20 minutes of the match had gone, adding: 'The great news is we have turned it round before; we have won games before where we're 2-0 down, we can do it again.' After taking Labour into Downing Street for the first time since 2010, the party's popularity has slumped in the polls, amid criticism over issues such as changes to welfare. Khan said: 'It hasn't been a great first year. There have been great things that have happened in this first year, around the rights for renters, around the rights for workers, around energy security, and I could go on. But as first years go, it has not been a great first year.' But he said his party had 'another four years to make sure we turn this around'. Speaking at the same event, Khan said he would be 'more than happy' to meet Donald Trump – despite warning that the US president could be 'inadvertently radicalising people' and is 'not a force for good'. He dismissed jibes Trump made against him on a recent visit to Scotland, where the president claimed the London mayor was 'a nasty person' who has 'done a terrible job'. The Labour politician said such remarks were 'water off a duck's back'. But he told the audience it sometimes felt as if he was nine years old again and 'in the school playground'. And Khan hit back at Trump, saying: 'Somebody who has views like he does about black people, about women, about gays, about Muslims, about Mexicans, thinks I'm nasty. Really. He is the leader of the free world, arguably the most powerful man in the world, and really.' He said records showed that, from the date Trump started his term in January up to July, 'there have never been more Americans applying for British citizenship and living in London. So I think Americans have got good taste by and large'. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion He added that he hoped the president would come to London during his state visit to the UK next month, with Khan stressing the diversity of the capital was a 'strength, not a weakness' that made the city 'richer not poorer'. He said: that, 'when President Trump says some of the things he does, it brings from the periphery to the mainstream, views that are potentially dangerous'. Khan added: 'He inadvertently – I'm not going to suggest he does it deliberately – he inadvertently could be radicalising people with views that could lead to them doing things that are dangerous.'
