Editorial: Senate makes wise budget changes
Both the House and Senate approved the budget unanimously when it left their chambers. Members of the House will decide today whether they will agree to changes to the state budget bill (House Bill 1) made by the Senate. It's called concurrence.
The Advocate reported that the Senate added $1.2 billion in one-time spending for roads and bridges, economic development initiatives and improvements to college campuses. The money comes from the Revenue Stabilization Trust Fund, which holds $3.9 billion.
Senate President Cameron Henry, R-Metairie, in a statement said, 'What we're doing today changes the overall budget climate in our state in terms of workforce investment, economic development advancement and infrastructure improvements. It sets the stage for a better tomorrow.'
Henry said he hoped the House would concur with the changes, adding that the two chambers worked in conjunction in recent days.
The Senate amendments set aside $709 million for the Louisiana Transportation Infrastructure Fund, which pays for improvements to roads, bridges and similar work and another $273 million for the Louisiana Economic Development Initiatives Fund, which funds efforts to attract new investments in the state.
Another $75 million will go toward local water system improvements which are sorely needed. And $43 million will fund higher education priorities, which have also been delayed too long.
The Senate budget, as Henry had forecast earlier, provides only $43.5 million for the LA GATOR school choice program that gives parents money to pay for private schools. Gov. Jeff Landry wanted the $93.5 million approved by the House.
Henry said anyone who received voucher funding last year for those same school costs will get it in the new budget.
'We made it crystal clear last year how much we were going to fund, and this year we followed through,' Henry said. 'To make sure we don't grow the government too fast, which Americans for Prosperity does not want us to do, and we want to make sure that we're spending taxpayer money wisely.'
The Advocate reported that Henry said total expected spending for the coming fiscal year is $48.2 billion and nearly half of that is paid for by federal funds.
Voters in March rejected an amendment that included plans to eliminate the Revenue Stabilization Trust Fund that the Senate used and move its funds to the Budget Stabilization Fund (rainy day fund) for future budget emergencies.
A bill filed for the current legislative fiscal session also called for merging those two funds. It passed the House 99-1 but as of Tuesday was pending in the Senate Finance Committee and it is expected to die there.
Like Henry, we hope the House goes along with Senate changes to the budget because the funding it provides is going to take care of pressing needs that haven't gotten the attention they deserve.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
5 Purchases That Keep the Middle Class From Getting Richer
When it comes to income class, many people find themselves somewhere in the middle — neither rich, nor poor, usually making ends meet while struggling to get ahead. Many economic factors come into play as to why this occurs, one of them being purchases that the middle class continue to make, which only keeps them from ascending into a higher tax bracket. Up Next: For You: Are you middle class? If so, check out these five purchases that are keeping you from getting richer. New Cars Specifically, the ones with high monthly payments. 'Unless you live in a city with excellent public transportation, you likely need a car. However, if the car you already have is in good working condition, keep driving it,' said Mark Henry, founder and CEO of Alloy Wealth Management. Henry knows that it can be tempting to go out and buy a nicer, newer car if you know you can cover the down payment, but cautioned that locking yourself into a car payment when your current car works fine is a waste of money you could be saving or investing. 'If your car needs frequent maintenance and you end up dumping money regularly into repairs, it might be a wiser financial decision to upgrade,' Henry added, 'but that doesn't mean you need a brand new dream car. He highlighted that a used car payment averages about $200 less than a new car payment, freeing up $200 you could use to pay off student loans or deposit into a 401(k) or IRA. Find Out: Unnecessary Fees and Recurring Costs Monthly subscriptions to streaming services, gym memberships, delivery services and other conveniences often go unnoticed, according to Melissa Murphy Pavone, founder at Mindful Financial Partners. 'Combined with lifestyle creep — incrementally upgrading living standards as income increases — they can drain financial resources.' 'Taking stock of your subscriptions regularly can help you save a ton of money,' Henry explained. 'Even if something costs just a few dollars a month, that adds up quickly when you are subscribed to 10 things you don't really need or use.' Henry pointed out that some bank and credit card apps now have features that will track recurring charges for you, making it easy to keep track. 