
Lafayette helped Americans turn the tide in their fight for independence – and 50 years later, he helped forge the growing nation's sense of identity
Matthew Smith, Miami University
(THE CONVERSATION) America is nearing the 250th anniversary of its revolutionary birth, the Declaration of Independence. July 4, 2026, will mark a milestone – and a time for reflection.
Yet as fascination with America's founding endures, controversy colors how the revolution is taught across the United States. From contested efforts by The New York Times ' 1619 Project ' to put slavery at the center of America's story, to attempts to limit teaching about race and racism, partisanship surrounds the teaching of American history. Anniversaries can inspire public passion, but they can also open old wounds.
As an American historian and a naturalized citizen of the United States, I regard the American Revolution with both personal and professional interest. The fact that I grew up in the United Kingdom amuses my students to no end whenever we discuss the Revolutionary War. Sometimes, in my British-accented English, I remind them I did not personally grow up with King George. Teaching history is encouraging students to think critically about the past without dictating what emotions they should feel – patriotic or otherwise.
Sadly, in the U.S., the sort of objective historical knowledge once taken for granted now appears to be waning. According to the National Assessment of Educational Progress, just 13% of eighth graders in 2023 ranked 'proficient' in American history. A 2010 survey found that 26% of adults could not identify from whom America declared its independence, with China, Mexico and France among the responses.
America divorcing France would have been news to Gilbert du Motier, better known as the Marquis de Lafayette. His commitment to the new country not only helped secure its independence, but it also helped solidify American identity decades later.
A privileged aristocrat who served in both the American and French revolutions, Lafayette went to war at age 19. Commissioning and equipping his own expedition across the Atlantic in 1777, he fought in many battles against the British, including decisive action at Yorktown. Earning George Washington's confidence, Lafayette attained the rank of major general in the Continental Army.
Lafayette's enrollment in the U.S. military predated the 1778 alliance between his home country and the United States. Eventually, France's alliance turned the tide against Great Britain on land and at sea. By the war's end, the French had supplied some 12,000 soldiers, 22,000 sailors and dozens of warships to the American cause, plus huge financial resources. When Lafayette volunteered, however, he was one of just a few foreign volunteers – and the most acclaimed.
'Nowadays,' as historian Sarah Vowell conceded, Americans think of Lafayette as 'a place, not a person.' But an abundance of cities, counties and thoroughfares named after the revolutionary hero attest to his former celebrity. During World War I, U.S. troops sailed to France under the slogan 'Lafayette here we come,' promising to repay America's debt of gratitude to France.
A growing country
Older Americans may recall the U.S. bicentennial of 1976, marked with much pageantry and even a state visit by Queen Elizabeth II. America's semicentennial, however – the 50th anniversary of independence – played a far greater role shaping the idea of America in the minds of its citizens.
Lafayette starred in the buildup to this 1826 commemoration, the first of its kind at the national level. President James Monroe, a fellow veteran of the War of Independence, invited Lafayette to be ' the guest of America,' honored as the last living major general of the Continental Army. Beginning in July 1824, at the age of 66, Lafayette embarked on a triumphal tour of all 24 states then comprising the union – nearly double the original 13.
As Lafayette headed west, borne by horse-drawn carriage, steamboat and canal barge, he journeyed across a changing America. Nowhere was America's economic and demographic growth more evident than Cincinnati, where a crowd of 50,000 welcomed Lafayette in May 1825. Once a small frontier town, Cincinnati was growing faster than any comparably sized city in the nation: Its population increased from around 15,000 to roughly 115,000 in the quarter century following Lafayette's visit.
He addressed his audience with emotion: 'The highest reward that can be bestowed on a revolutionary veteran is to welcome him with a sight of the blessings which have issued from our struggle for independence, freedom and equal rights.'
Lafayette gave human face to America's national commemoration. He granted citizens of frontier states like Ohio – hitherto excluded from the revolutionary narrative – license to celebrate themselves. High turnouts in western stops such as Cincinnati reflected enthusiasm for grand spectacles. They also reflected the growth of America's print media, which had advertised his visit, and improved transportation in formerly remote regions of the country.
Lafayette's tour culminated with a September 1825 state banquet in Washington, D.C., hosted by the new president, John Quincy Adams. Adams – the son of America's second president, John Adams – praised 'that tie of love, stronger than death,' connecting Lafayette 'for the endless ages of time, with the name of Washington.'
The enthusiasm that welcomed Lafayette 200 years ago was authentic. But like all good history lessons, Lafayette's legacy is open to interpretation.
His grand tour cemented the myth of ' the Era of Good Feelings ': a golden age of American political harmony. In reality, the seeds of America's civil war were already evident. Missouri's 1820 admission to the union threatened the country's precarious balance between states that opposed slavery and states that allowed it – a crisis Thomas Jefferson warned was ' a fire bell in the night.'
