Kerala govt. plans law to allow regulated culling of wild animals endangering human lives and raiding crop lands
It tasked the Principal Secretary, Forests, to work with the Principal Secretary, Law, to submit proposals for the draft Bill.
As a stopgap, the Cabinet extended an order designating heads of local self-government institutions (LSGIs) or their deputies as honorary chief wildlife wardens to enlist empanelled shooters with licensed firearms to cull marauding wild boars and dispose of their carcasses in the presence of wildlife enforcers and independent government witnesses.
After the Cabinet meeting, Forest Minister A.K. Saseendran told reporters that the government sought the Advocate General's opinion on whether the proposed law would conflict with the Indian Wildlife Act, 1972.
Simultaneously, the government would seek the Centre's permission to declare wild boars as vermin and lift the conservation protection given to the species under Schedule III of the Act in the farmers' interest.
The ruling Left Democratic Front (LDF) had flagged mitigating the wild boar menace as a political imperative ahead of the 2025 local body polls and the Assembly elections 2026.
The administration has faced repeated criticism from Church-backed settler farmer communities, a significant electoral bloc, for allegedly not doing enough to mitigate human-wildlife conflicts, including those involving wild elephants, leopards, tigers, and monkeys.
Human-wildlife conflict deaths have turned into public ire against the government and a rallying cry for the opposition to muster popular opinion against the ruling front during the crucial run-up to the local body and Assembly polls. It's a central talking point for the opposition in the Nilambur Assembly by-election campaign.
Wild boars have emerged as an existential threat to settler farmers, a politically animating issue for the community in at least 11 districts with significant forest cover. The wild boar threat spans 243 panchayats spread across 54 Assembly constituencies in the State.
The menace has almost cratered the rural economy. Farmers have left large swathes of land used for pineapple, tapioca, and other tubers to lie fallow, untended and overgrown.
Recently, small-scale rubber cultivators have found that wild boars have developed a taste for the bark of young trees, making replanting difficult. The wild animals also posed a threat to cardamom and coffee plantations.
Moreover, wild boars have attacked humans, including schoolchildren, two-wheeler riders, pedestrians, and early-morning walkers. They have trespassed into houses, causing panic.
According to government estimates, the wildlife menace has resulted in crop losses of an estimated 9,000 hectares of farmland in the State since 2020. The dearth of licensed shooters and the reluctance of certain local bodies to compensate those involved in wild boar culling operations have impeded the effective eradication of the menace.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
15 minutes ago
- Mint
Nimisha Priya case: Viral post seeks donation to save Kerala nurse on death row in Yemen, MEA calls it FAKE
The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) has dismissed the viral post seeking donations to save Nimisha Priya, the Kerala nurse on death row in Yemen and said it was 'fake'. 'We have seen claims being made on social media seeking monetary contributions into a GoI designated bank account in the Nimisha Priya case,' MEA addressed the viral post, and said, 'This is a fake claim.' This comes after evangelist and founder of Global Peace Initiative Dr KA Paul sought donations to save Nimisha in a 'Government of India account'. He said they require ₹ 8.3 crore. The nurse, hailing from Kollengode in Kerala's Palakkad district, has been found guilty of murdering a Yemeni citizen in July 2017. The 38-year-old Indian national's execution was scheduled for July 16, but it was postponed following intervention of Indian officials. She is currently lodged in a jail in Sana'a, the Yemeni capital city that is under the control of Iran-backed Houthis. On August 14, the Supreme Court was informed that there was 'no immediate threat' to Nimisha. 'Negotiations are going on. As of now there is no immediate threat. Kindly adjourn it by four weeks. Hopefully, everything will be over by that time,' the counsel for petitioner organisation Save Nimisha Priya International Action Council said. The petitioner's counsel had earlier told the apex court that payment of blood money to the family of the deceased, which is permissible under the Sharia law, could be explored. He said the victim's family might pardon Priya if blood money was paid. Reportedly, India doesn't have any diplomatic presence in Yemen, and diplomats in the Indian mission in Saudi Arabia were looking into the matter. Recently, some reports claimed that her death sentence has been revoked and an agreement has been reached for her release. However, MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said they were fake. 'Such reports are incorrect. This is a sensitive matter and we urge all sides to stay away from misinformation,' he said. In 2020, a Yemeni court handed her the death sentence and the country's Supreme Judicial Council dismissed her appeal in November 2023. On July 17, India said it was in touch with Yemeni authorities as well as certain friendly nations as part of efforts to reach a "mutually agreeable solution" in the case. According to Yemeni court documents, Priya allegedly drugged and murdered Talal Abdo Mahdi in July 2017.
