
Diljit Dosanjh's new film is a global success. Why can't Indians watch it?
'Sardaar Ji 3', the latest horror-comedy by Dosanjh, one of Asia's most bankable artists, has been shattering records abroad. But, in his own home country, India, the film has not been released and remains out of bounds for more than one billion people.
Dosanjh and his latest film – released globally on June 27 – have been marred by a political and cultural controversy over the nationality of his film's co-star, Hania Amir, a Pakistani actor.
Last year, Dosanjh sold out arenas in the US, Canada, and across Europe during his Dil-Luminati world tour. He became the first Indian artist to perform at the Coachella festival in California and, more recently, walked down the Met Gala carpet in an iconic turban. Dosanjh has also carved out a unique space for himself in Bollywood as both a crowd-puller and a critical favourite.
But at home, he is now facing calls for a boycott and the impounding of his passport. Film critics and political analysts, however, say this is part of a growing pattern of censorship and an attempt to restrict artistic freedom in India, to heed the nationalists' demands.
So, why is India blocking the work of one of its most successful artists?
Why is Dosanjh's latest film controversial?
Sardaar Ji 3, the third instalment of the popular horror-comedy franchise directed by Amar Hundal, stars a popular Punjabi pair – Dosanjh and Neeru Bajwa – in lead roles, alongside Pakistan's Hania Aamir.
Shortly after the film's production was wrapped in April this year, suspected rebels in Indian-administered Kashmir's resort town of Pahalgam killed 26 people, all but one of them tourists.
New Delhi immediately blamed Pakistan, which it said had supported the deadly 'terrorist attack', but Islamabad denied involvement. In the coming days, the two countries engaged in a four-day conflict, the most expansive between the nuclear-armed neighbours in decades.
When Dosanjh released the trailer for his upcoming film last month, the casting of Aamir took many by surprise – and prompted outrage.
Why has the Indian government blocked Sadaar Ji 3?
The film has not received certification from India's Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) and has not been released in Indian cinemas.
The Indian government also 'geoblocked' (restricted online access to) the film's trailer in India; however, the teaser and film's album, which do not include shots of Aamir, remain accessible.
Following the Kashmir attack in April, the Indian government swiftly brought in a series of digital crackdowns. This included blocking thousands of Pakistani social media handles on platforms like Instagram and X (formerly Twitter), including the accounts of celebrities such as Aamir, Fawad Khan and Mahira Khan.
The government, which is led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, also blocked access to the social media accounts of Pakistani journalists and news outlets in India.
The government then issued an advisory on May 8, directing all video platforms, streaming services and digital intermediaries to immediately remove Pakistani-origin entertainment content, including web series, films, songs, podcasts and other media.
In addition, the government banned 16 prominent Pakistani YouTube channels, including those of Geo News, ARY News, and Samaa TV, which collectively had more than 63 million subscribers, for allegedly spreading misinformation, provocative narratives, and content targeting India's armed forces and sovereignty.
Rahul Desai, a Mumbai-based film and TV critic, said blocking access to films over casting choices has become 'an excuse to antagonise Pakistan' under the current government.
'It's a vicious cycle because a lot of the cinema is informed by pro-establishment choices in India,' he told Al Jazeera.
'This has become a very neat medium for people to vent against Pakistan, just like cricket sometimes does.'
Today, the reality-based creative boundaries in India are neat, Desai said: 'Do not cast artists from the other side of the border, and a lot of filmmakers self-censor themselves.'
Are cross-border artistic collaborations common?
Yes, they are. Pakistani actors are not allowed to work in India, so shoots involving them have to be carried out abroad.
'Music departments of [Pakistan's] films used to contribute a lot to Indian cinema at least a decade or two ago in the 2000s,' said Desai. The release of the curated music show franchise, Coke Studio Pakistan, which had 15 seasons from 2008 to 2024, was almost 'like a cultural moment in India', he added.
But over the past two decades, there have been multiple instances of cross-border collaborations of artists, but they have faced boycotts and anger on both sides of the border due to political tensions between the South Asian neighbours.
For the Punjabi film and music industries, the situation is even more complex.
