Aussie woman shares horror at being confronted by her local postman at her home after she complained about stolen parcel
The woman from Melbourne took to Reddit this week to say she ordered puppy products from Queensland small business Pablo and Co in preparation for the impending arrival of her new canine companion.
What followed made her wish she had never made the purchase.
The woman was in Bendigo visiting her terminally ill grandmother when her phone pinged, informing her her package was out for delivery and Australia Post would take the goods to the post office if she wasn't home.
However, the corner-cutting postie delivered her parcel whilst she was away.
"I came home and no sign of our parcel, so I went to the local post office to see what was going on," the woman explained.
"The woman behind the desk showed me the screen and the delivery man had signed for my parcel on my behalf and then dumped it at my door.
"And you guessed it, it was stolen."
The disgruntled woman said the post office worker urged her to lodge an online complaint, which she did.
And that's when events took a turn for the sinister.
"Literally two days later, the delivery man came to my door while I was home and asked me why I'd submitted a complaint," she said.
"I told him he'd fraudulently signed on my behalf and his actions had led to my parcel being stolen.
"He tried looking into my house to probably see if I'd stashed it somewhere."
The woman asked him why he thought it was appropriate for him to come to her house and harass her, to which he said his "boss told him to."
"I was fuming, it seemed so inappropriate, and I'd been afraid something like this would happen if I complained."
"A few days later, I get (an email) where Australia Post admits to fault and to contact the shop I purchased from.
The woman did so, reaching out to Pablo and Co in the hopes Australia Post could reimburse the owners, only to be met with a brick wall.
"Apparently not. Even with the email where they say they're (Australia Post) in the wrong, they've refused to reimburse the shop," she said.
The business was kind enough to send the woman replacement products.
However, they ended up being delivered by the same unruly postman who "threw" the parcel at her.
The woman said she lodged another complaint with Australia Post and two more with the ombudsman for the fraudulent signature and for turning up to my house and "using my private details in an improper way."
Unfortunately she didn't have a camera installed to capture the postie's alleged harassment.
One person claimed the postman's forged signature was "100 per cent against the law."
"How he wasn't fired is beyond me," they said.
Another person quipped the postie must be "determined to lose his job" and "putting a lot of effort into it".
"If only he put that energy into to actually delivering the parcels."
"You should file a police report," one more person said.
"Whether it's for assault and theft or just assault, it's worth going through with."
SkyNews.com.au has contacted Australia Post and Pablo and Co for comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
SBS Australia
13 hours ago
- SBS Australia
The new scam that could target anyone scrolling social media
Australians will soon need to prove their age to access social media — and cybersecurity experts are warning the confusion about how it will work could open the door to a new wave of scams. As the federal government prepares to roll out the Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Bill 2024, concerns are emerging over how scammers might exploit public confusion about the changes. The ban, set to come into effect in December 2025, will require social media companies to take "reasonable steps" to prevent users under 16 from creating accounts. That includes verifying all users' ages — but not through government-issued ID. Still, many Australians mistakenly believe they'll need to submit sensitive documents — like their driver's licence or passport — to continue to scroll on Instagram or TikTok. And according to experts, that misconception could give scammers a dangerous new opportunity. What's actually required? The new legislation explicitly bans platforms from requiring government-issued identification, including a digital ID, for age assurance. Instead, companies will need to implement alternative verification methods, though exactly what that looks like remains unclear. Despite this, many Australians are under the impression they'll be asked for their ID. On Reddit, one user warned the policy "will confuse people and make more vulnerable boomers that get scammed asking for ID". "The status quo now is never to provide ID. Once the government says you must, the door is wide open," they wrote. That confusion could make people more susceptible to scams disguised as legitimate ID verification requests. A new type of scam Experts say scammers are quick to jump on policy grey areas — especially when public awareness is patchy and technical details are vague. Professor Toby Murray from the University of Melbourne's School of Computing and Information Systems said it's "not impossible" scammers will try to impersonate social media companies and trick users into uploading personal documents. "Mass text message scams where people are getting texts purporting to be from Facebook saying, 'You've got to click this link and verify your age before you're able to log into your Facebook account again' … It's not impossible that we might start to see that kind of stuff emerging," he told SBS News. David Lacey, CEO of IDCARE, a not-for-profit support service for identity theft victims, agreed, saying scammers were likely to exploit the uncertainty by impersonating social media platforms like Meta — a tactic they already use. "The most likely response will be scammers impersonating Meta, which already happens," Lacey told SBS News. "We haven't seen this specific nuance just yet, but expect it will happen." Mohiuddin Ahmed, senior lecturer in computing and security at Edith Cowan University, agreed the changes are likely to "instigate scammers to devise new ways to gather personal information and use them for fraudulent activities". He said these scams could involve: Fake websites requiring users to upload ID; Phishing messages with links asking for ID to "continue using" an app; Attempts to remotely access a victim's device or install spyware. "The