Likewise, Lafayette's lionization in the western United States coincided with the ongoing forced removal of Indigenous people. Ohio, for example, forcibly removed its last Native American tribe in 1843.
Despite the uses and abuses of historical memory and the aversion of modern historians toward hero-worship, Lafayette remains a charismatic figure – a ' citizen of two worlds ' who championed both abolitionism and women's rights. I believe his fading public memory indicates a troubling amnesia. America's anniversary offers the opportunity to reconsider his legacy, alongside revolutionary stories of Americans from all walks of life.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
10 minutes ago
- Axios
Read: White House launches "comprehensive" review of Smithsonian exhibits
The Trump administration told the Smithsonian Institution it's launching a "comprehensive internal review" of the world's biggest museum and research complex, per a letter the White House released Tuesday. The big picture: "As we prepare to celebrate the 250th anniversary of our Nation's founding, it is more important than ever that our national museums reflect the unity, progress, and enduring values that define the American story," states the letter to Smithsonian secretary Lonnie Bunch, signed by White House officials Lindsey Halligan, Vince Haley and Russell Vought. "This initiative aims to ensure alignment with the President's directive to celebrate American exceptionalism, remove divisive or partisan narratives, and restore confidence in our shared cultural institutions." The letter says the action is in accordance with President Trump's March executive order on reshaping the Smithsonian and removing what he deems "improper ideology" from the institution. Of note: The Smithsonian's National Museum of American History in July removed mentions of Trump's two impeachments from an exhibit, before restoring his name to an impeachment display with revisions. What to expect: The review will initially focus on the following museums before shifting focus to others: National Museum of American History. National Museum of Natural History. National Museum of African American History and Culture. National Museum of the American Indian. National Air and Space Museum. Smithsonian American Art Museum National Portrait Gallery. Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden. Zoom in: Each museum must submit within 30 days all requested materials, including current exhibition descriptions and draft plans for upcoming shows, according to the letter. An inventory of all permanent holdings must be submitted within 75 days and each museum "should finalize and submit its updated plan to commemorate America's 250th anniversary," among other requirements. Within 120 days, museums "should begin implementing content corrections where necessary, replacing divisive or ideologically driven language with unifying, historically accurate, and constructive descriptions across placards, wall didactics, digital displays, and other public-facing materials," per the letter. What they're saying: "The Smithsonian's work is grounded in a deep commitment to scholarly excellence, rigorous research, and the accurate, factual presentation of history," the institution said in a media statement Tuesday.


Newsweek
10 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Ukraine's Zelensky Says Putin Will Benefit From Trump Meeting in 3 Ways
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said in a new interview Tuesday that he believes Russian President Vladimir Putin will benefit from his upcoming summit with President Donald Trump in three key ways. Why It Matters Trump and Putin are slated to meet in Alaska on Friday to discuss bringing an end to Russia's ongoing war against Ukraine, which Putin launched in February 2022. The White House said the Russian strongman reached out to request the meeting and that Zelensky has not been invited. The Trump administration has also sought to temper expectations around the president's meeting with Putin. Trump said in the past that he would end the Russia-Ukraine war within 24 hours of being elected or shortly after being inaugurated. Neither promise has come to fruition and the White House this week framed talks between Trump and Putin as a "listening exercise" and a "fact-finding" mission. U.S. President Donald Trump, left, and Russian President Vladimir Putin shake hands at the conclusion of their joint news conference at the Presidential Palace in Helsinki, Finland, on July 16, 2018. U.S. President Donald Trump, left, and Russian President Vladimir Putin shake hands at the conclusion of their joint news conference at the Presidential Palace in Helsinki, Finland, on July 16, 2018. Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP What To Know Zelensky was asked by NewsNation on Tuesday what he believes Putin will take away from his meeting with Trump. The Ukrainian leader didn't mince words, telling the outlet, "I believe that Putin will benefit from this, because what he is seeking, frankly, is photographs. He needs a photo from a meeting with President Trump." Zelensky continued: "First, he will be meeting on U.S. soil, which I believe is his personal victory. Second, he is coming out of isolation because he is meeting on U.S. soil. Third, with this meeting, he has somehow postponed the sanctions policy. President Trump has serious sanctions, and we are very much looking forward to these sanctions." "We will see what happens next," he added. Indeed, the Trump administration's decision to allow Putin into the country is striking, given that the Russian leader has been accused of war crimes against Ukraine by the International Criminal Court. That the meeting will take place in Alaska—which Russia sold to the U.S. for a little over $7 million in 1867—adds another layer of significance. Putin's meeting with Trump will be the first time the Russian leader has met with an American president since June 