Tesla's long-awaited robotaxi rollout faced bumps in the road
Good morning. An American moved to France expecting the workplace dynamics to resemble those back home — they were wrong. For one, they had grown used to friendly yet professional office interactions with clear boundaries. Paris was different, they said. Workplace relationships felt far more personal.
In today's big story, Tesla's long-awaited robotaxis were rolled out in Austin.
What's on deck
Markets: From interviewing past midnight to scrambling to sign an offer, a PE professional shared his stressful on-cycle recruitment experience.
Business: Homebuyers can't afford to ignore the fight between Zillow and Compass anymore.
But first, there's a driver who won't judge your playlist.
If this was forwarded to you, sign up here.
The big story
Tesla's $4.20 robotaxi ride
Joel Angel Juarez/REUTERS
There were some bumps in the road. After a decade of waiting, Tesla launched a limited self-driving car service in Austin.
The first Tesla robotaxi rides were available on Sunday to a small group of invited users for a flat fee of $4.20 (surely not a coincidence). For now, the service is geofenced to avoid Austin's more challenging intersections.
The cars came with a passenger already buckled in — a Tesla employee as a safety precaution. In footage seen by BI, there appeared to be no significant intervention from the supervisor.
The vehicles did several things right, but the rollout wasn't without its hiccups. One video showed a passenger being driven across double yellow lines into the wrong lane, prompting a car behind to honk at it. During the same ride, the robotaxi also exceeded the 35-mph speed limit on multiple occasions.
While the rollout used the current Tesla Model Y, sources told BI the company is building a modified version of the car for its robotaxi fleet. The project, internally referred to as "Halo," involves cars with self-cleaning cameras and extra protection for the cameras to prevent damage and debris, one insider said.
The rollout came at a turbulent time for Musk.
At the end of March, Tesla capped its worst quarter since 2022 amid protests at its showrooms. Then, earlier this month, Tesla stock plummeted more than 14% following a very embittered, very public falling out between Elon Musk and US President Donald Trump.
Competition is also fierce. Waymo has such cabs in several cities, including Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Austin. They don't require human supervisors to be present, and their service range in Austin is about twice the size of Tesla's current operating limits.
Their technology differs, too. Tesla relies on a set of cameras mounted on its vehicles, rather than expensive radar and lidar sensors used by Waymo. This is in part why Musk expects Tesla's purpose-built Cybercab to sell for less than $30,000. Waymo, meanwhile, retrofits existing vehicles with its technology, which can result in a list price as high as $70,000.
Although the robotaxi arrived years later than promised, Tesla's rollout was a critical step for Musk's ambitions to make an Uber-like network of autonomous vehicles. The company's stock price leapt 8% when the markets opened on Monday, causing Musk's net worth to jump by $19 billion.
3 things in markets
1. Inside private equity's recruiting nightmare. The industry's process for hiring junior talent is notoriously competitive and chaotic. One PE professional shared his recruiting experience with BI, detailing how he interviewed until 2:30 a.m. with one firm and hid in the bathroom to call headhunters during interviews with another.
2. More Fed officials are calling for rate cuts. Three top officials appear to be on the same page as President Donald Trump after the Fed decided to hold interest rates steady last week. Fed Chairman Jerome Powell defended the central bank's patient approach in his testimony to Congress on Tuesday. Here's what the Fed officials are saying.
3. Tariff worries could soon make a comeback. July 9 is the end of the 90-day pause on Trump's tariffs. Markets are in relief mode now over Israel and Iran's ceasefire, but Morgan Stanley laid out three reasons why tariff anxiety could take center stage again.
3 things in tech
1. How AI data centers are deepening the water crisis. Large AI data centers each guzzle up millions of gallons of fresh water a day — enough for tens of thousands of Americans. Despite drought deepening, a BI investigation found that Big Tech companies have put nearly half of these centers in the most water-stressed areas of the US.
2. Why does Apple keep pulling its ads? The iPhone maker used to be infamous for its ad campaigns, but now Apple is becoming more known for yanking them. Its latest ad vanished from YouTube and Apple's site a few days ago, and BI's Peter Kafka doesn't get why.
