logo
Britain expands 'Deport Now Appeal Later" scheme to 15 more countries

Britain expands 'Deport Now Appeal Later" scheme to 15 more countries

UPIa day ago
Aug. 11 (UPI) -- Britain tripled the number of countries whose citizens face being deported immediately upon having their asylum claim denied or being convicted of a crime as part of a so-called "Deport Now Appeal Later" scheme designed to prevent foreigners from using the legal system to remain in the country.
An additional 15 countries, including Canada, Australia, India and Bulgaria, were being added to the existing eight whose nationals could now be returned before being able to appeal, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper and Foreign Secretary David Lammy said in a news release Sunday.
They said expanding the scheme, which applies in England and Wales only, would ease pressure on the detention system and prison overcrowding by boosting the government's ability to "remove foreign criminals at the earliest opportunity."
Foreign nationals who have had their human rights claim denied will be deported to their home country, from where they can lodge an appeal, taking part in any proceeding via video-link.
Separately, the Justice Ministry unveiled a parallel scheme that will work in tandem, removing foreign national offenders immediately after sentencing, saving taxpayers the cost of holding them until the current halfway point in their sentence in British prisons before they can be deported.
Prisoners serving long prison terms for terrorism, murder and other serious offenses will have to serve out their sentences before becoming eligible for deportation.
"For far too long, foreign criminals have been exploiting our immigration system, remaining in the U.K. for months or even years while their appeals drag on. That has to end. Those who commit crimes in our country cannot be allowed to manipulate the system, which is why we are restoring control and sending a clear message that our laws must be respected and will be enforced," said Cooper.
People whose asylum claim has been denied can be removed before their appeal if the home secretary can certify it would not breach the European Convention on Human Rights, which says people cannot be removed if they would be exposed to "serious irreversible harm" by doing so.
Most of the other countries being added to the list are in Africa and Asia with the new countries accounting for 774 prisoners, or just 7% of the 10,772 foreigners serving time in prisons in England and Wales. Albanians are the largest foreign group in the prison population with 1,193 inmates.
The Home Office claimed it had removed 5,200 people since the Labour government took office in July 2024, up 14% on the previous 12 months.
The changes are part of a government pledge to tackle "illegal" migration that it said had resulted in 35,000 people with no right to remain being returned in the past 12 months, a 50% jump in workplace raids and arrests and paring down the asylum claims backlog by more than doubling the number of decisions.
Shadow Home Secretary, Conservative MP Chris Philp, criticized what he said was a U-turn by Prime Minister Keir Starmer's Labour government.
"Until Keir Starmer either commits to deporting all foreign criminals or stops rolling out the red carpet for migrants the world over, this problem is not going away," Philp said.
The government is in the early stages of formulating new legislation to crack down on what it claims is abuse of a "right to a family life" clause in the country's Human Rights Act -- incorporating the ECHR into British law -- which it argues is widely invoked in appeals against deportation or when asylum claims are denied.
Under the strategy, defendants with immediate family in the United Kingdom can argue that separating them from their relatives by forcibly removing them to another country is a breach of their human rights.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

A 'security circus': How JD Vance's visit to a sleepy Cotswolds village sparked anger
A 'security circus': How JD Vance's visit to a sleepy Cotswolds village sparked anger

Yahoo

time35 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

A 'security circus': How JD Vance's visit to a sleepy Cotswolds village sparked anger

