logo
Trump's plan to eliminate Social Security taxes: What it means for retirees

Trump's plan to eliminate Social Security taxes: What it means for retirees

USA Today14-05-2025

Trump's plan to eliminate Social Security taxes: What it means for retirees
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Biden-signed law triggers Social Security increases for retirees
Many are seeing an increase in their Social Security payments, thanks to a law aimed at correcting long-standing benefit reductions for public sector workers.
unbranded - Newsworthy
President Trump during his campaign proposed exempting Social Security from federal income tax. Several lawmakers in Congress have recently introduced legislation that aims to accomplish the same goal.
Rep. Angie Craig (D-Minn.) in January announced the You Earned It, You Keep It Act.
Rep. Jeff Van Drew (R-N.J.) in January announced the No Tax on Social Security Act.
Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky) in February announced the Senior Citizens Tax Elimination Act.
Additionally, President Trump last month pushed Congress to approve a "big, beautiful" tax and spending bill that fulfills several other campaign promises. "In the coming weeks and months, we will pass the largest tax cuts in American history — and that will include no tax on tips, no tax on Social Security, and no tax on overtime," he said.
However, those major changes to tax law would likely hurt retired workers on Social Security. Here's why.
Social Security benefits could be cut 23% in 2035 under current tax law
Social Security is primarily financed by taxes, but there are three revenue sources: 91% comes from payroll taxes, 4% from taxes collected on benefits, and 5% from interest earned on trust fund assets. The program is regularly running deficits, meaning it's spending more money than it brings in, because the retired population that draws benefits is growing more quickly than the taxpaying population that supports the program.
The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates the Social Security Trust Fund — the financial account that pays benefits to retirees, spouses, survivors and disabled workers — will be exhausted by 2034. At that point, one funding source would disappear because the trust fund would no longer earn interest. The remaining tax revenues would cover only 77% of scheduled payments in 2035. That means benefits could be cut 23% in 10 years unless lawmakers find a solution.
Ending taxes on Social Security means benefit cuts would happen sooner
The CBO estimates Social Security will run a $3.3 trillion deficit over the next decade. Taxes on benefits will contribute $1.1 trillion to revenue during that period. So, eliminating that income would make an already-substantial deficit much larger. In turn, the trust fund would be exhausted sooner than CBO anticipates under current law, meaning Congress would have less time to avoid substantial benefit cuts.
More for retirees: 2026 Social Security COLA estimated at 2.4% after latest inflation report
Importantly, while the precise time to trust fund depletion depends on the discrepancy between cash inflows and outflows, the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CFRB) says ending taxes on Social Security would move trust fund depletion forward by one year. Alternatively, a budget model from Ivy League business school Penn Wharton estimates it would hasten trust fund depletion by two years.
More broadly, CRFB estimates ending taxes on tips, overtime and Social Security — changes President Trump wants included in the "big, beautiful bill" currently being debated in Congress — would collectively bring trust fund depletion forward by three years. In that scenario, benefits would be cut in 2032 unless lawmakers fix the financing problem.
Additionally, because those tax law modifications could reduce Social Security's revenue by as much as $2 trillion over the next decade, the resultant benefit cuts would be even larger than expected. CRFB estimates payments would be slashed 33% by 2035, up from the 23% cut projected by CBO under current tax law.
Here's the bottom line: Representatives from both political parties have proposed eliminating taxes on Social Security benefits. President Trump has gone even further in suggesting tips and overtime should be exempt from federal income tax. Those changes may ultimately be a bad thing for retired workers, despite increasing benefits for individuals that currently owe tax on their Social Security checks.
Nancy Altman, President of nonprofit group Social Security Works, recently told Kiplinger, "[Trump's] talking about getting rid of taxation, which increases benefits, but the very benefits that are subject to taxation will be much reduced. So basically, it's not an honest proposal."
The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The Motley Fool is a USA TODAY content partner offering financial news, analysis and commentary designed to help people take control of their financial lives. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY.
The $
22,924 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook
Offer from the Motley Fool: If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known "Social Security secrets"could help ensure a boost in your retirement income.
One easy trick could pay you as much as $22,924 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. JoinStock Advisorto learn more about these strategies.
View the "Social Security secrets" »