Hindustan Times
15 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
‘It is fake': MEA on drive to raise ₹8.3 crore for Nimisha Priya using govt's name
The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) has flagged a fake claim circulating on social media regarding 'donations' to save Kerala nurse Nimisha Priya, who is on death row in Yemen. On X on Tuesday, the fact check unit of the ministry dismissed the claim and said there was no government-affiliated donation campaign for the Indian nurse. Kerala nurse Nimisha Priya is on death row in Yemen for killing her Yemeni business partner Talal Abdo Mahdi.(File Pic) "We have seen claims being made on social media seeking monetary contributions into a GoI designated bank account in the Nimisha Priya case. This is a fake claim," said MEA. Also Read | No immediate threat to Nimisha Priya in Yemen, negotiations underway, SC told The post in question was made by a blue-tick X account of evangelist KA Paul. In the X post, the account says: 'Donate directly to Save Nimisha to the Government of India account designate. We need 8.3 crore rupees.' In July, the evangelist made a video appeal to the Houthi administration. The video, which was made from Sana'a, also featured Nimisha Priya's 13-year-old daughter Mishel and her husband Thomas. Indian nurse Nimisha Priya has been on death row in Yemen since 2020. The Kerala-based nurse has been accused of murdering a Yemeni citizen in July 2017. The 38-year-old Indian woman's execution was scheduled for July 16, but it was postponed following the intervention of Indian officials. Nimisha Priya is currently lodged in a jail in Sana'a, the Yemeni capital which is under the control of Iran-backed Houthis. Earlier this month, the Ministry of External Affairs said it was in touch with friendly governments as it continues to provide assistance in the case. "We continue to closely follow the matter and render all possible assistance. We are also in touch with some friendly governments on the issue," MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal was quoted as saying during a weekly media briefing.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Supreme Court dismisses NCPCR challenge to HC order upholding validity of minor Muslim girl's marriage under personal law
The Supreme Court on Tuesday (August 19, 2025) dismissed a petition filed by the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) challenging a 2022 judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court which held that, under Muslim personal law, a girl who had attained puberty or is aged 15 years and above could marry, notwithstanding the provisions of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012. The High Court had also extended protection to the couple against threats to their life and liberty. A Bench of Justices B.V. Nagarathna and R. Mahadevan ruled that the Commission lacked the locus standi to assail the High Court's order. 'We fail to see how the NCPCR can be aggrieved by such an order. If the High Court, in exercise of its writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution, extends protection to two individuals, it is strange that the NCPCR should contest it,' Justice Nagarathna remarked. Editorial | Protection against misuse: on POCSO Act, adolescent sex The counsel representing the Commission argued that the challenge was confined to the legal issue of whether minor girls could marry under personal or customary laws when such marriages are criminalised under statutory law. While Muslim personal law recognises the capacity of a girl to enter into a marriage contract on attaining puberty, criminal statutes in India bar the marriage of girls below 18 years and criminalise sexual relations with minors. 'No question of law arises here, as the relief sought has already been granted. Raise it in an appropriate case,' Justice Nagarathna told the Commission. In October 2022, the Supreme Court had issued notice on the NCPCR's plea to examine the question of law but declined to interfere with the relief granted to the couple. The High Court's ruling had stemmed from a petition by a Pathankot-based Muslim couple, who had married under Muslim rites and sought protection from their families. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the NCPCR, had urged a stay on the High Court's observations, terming it a 'serious issue' in view of the statutory prohibition of child marriages. In January 2023, a Bench led by then Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud, while hearing an NCPCR petition against a similar High Court ruling, had clarified that such a decision would not constitute binding precedent. The NCPCR had argued that secular laws such as the POCSO Act and the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006, must prevail over personal or customary practices. 'Harsh realities' During the proceedings, Justice B.V. Nagarathna underscored that Courts must take into account the 'harsh societal realities' while adjudicating upon cases involving consensual adolescent relationships. 'In genuine romantic cases, where young people like each other and wish to get married, should such cases be equated with other serious criminal offences? It is important to keep social realities in mind. Nowadays, students study together in co-educational institutions. Is it a crime to fall in love?' she remarked. The Judge also drew attention to the emotional distress suffered by young girls when forcibly separated from their partners. 'In such situations, parents often file frivolous POCSO cases to protect their reputation, as they do not wish to disclose that their daughter has eloped. This is a harsh reality of society,' she said. The Union Government has opposed before the Supreme Court any move to lower the age of consent under child protection laws from 18 to 16 years, cautioning that such a step would 'open the floodgates' to trafficking and other forms of child abuse under the guise of consent. However, Supreme Court-appointed amicus curiae and senior advocate Indira Jaising has argued that consensual sexual acts by teenagers in voluntary relationships cannot be classified as 'abuse' or prosecuted as a crime. The written submissions filed by Ms. Jaising form part of a petition instituted by advocate Nipun Saxena in 2012.