'If you find that you are struggling to stay on top of recurring charges, find an app that works for you (preferably a free one) and be sure to utilize this feature,' he said. Impulse Buys Large or tiny, useful or just for fun — impulse buys are an expense that adds up over time until it becomes a big, bad spending habit. 'If you spend $50 a month without thinking it through, that's $600 a year,' Henry explained, pointing to such impulsive purchases as clothes, household items or a social media ad for a 'must-have' item. 'Take at least 24 hours before swiping your card to decide if a purchase is worth it and you'll not only save money but end up with more meaningful purchases and less clutter.' Low-Quality Goods It may seem easier and more cost effective to buy off-brand clothes or household goods, but it often costs more in the long run, in Henry's opinion, he explained how the price might be lower, but the cost over time will be greater. 'For example, a $30 sweater you have to replace yearly (if not more) will cost $150 over 5 years, versus a $90 sweater of higher quality that will last a decade or more if you take care of it,' Henry said. 'Look for deals on high-quality goods, buy them on sale, take good care of them and you'll end up saving more money than if you had to work replacing cheap items into your budget every month.' Using Credit Cards Unnecessarily Credit cards are a great way to build credit and get rewards, as long as you use them wisely, according to Henry. 'A credit card is not a way to buy something you can't afford — so don't make big purchases on credit unless you know for sure you can pay them off by the due date,' Henry said. 'Credit cards often have high interest rates, so debt builds quickly,' he added. 'High-interest debt is entirely avoidable, but it can be a huge financial blow and a roadblock to ever building wealth.' More From GOBankingRates 5 Old Navy Items Retirees Need To Buy Ahead of Fall 10 Cars That Outlast the Average Vehicle This article originally appeared on 5 Purchases That Keep the Middle Class From Getting Richer Sign in to access your portfolio
Epoch Times
4 hours ago
- Epoch Times
Former New Mexico Candidate Gets 80 Years in Shootings at Officials' Homes
ALBUQUERQUE, N.M.— A former political candidate was sentenced to 80 years in federal prison Wednesday for his convictions in a series of drive-by shootings at the homes of state and local lawmakers in the aftermath of the 2020 election. A jury convicted former Republican candidate Solomon Peña earlier this year of conspiracy, weapons and other charges in the shootings in December 2022 and January 2023 on the homes of four Democratic officials in Albuquerque, including the current state House speaker.
5 hours ago
In Trump's redistricting push, Democrats find an aggressive identity
ATLANTA -- Fight! Fight! Fight! It's not just Donald Trump's mantra anymore. As the Republican president pushes states to redraw their congressional districts to the GOP's advantage, Democrats have shown they are willing to go beyond words of outrage and use whatever power they do have to win. Democrats in the Texas Legislature started it off by delaying, for now, Republican efforts to expand the GOP majority in the state's delegation and help preserve party control of the U.S. House through new districts in time for the 2026 midterm elections. Then multiple Democratic governors promised new districts in their own states to neutralize potential Republican gains in Washington. Their counter has been buoyed by national fundraising, media blitzes and public demonstrations, including rallies Saturday around the country. 'For everyone that's been asking, 'Where are the Democrats?' -- well, here they are," said U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett of Texas, one of several Democrats who could be ousted under her state's new maps. "For everyone who's been asking, 'Where is the fight?' – well, here it is.' There is no guarantee Democrats can prevent the Republican-powered redistricting, just as Democrats on Capitol Hill have not been able to stop Trump's moves. But it's a notable turn for a party that, by its own leaders' admissions, has honored conventional rules and bypassed bare-knuckled tactics. So far, progressive and establishment Democrats are aligned, uniting what has often been a fragmented opposition since Republicans led by Trump took control of the federal government with their election sweep in November. Leaders on the left say the approach gives them a more effective way to confront him. They can challenge his redistricting ploy with tangible moves as they also push back against the Republicans' tax and spending law and press the case that he is shredding American democracy. 'We've been imploring Democrats where they have power on the state and local level to flex that power,' said Maurice Mitchell, who leads the Working Families Party at the left flank of mainstream U.S. politics. 