The partition of British India, which resulted in the creation of Pakistan with borders drawn overnight, cuts through Punjab, and millions on each side share culture and linguistic ties.
Successful Punjabi franchises like Chal Mera Putt, known for its Pakistani cast, face uncertainty, especially the upcoming Chal Mera Putt 4, amid growing demands to avoid Pakistani involvement.
'There's obviously a lot of bullying involved by the establishment over casting Pakistani actors,' said Desai. 'There's a lot of banning and trolling involved. There's a lot of anxiety and tension associated with such choices.'
What do Indian film bodies say about Sadaar Ji 3?
Indian film associations, particularly the Federation of Western India Cine Employees (FWICE) and the All Indian Cine Workers Association (AICWA), have voiced strong objections to the casting of Aamir in Dosanjh's Sardaar Ji 3.
FWICE, headed by President BN Tiwari, labelled the collaboration a 'betrayal of the nation' and accused Dosanjh of 'disrespecting national sentiments and the sacrifices of Indian soldiers'. It demanded a complete ban on the film in India.
The body also issued appeals to India's CBFC to withhold certification for Sardaar Ji 3 and emphasised noncooperation with Pakistani artists.
AICWA echoed these sentiments, condemning the film's producers for prioritising Pakistani talent over Indian artists and calling for a widespread boycott of Dosanjh across the industry, including by music companies and event organisers.
Ashoke Pandit, the president of the Indian Film and Television Directors' Association, told a local newspaper: 'We are going to take action and tell the producers not to work with [Dosanjh].
'He should be fully boycotted in the country by music labels and the Punjabi film industry. Diljit is a compulsive Pakistani lover.'
However, Ira Bhaskar, a former CBFC Board member and retired professor of film studies at New Delhi's Jawaharlal Nehru University, said this episode is a reflection of the establishments of India and Pakistan, rather than pointing to a deeper divide between the people of the two countries.
'The Indian government [since Modi came to power] has not only understood the power of mass media, especially cinema, but is invested in taking control of the narratives that circulate in the public domain,' Bhaskar said.
What has Dosanjh said about the furore over Sadaar Ji 3?
Dosanjh told BBC Asian Network earlier this month: 'When this film was made, everything was fine.
'We shot it in February, and things were OK back then. After that, a lot of big things happened that were beyond our control,' the singer-actor said, referring to the Kashmir attack and the ensuing conflict.
'So the producers decided that the film obviously won't be released in India now, so they'll release it overseas. The producers have invested a lot of money, and when the film was being made, nothing like this was happening,' Dosanjh said.
How well has Sardaar Ji 3 done globally?
Dosanjh told the BBC that the film's producers were aware of the potential financial loss from pulling out of a territory like India, the world's most populous country. The previous film in the franchise – Sadaar Ji 2 – made nearly $3m at the box office in India.
Dosanjh has continued promoting his film on his social media handles, including sharing images from sold-out shows in Pakistan, where the movie has shattered records for Indian releases. Globally, the film has taken $7m at the box office, against a budget of $4m. In Pakistan, it is the highest-grossing Indian-made film in history, pulling in $1.4m so far.
In India, Desai, the critic, said 'censorship goes way beyond casting … It extends to the themes of the stories that people are allowed to tell now in India.'
Are any other of Dosanjh's works facing problems?
Yes. The release of Dosanjh's film, Panjab '95, directed by Honey Trehan in 2022, has stalled, primarily because of stringent demands from India's Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC), which has delayed its clearance since the project was submitted in December 2022.
The biographical drama about the life of human rights activist Jaswant Singh Khalra, who exposed 25,0000 extrajudicial killings and disappearances of Sikhs in Punjab during the 1980s and 1990s, was given 120 suggested cuts, including removing references to political figures, documented human rights abuses, and even the protagonist's name.
Trehan told Al Jazeera: 'The CBFC was established as an independent body, which could protect artists, so that the government should not influence the art … [but] the government is arm-twisting filmmakers and their films.'
Desai, the critic who watched Panjab '95 in a private screening, told Al Jazeera: 'It's such a well-made film that it might incite a sense of revolution among people today, especially people who are not happy with the establishment. So, we can see where a lot of the insecurity is coming from.'
