Saylor's Strategy swings to quarterly profit as treasury strategy gains momentum
In a watershed moment of legitimacy for the crypto industry, U.S. President Donald Trump signed the GENIUS Act into law earlier this month.
Industry anticipation leading up to the moment helped rally bitcoin — the largest cryptocurrency — past $120,000 for the first time as investors cheered Washington's long-awaited approval on digital assets.
Strategy held 597,325 bitcoins as of June 30, at an average cost of $70,982. Bitcoin currently trades around $116,600.
It recorded a $14 billion unrealized fair value gain on digital assets during the quarter that saw corporations ranging from major U.S. banks to payment firms embrace crypto.
Until the fourth quarter of 2024, the company could only record losses when bitcoin's value fell below its purchase price, but could not recognize price increases unless it sold bitcoin.
The company's net profit was $9.97 billion, or $32.60 per share, for the three months ended June 30, compared with a loss of $102.6 million, or 57 cents per share, a year earlier.
Strategy began buying bitcoin with cash in 2020 and then started issuing low-cost convertible bonds and stock sales to finance its accumulation drive.
Its shares are up nearly 39 per cent this year, eclipsing bitcoin's 25 per cent climb, a phenomenon that has now inspired several public companies to pivot their operations and mimic founder and executive chairman Michael Saylor's buy-and-hold treasury approach.
"We're in a hyper-growth, hyper-adoption phase for bitcoin as a treasury reserve asset," said Saylor on a post-earnings call.
A few among these companies are now also pivoting to smaller tokens like ether, often listing via mergers with blank-check vehicles to wrap crypto assets into equity.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
9 minutes ago
- Straits Times
After a lag, US consumers begin to feel the pinch of tariffs
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Government data showed prices rose in June on items heavily exposed to tariffs, such as home furnishings, toys and appliances. Companies are starting to shift more tariff-related costs onto consumers. Many businesses chose to absorb the additional tax during the early days of President Donald Trump's trade war . But evidence is emerging that they are running out of options to keep prices stable in the face of deteriorating profit margins, suggesting that the tariffs could have a more pronounced effect on prices in the months ahead. Government data shows that prices rose in June on items heavily exposed to tariffs, such as home furnishings, toys and appliances. And in recent days – before Mr Trump announced tariffs for much of the world on the night of July 31 – Adidas, Procter & Gamble, Stanley Black & Decker and other large corporations told investors that they either had increased prices or planned to do so soon to offset the tariff costs. Companies like Walmart and toy makers Hasbro and Mattel had already warned that tariffs would lead to higher prices. 'We have no interest in running a lower-margin business, particularly due to tariffs,' Mr Richard Westenberger, the chief financial officer of Carter's, a children's apparel maker, said on a call with analysts July 25. 'And if this is something that's going to be a permanent increase to our cost structure, we have to find a way to cover it.' Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Despite bag checks and warnings, young partygoers continue to vape in clubs in Singapore Singapore Ong Beng Seng to plead guilty on Aug 4, more than 2 years after trip to Qatar with Iswaran Singapore LTA, Singapore bus operators reviewing Malaysia's request to start services from JB at 4am Singapore NDP 2025: Veteran Red Lion says each leap 'feels like 5km run' Business Decoupling to save on tax? You may lose right to property if ties go awry Singapore Lessons learnt from Singapore's love-hate relationship with e-scooters Opinion At UN's Wipo, Singaporean Daren Tang strives to create an equal music for haves and have-nots Asia Mass grave with over 100 skeletons in Sri Lanka brings up old wounds Economists have been watching for signs of tariff-related price increases since Mr Trump rolled out his trade policy in the spring. But inflation remained relatively muted, defying expectations and prompting the White House to declare that those who predicted the tariffs would elevate prices were mistaken. Even some forecasters are acknowledging that the tariffs have taken longer to work their way through to consumer prices than initially anticipated. Mr Jerome Powell, chair of the Federal Reserve, said on July 30 that the process might be 'slower than expected at the beginning'. 'We think we have a long way to go to really understand exactly how it will be,' he said. Ms Sarah House, an economist at Wells Fargo, said the next three to six months would be 'crunch time,' as more tariff rates solidified. 'Businesses are grappling with the fact that tariffs are here to stay, and as there's more certainty around a higher tariff environment, they are going to be more willing and able to adjust their prices,' she said. 'We're getting to a point where you're going to start to see those feed through.' NYTIMES