possibilities are limitless, as the requirement to submit ID is also broadening the threat landscape," Ahmed told SBS News. Exploiting public confusion A key risk isn't the legislation itself — it's the public misunderstanding of it. And right now, there's little clarity on what age verification will actually look like in practice. Each platform will be responsible for creating and implementing its own solution, which may vary widely. That uncertainty creates what Murray called an "information vacuum" — ideal conditions for scammers to operate in. "Australian consumers, we're not used to having to hand over our ID documents to online websites to access them. There's certainly been a lot of confusion around what kinds of age assurance mechanisms are actually going to be used," Murray said. "When different platforms might be using different technologies, that only creates additional uncertainty and confusion for people," Murray said. "Most scams take advantage of the fact that the person who is being scammed doesn't understand what's going on as well as the scammer does." He said the rollout of two-factor authentication brought similar risks — new technology can help with security, but also introduces new vulnerabilities. "As age assurance technologies are going to start to become more widely rolled out, people are going to have to learn what risks they present and how to use them securely," he said. But until clearer public guidance is issued — and until platforms publish details of their chosen systems — scammers may continue to exploit the gap. "We don't know how it's going to look, so because of that, it has created a potential risk," Murray said. "It remains to be seen how dangerous that risk is going to be in practice." What happens when someone steals my identity? If scammers get hold of sensitive documents like a driver's licence or passport, the consequences can be long-lasting. They may use these to: Apply for credit cards or loans; Open bank accounts; Register vehicles or apply for government services; Conduct illegal activity in someone else's name. "It's the kinds of things that enable them to get money — and then for you to be the one who's maybe liable for that," Murray said. Ahmed said stolen identities can also severely impact a victim's credit score. "If the scammers use the stolen ID to apply for multiple credit cards or other loans, then the victim will have a tough time rebuilding their credit score," he said. According to the latest figures on personal fraud from the Australian Bureau of Statistics, in 2023-24: 14 per cent of Australians aged 15 and over experienced personal fraud; 1.2 per cent — around 255,100 people — were victims of identity theft. Of these, 25 per cent said scammers used their details to access money from a bank, superannuation or investment. And 12 per cent reported new accounts (like phone or utilities) being opened in their name. Murray said older Australians remain the most at-risk group. Ironically, the age group most affected by the new social media ban — younger people who often don't yet possess an ID — may also be the safest from scams. SBS News has contacted the Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts for comment.
Perth Now
15 hours ago
- Perth Now
Perv sentenced after spying on women
A Chilean who used a tiny camera to spy on women showering has been told Australia 'doesn't want him here'. Luis Alberto Cancino Mena recorded videos for months before the device was spotted by cleaners at a home in Sydney's Eastern Suburbs. Mena, 39, pleaded guilty to three separate charges of filming a person without their consent and appeared at Waverley Local Court on Wednesday where he was given a nine month intensive corrections order. Sentencing Mena, Magistrate Michael Barko said the impact of his crimes would cause anxiety for the victims for the rest of their lives. He said: 'Pornography is not illegal, but when innocent women get filmed without consent it beggars belief, it's a perversion, it has to be a perversion. 'These women for the rest of their lives are going to think, 'Are these images going to be shared on the World Wide Web?' 'The defendant at the time was here with the privilege of being allowed in this country, he's expressed the desire to return to his homeland of Chile. 'Quite frankly the Australian public doesn't want him here.' Luis Alberto Cancino Mena leaving Waverley Court on Wednesday after sentencing. NewsWire / Nikki Short Credit: News Corp Australia According to court documents, Mena's behaviour went undetected for months until cleaners stumbled upon the device in early February. 'The cleaners of the premises attended the location and begun cleaning as per the agreement in place. They were cleaning the bathroom before locating a recording camera device which was in the shape of a pen on the ground of the bathroom. The cleaner pulled apart the device and observed it to be recording,' court documents said. 'The storage device was accessed by the cleaners and they observed recording files of the victim with no clothes on taking a shower.' Police say one recording 'clearly shows the accused setting the camera up in the bathroom'. After arresting Mena, police seized the man's laptop where they found folders marked under the names of the victims. Footage taken from the hidden camera had been catalogued based on who it was recording, and was then placed into the folder allocated to that person. Luis Mena was sentenced to a nine month intensive corrections order. NewsWire / Nikki Short Credit: News Corp Australia In coming to his decision, Magistrate Barko noted the considerable effort Mena went to in buying the pen with a camera in it, getting the SIM card and downloading the footage, saying 'it's not as though you're picking up a box of chocolates from Woolworths'. He also queried the mindset of Mena, when pornography was easily accessible online. 'With all that's accessible on the internet, all that's accessible on social media, all that's accessible with the push of a button, why someone has to acquire a camera, to film the private parts … of three completely innocent victims,' he said. Mena must adhere to strict bail conditions including submitting to supervision by a Community Corrections Officer, or risk jail time. Magistrate Barko also handed Mena an AVO order prohibiting him from contacting the victims for two years.