Dosanjh and Trehan have publicly refused to accept the suggested cuts. And the film remains in limbo. Its scheduled premiere was pulled from the Toronto International Film Festival (TIFF) in 2023, and subsequent invitations from other international festivals were declined.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al Jazeera
2 days ago
- Al Jazeera
Why has an AI-altered Bollywood movie sparked uproar in India?
New Delhi, India – What if Michael had died instead of Sonny in The Godfather? Or if Rose had shared the debris plank, and Jack hadn't been left to freeze in the Atlantic in Titanic*? Eros International, one of India's largest production houses, with more than 4,000 films in its catalogue, has decided to explore this sort of what-if scenario. It has re-released one of its major hits, Raanjhanaa, a 2013 romantic drama, in cinemas – but has used artificial intelligence (AI) to change its tragic end, in which the male lead dies. In the AI-altered version, Kundan (played by popular actor Dhanush), a Hindu man who has a doomed romance with a Muslim woman, lives. But the film's director, Aanand L Rai, is furious. 'The idea that our work can be taken and modified by a machine, then dressed up as innovation, is deeply disrespectful,' Rai said, adding that the entire film crew had been kept in the dark about the re-release. 'What makes it worse is the complete ease and casualness with which it's been done,' said Rai. 'It is a reckless takeover that strips the work of its intent, its context, and its soul.' This is the first time a film studio has re-released a movie with AI alterations, anywhere in the world, and it has also caused an uproar among critics, filmmakers and film lovers. Here is what we know so far about why this move has been so controversial, and what the legal and ethical issues are. How has the film been altered? Eros International, a prominent film studio, has re-released a Tamil-dubbed version of the film, Raanjhanaa, titled Ambikapathy, with an alternate, AI-generated ending. This altered version, which significantly deviates from the original film's climax, screened at cinemas in Tamil Nadu, a southern Indian state, on August 1. At the end of the original movie, the lead male character, Kundan, lies dead, covered in bruises from his injuries, in a hospital with his lover sitting by his side, crying. In the AI-altered ending, however, Kundan does not die. Instead, he opens his eyes and starts to stand up. How have people reacted to the re-release? The release of the AI-altered version prompted immediate objections from the film's original creators. Dhanush, a Tamil actor, issued a statement noting that 'this alternate ending stripped the film of its soul' and that the re-release had 'completely disturbed' him. With its changed ending, Ranjhaanna is 'not the film I committed to 12 years ago', he said. The actor added that the use of AI to alter films 'is a deeply concerning precedent for both art and artists [that] threatens the integrity of storytelling and the legacy of cinema'. Rai, the director, shared a detailed note on Instagram condemning the move. 'Let me say this as clearly as I can: I do not support or endorse the AI-altered version … It is unauthorised. And whatever it claims to be, it is not the film we intended, or made.' 'This was never just a film to us. It was shaped by human hands, human flaws, and human feeling,' Rai added. 'To cloak a film's emotional legacy in a synthetic cape without consent is not a creative act. It's an abject betrayal of everything we built.' Richard Allen, professor of film and media art at City University of Hong Kong, said it seems inevitable that AI-altering will become a mainstream method of filmmaking in global film industries. 'If producers think they can make more money out of old content by using AI, they will do so,' Allen told Al Jazeera. Is AI-altering legal? Rai has said that he is investigating legal options to challenge the re-release of this movie. Eros International insists that its actions are perfectly legal, however, and has refused to retract the re-release. 