‘My house had the perfect energy rating – until I got a heat pump'
Colin Ferguson's home may well be the ultimate net zero property – at least in theory.
The detached house in Perthshire, Scotland, was rebuilt from the ground up to be as energy efficient as possible. 'I completely redesigned it to near-Passivhaus standard,' he says, referring to an international efficiency standard for high performance buildings.
The renovation, for which Mr Ferguson, now 74, was involved in the labour, was completed in 2013. An energy assessor assigned a perfect efficiency score of 100, placing it in a band typically reserved for new builds. On the certificate, seen by The Telegraph, under suggested 'cost-effective improvements' it simply read: 'not applicable'.
Then Mr Ferguson installed a heat pump – and his perfect energy rating went up in smoke.
The retired insurance claims manager and his wife, Sue, had wanted to replace their oil-fired boiler with a heat pump, using £9,500 worth of government funding. This would require obtaining a new energy performance certificate (EPC) after the heat pump was installed, as their previous one was due to expire.
EPCs are at the heart of Labour's drive to net zero. Energy secretary Ed Miliband wants all rental homes to achieve a C rating by the end of the decade, forcing landlords to pay for costly upgrades or be banned from letting to tenants at all. Meanwhile, mortgage lenders are offering cheaper deals to homes with superior ratings – and punishing those with low EPC scores with higher rates.
But the certificates have been criticised in the past for their inconsistency. Assessors often rely on guesswork to work out a property's efficiency level, and some have been known to wrongly estimate a property's floor area by tens of square metres. Heat pumps, while greener, can often incur households higher bills. In some cases they have hurt rather than help a home's EPC score, as the certificates currently reward lower bills over carbon emissions.
'What really annoyed me was the little man who came in an Audi A8 to do the assessment,' Mr Ferguson recalls. 'In he waltzed. I had all the documentation from the original build – reams of stuff – and he took one look at it and said, 'I don't need any of that'. Had it not been for the fact we'd applied for a grant to put a heat pump in he'd have been out the door.'
Incredulously, Mr Ferguson's new EPC assessment had fallen to 74, placing it in the C band. The total floor area of the house also appeared to shrink between assessments – from 331 square metres to 279, the equivalent of three large bedrooms.
Dropping an EPC band can wipe thousands off a home's value in an instant, according to analysis by Knight Frank. The estate agent said moving from a D to a C could add 3pc value over and above local house price growth, equivalent to £9,000 based on average resale figures, while 80pc of buyers are said to be conscious of a home's energy rating when eyeing up a purchase.
It's not that Mr Ferguson's home has become less efficient, or less green, in the 10 years between assessments – far from it. The property makes use of solar feed-in tariffs, and as a result Mr Ferguson's home generates more energy than it consumes, turning his bill into a profit. Mr Ferguson's bills show the retiree spends about £1,300 a year on electricity for his home and electric car, which is entirely offset by the £2,000 he makes selling surplus power back to the Grid at times of high demand.
Mr Ferguson puts the change in his energy rating down to a shift in the way assessors grade properties. The first assessment made in 2013 used a standard assessment procedure (SAP), which tends to be done when a house is new. Any subsequent assessments are done with a reduced data SAP (rdSAP), which relies more heavily on assumptions.
The second assessment was carried out by Elmhurst Energy, Britain's largest EPC assessment firm. Despite the meagre score it assigned to Mr Ferguson's home, it suggests only one way he might improve it – by installing a wind turbine at a cost of between £15,000 and £25,000. Doing so, the document claims, would save him around £3,300 over three years and possibly bump up his score to 82, which barely scrapes a B.
Elmhurst Energy said the methodology of energy assessments had changed 'many times' since 2013, and now accounts for more up-to-date fuel prices, carbon emissions and other technologies used in modern homes such as battery storage and heating controls. The company added that since EPCs still reward low bills over carbon emissions, the green taxes applied to electricity mean switching to a heat pump disadvantages homes 'despite the fact they are better for the environment'.
To add insult to injury, the heat pump that Mr Ferguson had wanted in the first place does not work as well as he had hoped it would. The installers, Mr Ferguson says, were flummoxed by his unique home. Now, like several other heat pump owners, Mr Ferguson and his wife rely on a wood stove in the winter months to keep warm.
'To be fair to the chap, all these EPC companies use a particular system,' says Mr Ferguson. 'All they do is pump the information into some algorithm and it comes up with the certificate. The assessor just gets prompted with questions and puts in an answer, like a primary school kid ticking boxes.'
Stuart Fairlie, from Elmhurst Energy, which trains and accredits energy assessors who deliver more than one million EPCs annually, said: 'This shows an example of a homeowner who has done the right thing to reduce their home's carbon emissions by installing a heat pump, but the EPC rating has not improved.
'EPCs do change over time as the methodologies improve. Since 2013, they now account for new fuel prices, carbon emissions and low carbon technologies. The home's score is actually a good score for what is now a 12-year-old property, even though it may have been built above the minimum regulations at the time.