'There's been this overwrought talk about fighters and largely performative actions to suggest that they're in the fight.' This time, he said, Democrats are 'taking real risks in protecting all of our rights' against 'an authoritarian president who only understands the fight.' Texas made sense for Republicans as the place to start a redistricting scuffle. They dominate the Statehouse, and Gov. Greg Abbott is a Trump loyalist. But when the president's allies announced a new political map intended to send five more Republicans to the U.S. House, state Democratic representatives fled Texas, denying the GOP the numbers to conduct business in the Legislature and approve the reworked districts. Those legislators surfaced in Illinois, New York, California and elsewhere, joined by governors, senators, state party chairs, other states' legislators and activists. All promised action. The response was Trumpian. Govs. Gavin Newsom of California, JB Pritzker of Illinois and Kathy Hochul of New York welcomed Texas Democrats and pledged retaliatory redistricting. Pritzker mocked Abbott as a lackey who says 'yes, sir' to Trump orders. Hochul dismissed Texas Republicans as 'lawbreaking cowboys.' Newsom's press office directed all-caps social media posts at Trump, mimicking his signature sign off: 'THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER.' U.S. Rep. Al Green, another Texas Democrat who could lose his seat, called Trump 'egomaniacal.' Yet many Democrats also claimed moral high ground, comparing their cause to the Civil Rights Movement. State Rep. Ramon Romero Jr., invoked another Texas Democrat, President Lyndon Johnson, who was 'willing to stand up and fight' for civil rights laws in the 1960s. Then, with Texas bravado, Romero reached further into history: 'We're asking for help, maybe just as they did back in the days of the Alamo.' A recent Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll found that about 15% of Democrats' own voters described the party using words like 'weak' or 'apathetic.' An additional 10% called it 'ineffective' or 'disorganized.' Beto O'Rourke, a former Texas congressman who is raising money to support Texas Democrats, has encouraged Democratic-run statehouses to redraw districts now rather than wait for GOP states to act. On Friday, California Democrats released a plan that would give the party an additional five U.S. House seats. It would require voter approval in a November election. 'Maximize Democratic Party advantage,' O'Rourke said at a recent rally. 'You may say to yourself, 'Well, those aren't the rules.' There are no refs in this game. F--- the rules. ... Whatever it takes.' Democratic National Committee Chairman Ken Martin acknowledged the shift. 'This is not the Democratic Party of your grandfather, which would bring a pencil to a knife fight,' he said. Andrew O'Neill, an executive at the progressive group Indivisible, contrasted that response with the record-long speeches by U.S. Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J. and the Democratic leader of the U.S. House, New York Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, in eviscerating Trump and his package of tax breaks and spending cuts. The left 'had its hair on fire' cheering those moments, O'Neill recalled, but were 'left even more frustrated in the aftermath.' Trump still secured tax cuts for the wealthy, accelerated deportations and cut safety net programs, just as some of his controversial nominees were confirmed over vocal Democratic opposition. 'Now,' O'Neill said, 'there is some marriage of the rhetoric we've been seeing since Trump's inauguration with some actual action.' O'Neill looked back wistfully to the decision by Senate Democrats not to eliminate the filibuster 'when our side had the trifecta,' so a simple majority could pass major legislation. Democratic President Joe Biden's attorney general, Merrick Garland, he said, was too timid in prosecuting Trump and top associates over the Capitol riot. In 2016, Democratic President Barack Obama opted against hardball as the Senate's Republican leader, Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, refused to consider Obama's nomination of Garland to the Supreme Court. 'These unspoken rules of propriety, especially on the Democratic side, have created the conditions' that enabled Trump, Mitchell said. Even on redistricting, Democrats would have to ignore their previous good-government efforts and bypass independent commissions that draw boundaries in several states, including California. Party leaders and activists rationalize that the broader fights tie together piecemeal skirmishes that may not, by themselves, sway voters. Arguing that Trump diminishes democracy stirs people who already support Democrats, O'Neill said. By contrast, he said, the GOP 'power grab,' can be connected to unpopular policies that affect voters' lives. Green noted that Trump's big package bill cleared the Senate 'by one vote' and the House by a few, demonstrating why redistricting matters. U.S. Rep. Greg Casar of Texas said Democrats must make unseemly, short-term power plays so they can later pass legislation that 'bans gerrymandering nationwide ... bans super PACs (political action committees) and gets rid of that kind of big money and special interest that helped get us to this place.' U.S. Rep. Lloyd Doggett, D-Texas, added that a Democratic majority would wield subpoena power over Trump's administration. In the meantime, said U.S. Rep. Julie Johnson, D-Texas, voters are grasping a stark reality. 'They say, 'Well, I don't know. Politics doesn't affect me,'' she said of constituents she meets. 'I say, 'Honey, it does' If you don't do politics, politics will do you.''
