Thailand's Senate panel invites PM Paetongtarn to clarify casino policy
Thailand Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra. -- Photo: The Nation Thailand/ANN
BANGKOK (The Nation Thailand/ANN): Thailand Senate's ad hoc committee studying the establishment of entertainment complexes and has resolved to invite the Cabinet — particularly Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra — to provide policy direction on the casino issue at the next session.
Senator Veerapun Suvannamai, who chairs the committee, emphasized the desire for the Prime Minister to appear in person, though it is not mandatory.
Senate panel invites PM Paetongtarn to clarify casino policy
'We want the Prime Minister to attend, but it's not an obligation. If she has prior commitments, she may delegate a minister to represent her,' said Veerapun.
The committee also plans to invite several former national leaders to share insights and opinions on the matter. Those invited include former Prime Ministers Thaksin Shinawatra, Abhisit Vejjajiva, Chuan Leekpai, Srettha Thavisin, and Somchai Wongsawat, as well as former House Speakers Meechai Ruchuphan and Arthit Ourairat.
These invitations reflect the committee's commitment to gathering comprehensive and diverse viewpoints to ensure a balanced and thorough assessment, said Veerapun.
During the session on Thursday, the committee outlined its framework and established two subcommittees to assess various impacts of opening entertainment complexes that include casinos and online gambling in Thailand. Details are as follow:
1. Social and Legal Impacts Subcommittee
Chaired by Senator Nipon Ekwanit, this group will examine societal and environmental consequences, urban planning, constitutional implications, national strategy alignment, and requirements for public referenda under Section 77.
2. Economic Impacts Subcommittee
Chaired by Senator Sorachart Wichayasuwannaprom, this group will study potential economic impacts, investment, tourism, and employment opportunities related to the integrated entertainment complexes.
3. Definition of entertainment complexes
The committee debated the most appropriate and transparent terminology. Several options were proposed to ensure public understanding and legal clarity. Ultimately, the term 'integrated entertainment complexes with casinos and online gambling' was selected for its comprehensiveness and alignment with draft legislation.
4. Legal considerations
An initial proposal to form a separate legal subcommittee was rejected due to concerns it would undermine the importance of legal aspects in the casino debate. Legal matters will instead be covered under the Social and Legal Impacts Subcommittee. Discussions also touched on the political power dynamics that may affect future legislative efforts, with calls to consider constitutional protections.
5. Neutrality and timeline
Chairman Veerapun stressed the importance of neutrality, stating, 'We must set aside personal opinions and remain as impartial as possible to hear all sides.' He emphasized that the committee has no predetermined conclusions and aims to provide well-rounded recommendations for both the government and the public.
Although the original timeline allowed 180 days, the committee now aims to complete its report by the end of July 2025, ahead of the parliamentary session beginning in early July. Members expressed concern that the government may propose legislation before the study is finalized.
6. Public referendum
The meeting also briefly addressed the need for public consultation and referenda. However, no concrete process has been outlined yet. 'There is still no decision on how this will be carried out,' said Veerapun, noting that further discussions are planned. - The Nation Thailand/ANN
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
30 minutes ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Thai panel upholds suspension of doctors who helped Thaksin dodge jail
Thaksin Shinawatra remains a towering figure in Thai politics and is highly influential. (AFP pic) BANGKOK : Thailand's medical council on Thursday upheld its suspension of two doctors who enabled influential politician Thaksin Shinawatra to spend his prison sentence in hospital, a day ahead of the start of a Supreme Court case that could see him jailed. Thaksin, the driving force behind the current government, returned from 15 years of self-exile in 2023 to serve a prison term for abuse of power and conflicts of interest, but was sent to hospital after only a few hours in jail complaining of chest problems. The polarising billionaire, whose daughter Paetongtarn Shinawatra is prime minister, stayed in a VIP wing of the hospital for six months until his release on parole without a single night in jail, prompting public outrage and deep scepticism about the extent of his ailments. 'More than two-thirds of the council voted to uphold the punishments,' medical council of Thailand vice president, Prasit Watanapa, told reporters. 'Members made the decision based on medical principles, evidence and reason.' The suspensions could impact a case at the Supreme Court that begins on Friday in which the legality of Thaksin's hospital stay has been challenged, with the possibility the tycoon could be made to serve that time again, in prison. Thaksin, 75, remains a towering figure in Thai politics and though he holds no formal government role, he is highly influential. His lawyer declined to comment on Thursday on the council's decision. The revival of the controversy over Thaksin's hospital stay comes at a challenging time for Paetongtarn's government, which is seeing its popularity dwindle amid a prolonged struggle to spur economic growth and domestic pressure to take a tougher stance on an ongoing border dispute with Cambodia. Thaksin's sentence was originally eight years, but it was commuted to a year by the king and he became eligible for parole after six months. The medical council's vote overrides a veto of its earlier decision by health minister Somsak Thapsutin, a Thaksin ally. The council had yet to confirm the duration of the suspension of the two doctors, who it found had issued documents that contained false medical information. They had denied wrongdoing and stood by their medical assessments. Another doctor with the corrections department received a warning for failing to meet medical standards in a referral notice for Thaksin.