3. What we know about the mystery device from OpenAI and Jony Ive. Or rather, what it won't be. Tang Tan, cofounder of Ive's io, revealed in legal filings that the highly anticipated AI device doesn't go in your ear and isn't a wearable.
3 things in business
1. Homebuyers are caught in the middle of an ugly real-estate fistfight. Compass and Zillow have been trading blows over who gets to see the houses for sale in America and where buyers will have to go to find them. Everyday consumers can't afford to ignore it anymore, writes BI's James Rodriguez.
2. The vibes are rank in HR right now. Nonstop layoffs, RTO mandates, AI training demands, not to mention concerns over immigration raids in the workplace — it's all piling up on HR workers. They told BI about the parts of the job that are getting downright ugly.
3. Disney's tough June. The company laid off workers for the second time this month, this time in product and technology. The layoffs affected under 2% of the group, according to a person with direct knowledge.
In other news
Tech stocks power Nasdaq 100 to a record high as markets celebrate the Israel-Iran ceasefire.
Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sánchez's wedding guest list: A-listers arrive in Italy to celebrate.
Bombings set back Iran's nuclear program, but likely didn't kill it.
Logan Paul's Prime sales plummet in a key market as the once-popular drink has growing pains.
Chase Sapphire Reserve's changes are making some people furious. I'm finally vindicated.
The American dream used to be owning a home — now it's just finding one to rent.
The massive heat wave, stretching from Maine to Texas, is slowing commuters down and making their waits miserable.
Gamers are loving Nintendo's Switch 2 — and investors are loving the stock.
Meet 19 startups in social networking, dating, and AI that investors have their eyes on.
Buy now, pay later loans will soon hit credit scores — and experts think Gen Z could be at risk.
The price of your regular Starbucks order could be about to change — if you load up on add-ons like syrups or matcha.
What's happening today
Fed Chair Jerome Powell presents semiannual monetary policy report to the Senate Banking Committee.
Dan DeFrancesco, deputy editor and anchor, in New York (on parental leave). Hallam Bullock, senior editor, in London. Meghan Morris, bureau chief, in Singapore. Grace Lett, editor, in Chicago. Amanda Yen, associate editor, in New York. Lisa Ryan, executive editor, in New York. Akin Oyedele, deputy editor, in New York. Ella Hopkins, associate editor, in London.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
38 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Bipartisan bill seeks to ban Chinese AI from federal agencies, as US vows to win the AI race
Advertisement The ever-tighter race is now a central part of the US-China rivalry. And so much is at stake that the US must win, witnesses told the congressional panel. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The two countries are 'in a long-term techno-security competition that will determine the shape of the global political order for the coming years,' said Thomas Mahnken, president and CEO of the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. Jack Clark, co-founder and head of policy at Anthropic, told the committee that AI has built-in values. 'I know that AI systems are a reflection of the societies that are built from. AI built in democracies will lead to better technology for all of humanity. AI built in authoritarian nations will... be inescapably intertwined and imbued with authoritarianism,' Clark said. 'We must take decisive action to ensure America prevails.' Advertisement Earlier this year, Chris Lehane, OpenAI's head of global affairs, told reporters in Paris that the US and China were the only two countries in the world that could build AI at scale. The competition, which he described as one between democratic AI and autocratic AI, is 'very real and very serious,' and the stakes are 'enormous,' he said, for 'the global rails of AI will be built by one of those two countries.' The 2025 AI Index Report by Stanford University's Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence center has the US in the lead in producing top AI models. But the report notes China is rapidly closing the performance gap, reaching near parity in 2024 on several major benchmarks. It also shows that China leads in AI publications and patents. At the hearing, Clark urged the lawmakers to maintain and strengthen export controls of advanced chips to China. 'This competition fundamentally runs on compute,' he said. The US must control the flow of powerful chips to China, Clark said, 'or else you're giving them the tools they will need to build powerful AI to harm American interests.' Mark Beall, Jr., president of government affairs at The AI Policy Network, said there are 'a number of very glaring gaps' in the US export controls that have allowed China to obtain controlled chips. Lawmakers earlier this year introduced a bill to track such chips to ensure they would not be diverted to the wrong hands. In another legislative step, Republican and Democratic lawmakers in both the House and the Senate on Wednesday introduced a bill to ban Chinese AI systems in the federal government. Advertisement 'The US must draw a hard line: hostile AI systems have no business operating inside our government,' Moolenaar said. The No Adversarial AI Act, as proposed, seeks to identify AI systems developed by foreign adversaries and ban their use in the US government, with exceptions for use in research and counter terrorism.
