Experts say 'impossible' for Sun and full Moon to align on horizon
"#UnbelievableAstronomicalPhenomenon! The Sun and Moon meet on the horizon," reads a Thai-language Facebook post published on February 17, 2025.
The caption goes on to say: "This scene was captured at the Patong Beach in Phuket, Thailand, where the two celestial bodies appeared side by side over the horizon."
The post shares an image showing two bright objects slightly above the horizon at the same time.
Image
Screenshot of the false post, taken on February 25, 2025
The same image has been shared by social media users in Thailand claiming it shows an "unbelievable phenomenon" seen at the kingdom's popular beach.
However, astronomers told AFP the claim is impossible in real life.
"The claim that the Sun and the full Moon met on the horizon over Patong Beach is astronomically impossible," Matipon Tangmatitham, an astrophysicist at National Astronomical Research Institute (NARIT), told AFP on February 25.
Matipon -- who is also the director of UNESCO's International Training Centre in Astronomy -- explained the Moon only reflects sunlight and does not emit light on its own.
He went on to say if the Sun and Moon appear close together, the Moon will be a thin crescent or completely invisible.
This contradicts the bright full Moon as shown in the image -- which only happens when it is positioned directly opposite to the Sun in the sky.
"As a result of Thailand's location near the Earth's equator, it is not possible for the Sun and Moon to appear parallel to each other along the horizon."
Matipon also noted that while the image does not appear to be AI-generated, the two objects in the photo are likely not the Sun and the Moon.
"The two bright objects are not bright enough to be the Sun and the Moon and could actually be light sources from another origin, such as a ship, a lighthouse, or other artificial lighting," Matipon said.
NARIT addressed the viral claim in a Facebook post on February 24 -- stating that such a celestial phenomenon was not possible (archived link).
A Google reverse image search found the same photo circulating online since at least January 2022, when it was falsely claimed to depict the Sun and Moon "meeting" in the Strait of Magellan.
José Luis Hormaechea, chief astronomer at the Río Grande Astronomical Station in Argentina, told AFP at the time that a full Moon can only be visible when it is positioned directly opposite the Sun in the sky.
"Sun and Moon are almost diametrically opposed -- a necessary condition for the Sun to completely illuminate the side of the Moon facing Earth. There is no other possibility," Hormaechea said. "When one rises, the other sets."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sustainability Times
a day ago
- Sustainability Times
'Collision With Earth Is Real': NASA Simulation Reveals Venus Asteroids Could Annihilate Entire Regions in the Coming Millennia
IN A NUTSHELL 🌌 New research identifies potentially hazardous asteroids co-orbiting with Venus that could collide with Earth. identifies potentially hazardous asteroids co-orbiting with Venus that could collide with Earth. 🔍 Detection challenges arise due to short observation windows and the Sun's glare, complicating efforts to track these asteroids. arise due to short observation windows and the Sun's glare, complicating efforts to track these asteroids. 🛰️ 36,000-year simulations reveal a significant population of Venus co-orbitals with eccentricities that may bring them close to Earth. reveal a significant population of Venus co-orbitals with eccentricities that may bring them close to Earth. 🚀 Enhanced planetary defense measures, including space-based observatories, are crucial to mitigate the potential threat. Recent discoveries have unveiled a new threat to our planet: hidden asteroids that co-orbit with Venus could potentially collide with Earth. Known as Venus co-orbitals, these asteroids are difficult to detect from our vantage point due to their unique orbital path, mirroring that of Venus around the Sun. Over recent years, scientists have only identified around 20 of these asteroids. However, new research indicates that there may be a much larger, yet unseen population that could pose a threat to Earth. This emerging evidence calls for a re-evaluation of our asteroid detection and planetary defense strategies. Hard to Detect Asteroids The asteroids orbiting in sync with Venus, classified as Potentially Hazardous Asteroids (PHAs), pose a significant challenge to astronomers. These asteroids are characterized by their size, at least 460 feet in diameter, and their potential proximity to Earth, coming within 4.6 million miles of our planet's orbit. The challenge lies in whether these asteroids truly threaten Earth. Current detection methods are limited by short observation windows and the Sun's glare, making these asteroids particularly elusive. Adding to the complexity is the concept of 'Lyapunov time,' which refers to the period after which an asteroid's orbit becomes chaotic and unpredictable. For Venus co-orbitals, this time is approximately 150 years. While scientists can track their paths for a while, the longer-term behavior remains uncertain. This unpredictability complicates efforts to determine if any of these asteroids might have a close encounter or collision with Earth in the future. 'The Oldest Algebra Problem Solved': Australian Mathematician Cracks Ancient Mystery That Baffled Minds for Over 4,000 Years 36,000-Year Orbital Simulations To evaluate the threat posed by these asteroids, researchers have conducted extensive 36,000-year orbital simulations. The simulations revealed a substantial population of potential co-orbitals capable of approaching or even colliding with Earth. The study highlights asteroids with eccentricities below 0.38 as particularly concerning, as these orbits could lead to close encounters with our planet. Understanding eccentricity is crucial here—it measures how elongated an asteroid's orbit is. An orbit with an eccentricity of 0 is perfectly circular, while higher numbers indicate more elliptical paths. The findings underscore the need for enhanced detection capabilities. The upcoming Vera Rubin Observatory, with its powerful camera, promises to improve our ability to spot these elusive objects. Yet, even this advanced technology might not cover the entire population. A more comprehensive solution may involve deploying a space-based observatory or a constellation of spacecraft near Venus. 