'We have been calling for the EPC to change for a long time. We expect the Government's reforms to make sure homes with low carbon heating systems are given the credit they are due on the EPC.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Sarwar dodges question on potential welfare reform revolt
Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar has dodged questions about the brewing rebellion to the UK Government's welfare reforms. Around 120 Labour MPs – including a reported 12 from Scotland – have put their names to an amendment which would block the welfare reform Bill. But on Wednesday, Mr Sarwar refused to say if he supported the reforms or the rebellion against them. When asked if he supports the Scottish MPs seeking to block the Bill at a live taping of the Holyrood Sources podcast in Edinburgh, the Scottish Labour leader said: 'My position has been quite consistent on the welfare reforms, which is I support the principle of reform. 'We have to look at the structural challenges that exist in our welfare system, even with the changes currently being proposed.' Mr Sarwar said there were 'many positives' in the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill, but added that there were 'still conversations to be had' about potential changes. Pushed again on whether he supports the rebellion, Mr Sarwar said: 'Conversations are ongoing, as you would expect. 'People are legitimately voicing their concerns, having those conversations.' Pressed again on his view on the potential revolt, Mr Sarwar added: 'We have to support the principle of reform. 'What those reforms look like has to be balanced and has to be fair.' Mr Sarwar stressed that he believed the best way out of poverty was through work, but said those who cannot work should be supported. The most controversial part of the plans will see the eligibility of the personal independence payment (Pip) in England and Wales be reduced in a bid to save £5 billion. Earlier on Wednesday, Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner suggested that ministers were considering potential concessions to Labour MPs to stave off a rebellion. 'Those discussions are ongoing around making sure that the welfare reforms that we're bringing in support people into work who need that, and we're putting a huge amount of investment into doing that, but also protecting the most vulnerable,' she said in an interview with ITV's Peston programme.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Welfare concessions being discussed with Labour rebels, Rayner suggests
Ministers are discussing the prospect of further concessions to win over Labour MPs preparing to rebel over plans to cut disability benefits, the Deputy Prime Minister has suggested. Angela Rayner insisted the Government was not expecting backbenchers to go against traditional party values amid a looming revolt over the welfare Bill set for a Commons vote next week. Some 120 Labour MPs have put their names to a bid to block the legislation in its tracks, arguing that disabled people have not been properly consulted about the plans and further scrutiny is required before making any changes. Asked what concessions could be offered to convince rebels to back the Bill, Ms Rayner said 'discussions are ongoing'. 'I'm not going to get into that on your show tonight,' she said in an interview on ITV's Peston programme. 'Those discussions are ongoing around making sure that the welfare reforms that we're bringing in support people into work who need that, and we're putting a huge amount of investment into doing that, but also protecting the most vulnerable.' She acknowledged that 'a lot of people are very scared about these changes' but added: 'I haven't changed my Labour values and we're not expecting our benches to do anything that isn't in check with them. 'What we want to do is support people, and that is the crucial bit around these reforms of what Labour are trying to achieve, and we're discussing that with our MPs.' Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall, who has already taken steps to soften the impact of the welfare Bill, has been locked in talks with backbenchers as she seeks to win over those opposed to the measures. The Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill faces its first Commons test on Tuesday. The plans restrict eligibility for personal independence payment (Pip), the main disability payment in England, and limit the sickness-related element of universal credit, with the aim of getting more people back into work and saving up to £5 billion a year. Existing claimants will be given a 13-week phase-out period of financial support, a move seen as a bid to head off opposition. But the fact so many Labour MPs are prepared to put their names to the 'reasoned amendment' calling for a change of course shows how entrenched the opposition remains. Earlier on Wednesday, Sir Keir Starmer defended his leadership against accusations he had misjudged the mood in his party, insisting he is 'comfortable with reading the room'. At a press conference at the Nato summit in the Hague, he said: 'Is it tough going? Are there plenty of people and noises off? Yes, of course, there always are, there always have been, there always will be. 'But the important thing is to focus on the change that we want to bring about.' Ms Rayner earlier told MPs in the Commons the vote will take place as planned despite the rebellion, saying: 'We will go ahead on Tuesday.' Social security minister Sir Stephen Timms said he was 'looking forward to the debate' next week. He told the Commons Work and Pensions Committee the changes need to be made urgently to cut the spiralling welfare bill. Committee chairwoman Debbie Abrahams, who is one of the Labour MPs to have signed the amendment to block the legislation, asked why the provisions within the Bill had not been consulted on. Sir Stephen said: 'Essentially because of the urgency of the changes needing to be made.' He said the cost of Pip had gone up from £12 billion before the pandemic to £22 billion last year 'and that is not a sustainable trajectory'. Setting out the impact of the reforms, he told the Committee 370,000 people getting Pip under the current system would not be receiving it by the end of the decade. Other senior Labour figures outside Parliament, including Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham and London Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan, have also publicly expressed their opposition to the plans. Meanwhile, the Tories seem unlikely to lend the Government their support, with leader Kemi Badenoch setting out conditions for doing so including a commitment to rule out tax rises in the autumn budget and further cut the benefits bill.
