Iranian press review: Conservatives demand war until destruction of Israel
Kayhan daily calls for war until Israel destroyed
As Israel's attacks on military and civilian targets in Iran escalate, the conservative Kayhan daily has called for the war to continue until Israel is completely destroyed.
Kayhan is closely tied to Iran's supreme leader, and its editor-in-chief, Hossein Shariatmadari, was directly appointed by him.
On Tuesday, the daily published a front-page editorial with the headline: 'The condition for ending the war is the destruction of Israel, not the halt of attacks'.
Kayhan published the article after Iran's foreign ministry said that Iran would stop firing missiles if Israel ended its attacks.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
Kayhan wrote: 'Now is not the time for retreat or meaningless diplomacy. This is the golden moment. The condition for ending the war is not a ceasefire, nor is it political pressure, nor is it a shift in position. The only condition is the complete destruction of Israel.'
Shariatmadari is also a strong and regular advocate for closing the strategic Strait of Hormuz. The strait, located between Oman and Iran, is considered the world's most important gateway for oil shipping.
Pahlavi's support for Israel sparks anger
The BBC's interview with Reza Pahlavi, the son of the ousted shah of Iran, has sparked widespread criticism after he expressed support for Israel's bombing of Iranian cities.
Pahlavi, who has long supported Israel and met several times with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, also visited the Western Wall in 2023 and took part in Jewish religious ceremonies.
Trump promised not to go to war. His most ardent supporters want him to keep his word Read More »
In the BBC interview, he voiced strong support for Israel's attacks and claimed that harming civilians was not Israel's goal. He said, 'Clearly, I do not think it was the intention of the Israeli government to attack Iranian civilians.'
Arash Azizi, an Iranian writer based in the United States, commented on the BBC presenter's reaction to Pahlavi's remarks.
'Did you see the BBC presenter?' he wrote on X. 'She looks shocked and in disbelief. It's like she's feeling vicarious embarrassment when she asks Pahlavi, 'Are you actually saying that the Israel bombing your country, civilians in Iran are being killed, is a positive thing?' She can't believe it.'
Other Persian social media users also strongly criticised Pahlavi. Some compared his photo with Netanyahu to a photo of Massoud Rajavi and Saddam Hussein during the Iran-Iraq war, suggesting Pahlavi's actions were similar to those of Rajavi.
Rajavi was the leader of the People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran. During the eight-year Iran-Iraq war, he moved his forces to Iraq and fought alongside Saddam Hussein against Iran.
Granaz Mousavi, an Iranian poet who has faced court summons and travel restrictions imposed by Iranian authorities, posted both photos on Facebook with the caption: 'Don't sell out your homeland.'
Criticism mounts over intelligence failure
Since the start of Israel's attacks on Iran, state-run media have reported multiple arrests of individuals allegedly linked to Israeli intelligence. These reports claim the suspects were helping coordinate strikes from inside Iran.
Although these announcements were presented as achievements by Iranian security agencies, some outlets, such as the Sharq daily, criticised the intelligence services for failing to prevent Israeli infiltration.
Israeli attacks reawaken Gulf war trauma as Iranians attempt to flee Tehran Read More »
On Monday, the state-run IRNA news agency reported the discovery of a house in Fashafouyeh containing 200 kilograms of explosives. Meanwhile, Hamshahri reported that a drone production workshop had been found in Isfahan, along with the arrest of four people accused of collaborating with the Mossad, Israel's intelligence agency.
The claims have not been confirmed by independent sources.
The Sharq daily argued that these developments, along with the killing of several commanders from the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), show that Israel's intelligence network has been operating inside Iran for years without being stopped.
Sharq wrote: 'The recent attack by the Zionist regime on Iranian soil was not based on military strength, but rather on years of intelligence planning, building networks, and using agents inside the country.
'Previous security officials had warned about this many times, and even some senior figures raised alarms, but instead of listening, the authorities pushed them aside.'
Authorities tighten grip on free expression
Iranian authorities have tightened restrictions on media and free expression amid Israel's ongoing offensive.
Since Friday, several Iranians - including civil society activists - have been arrested for commenting on the conflict.