'Dark Energy Just Got Stranger': Groundbreaking Discovery Shakes the Foundations of How We Understand the Entire Universe Potential Solutions and Future Steps NASA has already initiated planetary defense measures, such as the successful DART asteroid mission, to prepare for potential asteroid impacts. This mission aims to prevent catastrophic events similar to the one that led to the dinosaurs' extinction. However, accurately predicting the paths of Venus co-orbitals is essential for any successful deflection or mitigation efforts. The study on these asteroids has been shared on the pre-print server and submitted for publication in the journal Astronomy and Astrophysics. As the scientific community continues to evaluate these findings, the need for international collaboration in monitoring and potentially mitigating these threats becomes increasingly clear. The potential risk these asteroids pose underscores the importance of advancing our understanding and technology to safeguard our planet. 'I'm Almost Certain There Are Inhabited Planets': Astrophysicist Drops Chilling Statement That Shakes Our Place in the Universe Venus: Earth's Enigmatic Twin Despite its similar size and proximity to Earth, Venus remains a planet full of mysteries. Its hostile environment, with extreme temperatures and pressures, makes it an unlikely candidate for human exploration. Yet, it continues to capture the imagination of scientists and researchers worldwide. The discovery of Venus co-orbitals adds another layer of intrigue to our understanding of the planet and its potential impact on Earth. As scientists work to uncover more about these asteroids, the need for sophisticated detection methods and international cooperation becomes evident. The secrets Venus holds may one day prove vital to our survival. As we look to the future, we must ask ourselves: How can we best utilize our growing astronomical capabilities to protect Earth from these celestial threats? Our author used artificial intelligence to enhance this article. Did you like it? 4.6/5 (25)
France 24
2 days ago
- France 24
Japanese company abandons Moon landing mission after losing contact with spacecraft
Japan 's hopes of achieving its first soft touchdown on the Moon by a private company were dashed Friday when the mission was aborted after an assumed crash-landing, the startup said. Tokyo-based ispace had hoped to make history as only the third private firm -- and the first outside the United States -- to achieve a controlled arrival on the lunar surface. But "based on the currently available data... it is currently assumed that the lander likely performed a hard landing", the startup said. "It is unlikely that communication with the lander will be restored" so "it has been decided to conclude the mission", ispace said in a statement. The failure comes two years after a prior mission ended in a crash. The company's unmanned Resilience spacecraft began its daunting final descent and "successfully fired its main engine as planned to begin deceleration", ispace said Friday. Mission control confirmed that the lander's positioning was "nearly vertical" -- but contact was then lost, with the mood on a livestream from mission control turning sombre. Technical problems meant "the lander was unable to decelerate sufficiently to reach the required speed for the planned lunar landing", ispace said. High-profile payloads To date, only five nations have achieved soft lunar landings: the Soviet Union, the United States, China, India, and most recently Japan. Now, private companies are joining the race, promising cheaper and more frequent access to space. On board the Resilience lander were several high-profile payloads. They included Tenacious, a Luxembourg -built micro rover; a water electrolyser to split molecules into hydrogen and oxygen; a food production experiment; and a deep-space radiation probe. The rover also carried "Moonhouse" -- a small model home designed by Swedish artist Mikael Genberg. "I take the fact that the second attempt failed to land seriously," CEO Takeshi Hakamada told reporters. "But the most important thing is to use this result" for future missions, he said, describing a "strong will to move on, although we have to carefully analyse what happened". Last year, Houston-based Intuitive Machines became the first private enterprise to reach the Moon. Though its uncrewed lander touched down at an awkward angle, it still managed to complete tests and transmit photos. Then in March this year, Firefly Aerospace's Blue Ghost -- launched on the same SpaceX rocket as ispace's Resilience -- aced its lunar landing attempt. Never quit The mood ahead of Friday's attempt had been celebratory, with a watch party also held by ispace's US branch in Washington. After contact was lost, announcers on an ispace livestream signed off with the message: "Never quit the lunar quest." The mission had also aimed to collect two lunar soil samples and sell them to NASA for $5,000. Though the samples would remain on the Moon, the symbolic transaction is meant to strengthen the US stance that commercial activity -- though not sovereign claims -- should be allowed on celestial bodies. Landing on the Moon is highly challenging as spacecraft must rely on precisely controlled thruster burning to slow their descent over treacherous terrain. Intuitive Machines' second attempt at a Moon landing ended in disappointment in late March. Its spacecraft Athena, designed to touch down on a spot called the Mons Mouton plateau -- closer to the lunar south pole than any previous mission -- tipped over and was unable to recharge its solar-powered batteries.