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
Charter experts urge Philippines Senate to proceed with Duterte impeachment trial
MANILA: The Philippines's oldest and most authoritative voice on constitutional law has urged the Senate to proceed with the impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte, reminding senators that the accountability of public officials should not be thwarted by procedural inventions or partisan manoeuvring. 'At stake is not merely the fate of one official, but the integrity of the Constitution itself. Impeachment is the people's mechanism to enforce Accountability of Public Officials. It must not be thwarted by procedural invention or partisan manoeuvre,' the Philippine Constitution Association (Philconsa), led by its chairman, retired Chief Justice Reynato Puno, said in a statement. Philconsa issued the statement after the Senate convened as an impeachment court but opted to remand the Articles of Impeachment to the House of Representatives, citing alleged 'constitutional infirmities' that needed to be addressed. The supposed 'constitutional infirmities' were raised by the Duterte bloc, staunch allies of Vice President Duterte and her father, former President Rodrigo Duterte. Among the issues cited was the lack of certification, which Philconsa argued is neither required by the Constitution nor supported by established impeachment practice. Four key constitutional concerns were raised by the Senate's remand: > Grave abuse of discretion: Whether the Senate unlawfully suspended its jurisdiction, already validly acquired as an impeachment court. > Encroachment on the House's exclusive power: Whether requiring the House to certify compliance with the one-year ban infringes upon the House's sole prerogative under Article XI, Section 3 of the Constitution. > Circumlocutory delay: Whether imposing novel requirements not found in the Constitution or Senate rules constitutes a circumlocutory device designed to delay or defeat the trial. > Due process and impartiality: Whether raising possible defences on behalf of the respondent compromises the impartiality of the Senate as an impeachment court. Philconsa reminded the Senate that once convened as an impeachment court, its jurisdiction 'cannot be lost or suspended by mere procedural acts.' Citing the 1997 case of Republic vs. Sandiganbayan, Philconsa said, 'jurisdiction, once validly acquired, is not lost by subsequent happenings. It continues until the case is finally resolved or dismissed.' It also pointed out that the principle of continuing jurisdiction has been an established practice, including during the impeachment trial of former US President Bill Clinton. The House of Representatives has since adopted a resolution certifying that the impeachment complaint against Duterte complies with constitutional requirements. However, it deferred acceptance of the articles of impeachment until the Senate responds to clarificatory questions submitted by the House prosecution panel regarding the remand order. Vice President Duterte, who faces allegations including corruption and plotting to assassinate President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., has denied all wrongdoing and dismissed the impeachment efforts as politically motivated. If the trial proceeds and results in her conviction, she could be removed from office and face a lifetime ban from holding public office. The Senate's decision has sparked public outcry, with protests erupting outside the Senate complex and various groups decrying the move as a betrayal of the Constitution. Malacanang has distanced itself from the controversy, stating that the President is not involved in the Senate's deliberations, but emphasised the importance of adhering to legal procedures. - Philippine Daily Inquirer/ANN
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
China extends 10-day visa-free transit policy to Indonesia
BEIJING: China granted Indonesian citizens a visa-free transit stay of up to 10 days on Thursday (June 12), expanding the countries that enjoy the policy to 55. China's visa-free transit policy applies to 60 ports in the country. Citizens from the 55 countries holding valid international travel documents and interline tickets with confirmed dates and seats to a third country or region can enter China visa-free at any of the 60 ports, and stay in designated areas for as long as 10 days. These travellers are allowed to engage in tourism, business, exchange visits or family visits. Expanding the policy to Indonesia will help boost the good momentum of China-Indonesia cooperation, and make bilateral trade and investment more convenient, an official with the National Immigration Administration said. - China Daily/ANN