The Advertiser
15 hours ago
- The Advertiser
Outback Wrangler star 'tampered with helicopter dash'
Reality TV star Matt Wright tampered with the dashboard of a helicopter after a fatal crash and falsely reported its fuel tank level, a jury has heard. The Outback Wrangler star's trial began on Wednesday, more than three years after Wright's mate and co-star Chris "Willow" Wilson died in the outback chopper crash that left pilot Sebastian Robinson a paraplegic. Wright has pleaded not guilty to three counts of attempting to pervert the course of justice following the February 2022 incident in the Northern Territory. The trial got underway in the Supreme Court in Darwin with crown prosecutor Jason Gullaci SC outlining his case to the jury. None of the charges related to the cause of the crash and it was not alleged Wright was responsible for it, the death of Mr Wilson or Mr Robinson's injuries, Mr Gullaci said. The Crown case was Wright did not properly record helicopter flying hours and was concerned that crash investigations would uncover that, leading to charges against him and his companies. The jurors were told part of the evidence would be covertly recorded conversations of Wright and others at his home and on his phone, using listening devices. Mr Wilson died doing something "incredibly brave", dangling from a helicopter to collect crocodile eggs along the King River in Arnhem Land, Mr Gullaci said. He and Mr Robinson were working for Wright to lawfully collect the eggs for sale to crocodile farms. On the day of the crash, Wright was aware there would be investigations by aviation safety authorities and NT Police, leading to possible charges, Mr Gullaci said. Wright was the chief pilot, CEO and head of flight operations at his company Helibrook, Mr Gullaci said. As holder of an air operating certificate he was required to abide by all Australian civil aviation regulations to ensure safe operations. The Robinson R44 helicopter had a maximum flying-hour threshold of 2200 hours, at which time an operator had to decide to retire the aircraft or give it an overhaul costing more than $400,000. The case was about Wright engaging in practices to not properly record flying hours, including evidence that Hobbs flight-time recording meters were deliberately disconnected, Mr Gullaci said. "If you don't properly record service hours, you put off the maintenance and service requirements. It's a way of extending the life of the aircraft." That meant the 2200-hour limit could be passed by hundreds of hours and that affected airworthiness, Mr Gullaci said. The prosecution case was Wright was aware his pilots routinely disconnected Hobbs meters and did not accurately record their flying hours in log books - to make sure the meters and log books matched. The jury was told they would hear covertly recorded conversations between Wright and his wife Kaia in which he said: "I don't write shit down ... I will be guilty of not keeping my paperwork up to speed." They would also hear from pilots that Wright regularly asked them not to record flying hours in their log books. Investigations concluded the crashed helicopter was likely over its 2200 hours and its Hobbs meter was not working, Mr Gullaci said. "The rules are it shouldn't have been flying." Wright immediately choppered to the crash site on the day and "played around with the dash", the Crown alleging he was trying to see if the Hobbs meter was disconnected," Mr Gullaci said. "From the outset he attempts to cover up previous rule-breaking." Wright said in a statutory declaration to police he had seen about half a tank of fuel in the crashed chopper. But covert recording of Mr Wright showed he did not believe that, saying on the phone, "I didn't see any f***ing fuel in the tank - zero", Mr Gullaci told the jury. Wright made the statutory declaration with intent to obstruct investigations and avoid suggestions the aircraft operated without adequate fuel or there was a fuel line problem, the prosecutor said. Reality TV star Matt Wright tampered with the dashboard of a helicopter after a fatal crash and falsely reported its fuel tank level, a jury has heard. The Outback Wrangler star's trial began on Wednesday, more than three years after Wright's mate and co-star Chris "Willow" Wilson died in the outback chopper crash that left pilot Sebastian Robinson a paraplegic. Wright has pleaded not guilty to three counts of attempting to pervert the course of justice following the February 2022 incident in the Northern Territory. The trial got underway in the Supreme Court in Darwin with crown prosecutor Jason Gullaci SC outlining his case to the jury. None of the charges related to the cause of the crash and it was not alleged Wright was responsible for it, the death of Mr Wilson or Mr Robinson's injuries, Mr Gullaci said. The Crown case was Wright did not properly record helicopter flying hours and was concerned that crash investigations would uncover that, leading to charges against him and his companies. The jurors were told part of the evidence would be covertly recorded conversations of Wright and others at his home and on his phone, using listening devices. Mr Wilson died doing something "incredibly brave", dangling from a