Straits Times
9 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Lashing out over Russia and jobs data, Trump displays his volatile side
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox On Aug 1, Mr Trump, confronted with foes and facts that he could not easily control, displayed another side of himself. WASHINGTON - Despite slowing over the first half of the year, the US economy has remained reasonably healthy. Yet when the jobs report for July was released Aug 1, showing a substantial slowdown in hiring, President Donald Trump lashed out, claiming the figures were rigged and firing the head of the government agency that produces them. Mr Dmitry Medvedev was once president of Russia, but now is little more than the Kremlin's favourite online troll. Yet when he got under Mr Trump's skin with provocative posts about nuclear war, Mr Trump, already increasingly infuriated by President Vladimir Putin's unwillingness to work with him to end the war in Ukraine, responded on Aug 1 as if a real superpower conflict could be brewing, ordering submarines into position to guard against any threat. Just days earlier, Mr Trump had returned to the United States from a golf trip, happily flexing his political and diplomatic power. A capitulating Congress had passed his signature domestic policy legislation, despite concerns over its deep cuts to the social safety net. The European Union caved to Mr Trump and his threat of tariffs by announcing a trade deal during the president's trip to Scotland. Emboldened, Mr Trump moved ahead with sweeping tariffs that could reshape the world economy. But on Aug 1, Mr Trump, confronted with foes and facts that he could not easily control, displayed another side of himself, responding with disproportionate intensity and a distinct impatience. His actions were part of a pattern in which he has shown growing intolerance toward those who will not bend to his will. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Despite bag checks and warnings, young partygoers continue to vape in clubs in Singapore Singapore Ong Beng Seng to plead guilty on Aug 4, more than 2 years after trip to Qatar with Iswaran Singapore LTA, Singapore bus operators reviewing Malaysia's request to start services from JB at 4am Singapore NDP 2025: Veteran Red Lion says each leap 'feels like 5km run' Business Decoupling to save on tax? You may lose right to property if ties go awry Singapore Lessons learnt from Singapore's love-hate relationship with e-scooters Opinion At UN's Wipo, Singaporean Daren Tang strives to create an equal music for haves and have-nots Asia Mass grave with over 100 skeletons in Sri Lanka brings up old wounds Mr Jerome Powell, the Federal Reserve chair who has defied Mr Trump's demands for interest rate cuts, has been subject to withering and relentless criticism and insults from the president. Mr Trump has assailed those of his own supporters who have refused to drop their demands for release of the Jeffrey Epstein files. But his actions on Aug 1 were especially striking because they involved fiery reactions to two of the biggest issues on his plate. Russia under Putin, once viewed by Mr Trump as a partner in solving big problems, has left Mr Trump frustrated and facing mocking reminders of his pledge that he could bring the war in Ukraine to an end on his first day in office. With Mr Putin now responding to Mr Trump's peace efforts by launching more attacks and brushing off threats of further US sanctions, Mr Trump has turned against him – and on Aug 1 used his commander-in-chief powers to respond to baiting posts from one of Mr Putin's online attack dogs. Soon after disclosing on his social media platform that he had ordered nuclear submarines 'to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that', Mr Trump fired the head of the Bureau of Labour Statistics, claiming that the employment numbers were being massaged to make him look bad. 'I think he deliberately surrounded himself with yes men and yes women,' said Mr John Bolton, a former national security adviser to Mr Trump. 'It's more evidence he's not fit to be president. This is not the way a president responds to either one of these situations.' In firing the commissioner of the statistics bureau, Ms Erika McEntarfer , who was confirmed on a bipartisan basis in 2024, Mr Trump accused her of a long pattern of rigging the job numbers to hurt him before and after the 2024 election, a claim dismissed by economists across the political spectrum. 'I believe the numbers were phony, just like they were before the election,' Mr Trump said as he left the White House on Aug 1. 