Bank of England head welcomes UK efforts with EU
Speaking in Dublin on Thursday, Andrew Bailey said in relation to Brexit 'that we should do all we can to minimise negative effects on trade'.
With reference to the Windsor Framework, which he described as a 'welcome step forward', Mr Bailey said: 'So too are the initiatives of the current UK Government to rebuild trade between the UK and EU.'
The Windsor Framework, agreed between the UK and the EU in 2023, amended the Northern Ireland Protocol and governs post-Brexit trading arrangements in the region.
Last week, the Government announced a deal with the European bloc that gives UK tourists in Europe easier access to passport e-gates, and frees up trade with the continent for farmers and food producers because of alignment on veterinary and plant standards.
It was also said that the UK and EU will work more closely together on defence and security, and will agree a 'youth experience scheme' allowing young British people to travel and work on the continent.
Sir Keir Starmer said at the time the deal was announced that it is 'time to look forward, to move on from the stale old debates and political fights'.
In an interview with the BBC earlier this month – before the deal was struck with the EU – Mr Bailey said that it would be 'beneficial' to reverse the post-Brexit reduction in UK-EU trade.
He said: 'It is important we do everything we can to ensure that whatever decisions are taken on the Brexit front do not damage the long-term trade position.
'So I hope that we can use this to start to rebuild that relationship.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Guardian
5 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Hegseth: US will stand by Indo-Pacific allies against ‘imminent' China threat
He said Washington will bolster its defences overseas to counter what the Pentagon sees as rapidly developing threats by Beijing, particularly in its aggressive stance towards Taiwan. China has conducted numerous exercises to test what a blockade would look like of the self-governing island, which Beijing claims as its own and the US has pledged to defend. China's army 'is rehearsing for the real deal', Mr Hegseth said in a keynote speech at a security conference in Singapore. 'We are not going to sugarcoat it — the threat China poses is real. And it could be imminent.' China has a stated goal of having its military have the capability to take Taiwan by force if necessary by 2027, a deadline that is seen by experts as more of an aspirational goal than a hard war deadline. But China also has built sophisticated man-made islands in the South China Sea to support new military outposts and developed highly advanced hypersonic and space capabilities, which are driving the US to create its own space-based Golden Dome missile defences. Speaking at the Shangri-La Dialogue, a global security conference hosted by the International Institute for Security Studies, Mr Hegseth said China is no longer just building up its military forces to take Taiwan, it's 'actively training for it, every day'. Mr Hegseth also called out China for its ambitions in Latin America, particularly its efforts to increase its influence over the Panama Canal. He urged countries in the region to increase defence spending to levels similar to the 5% of their gross domestic product European nations are now pressed to contribute. 'We must all do our part,' Mr Hegseth said. He also repeated a pledge made by previous administrations to bolster US military capabilities in the Indo-Pacific to provide a more robust deterrent. While both the Obama and Biden administrations had also committed to pivoting to the Pacific and established new military agreements throughout the region, a full shift has never been realised. Instead, US military resources from the Indo-Pacific have been regularly pulled to support military needs in the Middle East and Europe, especially since the wars in Ukraine and Gaza. In the first few months of president Donald Trump's second term, that has also been the case. In the last few months the Trump administration has taken a Patriot missile defence battalion out of the Indo-Pacific in order to send it to the Middle East, a massive logistical operation that required more than 73 military cargo aircraft flights, and sent Coast Guard ships back to the US to help defend the US-Mexico border. Mr Hegseth was asked why the US pulled those resources if the Indo-Pacific is the priority theatre for the US. He did not directly answer but said the shift of resources was necessary to defend against Houthi missile attacks launched from Yemen, and to bolster protections against illegal immigration into the US. At the same time, he stressed the need for American allies and partners to step up their own defence spending and preparations, saying the US was not interested in going it alone. 'Ultimately a strong, resolute and capable network of allies and partners is our key strategic advantage,' he said. 'China envies what we have together, and it sees what we can collectively bring to bear on defence, but it's up to all of us to ensure that we live up to that potential by investing.' The Indo-Pacific nations caught in between have tried to balance relations with both the US and China over the years. Beijing is the primary trading partner for many, but is also feared as a regional bully, in part due to its increasingly aggressive claims on natural resources such as critical fisheries. Mr Hegseth cautioned that playing both sides, seeking US military support and Chinese economic support, carries risk. 'Economic dependence on China only deepens their malign influence and complicates our defense decision space during times of tension,' Mr Hegseth said. China usually sends its own defence minister to this conference, but Dong Jun did not attend this year in a snub to the US and the erratic tariff war Mr Trump has ignited with Beijing, something the US delegation said it intended to capitalise on. 'We are here this morning. And somebody else isn't,' Mr Hegseth said. Mr Hegseth was asked by a member of the Chinese delegation, made up of lower level officers from the National Defence University, how committed it would be to regional alliances. In some, China has a more dominant influence. Mr Hegseth said the US would be open to engaging with any countries willing to work with it. 'We are not going to look only inside the confines of how previous administrations looked at this region,' he said. 'We're opening our arms to countries across the spectrum — traditional allies, non-traditional allies.' Mr Hegseth said committing US support for Indo-Pacific nations would not require local governments to align with the West on cultural or climate issues. It is not clear if the US can or wants to supplant China as the region's primary economic driver. But Mr Hegseth's push follows Mr Trump's visit to the Middle East, which resulted in billions of dollars in new defence agreements.