Israel and US exhausting supplies of ballistic missile interceptors, source says Read More »
Domestic media have also reported the return of Basij forces to the streets and the re-establishment of checkpoints, measures widely seen during the Iran-Iraq war.
This week, Ali Pakzad, a reporter for Sharq daily, and Saeed Majidi, a photojournalist working with international outlets, were detained for two days because of their reporting activities. Both were released on Wednesday after questioning.
The crackdown has not been limited to journalists. Social media users have also been targeted.
On Sunday, Tasnim news agency reported that 15 people were arrested in Mazandaran province for their posts on Persian-language platforms.
In addition, local media reported that student activist Motaharah Gonoy and well-known sociologist Mostafa Mehrayin were also recently detained.
*Iranian press review is a digest of news reports not independently verified as accurate by Middle East Eye.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
42 minutes ago
- Middle East Eye
EU review finds Israel violated trade agreement, but sanctions not expected
A major upcoming review of the EU-Israel trade agreement has found that Israel has violated the agreement due to its conduct in Gaza, Middle East Eye understands. EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas commissioned the review last month in response to a request by the Dutch government. Now MEE understands from diplomatic sources in Brussels that the review finds that Israel has violated the trade agreement's human rights and international law clauses. The EU is Israel's biggest trading partner. Sources told MEE the review contains evidence that Israel has breached international humanitarian law during its war on Gaza. They said that Kallas will present the review to EU foreign ministers in Brussels on Monday. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Diplomats expect a "difficult" debate and believe there will be no agreement reached on whether to "suspend political dialogue" or impose sanctions on Israel. Those issues will be addressed again at the 15 July meeting of EU foreign ministers, diplomats believe. MEE also understands that Kallas has a mandate from EU foreign ministers to push for de-escalation in the conflict between Israel and Iran - and that she is set to visit the Middle East next week. MEE has contacted Kallas' team for comment. Israel has gone 'beyond self-defence' Foreign ministers from Britain, France and Germany are reportedly scheduled to join Kallas on Friday in a meeting with the Iranian foreign minister to promote de-escalation. EUObserver and RTE have also reported the review is expected to find Israel violated the trade agreement. EU Commission and states indirectly fund Israeli military industry, report says Read More » On Wednesday Kallas told members of the European parliament that Israel's "blocking food... goes beyond self-defence". She said Israel was responsible for "disproportionate use of force" against civilians - and that "if it was up to me, personally", the EU would impose sanctions on Israel. Last week it emerged that Israel's largest state-owned defence company, which is directly involved in the war on Gaza, has received millions of euros in EU defence funding. According to a report published last Wednesday by Investigate Europe, the French newsroom Disclose and the Greek outlet Reporters United, Intracom Defense is currently involved in 15 European Defence Fund projects worth at least €15m (around $17.5m). Seven of them were awarded after Israel launched its war on Gaza in October 2023. The company was acquired by Israel Aerospace Industries in May 2023.
Arabian Post
an hour ago
- Arabian Post
Markets aren't ready for a US move on Iran
If the United States launches direct military strikes against Iran, global stock markets will likely react with speed and force—dropping hard before any official policy statements are made or economic forecasts adjusted. This would not be a measured repricing. It would be a sharp reflex from investors who have, until now, largely overlooked the rising threat of a wider regional war in the Middle East. Equities across the US, Europe and Asia are still trading near record highs. Confidence has been built on assumptions of rate cuts, stable oil prices, and easing inflation. Those assumptions are now vulnerable. The prospect of a broader military conflict—especially one involving the world's largest economy—threatens to knock markets off balance. ADVERTISEMENT Oil has already climbed nearly 9% since the initial Israeli strikes on Iran. That alone sends a clear signal. Energy traders are building in the possibility of deeper supply disruptions. If US forces join the offensive, that risk multiplies. Supply chains would be at risk. Shipping through the Strait of Hormuz could be affected. The effect on crude would likely be immediate and severe. Higher oil prices feed directly into inflation expectations. After a long and painful stretch of monetary tightening, many central banks have just begun preparing to pivot. Those plans would stall. Rate cuts expected later this year would be pushed