Locals are tired of closed roads, vehicle searches and constant security presence, while protesters told the vice president to 'go home'. Protesters are set to gather close to a manor house in the Cotswolds where US vice president JD Vance is holidaying with his wife and three children. Demonstrators are expected in the Oxfordshire town of Charlbury, where a heavy police operation has been put in place to protect Vance and his family. Vance travelled to the picturesque area on Sunday evening (10 August) after spending two nights in Chevening House, Kent, with the UK's foreign secretary David Lammy. Locals in nearby Dean faced with road closures, sniffer dogs, ID checks are frustrated by the constant security presence, with one comparing the "over-the-top" spectacle to a scene from Men in Black. What is JD Vance doing in the Cotswolds? JD Vance is holidaying in the tiny hamlet of Dean with his family. They are staying in Dean Manor, a Grade II listed Georgian home that is hidden behind a 15-foot stone wall and surrounded by six acres of gardens. While this is a summer holiday, Vance has already met with the foreign secretary, and is also expected to host shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick on Tuesday (12 August) at his Cotswolds retreat. Vance and his family are expected to travel to Ayrshire in Scotland later in the week, where they'll stay for five days, according to the London Standard, with police planning their own security operation for his visit. Why is JD Vance facing protests? Protesters are gathering in opposition to what they describe as the "genocide-enabling" US regime's support of Israel's onslaught in Gaza. "JD Vance is a hideous moral vacuum and the British public want nothing to do with him," Stop Trump Coalition spokesperson Zoe Gardner told the Huffington Post. 'It is nauseating to watch ministers' displays of fake friendship with this authoritarian, anti-democratic, genocide-enabling US regime." Beyond Gaza, protesters are understood to have a broader range of grievances including LGBTQ rights, the climate, inequality and Ukraine, according to the New Statesman. The so-called "Vance not welcome party" is scheduled to start at Mill Field from 4pm, according to the Oxford Mail. In an email to the newspaper, one activist said: "It's not a mass demonstration but we plan to make ourselves heard, show the Vance meme image that we know the thin-skinned Vance can't stand, and 'dance against Vance'." Speaking to the Oxford Mail on Monday, Jonathan Mazower, said residents objected to Vance's visit "because of who he is", with some putting up signs around Dean saying "go home" and "fascists not welcome here". The charity worker said the Trump administration 'is attacking so much of what our democratic societies hold dear' and that Vance "represents the worst excesses of the American far right". This isn't the first time Vance has been met with protesters while on holiday. He was faced with hundreds of pro-Ukraine demonstrators during a ski trip in Vermont in March, following his clash with Volodymyr Zelensky in the Oval Office. The vice president was also heckled during a family visit to Disneyland California in July. Locals fed up of 'American security circus' Cotswolds residents faced with vehicle searches and traffic diversions are growing tired of Vance's trip to an otherwise tranquil part of the British countryside. All entrances to Dean – two roads and three public footpaths – have been blocked off, with a heavy police and US Secret Service presence stationed at a large marquee. Only residents of the hamlet are allowed in and out, dog walkers are diverted, and those entering are subject to car searches by security. Many locals are reluctant to speak about the visit due to security concerns, but Andy Graham, a local councillor for Charlbury, said the heavy presence of guards in black suits and sunglasses felt "a bit over-the-top". 'The trouble is when you get security on such a scale, it tends to be a bit initiatory. It was a bit like the Men in Black had arrived on a film set in Chipping Norton and Dean yesterday," he said. 'We understand that people do need security, but I think they haven't been discreet about it. And I think that tends to generate more concern than is necessary. Roads have been closed up." Cllr Graham questioned the level of resources used by Thames Valley Police, claiming the force "should be doing other things", and was "disappointed" that authorities didn't keep him "in the loop". "I don't need the details because they can't do that but giving us a bit more of a steer so that I could reassure my constituents a bit more would have been good. I'm just a bit miffed about it I suppose. Stephen Bubb, a 72-year-old retiree, said he has "no objection" to Vance coming to Britain for his holiday. "What I object to, is the over-the-top American security circus that is causing significant disruption to us," he said. "You know, I think the Americans could learn a little from our own royal family. Our royal family manages to get around the country with minimum security, minimum disruption to people's lives." A couple, both US citizens living in the UK, said they attempted to visit the town of Dean because they were curious about the area where JD Vance had chosen to stay. 'We were being nosey. But the security wouldn't let us past the blockade," one of them said, having told guards that they weren't there to visit anyone and only wanted to check out the cafes. 'I'm saddened in a way that the Cotswolds will be on the radar of Americans and particularly MAGA type Americans," she added. Software salesman Miles Walkden, 57, said that plenty of famous people stop by in the area, and that it doesn't usually affect locals "too much". "To be fair, I don't think there's many people who like JD Vance around here... I don't like him, but he's a guy on holiday with his family, so I feel a bit like, if I saw him anywhere else, I might have something to say. "But if he's out with his family, I'm probably going to ignore it. But there's a lot of people around here who are not happy about it." Read more JD Vance to host Robert Jenrick at Cotswolds manor house (The Telegraph) US Vice President JD Vance set to stay at 'luxurious' estate on Ayrshire visit (The Daily Record) JD Vance visits farm shop owned by Tory donor's wife (The Telegraph)