The Herald Scotland
12 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Supreme Court lets Trump revoke migrants' temporary status
Jackson wrote that the court "plainly botched" its assessment of whether the government or the migrants would suffer the greater harm if the migrants' legal status ends while the case is being litigated. Jackson said the majority undervalued "the devastating consequences of allowing the Government to precipitously upend the lives and livelihoods of nearly half a million noncitizens while their legal claims are pending." The administration wants to cut short a program that provided a two-year haven for immigrants because of economic, security, political and health crises in their home countries. Lawyers for the migrants said half a million people lawfully in the country will become subject to deportation, what it called the "largest mass illegalization event in modern American history." Labor unions and communities that have welcomed the migrants said they've filled gaps in key industries, including healthcare, construction and manufacturing. Nearly 20% of the workers at one automotive parts manufacturer are in the temporary program, according to labor unions. The Trump administration said it's determined the migrants' presence in the United States is "against the national interests" and the courts don't get to decide otherwise. The move is part of the President Donald Trump's crackdown on immigration and push to ramp up deportations, including of noncitizens previously granted a legal right to live and work in the United States. The Biden administration hoped the program would deter migrants from those countries from trying to enter the country illegally. But the Trump administration cancelled people's work permits and deportation protections, arguing the program failed as a deterrent and makes it harder to enforce immigration laws for those already in the country. Immigrant rights groups challenged the change on behalf of the immigrants and their sponsors. A federal judge in Massachusetts said the abrupt curtailing of the program was based on a legal error, as the administration wrongly concluded that letting the temporary status naturally expire would foreclose the Homeland Security Department's ability to legally expedite their deportations. District Judge Indira Talwani, an appointee of Democratic President Barack Obama, also said early cancellation of protections requires a case-by-case review for each participant. A three-judge panel of the Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals backed Talwani's decision to temporarily block mass cancellation. All three judges were appointed by Democratic presidents. The Justice Department argued the lower courts are "undoing democratically approved policies that featured heavily in the November election." Lawyers for a group of cities and counties said the abrupt cancellation of the program "would case severe economic and societal harms."
Telegraph
25 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Farage's flirtation with Bitcoin will cost him his credibility
Nigel Farage's entire political career has been coupled with the pursuit of credibility. From those early days of Ukip, unsuccessfully soliciting the backing of Enoch Powell, through his incendiary years in the European Parliament culminating in Brexit, to his return to Reform ahead of last year's general election, Farage has been a vocal and powerful figure in politics – but always outside the realm of serious contender. Lately, however, the story has changed. Reform comfortably leads the polls, overturned a near 15,000-vote majority to win a by-election and was the emphatic winner of recent local elections. Farage is an MP and widely considered the unofficial opposition, despite heading only the seventh-largest party in Parliament. Even the Prime Minister was forced to declare Farage the 'main challenger' to his government. His credibility is no longer in question. Or at least it shouldn't be. But, just hours after Sir Keir Starmer conceded that Reform had replaced one of the most successful political parties in history as the focus of his attention, Farage took the stage in a foreign country to announce a new policy that could torch his hard-won recognition. Playing to the crowds of the annual Bitcoin Conference in Las Vegas, Farage committed the UK to a variety of crypto proposals in a move that smells more of his time in the political cold between Ukip and Reform than it does of a potential prime minister-in-waiting. While policies such as allowing Reform to accept political donations in Bitcoin are irrelevant (I honestly believed they already accepted crypto cash), and a new rate of capital gains tax just for the world's most insufferable zealots will be forgotten by both party and people, Farage laid out a dangerous precedent at his fireside chat. In declaring the Bank of England will be forced to establish a 'Bitcoin digital reserve', à la Donald Trump, Farage has made two key errors. The first threatens his credibility with markets and the mysterious 'bond vigilantes' – a relationship that has already been strained by his other recent policy announcements. It's not even the ridiculous notion itself of a nation state buying a bunch of Bitcoin that rankles, but the inherent threat to the independence of the central bank which is foolhardy. Just ask Liz Truss. Even Trump has (somewhat) backed down from his fight with 'loser' chairman of the Federal Reserve Jerome Powell, understanding that, like it or not, an independent central bank is sacrosanct in the 21st century. There are fair arguments to be made on both sides regarding Farage's £90bn tax cuts. They simply cannot all be instated and do ring of 'fantasy economics' in some regards, but I think you would struggle to find any supporters of 'fiscal drag', that most euphemistic of persistent tax burdens. But, even more vital to Farage's credibility is his perception from the polling station, not Threadneedle Street – and right now he seems more concerned with winning votes in the US than he does the UK. Crypto is not a serious issue for voters here: a recent YouGov survey found that just 11pc of people in the UK have a positive view of crypto, which correlates with the amount of people who own any. More than a third of people either don't know or don't care. It strikes anyone paying attention as a tickbox exercise designed to emulate the American Right rather than built from his own sincere belief. A brief look at the comments confirms it: 'Farage is making a big mistake here. He is copying Trump on this but the involvement of Trump and his DJT company and of his two sons in this is rather murky, to say the least.' 'Sorry Nigel, not a good idea, total gamble and the sort of thing Trump does, but should not be for a stable central bank to do…' Perhaps Farage is hoping for a boost to the (unaffiliated) $FARAGE coin he once shilled for (currently down 96pc on its peak). Or maybe he is being paid for the promotion (like his £189,000 pay cheque from Direct Bullion for four hours' work promoting gold). He may even sincerely believe these policies will drag Britain into a prosperous future. But he must consider whether all of this is worth that hard won and easily lost prize of credibility. He'll have to make up his mind soon. The most liked comment under the news of his Bitcoin bill is simple: 'Successfully turning me off Reform day-by-day.'