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Bipartisan bill seeks to ban Chinese AI from federal agencies, as U.S. vows to win the AI race
WASHINGTON (AP) — A bipartisan group of lawmakers on Wednesday vowed to keep Chinese artificial intelligence systems out of federal agencies while pledging to ensure the U.S. will prevail against China in the global AI competition. 'We are in a new Cold War, and AI is the strategic technology at the center,' Rep. John Moolenaar, the Republican chair of the House Select Committee on China, said as he opened a hearing on the matter. 'The future balance of power may very well be determined by who leads in AI.' The hearing on Capitol Hill comes about five months after a Chinese technology start-up called DeekSeek introduced an AI model that rivaled platforms from OpenAI and Google in performance, but cost only a fraction to build. This raised concerns that China was catching up to U.S. despite restrictions on chips and other key technologies used to develop AI. The ever-tighter race is now a central part of the U.S.-China rivalry. And so much is at stake that the U.S. must win, witnesses told the congressional panel. The two countries are 'in a long-term techno-security competition that will determine the shape of the global political order for the coming years,' said Thomas Mahnken, president and CEO of the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. Jack Clark, co-founder and head of policy at Anthropic, told the committee that AI has built-in values. 'I know that AI systems are a reflection of the societies that are built from. AI built in democracies will lead to better technology for all of humanity. AI built in authoritarian nations will... be inescapably intertwined and imbued with authoritarianism,' Clark said. 'We must take decisive action to ensure America prevails.' Earlier this year, Chris Lehane, OpenAI's head of global affairs, told reporters in Paris that the U.S. and China were the only two countries in the world that could build AI at scale. The competition, which he described as one between democratic AI and autocratic AI, is 'very real and very serious,' and the stakes are 'enormous,' he said, for 'the global rails of AI will be built by one of those two countries.' The 2025 AI Index Report by Stanford University's Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence center has the U.S. in the lead in producing top AI models. But the report notes China is rapidly closing the performance gap, reaching near parity in 2024 on several major benchmarks. It also shows that China leads in AI publications and patents. At the hearing, Clark urged the lawmakers to maintain and strengthen export controls of advanced chips to China. 'This competition fundamentally runs on compute,' he said. The U.S. must control the flow of powerful chips to China, Clark said, 'or else you're giving them the tools they will need to build powerful AI to harm American interests.' Mark Beall, Jr., president of government affairs at The AI Policy Network, said there are 'a number of very glaring gaps' in the U.S. export controls that have allowed China to obtain controlled chips. Lawmakers earlier this year introduced a bill to track such chips to ensure they would not be diverted to the wrong hands. In another legislative step, Republican and Democratic lawmakers in both the House and the Senate on Wednesday introduced a bill to ban Chinese AI systems in the federal government. 'The U.S. must draw a hard line: hostile AI systems have no business operating inside our government,' Moolenaar said. The No Adversarial AI Act, as proposed, seeks to identify AI systems developed by foreign adversaries and ban their use in the U.S. government, with exceptions for use in research and counter terrorism. Didi Tang, The Associated Press Sign in to access your portfolio
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
I shopped at Walmart and Target to compare their Pride Month collections. They weren't easy to find.