helicopter to collect crocodile eggs along the King River in Arnhem Land, Mr Gullaci said. He and Mr Robinson were working for Wright to lawfully collect the eggs for sale to crocodile farms. On the day of the crash, Wright was aware there would be investigations by aviation safety authorities and NT Police, leading to possible charges, Mr Gullaci said. Wright was the chief pilot, CEO and head of flight operations at his company Helibrook, Mr Gullaci said. As holder of an air operating certificate he was required to abide by all Australian civil aviation regulations to ensure safe operations. The Robinson R44 helicopter had a maximum flying-hour threshold of 2200 hours, at which time an operator had to decide to retire the aircraft or give it an overhaul costing more than $400,000. The case was about Wright engaging in practices to not properly record flying hours, including evidence that Hobbs flight-time recording meters were deliberately disconnected, Mr Gullaci said. "If you don't properly record service hours, you put off the maintenance and service requirements. It's a way of extending the life of the aircraft." That meant the 2200-hour limit could be passed by hundreds of hours and that affected airworthiness, Mr Gullaci said. The prosecution case was Wright was aware his pilots routinely disconnected Hobbs meters and did not accurately record their flying hours in log books - to make sure the meters and log books matched. The jury was told they would hear covertly recorded conversations between Wright and his wife Kaia in which he said: "I don't write shit down ... I will be guilty of not keeping my paperwork up to speed." They would also hear from pilots that Wright regularly asked them not to record flying hours in their log books. Investigations concluded the crashed helicopter was likely over its 2200 hours and its Hobbs meter was not working, Mr Gullaci said. "The rules are it shouldn't have been flying." Wright immediately choppered to the crash site on the day and "played around with the dash", the Crown alleging he was trying to see if the Hobbs meter was disconnected," Mr Gullaci said. "From the outset he attempts to cover up previous rule-breaking." Wright said in a statutory declaration to police he had seen about half a tank of fuel in the crashed chopper. But covert recording of Mr Wright showed he did not believe that, saying on the phone, "I didn't see any f***ing fuel in the tank - zero", Mr Gullaci told the jury. Wright made the statutory declaration with intent to obstruct investigations and avoid suggestions the aircraft operated without adequate fuel or there was a fuel line problem, the prosecutor said. Reality TV star Matt Wright tampered with the dashboard of a helicopter after a fatal crash and falsely reported its fuel tank level, a jury has heard. The Outback Wrangler star's trial began on Wednesday, more than three years after Wright's mate and co-star Chris "Willow" Wilson died in the outback chopper crash that left pilot Sebastian Robinson a paraplegic. Wright has pleaded not guilty to three counts of attempting to pervert the course of justice following the February 2022 incident in the Northern Territory. The trial got underway in the Supreme Court in Darwin with crown prosecutor Jason Gullaci SC outlining his case to the jury. None of the charges related to the cause of the crash and it was not alleged Wright was responsible for it, the death of Mr Wilson or Mr Robinson's injuries, Mr Gullaci said. The Crown case was Wright did not properly record helicopter flying hours and was concerned that crash investigations would uncover that, leading to charges against him and his companies. The jurors were told part of the evidence would be covertly recorded conversations of Wright and others at his home and on his phone, using listening devices. Mr Wilson died doing something "incredibly brave", dangling from a helicopter to collect crocodile eggs along the King River in Arnhem Land, Mr Gullaci said. He and Mr Robinson were working for Wright to lawfully collect the eggs for sale to crocodile farms. On the day of the crash, Wright was aware there would be investigations by aviation safety authorities and NT Police, leading to possible charges, Mr Gullaci said. Wright was the chief pilot, CEO and head of flight operations at his company Helibrook, Mr Gullaci said. As holder of an air operating certificate he was required to abide by all Australian civil aviation regulations to ensure safe operations. The Robinson R44 helicopter had a maximum flying-hour threshold of 2200 hours, at which time an operator had to decide to retire the aircraft or give it an overhaul costing more than $400,000. The case was about Wright engaging in practices to not properly record flying hours, including evidence that Hobbs flight-time recording meters were deliberately disconnected, Mr Gullaci said. "If you don't properly record service hours, you put off the maintenance and service requirements. It's a way of extending the life of the aircraft." That meant the 2200-hour limit could be passed by hundreds of hours and that affected airworthiness, Mr Gullaci said. The prosecution case was Wright was aware his pilots routinely disconnected Hobbs meters