'This re-release is not a replacement – it is a creative reinterpretation, clearly labelled and transparently positioned,' said Pradeep Dwivedi, chief executive of Eros International Media. Dwivedi noted that under Indian copyright law, the producer of a film (in this case, Eros International) is deemed its author and primary rights-holder, meaning that the production house is the first owner of copyright for the film. He said the film studio is 'the exclusive producer and copyright holder, holds full legal and moral rights' under Indian laws. He described the alternate ending to the movie as 'a new emotional lens to today's audiences'. The studio, which has released more than 4,000 movies globally, will 'embrace generative AI as the next frontier in responsible storytelling', Dwivedi said, adding that Eros International is 'uniquely positioned to bridge cinematic legacy with future-ready formats'. What about the ethics of this? Mayank Shekhar, an Indian film critic, said the real issue with AI-altering is one of ethics: doing it without the expressed consent of the creators – writer, director and actors – involved. 'What's left then is simply the legalese of who owns the copyright, or who paid for the product, and is hence the sole producer, and therefore the owner of the work,' Shekhar said. 'Technically, I suppose, or so it seems, what Eros has done isn't illegal – it's certainly unethical.' In his statement, Eros International's Dwivedi said that every era of cinema has faced the clash between 'Luddites and Progressives'. He added: 'When sound replaced silence, when colour replaced black-and-white, when digital challenged celluloid, and now, when AI meets narrative.' Dwivedi insisted that reimagining the movie's ending was not 'artificial storytelling,' but 'augmented storytelling, a wave of the future'. Has AI been used to alter films before? AI has not been used to alter the storyline of an existing movie by its own producers or crew for re-release before this. However, it has been used for post-production purposes in movies – such as voice dubbing or computer-generated imagery (CGI) enhancements. Its use was a flashpoint in Hollywood during the labour protests of 2023, which resulted in new guidelines for the use of the technology. In an interview, The Brutalist's Oscar-nominated editor, David Jancso, said that the production had used a Ukrainian software company, Respeecher, to make the lead actors, Adrien Brody and Felicity Jones, sound more 'authentic' when they spoke Hungarian in the film. Similarly, filmmaker David Fincher supervised a 4K restoration of his celebrated crime-thriller, 'Se7en' for its 30th anniversary this year, using AI to correct technical flaws in focus and colour. Ted Sarandos, Netflix's co-CEO, said last month that the company had used generative AI to produce visual effects for the first time on screen in its original series, El Eternauta, or The Eternaut. Netflix has also been exploring the use of trailers personalised for subscribers' user profiles. Reuters reported that Netflix had also tested AI to synchronise actors' lip movements with dubbed dialogue to 'improve the viewing experience', quoting company sources. Will AI alterations become the norm in cinema? Allen said the alteration to Raanjhanaa felt different from the way AI has been used to enhance movies in the past. 'There are so many things that AI doctoring might do to a movie,' he said. However, he added: 'We won't necessarily lose sight of the definitive version, unless newly released versions are mislabelled as restorations or original versions of the movies themselves, which goes back to the ethical frameworks.' Shekhar said: 'The larger issue is simply of regulation. AI is too new for laws to catch up yet. 'The fact is, a work of art ought to be protected from predators. And respected for its own worth, whether or not somebody likes the ending of a film!' An alternative ending to a film also needs to be plausible. In 2022, Titanic director James Cameron said he commissioned a forensic analysis, involving a hypothermia expert, that proved there would have been no way for both Jack and Rose to survive on that infamous floating door. Jack 'had to die', Cameron said then. And AI can't change that science.


Al Jazeera
19-07-2025
- Al Jazeera
Diljit Dosanjh's new film is a global success. Why can't Indians watch it?