back, or possibly cancelled altogether, if energy costs spike again. This matters for equity markets because so much of the recent rally is based on an expectation of easier policy ahead. Investors have leaned heavily into risk, chasing yield and growth stories on the belief that borrowing conditions will soon improve. If inflation returns, that narrative collapses. And with it, much of the positioning tied to it. We are already seeing hints of a shift. The US dollar has strengthened modestly against safe-haven currencies like the yen and Swiss franc. Treasury yields have edged lower as capital moves into government bonds. None of this is extreme, but all of it reflects a market sensing that something is changing. A direct US strike on Iran would remove all ambiguity. The market's tolerance for risk would drop instantly. The initial reaction would likely hit tech stocks, high-beta names, and emerging market assets first. Liquidity would shrink. Volatility would surge. Many investors would step to the sidelines, awaiting clarity that may not come for days. ADVERTISEMENT There's also the issue of timing. Should US action occur suddenly—overnight or during a weekend—it would leave global markets scrambling to price in the consequences before trading resumes. That sort of blind repricing creates wider gaps and sharper drops. None of this is about the long-term value of businesses or the global economy's trajectory five years from now. It's about near-term risk tolerance. The kind of rapid repricing triggered by geopolitics tends to override valuation logic. It pulls markets down in broad strokes. What makes this situation particularly sensitive is how underprepared markets seem to be. Despite the headlines and military posturing, positioning remains optimistic. Risk appetite has returned. Rate-sensitive trades are back in fashion. Many investors appear to be assuming that the conflict will remain contained. That assumption is weak. The Middle East remains highly interconnected. A move by the US opens the door to a wider confrontation, including proxy responses across multiple borders. Markets will struggle to measure the implications if those scenarios begin to unfold. Even a limited US strike would likely bring airspace closures, shipping route disruptions, and the possibility of further retaliation. All of this increases complexity for supply chains, commodities, and corporate earnings. The most affected companies may not be the most obvious ones—but the reallocation of risk would be fast and indiscriminate at the start. Investors should be using this moment to assess exposure. That doesn't mean exiting markets entirely. But it does mean understanding where the pressure will come first, and how it could spread. Diversification, liquidity access, and contingency planning all become more important in periods of sudden geopolitical stress. What's unfolding is not just a regional military story—it's a global market risk. If the United States escalates its involvement, the reaction will not be slow or orderly. It will come in a wave of de-risking that hits asset prices across regions and sectors. Markets have recovered from shocks before. But the damage often comes from being unprepared when the first move hits. The cost of ignoring this risk is far greater than the cost of adjusting for it. Investors need to be alert now, not later. When geopolitics meets stretched valuations and overconfidence, the result is rarely subtle. If Washington acts, markets will move—and they will move fast. Nigel Green is deVere CEO and Founder Also published on Medium. Notice an issue? Arabian Post strives to deliver the most accurate and reliable information to its readers. If you believe you have identified an error or inconsistency in this article, please don't hesitate to contact our editorial team at editor[at]thearabianpost[dot]com. We are committed to promptly addressing any concerns and ensuring the highest level of journalistic integrity.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Assad-era general asks Iran for funds to launch anti-Israel front in Syria
A top military figure under Syria's former president Bashar Al Assad has contacted Tehran for financial support to rebuild Iran's influence in the country and strengthen its position as it comes under attack by Israel, a Syrian security official and former regime operatives has told The National. Iran is unlikely to divert resources from its current war effort but re-establishing a proxy presence in Syria could help it strategically in future, the sources said. The proposal to Tehran came from Ghiath Dalla, a brigadier general in elite Fourth Division, the praetorian guard of the former Iran-backed regime and the military unit closest to Iran, within the past 10 days. He is seeking hundreds of millions of dollars to create a militia drawn from former members of Mr Al Assad's now disbanded army that would fight Syria's new government led by Hayat Tahrir Al Sham and launch attacks on Israeli targets, the sources said. Mr Dalla, like most of his peers and the deposed president, is from the minority Alawite sect, an offshoot of Shiite Islam, that dominated Sunni-majority Syria after a coup in 1963. He is among thousands of Alawite security personnel who have been on the run after the Assad regime fell to HTS-led rebel forces on December 8. Hundreds of Alawite officers, including Mr Dalla, are believed to have fled to Lebanon, where the Iran-backed Hezbollah group still wields significant influence, despite heavy losses in its war with Israel last year. 