and did not accurately record their flying hours in log books - to make sure the meters and log books matched. The jury was told they would hear covertly recorded conversations between Wright and his wife Kaia in which he said: "I don't write shit down ... I will be guilty of not keeping my paperwork up to speed." They would also hear from pilots that Wright regularly asked them not to record flying hours in their log books. Investigations concluded the crashed helicopter was likely over its 2200 hours and its Hobbs meter was not working, Mr Gullaci said. "The rules are it shouldn't have been flying." Wright immediately choppered to the crash site on the day and "played around with the dash", the Crown alleging he was trying to see if the Hobbs meter was disconnected," Mr Gullaci said. "From the outset he attempts to cover up previous rule-breaking." Wright said in a statutory declaration to police he had seen about half a tank of fuel in the crashed chopper. But covert recording of Mr Wright showed he did not believe that, saying on the phone, "I didn't see any f***ing fuel in the tank - zero", Mr Gullaci told the jury. Wright made the statutory declaration with intent to obstruct investigations and avoid suggestions the aircraft operated without adequate fuel or there was a fuel line problem, the prosecutor said. Reality TV star Matt Wright tampered with the dashboard of a helicopter after a fatal crash and falsely reported its fuel tank level, a jury has heard. The Outback Wrangler star's trial began on Wednesday, more than three years after Wright's mate and co-star Chris "Willow" Wilson died in the outback chopper crash that left pilot Sebastian Robinson a paraplegic. Wright has pleaded not guilty to three counts of attempting to pervert the course of justice following the February 2022 incident in the Northern Territory. The trial got underway in the Supreme Court in Darwin with crown prosecutor Jason Gullaci SC outlining his case to the jury. None of the charges related to the cause of the crash and it was not alleged Wright was responsible for it, the death of Mr Wilson or Mr Robinson's injuries, Mr Gullaci said. The Crown case was Wright did not properly record helicopter flying hours and was concerned that crash investigations would uncover that, leading to charges against him and his companies. The jurors were told part of the evidence would be covertly recorded conversations of Wright and others at his home and on his phone, using listening devices. Mr Wilson died doing something "incredibly brave", dangling from a helicopter to collect crocodile eggs along the King River in Arnhem Land, Mr Gullaci said. He and Mr Robinson were working for Wright to lawfully collect the eggs for sale to crocodile farms. On the day of the crash, Wright was aware there would be investigations by aviation safety authorities and NT Police, leading to possible charges, Mr Gullaci said. Wright was the chief pilot, CEO and head of flight operations at his company Helibrook, Mr Gullaci said. As holder of an air operating certificate he was required to abide by all Australian civil aviation regulations to ensure safe operations. The Robinson R44 helicopter had a maximum flying-hour threshold of 2200 hours, at which time an operator had to decide to retire the aircraft or give it an overhaul costing more than $400,000. The case was about Wright engaging in practices to not properly record flying hours, including evidence that Hobbs flight-time recording meters were deliberately disconnected, Mr Gullaci said. "If you don't properly record service hours, you put off the maintenance and service requirements. It's a way of extending the life of the aircraft." That meant the 2200-hour limit could be passed by hundreds of hours and that affected airworthiness, Mr Gullaci said. The prosecution case was Wright was aware his pilots routinely disconnected Hobbs meters and did not accurately record their flying hours in log books - to make sure the meters and log books matched. The jury was told they would hear covertly recorded conversations between Wright and his wife Kaia in which he said: "I don't write shit down ... I will be guilty of not keeping my paperwork up to speed." They would also hear from pilots that Wright regularly asked them not to record flying hours in their log books. Investigations concluded the crashed helicopter was likely over its 2200 hours and its Hobbs meter was not working, Mr Gullaci said. "The rules are it shouldn't have been flying." Wright immediately choppered to the crash site on the day and "played around with the dash", the Crown alleging he was trying to see if the Hobbs meter was disconnected," Mr Gullaci said. "From the outset he attempts to cover up previous rule-breaking." Wright said in a statutory declaration to police he had seen about half a tank of fuel in the crashed chopper. But covert recording of Mr Wright showed he did not believe that, saying on the phone, "I didn't see any f***ing fuel in the tank - zero", Mr Gullaci told the jury. Wright made the statutory declaration with intent to obstruct investigations and avoid suggestions the aircraft operated without adequate fuel or there was a fuel line problem, the prosecutor said.