2021, when he encountered then-President Joe Biden for a bilateral summit. Russia invaded Ukraine less than eight months later, cementing Putin's status as a pariah in the Western world. Trump addressed the upcoming meeting with his Russian counterpart while speaking to reporters last week and suggested that there would be "swapping of territories" between Russia and Ukraine. Zelensky flatly rejected the notion, saying that Ukrainians "will not give their land to an occupier." The Ukrainian leader's refusal to cede land to Russia irked Trump, who said Monday that he disagreed "very, very severely" with him. "I get along with Zelensky, but, you know, I disagree with what he's done," Trump told reporters at the White House. "Very, very severely disagree. This is a war that should have never happened." Zelensky spoke by phone with Trump, special envoy Steve Witkoff and European leaders on Tuesday. After the call, the Ukrainian president said he was told Russia is showing signs that it may want to end the war. "During the call, there was a signal from Mr. Witkoff, who was also on the call, that Russia is ready to end the war, or at least to make a first step toward a ceasefire, and that this was the first such signal from them," Zelensky said. "Everyone on the call felt positive about this, that there was some kind of shift." But he emphasized that it was still unclear to him what Putin may have told Witkoff regarding a cessation of hostilities. Trump's announcement on Friday about a meeting with Putin came as the Kremlin's army slowly advances deeper into Ukraine—in defiance of demands from Trump and other Western leaders to cease attacks on civilian locales, according to the Associated Press (AP). Russia and Ukraine are also far apart on their terms for peace. Zelensky has refused to agree to a ceasefire deal that doesn't include security guarantees for his country, while Putin demands Ukraine be shut out from NATO and cede to Russia four territories Moscow claims it annexed. Ukrainian soldiers on the battlefield have also expressed little hope for a diplomatic solution to the war. What People Are Saying Zelensky wrote on Telegram: Putin "is definitely not preparing for a ceasefire or an end to the war. Putin is determined only to present a meeting with America as his personal victory and then continue acting exactly as before, applying the same pressure on Ukraine as before. "So far, there is no indication whatsoever that the Russians have received signals to prepare for a post-war situation. On the contrary, they are redeploying their troops and forces in ways that suggest preparations for new offensive operations. If someone is preparing for peace, this is not what he does." A Ukrainian Spartan Brigade drone unit commander with the call sign Buda told the AP he doesn't think Russia is interested in peace, adding: "It is impossible to negotiate with them. The only option is to defeat them. I would like them to agree and for all this to stop, but Russia will not agree to that. It does not want to negotiate. So the only option is to defeat them." A howitzer commander with the call sign Warsaw in Ukraine's southern Zaporizhzhia region, told the AP: "We are on our land, we have no way out. So we stand our ground, we have no choice." What Happens Next Trump and Zelensky will speak on the phone Wednesday, with European leaders joining the call. Putin has also briefed North Korean leader Kim Jong-un about his meeting with Trump in Anchorage, according to Russian state media. Moscow and Pyongyang have strengthened their strategic partnership since Russia invaded Ukraine and North Korea has sent troops to fight alongside Russian soldiers on the front lines. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt also left open the possibility that Trump could travel to Russia at some point, telling reporters on Tuesday that "perhaps" the American president will visit Putin in his home country down the road. The Associated Press contributed reporting to this article.


The Hill
40 minutes ago
- The Hill
Bill Barr: Trump ‘right on the money' with DC police takeover
Former Attorney General Bill Barr said Tuesday that President Trump is 'right on the money' with his takeover of the Washington, DC, police. 'And I think the president's right on the money, and I think Judge Pirro laid out the case very well, and I'm glad she's there, because she has the right idea of what needs to be done in this town,' Barr said on Fox News's 'America reports. 'As far as crime is concerned, the crime levels are much too high. If it was a state, it would have the highest murder rate in the — in the country. It competes to be the capi— or the crime capital of the country, not the capital of this great republic, among St. Louis and Memphis and Chicago in terms of the violence. That's not good enough. This place belongs to the American people, it's a symbol of our country, and we have to keep it safe,' the former attorney general added. Barr's praise for the president is notable due to the strained relationship he and Trump have had in recent years. Trump announced Monday he was taking federal control of D.C.'s police department and deploying the National Guard in the city in an effort to battle crime. 'Our capital city has been overtaken by violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals, roving mobs of wild youth, drugged-out maniacs and homeless people, and we're not going to let it happen anymore. We're not going to take it,' the president said. Democrats have slammed Trump's recent DC moves, with Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) saying in a thread on the social platform X Monday that 'Trump's raw authoritarian power grab in DC is part of a growing national crisis.' 'He's playing dictator in our nation's capital as a dress rehearsal as he pushes democracy to the brink. This assault on freedom is exactly why we've fought for DC statehood & to give DC control of its National Guard,' Van Hollen added.