There is 'good doubt' about Trump's BLS head nominee EJ Antoni
There is 'good doubt' about Trump's BLS head nominee EJ Antoni

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

There is 'good doubt' about Trump's BLS head nominee EJ Antoni

President Trump has nominated the Heritage Foundation's chief economist EJ Antoni to be the new commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). Antoni will face the Senate before being appointed as commissioner. New Century Advisors chief economist and former Fed economist Claudia Sahm, RSM chief economist Joe Brusuelas, and Schwab Center for Financial Research fixed income strategist Collin Martin join Morning Brief with Julie Hyman to discuss the nomination and the future of the BLS. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Morning Brief. President Trump has now nominated EJ Antoni. He's the chief economist currently at the Conservative think tank, the Heritage Foundation. He's nominated him as the next commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics. There has been a lot of commentary about that nomination, which still has to face the Senate to get through. So I want to bring you guys back in to to talk about this as well. Claudia, let me get your take first, you know, given what we were just talking about, um, what does Antoni do, you know, what does that nomination say? Does it get through? Does it, is does this guy have the chops to to have that job? Right. Well, the commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, that is the one political figure at the BLS. And that it's always the case, the president, you know, nominates, the Senate confirms for that position. I think my biggest concern is that BLS is facing a lot of challenges. It is legitimately hard to run surveys, construct statistics, communicate them to the public, get them out in a timely manner. And frankly, this nominee just doesn't have a lot of experience and background in measurement and statistics. So I'll be really interested to hear what ideas he has on how to fix the problems that he's been a very vocal critic of. Uh, but that's, you know, the BLS needs leadership and they need resources. So, you know, if he's able to, you know, get them those resources and provide that leadership, that'd be excellent. I just, I don't, I don't see it in the record, but you know, we will be surprised there too. As as we all know from probably daily experience in all of our jobs and lives, it's very easy to criticize. It's another thing to fix. Um, Joe, what's your take on Antoni and and what he might bring to the BLS? When his Senate confirmation hearings happen, he should prepare for a withering set of criticism based on his credibility and his qualifications. We all know who EJ is. We all see his work. And there's good doubt around his, his, his background and whether he's able to do this. Let me give you a sense of what's going on, like just with the inflation data, right? Obviously, there's been three big areas where the Feds, excuse me, the BLS has had to impute statistics, because they're no longer collecting because investment in data collection is just not where it needs to be. BLS went back and did a 77-month study. You know what they found was that 18% of the months inflation was uh, revised upward 1/10 of 1%, and in 14% of the months it was revised downward by 1/10 of 1%. You know what that's like? That's like watching the paint dry. You're, if you're expecting major revisions in a granular uh, time series like the consumer price index, you're not going to get it. And that's the problem though, because there But in labor, the revisions have been much larger. Okay. Sure. That's right. But I was using this, we can go to labor, right? Again, you need to invest more. In general, right, in general, it does seem like there is an issue with data collection. Because we haven't been investing in it, right? And the survey response rates following the pandemic, when lots of businesses were wiped out, have dropped to 60% or below. So the way to fix that is to invest in data collection, invest in new methodologies, and then ride with it. But I gotta tell you, even in the big numbers, right, when you take, take a step back and look at the long period of the revisions, I mean, 99% of it's right, right? It's just right now this has been so politicized, right? Because we have a different president with a different point of view, who just clearly is going to be uncomfortable with what the data implies about his own policies. Colin, when it comes to what the market's going to key off of, you know, let's say Antoni gets confirmed, goes in there, does whatever he's going to do. I mean, the market doesn't have a lot of choice in terms of the data that it moves off of, unless we turn to alternative sources of data. I mean, what how do you think this plays out? Yeah, it's going to be difficult because a lot of the BLS data is, is, you know, really good. I mean, not just in the US, but globally, we rely on that data. And I think there, if there was a concern that it was being politicized or manipulated, I'm not saying that's going to happen, but I think there's probably concerns out there. There's a difference between updating methodologies and making sure we're getting the right data, but also making sure that it's not then politicized to get a certain outcome. I think that's going to be really important. There could be a push and pull between what we're getting from data, if it does seem like the methodologies and the processes are changing, when we do have other private services. A lot of times though we kind of disregard those and focus on the government ones. I think ADP is a really good one. ADP comes out up or down, people look at it, they don't really care too much, because they say, well, we're going to look at the BLS data. The real numbers coming out on Friday. We're going to look at the real data. So I think trust is really important. I don't know how we solve for that if there's a lack of trust. Yeah. Joe, real quick. Okay. So we're going to be looking at private label data, ADP, indeed, the Billion Prices Project over at Harvard. There's a plethora of data out there that we're all going to start turning to. And this is going to get different in a way I don't think those who make these criticisms have thought through. Related Videos What July CPI data means for the Fed & what's next for BLS Fed cut isn't the 'easy layup' Trump says it is, CPI data shows Inflation report, BLS pick, China trade extension: 3 Things Why bonds matter now for every investor Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Column: History shows that summits are unpredictable
Column: History shows that summits are unpredictable