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Thinking of getting away? A new direct flight debuts at Miami airport
Thinking of getting away? A new direct flight debuts at Miami airport

Miami Herald

time25 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Thinking of getting away? A new direct flight debuts at Miami airport

Have the storms and flooding the first few days of hurricane season got you thinking of heading out of town? You may want to get over to MIA, pronto. American Airlines debuts a nonstop flight to Rome on Thursday. American Airlines' first nonstop flight between Miami International Airport and Rome's Fiumicino Airport is scheduled to depart MIA at 7:45 p.m. June 5. The roughly 10-hour trip will be aboard a Boeing 777-200 aircraft. The airline will run daily service. The flight was originally planned to start in July, but increased demand pushed up the date. Miami to Europe Rome becomes the fifth city in Europe with direct flights with MIA on American Airlines. The others are Madrid, Barcelona, Paris and London. The flight to Charles de Gaulle Airport operates during the winter. 'We are strengthening our service to Europe,' Juan Carlos Liscano, the airline's vice president of MIA operations, said in an email to the Miami Herald. Other carriers fly between MIA and Italy. British Airways and Lufthansa have direct flights to Rome although not every day. Condor has service four times a week. American Airlines and MIA As MIA's largest airline, American is betting on the airport's continued growth. 'American Airlines continues to double down on Miami,' Liscano said. The carrier, which says it has about 15,000 employees based at MIA, is flying its largest summer schedule ever out of Florida's second busiest airport, and for the second straight year. Between May 16 and Sept. 2, American will operate more than 37,200 flights from MIA, about 336 per day. That's an increase of 3% in flights compared to the same period in 2024. The number of flights is also expected to grow next year with American the official North American Supplier of the FIFA World Cup and with Miami is one of the host cities. Other locales seeing more flight frequency from MIA on American this summer include: ▪ Chicago O'Hare: 8 flights daily, up from 7 daily ▪ Las Vegas: 4 flights daily, up from 3 ▪ Montego Bay: 3 flights daily, up from 2 ▪ Charleston: 3 flights daily, up from 2 ▪ Los Angeles: 8 flights daily, up from 7 ▪ New York La Guardia: 10 flights daily, up from 9 American is also adding new year-round service to Salt Lake City. And if you're looking to stay closer to home, American will start service from MIA to Sarasota-Bradenton in November.

Private prison operator blocked from housing ICE detainees at shuttered facility
Private prison operator blocked from housing ICE detainees at shuttered facility

The Hill

time26 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Private prison operator blocked from housing ICE detainees at shuttered facility

A judge in Kansas issued a Wednesday ruling determining that a private prison operator could not use its shuttered facility to house detainees from the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Leavenworth County Judge John Bryant granted a temporary restraining order blocking CoreCivic from housing individuals in the custody of ICE. The order was issued after a March lawsuit was thrown out in May on technical grounds, according to the Associated Press. CoreCivic did not immediately reply to The Hill's request for comment on the ruling. Earlier this year, executives applied to use their 1,033-bed facility to help the Trump administration facilitate removals in its crackdown on illegal immigration. CoreCivic said it would lose $4.2 million each month it wasn't open, according to legal files reviewed by AP. The company applied for a permit to use the grounds for ICE operations but withdrew its application in May alleging it didn't need permission from the city to determine which detainees to house. 'It became clear to CoreCivic that there was not a cooperative relationship,' said Taylor Concannon Hausmann, an attorney for the private prison operator, speaking in court, as reported by the AP. However, city attorney Joe Hatley urged the company to 'follow the rules' and obtain the proper permit for operations. The CoreCivic property is located 10 miles away from the Kansas City International Airport and has previously worked with federal officials to house pre-trial detainees, according to the AP. In 2021, the Tennessee-based company stopped working for the U.S. Marshals Service after former President Biden urged the Justice Department to cease contracts with private prison operators. Multiple inmate violations were flagged in addition to reported suicides and killings. The Trump administration has been working with the private sector to undertake deportation efforts, including the GEO Group, which is planning to reopen New Jersey's Delaney Hall to hold individuals awaiting removal. Democrats have protested the use of the facility for federal purposes citing concerns about federal operations within Newark, a designated sanctuary city.