France 24
2 days ago
- France 24
The promise and peril of a crewed Mars mission
That political momentum, coupled with SpaceX chief Elon Musk's zeal, has breathed new life into a cause long championed by Red Planet advocates -- even as major obstacles remain, including Trump and Musk's latest feud. Why go? As NASA writes in its Moon to Mars blueprint, "exploration of the cosmos remains a great calling for humanity." A mission to Mars would pursue scientific objectives like determining whether Mars ever hosted life and charting the evolution of its surface, as well as answering broader space physics questions -- such as the history of the Sun through studying Martian soil. Geopolitics also looms large, as Trump has pledged to "plant the American flag on the planet Mars and even far beyond," invoking the "unlimited promise of the American dream." Critics, however, say cuts to NASA's science budget and the cancellation of key projects -- including the return of rock samples collected by the Perseverance rover -- are undermining the research mission. "The purpose of exploration is not just to go somewhere," Nobel-winning astrophysicist John Mather told AFP. "This is not a tourist thing. This is a fundamental knowledge thing." - Getting there - Musk is betting SpaceX's future on Starship, the largest rocket ever built, despite fiery failures in its nine test flights. He's aiming for an uncrewed launch by late 2026, timed with the next favorable Earth-Mars alignment. But the timeline is widely seen as optimistic: Starship has yet to land its upper stage or demonstrate in-orbit refueling -- both essential for deep space travel. Some experts believe the system is fundamentally sound, while others say it's too soon to judge. "A lot of the pertinent and relevant technical information... is not known to us," Kurt Polzin, chief engineer for NASA's space nuclear propulsion project, told AFP. He backs Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (NTP), which uses fission to heat hydrogen and generate thrust. NTP delivers "a lot of power in a very small package," Polzin said, eliminating the need for orbital refueling or fuel production on Mars. Astronauts would spend seven to nine months in a cramped spacecraft, exposed to intense space radiation beyond Earth's magnetosphere. Ideas to improve radiation shielding range from passive methods, like using dense materials, to active concepts such as plasma fields that deflect radiation, while drugs are being developed to reduce cell damage. Without a system to simulate gravity -- such as rotational spin -- crews would also need grueling exercise routines to counteract muscle and bone loss. Mental health is another concern. Growing plants aboard -- more for morale than sustenance -- has proved beneficial on the ISS. Communication delays further complicate matters. On the station, real-time data has helped prevent an average of 1.7 potentially fatal incidents per year, said Erik Antonsen, chair of NASA's human systems risk board -- but such communication will not be possible en route to Mars. Life on Mars Once on the surface, the uncertainties grow. Probes and rovers have found hints -- organic molecules, seasonal methane -- but no definitive signs of life. If it ever existed, it likely died out long ago. Still, Earth's own "extremophiles" offer intriguing clues -- from fungi that harness Chernobyl's radiation for energy, to microbes that survived 500,000 years in frozen stasis. "If they can survive here in extreme environments, we have every reason to suspect they can be on Mars," said NASA astrobiologist Jennifer Eigenbrode at the recent Humans to the Moon and Mars Summit. And while NASA has decided nuclear fission will power surface operations, other choices -- from crop selection to habitat design -- remain open. "Mars has a 24-hour, 39-minute day -- that small difference creates strain, increases stress, and reduces sleep quality," said Phnam Bagley, a space architect who designs for comfort and crew well-being -- critical factors in preventing conflict. The first trip would be around 500 days on the surface, but long-term colonization raises deeper questions. For instance, scientists don't yet know whether mammalian embryos can develop in low gravity -- or what childbirth on Mars would entail. "I think it's really important to take that seriously," said NASA's Antonsen.