'He thinks that the [Israel-Iran] war is a golden chance to unite the Alawites and form a resistance force supported by Iran,' said the security official, who requested anonymity. Mr Dalla commanded the 42nd Armoured Brigade, regarded as among the best-equipped and best-trained formations in the former military. During the 2011-2024 civil war it operated in southern Syria, from where proxy groups backed by Iran launched rocket attacks on Israel in the final year of the Assad regime. 'The south has remnants of Iranian proxies whom Dalla can re-activate to resume the attacks,' the security official said. The official said the seizure by authorities of Grad rockets at a warehouse in the southern Deraa province this week, and a rocket attack on June 3 on an Israeli-occupied area of the Golan Heights by a splinter Hezbollah group, were signs of the potential for destabilisation that could be boosted by Iranian money. The official, who was a rebel fighting the regime in the northern province of Idlib, said the threat from Mr Dalla and his followers could not be underestimated. 'We were like him, hiding in the woods of Idlib, bereft of support. Once support [from Arab countries and Turkey] started coming, the game changed quickly,' he said, referring to the early years of the civil war. The official would not be drawn on whom Mr Dalla has been in contact with in Iran, citing ongoing intelligence gathering. The contact was made directly, not through Hezbollah, he said. A prominent figure in the Alawite community said Mr Dalla's obvious recruiting pool comprises at least 100,000 former Alawite security personnel. Many of them, associated with atrocities under the former regime, have sought refuge in the Alawite Mountains in Syria's coastal region, the ancestral homeland of the minority sect. However, widespread killings of Alawites in the area by pro-government forces have raised fears that the community might not survive under the new government led by HTS, a group once affiliated with Al Qaeda. An estimated 1,300 Alawite civilians were killed over two days in March after gunmen from the sect resisted, mainly through ambushes, an HTS-led incursion into the Alawite Mountains. The security operation was aimed at cleansing the coastal provinces of regime remnants, according to the government. Mr Dalla's loyalists, called the Military Council for the Liberation of Syria, led the ultimately failed resistance. The Alawite figure said Mr Dalla and his men, who are believed to number several thousand, still have an underground arsenal consisting mainly of light weapons but also significant amounts of medium weaponry, such anti-aircraft guns mounted on pickup trucks. 'He has been depleted cash-wise. But he is counting on the spreading fears that the Alawites have no home and the only path is resistance to create an Alawite province.' He said many Alawites still see a future in acquiescing to the new order and do not want to be associated with Iran, and added that he himself had declined requests for money by insurgents associated with Mr Dalla. A former Syrian intelligence operative, who is also Alawite, said Mr Dalla was trying to fill the leadership vacuum in the community created by the fall of Mr Al Assad, who fled to Moscow. Unlike the former regime, Mr Dalla is, in the main, not viewed as corrupt. He is also religious, unlike the secular Assads, which would make him more trustworthy to Iran. In contrast to the Assads, who have 'sacrificed the Alawites' for their own survival, Mr Dalla is a more ideological figure who believes that the only way for the community to survive is a long-term fight supported by Iran to a break away from Syria, the former intelligence operative said. Observers are split on how much advantage a Iran would have had in the war with Israel had the Assad regime survived the civil war. After Israeli attacks on Syrian security personnel and military infrastructure in 2023-2024, signs emerged that Mr Al Assad viewed his alliance with Iran as too costly for the regime. It remains an open question whether the former president was willing, or able, to stop Iran from using Syria as a conduit for weapons and supplies to Hezbollah, once considered Tehran's first line of defence against Israel. The Israeli military had already largely destroyed Syrian air defences by the time Mr Al Assad was ousted, giving its air force freedom to operate over Syria. However, Iran would be striking at Israel from short range with missiles and drones launched from Syria, instead of relying solely on long-distance attacks, had the former regime remained, a former member of Mr Al Assad's military said. 'It would have made a difference had they not lost Syria,' the source said. 'But nowhere near enough to gain a decisive advantage'.