New Delhi, India – In a career marked by chart-topping music and highly acclaimed performances, Punjabi actor Diljit Dosanjh is cruising towards yet another milestone on his list: Delivering the highest-grossing Punjabi film. 'Sardaar Ji 3', the latest horror-comedy by Dosanjh, one of Asia's most bankable artists, has been shattering records abroad. But, in his own home country, India, the film has not been released and remains out of bounds for more than one billion people. Dosanjh and his latest film – released globally on June 27 – have been marred by a political and cultural controversy over the nationality of his film's co-star, Hania Amir, a Pakistani actor. Last year, Dosanjh sold out arenas in the US, Canada, and across Europe during his Dil-Luminati world tour. He became the first Indian artist to perform at the Coachella festival in California and, more recently, walked down the Met Gala carpet in an iconic turban. Dosanjh has also carved out a unique space for himself in Bollywood as both a crowd-puller and a critical favourite. But at home, he is now facing calls for a boycott and the impounding of his passport. Film critics and political analysts, however, say this is part of a growing pattern of censorship and an attempt to restrict artistic freedom in India, to heed the nationalists' demands. So, why is India blocking the work of one of its most successful artists? Why is Dosanjh's latest film controversial? Sardaar Ji 3, the third instalment of the popular horror-comedy franchise directed by Amar Hundal, stars a popular Punjabi pair – Dosanjh and Neeru Bajwa – in lead roles, alongside Pakistan's Hania Aamir. Shortly after the film's production was wrapped in April this year, suspected rebels in Indian-administered Kashmir's resort town of Pahalgam killed 26 people, all but one of them tourists. New Delhi immediately blamed Pakistan, which it said had supported the deadly 'terrorist attack', but Islamabad denied involvement. In the coming days, the two countries engaged in a four-day conflict, the most expansive between the nuclear-armed neighbours in decades. When Dosanjh released the trailer for his upcoming film last month, the casting of Aamir took many by surprise – and prompted outrage. Why has the Indian government blocked Sadaar Ji 3? The film has not received certification from India's Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) and has not been released in Indian cinemas. The Indian government also 'geoblocked' (restricted online access to) the film's trailer in India; however, the teaser and film's album, which do not include shots of Aamir, remain accessible. Following the Kashmir attack in April, the Indian government swiftly brought in a series of digital crackdowns. This included blocking thousands of Pakistani social media handles on platforms like Instagram and X (formerly Twitter), including the accounts of celebrities such as Aamir, Fawad Khan and Mahira Khan. The government, which is led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, also blocked access to the social media accounts of Pakistani journalists and news outlets in India. The government then issued an advisory on May 8, directing all video platforms, streaming services and digital intermediaries to immediately remove Pakistani-origin entertainment content, including web series, films, songs, podcasts and other media. In addition, the government banned 16 prominent Pakistani YouTube channels, including those of Geo News, ARY News, and Samaa TV, which collectively had more than 63 million subscribers, for allegedly spreading misinformation, provocative narratives, and content targeting India's armed forces and sovereignty. Rahul Desai, a Mumbai-based film and TV critic, said blocking access to films over casting choices has become 'an excuse to antagonise Pakistan' under the current government. 'It's a vicious cycle because a lot of the cinema is informed by pro-establishment choices in India,' he told Al Jazeera. 'This has become a very neat medium for people to vent against Pakistan, just like cricket sometimes does.' Today, the reality-based creative boundaries in India are neat, Desai said: 'Do not cast artists from the other side of the border, and a lot of filmmakers self-censor themselves.' Are cross-border artistic collaborations common? Yes, they are. Pakistani actors are not allowed to work in India, so shoots involving them have to be carried out abroad. 'Music departments of [Pakistan's] films used to contribute a lot to Indian cinema at least a decade or two ago in the 2000s,' said Desai. The release of the curated music show franchise, Coke Studio Pakistan, which had 15 seasons from 2008 to 2024, was almost 'like a cultural moment in India', he added. But over the past two decades, there have been multiple instances of cross-border collaborations of artists, but they have faced boycotts and anger on both sides of the border due to political tensions between the South Asian neighbours. For the Punjabi film and music industries, the situation is even more complex. The partition of British India, which resulted in the creation of Pakistan with borders drawn overnight, cuts through Punjab, and millions on each side share culture and linguistic ties. Successful Punjabi franchises like Chal Mera Putt, known for its Pakistani cast, face uncertainty, especially the upcoming Chal Mera Putt 4, amid growing demands to avoid Pakistani involvement. 