AUD Students' Council demands to revoke suspensions of 5 students
Tensions escalated in the university following the April 12 suspension of five students including elected union members for allegedly attempting to meet Vice Chancellor Anu Singh Lather.
However, the administration accused them of obstructing official duties and attempting assault, allegations that have been firmly denied by the students as well as the Students' Federation of India , which has extended support to the protest.
The suspended students were part of a demonstration against the administration's handling of a ragging case in the Karampura campus. Videos and photos circulating online reportedly show the students being beaten with sticks and physically assaulted by police and private security personnel.
Over the last 11 days, the student movement has seen a surge in participation and activity and April 15, more than 200 students participated in a 'March for Justice' on the Karampura campus, an official statement of AUDSC said.
Between April 16 and 20, General Body Meetings were held across undergraduate and postgraduate programs, all of which condemned the suspensions and called for the restoration of normalcy. Research scholars from other AUD campuses have passed solidarity resolutions backing the demands of the Karampura students.
A campus-wide class boycott was held on April 21, which the students' council claimed was successful in 20 out of 27 programs — amounting to roughly 75 per cent of lectures being boycotted. The council said this was not the first time students had resorted to such measures, recalling earlier boycotts in solidarity with the victims of the 2020 Delhi riots and to demand digital infrastructure during the COVID-19 lockdown.
Students have also launched a hunger strike, which has now entered into its second week, with many reportedly falling ill due to heat and starvation. The students claim they have made repeated efforts to meet the university administration, but no meeting has materialised despite verbal assurances.
'This raises serious questions over whether AUD's management is wishing to fight a war of attrition against its main stakeholders — the students,' the council said in its statement.
Their demands include the immediate revocation of suspensions, reopening of the main gate and removal of barricades inside the campus, withdrawal of a notice banning protests in administrative areas, cancellation of a show-cause notice issued to faculty member Dr Kaustav Banerjee for expressing solidarity with students, and restoration of the university's common mailing list, which has been disabled since March 6.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
2 days ago
- The Hindu
Students' unions demand A.P. government to conduct elections in educational institutions
Condemning the recent circular by the State government restricting individuals or groups to enter school premises without prior permission from the head of the institution, leaders of Students' Federation of India (SFI), Progressive Democratic Students Union (PDSU) and All India Students' Federation (AISF) demanded the government to immediately revoke the orders. In a press conference at MCA Bhavan in Ongole on Thursday, PDSU State vice-president L. Rajasekhar demanded the State government to conduct elections for student unions in educational institutions. He strongly criticised the government for allegedly trying to control student unions that have been fighting uncompromisingly for the rights and welfare of students for the last 70 years. Calling the circular 'undemocratic', he said, 'No matter which government is in power, student unions will selflessly fight for the problems of the students. Right to Education Act was brought due to our struggles. We want proper teachers in government educational institutions, own buildings and labs, funds for the mid-day meal scheme and jobs for the students who completed their studies.' 'Is it wrong to question the government on the private and corporate educational institutions that are collecting exorbitant fees, as well as thousands of rupees for books, shoes, belts, ties, and others from the students? Is it not necessary to control the mushrooming schools without recognition,' asked SFI State vice-president CH. Vinod Kumar. 'Shouldn't we question if the students in corporate educational institutions are being forced to commit suicide for various reasons? They are saying that students should not be involved in politics. Is politics in the State confined to only Nara Chandrababu Naidu, Lokesh, and few other families?' he questioned. 'The existence of student unions does not harm any student, they act as intermediaries between the government and students. They work for the welfare of students. The circular issued by the government to control the student organisations should be immediately revoked,' the SFI leaders demanded.
The Hindu
6 days ago
- The Hindu
SFI conducts cricket tournament for social welfare hostel students
The Students' Federation of India (SFI) on Sunday (August 10, 2025) organised a cricket tournament for students of the social welfare hostels at the ITI Grounds in Kongareddypalle locality here. The Communist Party of India (Marxist) State leaders Vada Gangaraju and Balasubramanyam inaugurated the event and appreciated the participation of students from SC, ST, and BC hostels. They urged the State government to ensure that social welfare hostels have sports material and also curb the sale of gutka and other drugs near educational institutions. They further demanded that the students travelling long distances from hostels to colleges should be transported safely. The SFI is conducting a series of competitions in sports and games across the Chittoor district as part of the Independence Day celebrations, and the prizes will be presented on August 15.
Hans India
30-07-2025
- Hans India
Australia to Ban YouTube for Under-16s by December 2025, Tech Giants Face $50M Penalty for Non-Compliance
Australia is taking a firmer stand on digital safety for children, expanding its age restrictions on social media to now include YouTube. The move, announced this week, will prohibit children under the age of 16 from creating accounts on the video-sharing platform starting in December 2025. Platforms found in violation of the new law could face penalties of up to AUD 49.5 million (approximately $50 million USD). This decision comes as part of a broader crackdown aimed at minimizing children's exposure to harmful online content. YouTube joins the likes of TikTok, Snapchat, Instagram, and Facebook—platforms already restricted under the same law passed in November 2024. Previously, YouTube had been given a temporary exemption. The reversal was driven by mounting concerns raised by Australia's eSafety Commissioner, who argued that YouTube's algorithmic recommendations and interactive features present dangers comparable to other social platforms. A government report set to be released later this month is expected to outline enforcement mechanisms, especially regarding age-verification technology. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, voicing his support for the expanded ban, said, 'I'm calling time on it.' He emphasized that tech companies must take more responsibility for the well-being of young users and not prioritize profit over protection. 'I want Australian parents to know that we have their backs,' he stated. A recent survey added urgency to the government's decision, revealing that 37% of users under 18 had encountered harmful or disturbing content on YouTube—the highest of any platform. Moreover, 68% of children aged 10 to 12 were found to be actively engaging with YouTube content, despite existing parental control options. Although children under 16 will be restricted from creating their own accounts, parents and educators will still be allowed to show videos in classrooms and homes. Angela Falkenberg, president of the Australian Primary Principals Association, supported the government's action and assured the public that teachers are capable of managing content in educational settings. 'Teachers are always curators of any resource for appropriateness (and) will be judicious,' she said. Not surprisingly, YouTube has expressed opposition to the decision. In a statement, the company argued, 'Our position remains clear, YouTube is a video sharing platform with a library of free, high-quality content, increasingly viewed on TV screens. It's not social media.' The platform insists that its core function differs from social networks and that nearly 75% of Australian teens aged 13–15 rely on it. However, critics remain unconvinced. Many point to YouTube's recommendation algorithm and user engagement features, which they claim mirror social media behaviour. Cybersecurity professionals have noted that advances in AI have exacerbated these issues. 'The Australian government's move to regulate YouTube is an important step in pushing back against the unchecked power of big tech and protecting kids,' said Adam Marre, Chief Information Security Officer at Arctic Wolf. While YouTube has been lobbying behind the scenes and may pursue a legal challenge, the government seems determined to enforce the upcoming age restrictions. As the December deadline approaches, all eyes are now on how tech companies will respond—and whether more countries will follow suit.