Chicago Tribune

time3 hours ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Column: History shows that summits are unpredictable

Alaska carries a lot of symbolism, especially for Americans. The phrase 'North to Alaska' is the title of a popular song performed by Johnny Horton, a rockabilly singer of the 1950s, and a 1960 film starring John Wayne. Both song and film are earthy and gritty, emphasizing the uncertainty of life. That sentiment is appropriate to open a discussion about the Alaska summit between Presidents Vladimir Putin of Russia and Donald Trump of the United States. At a minimum, talking is preferable to fighting. As Winston Churchill observed, 'To jaw-jaw is better than to war-war.' The great British leader made that statement in 1954, when the Soviet-U.S. Cold War was intense. He knew what he was talking about. Churchill had participated in five separate wars on four continents before he was 42 years old. He is also credited with coining the term 'summit' to describe consequential meetings between leaders. During World War II, the first encounter was between him and President Franklin D. Roosevelt in August of 1941, off the coast of Newfoundland, four months before the attack on Pearl Harbor. One of the last of the war was held in Yalta, on the southern coast of Crimea, early in 1945. Joseph Stalin of the Soviet Union was at Yalta and others. The Newfoundland summit resulted in the Atlantic Charter, confirmation of human rights that laid the foundation for the United Nations. The Yalta summit acknowledged Soviet occupation of Eastern Europe, and later fed intense partisan criticism and recriminations in the U.S. as Republicans attacked FDR for allegedly 'selling out' to communists. In short, summits are unpredictable, and results are dependent on many factors, including the personalities of the leaders involved. Regarding the Alaska summit, potentially important mixed symbolic history is involved. Putin is meeting on U.S. soil rather than on more traditional neutral ground, such as Geneva, Switzerland. The venue also implies Trump's publicly stated fascination with northern latitudes, including specifically his fantasies about annexing both Canada and Greenland, the latter a territory of Denmark. Leaders in neither Ottawa nor Copenhagen have concurred with these suggestions. Alaska was a territory of Imperial Russia before purchase by the United States in 1867 for $7.2 million. Secretary of State William Seward, who initiated the deal, was severely criticized at the time and afterwards. Acquiring the territory was widely referred to as 'Seward's Folly.' The purchase did head off Alaska's acquisition by Great Britain. Seward carried the day thanks to impressive political skill and general prestige. A powerful Republican leader from New York, he was a rival of Abraham Lincoln for the 1860 Republican presidential nomination. He joined Lincoln's Cabinet, and became a close ally and friend during the Civil War. Events of later years, including especially the discovery of gold in Alaska, led to belated appreciation of his territorial acquisition. Before the summit, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky was adamant about not surrendering territory, while Putin has demanded such concessions. Either way, two-way or three-way discussions could lay the foundation for later agreement. President Trump stresses the importance of effective negotiation, and he should relish this opportunity. Soviet economic weakness led to eventual collapse; Russia's economy remains weak. Trump's threat of increased sanctions doubtless led Putin to agree to meet in Alaska.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store