'There's obviously a lot of bullying involved by the establishment over casting Pakistani actors,' said Desai. 'There's a lot of banning and trolling involved. There's a lot of anxiety and tension associated with such choices.' What do Indian film bodies say about Sadaar Ji 3? Indian film associations, particularly the Federation of Western India Cine Employees (FWICE) and the All Indian Cine Workers Association (AICWA), have voiced strong objections to the casting of Aamir in Dosanjh's Sardaar Ji 3. FWICE, headed by President BN Tiwari, labelled the collaboration a 'betrayal of the nation' and accused Dosanjh of 'disrespecting national sentiments and the sacrifices of Indian soldiers'. It demanded a complete ban on the film in India. The body also issued appeals to India's CBFC to withhold certification for Sardaar Ji 3 and emphasised noncooperation with Pakistani artists. AICWA echoed these sentiments, condemning the film's producers for prioritising Pakistani talent over Indian artists and calling for a widespread boycott of Dosanjh across the industry, including by music companies and event organisers. Ashoke Pandit, the president of the Indian Film and Television Directors' Association, told a local newspaper: 'We are going to take action and tell the producers not to work with [Dosanjh]. 'He should be fully boycotted in the country by music labels and the Punjabi film industry. Diljit is a compulsive Pakistani lover.' However, Ira Bhaskar, a former CBFC Board member and retired professor of film studies at New Delhi's Jawaharlal Nehru University, said this episode is a reflection of the establishments of India and Pakistan, rather than pointing to a deeper divide between the people of the two countries. 'The Indian government [since Modi came to power] has not only understood the power of mass media, especially cinema, but is invested in taking control of the narratives that circulate in the public domain,' Bhaskar said. What has Dosanjh said about the furore over Sadaar Ji 3? Dosanjh told BBC Asian Network earlier this month: 'When this film was made, everything was fine. 'We shot it in February, and things were OK back then. After that, a lot of big things happened that were beyond our control,' the singer-actor said, referring to the Kashmir attack and the ensuing conflict. 'So the producers decided that the film obviously won't be released in India now, so they'll release it overseas. The producers have invested a lot of money, and when the film was being made, nothing like this was happening,' Dosanjh said. How well has Sardaar Ji 3 done globally? Dosanjh told the BBC that the film's producers were aware of the potential financial loss from pulling out of a territory like India, the world's most populous country. The previous film in the franchise – Sadaar Ji 2 – made nearly $3m at the box office in India. Dosanjh has continued promoting his film on his social media handles, including sharing images from sold-out shows in Pakistan, where the movie has shattered records for Indian releases. Globally, the film has taken $7m at the box office, against a budget of $4m. In Pakistan, it is the highest-grossing Indian-made film in history, pulling in $1.4m so far. In India, Desai, the critic, said 'censorship goes way beyond casting … It extends to the themes of the stories that people are allowed to tell now in India.' Are any other of Dosanjh's works facing problems? Yes. The release of Dosanjh's film, Panjab '95, directed by Honey Trehan in 2022, has stalled, primarily because of stringent demands from India's Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC), which has delayed its clearance since the project was submitted in December 2022. The biographical drama about the life of human rights activist Jaswant Singh Khalra, who exposed 25,0000 extrajudicial killings and disappearances of Sikhs in Punjab during the 1980s and 1990s, was given 120 suggested cuts, including removing references to political figures, documented human rights abuses, and even the protagonist's name. Trehan told Al Jazeera: 'The CBFC was established as an independent body, which could protect artists, so that the government should not influence the art … [but] the government is arm-twisting filmmakers and their films.' Desai, the critic who watched Panjab '95 in a private screening, told Al Jazeera: 'It's such a well-made film that it might incite a sense of revolution among people today, especially people who are not happy with the establishment. So, we can see where a lot of the insecurity is coming from.' Dosanjh and Trehan have publicly refused to accept the suggested cuts. And the film remains in limbo. Its scheduled premiere was pulled from the Toronto International Film Festival (TIFF) in 2023, and subsequent invitations from other international festivals were declined.


Al Jazeera
18-07-2025
- Al Jazeera
Why is Taiwan training for war with China?
The Take Taiwan's annual war games simulating a real Chinese invasion are bigger than ever. As China continues to ramp up military pressure on the island, what does it feel like to live in a place rehearsing for invasion? Video Duration 19 minutes 21 seconds 19:21 Video Duration 19 minutes 05 seconds 19:05 Video Duration 21 minutes 51 seconds 21:51 Video Duration 20 minutes 04 seconds 20:04 Video Duration 20 minutes 01 seconds 20:01 Video Duration 20 minutes 28 seconds 20:28 Video Duration 21 minutes 07 seconds 21:07