I shopped at Walmart and Target to compare their Pride Month collections of LGBTQ+-themed items. The Walmart I visited had a few rainbow pajama sets. Target's Pride collection was more extensive. Both retailers appear to be keeping most of their Pride merchandise online amid political pressure. Pride Month looks different this year. When I set out to compare Pride Month collections at Walmart and Target in June, I expected to see aisles full of rainbows and apparel with snappy slogans as I'd seen in previous years. Instead, I found that both retailers kept much of their LGBTQ+-themed items online instead of on shelves. The limited offerings at the stores I visited in Wisconsin could simply be due to differences in inventory across different locations. It could also be part of the brands' broader efforts to avoid right-wing backlash while still catering to customers who celebrate Pride Month. In 2023, Target said it was reducing its Pride collections due to "threats impacting our team members' sense of safety and well-being" from anti-LGBTQ protesters, and in 2024, it said only half its stores would carry Pride items. This year, it told BI it is "absolutely dedicated to fostering inclusivity" with its Pride collection. Walmart's chief marketing officer, on the other hand, said in 2023 that it hadn't received threats related to its line and didn't plan to pull any items, although it did remove some LGBTQ+ merchandise from its website in 2024. A Walmart spokesperson told BI that roughly the same number of stores are carrying Pride merchandise this year. As some corporations scale back their Pride Month offerings amid political pressure, I was curious to see what kind of themed merchandise Target and Walmart might offer this year. Here's what I found during my shopping trips at the two retailers. My first stop was a Walmart Supercenter in Saukville, Wisconsin, to check out its Pride merchandise. The Walmart Supercenter spans 122,000 square feet. I started in the seasonal aisle, but the store had already moved on to the Fourth of July. The seasonal aisle was full of American flags, barbecue accessories, and red, white, and blue decor — no rainbows. There wasn't a designated Pride section in the store, but I found some Pride apparel in the pajama aisle. A pajama set with rainbows and the words "Love" and "Be you" retailed for $16.98. The rainbow pajama sets were the only Pride items I found in-store. A Walmart employee told me she hadn't seen much Pride merchandise in the store and that I'd have better luck shopping online. Next, I visited a Target store in the neighboring town of Grafton, Wisconsin. This Target store was about 5.5 miles from the Walmart store I visited. At 104,000 square feet, the suburban Target location is much larger than the small-format Target stores found in larger cities. The Pride section was located at the back of the store near the fitting rooms in the women's clothing section. The Pride display was marked with a rainbow Target logo, but it took me a few laps around the store to locate. Target's Pride collection included a mix of clothes, accessories, home decor, and other knickknacks. A black polo featured hearts in colors representing the trans flag as well as the rainbow colors of the Pride flag. The all-gender shirt retailed for $24. A 14-inch square rainbow pillow added a pop of color to the shelves. Pride-themed teacups featured rainbow handles. The teacup and saucer sets were priced at $8. A dog toy in the Pride collection had the words "proud pup" in rainbow letters. There was also a rainbow journal printed with the words "Love first." The journal was priced at $10. While Target's in-store Pride collection was larger than Walmart's, Target's website also offered a more extensive selection of items. Target's website had even more Pride apparel, jewelry, home goods, and accessories than I saw stocked on the shelves. A QR code in the Pride display directed customers to "discover more" of the collection online. Both companies kept much of their Pride collections out of stores. I could have saved myself a trip and shopped online. It's possible that other Target and Walmart locations feature more robust sections for Pride Month. A Walmart spokesperson told BI that inventory varies by store and that there has been no effort to move more Pride merchandise online. A Target spokesperson told BI, "We are absolutely dedicated to fostering inclusivity for everyone — our team members, our guests, our supply partners, and the more than 2,000 communities we're proud to serve. As we have for many years, we will continue to mark Pride Month by offering an assortment of celebratory products, hosting internal programming to support our incredible team and sponsoring local events in neighborhoods across the country." It's also worth noting that this year's Pride Month arrives on the heels of both companies rolling back their diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives following President Donald Trump's executive order to end diversity programs across the federal government. This change has led some shoppers to boycott the brands. As corporations grapple with how to approach Pride amid political, legal, and cultural shifts, it appears that retailers like Target and Walmart want to have their cake and eat it too. They still sell Pride Month collections to cater to customers on the left, but keep them largely out of sight to avoid angering customers on the right. As Business Insider's Dominick Reuter wrote, this approach risks backlash from both sides.