'And there were other times. So you know what I did? I fired her, and you know what I did? The right thing.' The move cemented many fears that Mr Trump, who has already fired inspectors general and installed loyalists in the Justice Department, would eventually root out government officials who report politically inconvenient data or intimidate them from publicly disclosing bad news. Mr William W. Beach, a former head of the Bureau of Labour Statistics who was nominated by Mr Trump during his first term, described the firing as 'groundless' and warned that it sets 'a dangerous precedent'. 'This escalates the president's unprecedented attacks on the independence and integrity of the federal statistical system,' Mr Beach said in a joint statement with other statisticians. 'The president seeks to blame someone for unwelcome economic news.' Mr Trump similarly showed little caution earlier in the day in responding to Mr Medvedev, who had said in a social media post that Mr Trump should imagine the apocalyptic television series 'The Walking Dead' and noted the Soviet Union's system for launching a nuclear strike. 'Words are very important,' Mr Trump said. 'And can often lead to unintended consequences. I hope this will not be one of those instances.' Mr Bolton said it was the president who needed to show more discipline. 'He may not even understand what he's doing,' Mr Bolton said. 'It's so natural to him to say outrageous things that he's incapable of thinking about the strategic consequences.' Having surrounded himself with aides unwilling to challenge his impulses, Mr Trump faces no constraints on lashing out impulsively, Mr Bolton said. 'Trump is not deterred by reality,' Mr Bolton said. 'He just says what he wants to say.' In attacking Mr Powell, the Fed chair, Mr Trump has sought to accuse him of mismanaging an expensive renovation of the central bank's headquarters. But when Mr Trump showed up at the building recently to make his case, Mr Powell, in a low-key but remarkable display of defiance, publicly challenged cost figures being cited by the president.
CNA
9 hours ago
- CNA
India will continue to buy Russian oil, government sources say
NEW DELHI: India will continue to purchase oil from Russia, despite US President Donald Trump's threats of penalties, two Indian government sources said, speaking on condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the matter. "These are long-term oil contracts," one of the sources said. "It is not so simple to just stop buying overnight." Trump last month indicated in a Truth Social post that India would face additional penalties for purchases of Russian arms and oil. On Friday (Aug 1), Trump told reporters that he had heard that India would no longer be buying oil from Russia. The New York Times on Saturday quoted two unnamed senior Indian officials as saying there had been no change in Indian government policy, with one official saying the government had "not given any direction to oil companies" to cut back imports from Russia. Reuters reported this week that Indian state refiners stopped buying Russian oil in the past week after discounts narrowed in July. "TIME-TESTED PARTNERSHIP" WITH RUSSIA "On our energy sourcing requirements ... we look at what is there available in the markets, what is there on offer, and also what is the prevailing global situation or circumstances," India's foreign ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal told reporters during a regular briefing on Friday. Jaiswal added that India has a "steady and time-tested partnership" with Russia, and that New Delhi's relations with various countries stand on their own merit and should not be seen from the prism of a third country. The White House in Washington did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Indian refiners are pulling back from Russian crude as discounts shrink to their lowest since 2022, when Western sanctions were first imposed on Moscow, due to lower Russian exports and steady demand, sources said earlier this week. The country's state refiners - Indian Oil Corp, Hindustan Petroleum Corp, Bharat Petroleum Corp and Mangalore Refinery Petrochemical Ltd - have not sought Russian crude in the past week or so, four sources familiar with the refiners' purchase plans told Reuters. 100% TARIFF THREAT On July 14, Trump threatened 100 per cent tariffs on countries that buy Russian oil unless Moscow reaches a major peace deal with Ukraine. Russia is the top supplier to India, responsible for about 35 per cent of India's overall supplies. Russia continued to be the top oil supplier to India during the first six months of 2025, accounting for about 35 per cent of India's overall supplies, followed by Iraq, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. India, the world's third-largest oil importer and consumer, received about 1.75 million barrels per day of Russian oil in January-June this year, up 1 per cent from a year ago, according to data provided to Reuters by sources. Nayara Energy, a major buyer of Russian oil, was recently sanctioned by the European Union as the refinery is majority-owned by Russian entities, including oil major Rosneft. Last month, Reuters reported that Nayara's chief executive had resigned after the imposition of EU sanctions, and company veteran Sergey Denisov had been appointed as CEO.