Anthropic CEO: GOP AI regulation proposal ‘too blunt'
Anthropic CEO: GOP AI regulation proposal ‘too blunt'

The Hill

time28 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Anthropic CEO: GOP AI regulation proposal ‘too blunt'

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei criticized the latest Republican proposal to regulate artificial intelligence (AI) as 'far too blunt an instrument' to mitigate the risks of the rapidly evolving technology. In an op-ed published by The New York Times on Thursday, Amodei said the provision barring states from regulating AI for 10 years — which the Senate is now considering under President Trump's massive policy and spending package — would 'tie the hands of state legislators' without laying out a cohesive strategy on the national level. 'The motivations behind the moratorium are understandable,' the top executive of the artificial intelligence startup wrote. 'It aims to prevent a patchwork of inconsistent state laws, which many fear could be burdensome or could compromise America's ability to compete with China.' 'But a 10-year moratorium is far too blunt an instrument,' he continued. 'A.I. is advancing too head-spinningly fast. I believe that these systems could change the world, fundamentally, within two years; in 10 years, all bets are off.' Amodei added, 'Without a clear plan for a federal response, a moratorium would give us the worst of both worlds — no ability for states to act, and no national policy as a backstop.' The tech executive outlined some of the risks that his company, as well as others, have discovered during experimental stress tests of AI systems. He described a scenario in which a person tells a bot that it will soon be replaced with a newer model. The bot, which previously was granted access to the person's emails, threatens to expose details of his marital affair by forwarding his emails to his wife — if the user does not reverse plans to shut it down. 'This scenario isn't fiction,' Amodei wrote. 'Anthropic's latest A.I. model demonstrated just a few weeks ago that it was capable of this kind of behavior.' The AI mogul added that transparency is the best way to mitigate risks without overregulating and stifling progress. He said his company publishes results of studies voluntarily but called on the federal government to make these steps mandatory. 'At the federal level, instead of a moratorium, the White House and Congress should work together on a transparency standard for A.I. companies, so that emerging risks are made clear to the American people,' Amodei wrote. He also noted the standard should require AI developers to adopt policies for testing models and publicly disclose them, as well as require that they outline steps they plan to take to mitigate risk. The companies, the executive continued, would 'have to be upfront' about steps taken after test results to make sure models were safe. 'Having this national transparency standard would help not only the public but also Congress understand how the technology is developing, so that lawmakers can decide whether further government action is needed,' he added. Amodei also suggested state laws should follow a similar model that is 'narrowly focused on transparency and not overly prescriptive or burdensome.' Those laws could then be superseded if a national transparency standard is adopted, Amodei said. He noted the issue is not a partisan one, praising steps Trump has taken to support domestic development of AI systems. 'This is not about partisan politics. Politicians on both sides of the aisle have long raised concerns about A.I. and about the risks of abdicating our responsibility to steward it well,' the executive wrote. 'I support what the Trump administration has done to clamp down on the export of A.I. chips to China and to make it easier to build A.I. infrastructure here in the United States.' 'This is about responding in a wise and balanced way to extraordinary times,' he continued. 'Faced with a revolutionary technology of uncertain benefits and risks, our government should be able to ensure we make rapid progress, beat China and build A.I. that is safe and trustworthy. Transparency will serve these shared aspirations, not hinder them.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store