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Conservatives fear welfare reforms will not head off ‘tax rises' this autumn
Angela Rayner has said she is 'proud' of Labour's record in Government, after the Tories challenged her to say whether she was 'embarrassed to be defending' proposed welfare reforms. Deputy Prime Minister Ms Rayner promised a debate on the welfare Bill next Tuesday as planned, despite 120 Labour MPs publicly backing a move to block the reforms. She criticised the Conservatives for having 'no plan, no idea', amid Labour efforts to temper benefits spending. But shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride warned that 'tax rises are coming' in this autumn's budget, with the number of benefits claimants set to rise. Sir Mel asked: 'When you cut out the blather, isn't the reality that this Labour Government has condemned us to higher taxes, more debt, fewer jobs, more pain for businesses right up and down our country? 'Borrowing up, unemployment up, inflation up, yet (the Deputy Prime Minister) tells us the Government's plan is working. 'It's not just me who isn't convinced, the people behind her are not convinced either and neither are the public. 'In fact, I'm not even sure if (Ms Rayner) herself is convinced, so can I ask her, isn't she just a little embarrassed to be defending policies she doesn't even agree with herself?' At the despatch box, Ms Rayner replied: 'I'm proud we've got a huge boost to the minimum wage, the biggest uplift to affordable housing in a generation, and expanding free school meals to half a million children. 'The Tories' choice? Billions of pounds in unfunded tax cuts for the very wealthiest. 'We know where that gets us, it's the same old Tories' failed approach. 'They haven't listened and they haven't learned a thing.' Earlier during Deputy Prime Minister's Questions, Ms Rayner vowed not to 'walk away and stand by and abandon millions of people trapped in the failing system left behind by him and his colleagues'. Asked whether a vote on Tuesday 'will actually go ahead', including a potential vote on the reasoned amendment put forward by critics which would block the reforms, Ms Rayner replied that it 'will'. Sir Mel continued: 'There you have it, there will be a vote in this House on Tuesday on the welfare Bill, although many on the backbenches could be forgiven for thinking they've heard this before with the winter fuel payment, where they were marched up the hill – and we all know where that story ended. 'But on this side of the House, we're absolutely clear, we will help her to get their Bill through, if they can commit to actually reducing the welfare bill and getting people off benefits and into work. 'Can (Ms Rayner) make that commitment right now, yes or no?' The Deputy Prime Minister replied: 'Well, if ever we needed a reminder of the party opposite having no shame, it's their demands for this Bill. 'He demands a programme to help people into work – exactly what this Bill does – after he left one in eight young people out of the economy.' She added: 'He demands further welfare savings, from the man who was in charge, as the welfare bill absolutely ballooned. 'They say cut welfare bill, they failed. 'They say put people in work, they failed. 'They say no tax increases, they failed.' The reforms would 'see the number of people on welfare rising for every single year going forward' with 'no commitment' to cut the number of claimants, Sir Mel warned. 'And even if they manage to deliver these reforms, almost every respected economist now says tax rises are all but inevitable in the autumn,' he continued. 'But after the budget, the Chancellor (Rachel Reeves) said, and I quote, 'I'm not coming back for more taxes'. 'British businesses have been hit again and again by Labour's economic mismanagement. 'They are desperate for certainty, so can (the Deputy Prime Minister) give them that certainty now and repeat to the House the Chancellor's promise not to raise taxes at the budget?' Ms Rayner replied that the Tories had 'no plan, no idea' and added: 'This is a bit rich – unbelievable. 'Inflation above 11%, the biggest tax rises? By their party. 'I take no lectures and on this issue in particular, they can't make their minds up. 'First they said our reforms were taking too long, then they say they were rushed, then their front bench said our measures are too tough, and now they say they need to be tougher.' Responding, Sir Mel said: 'The whole House will have heard that (Ms Rayner) did not repeat the Chancellor's promise not to raise taxes and Britain's businesses have today been put on notice – tax rises are coming.' The Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill, if agreed, would restrict personal independence payment (Pip) eligibility and curb rises the sickness-related element of universal credit, with the aim of getting more people back into work and saving up to £5 billion a year. Conservative MP for Fylde Andrew Snowden later asked Ms Rayner who she would sack if she were in charge of a reshuffle, and criticised Chancellor Ms Reeves 'for killing economic growth', Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall 'for the botched handling of the welfare Bill', and Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer. Ms Rayner suggested Mr Snowden might want 'a go' at asking questions from the despatch box, in place of Sir Mel. 'I'm just wondering when they're going to give the shadow justice secretary (Robert Jenrick) a go,' she added Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data