Ohio school district reverts to birth names, catching students, parents off guard
COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) – Students at Columbus City Schools with preferred names in the district's system have had their names reverted back to the one listed on their birth certificates, including transgender and nonbinary students, who were not notified that this was happening.
Students and teachers were caught off guard on March 19 when attendance was called and they realized preferred names were changed in the district's system, which is called Infinite Campus.
'He found out about the rescinded name change policy at school,' said a parent with a transgender son. 'His fourth-period teacher advised him to go to the office because his preferred name was not listed in Infinite Campus. My son started to go to the office and in a panic ran to the bathroom to call me at work.'
'This should be a welcoming state:' DeWine denies claim of 'anti-LGBTQ+ climate' in Ohio
Izetta Thomas, the lead organizer with the Columbus Education Justice Coalition, said she has been talking to parents and students since the day of the change.
'To have that happen on such a grand scale and to not even see it coming, I don't think that there are any words to describe the feelings that folks had when that happened,' she said.
Thomas added, 'Those names that were in the system were actually there with parent consent and permission because there was a form that parents had to fill out for that change to even be in the system at all.'
She also said she feels uncomfortable sending her son back to class.
'My son has not physically been back to school since March 19,' the parent said. 'For his safety, we unenrolled from his previous school. Now, his educational opportunities have been taken from him.'
There's a new push to put whole milk back in school meals. Here's what you should know
Columbus Schools Superintendent Angela Chapman sent out a letter to students, parents and staff on Friday acknowledging that no warning was given. In the letter, Chapman said in part, 'We did not provide prior notice this was occurring, nor did we ensure support was in place to prioritize the emotional well-being of everyone impacted.'
Chapman also apologized for how the district handled this situation.
The letter cited recent Ohio laws — including a school bathroom bill and the Parents' Bill of Rights — as reasons for the change, but Thomas said that none of those laws require school districts to revert trans students' names.
'A lot of the information that we've been getting from folks at the district is that it was anticipatory,' Thomas said. 'An apology is not enough. An apology is not accountability, and that's what we're looking for, is accountability.'
Ohio 'Given Name Act' proposes strict rules for names, pronouns in schools
The parent did say Chapman called them personally to apologize, but they said she offered little in the way of a solution.
Thomas said a number of people from the Columbus Education Justice Coalition planned to be at the next Columbus Board of Education meeting to show their support for impacted students and families.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Ohio bill would require employers to pay people with disabilities minimum wage
COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) – While federal law allows employers to pay some individuals with disabilities less than minimum wage, Ohio lawmakers are attempting to eliminate the practice in the state. House Bill 225, sponsored by Reps. Dontavius Jarrells (D-Columbus) and Tom Young (R-Washington Twp.), seeks to phase out subminimum wages for employees with disabilities over a five-year period. Indoor park with 'waterless slides' opens first Ohio location in Columbus 'This bipartisan legislation is about dignity,' Jarrells said at a hearing for the bill in May. 'It's about economic opportunity and it's about making sure every Ohioan, regardless of ability, has the right to fair wages and the chance to contribute meaningfully to their communities.' Section 14(c) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 permits employers to pay workers whose disabilities impact their productivity less than the federal hourly minimum wage of $7.25, if they obtain a certificate from the U.S. Department of Labor. The practice is intended to prevent the restriction of employment opportunities for those with disabilities, according to the department. Introduced in April, the bill would require employers who hold a certificate to submit a plan regarding phasing out subminimum wage to the Ohio Department of Developmental Disabilities. The plan would have to be submitted within 15 months of the bill's effective date. Under the legislation, the state would assist employers with implementing their plans. Over the five-year transition period, the state would also be required to gather, monitor and publicly report the progress of the phase-out. Unsolved Ohio: Who killed Amy Jo Nelson? Family wants answers in 2017 homicide The bill underwent three hearings in the House's Commerce and Labor Committee in May, where more than 40 people testified in support of the bill. 'Paying people with disabilities less than minimum wage devalues their labor and reinforces harmful stereotypes that their work is worth less,' said Justin Blumhorst with the disability support organization Capabilities. 'Many people with disabilities perform as well as or better than their non-disabled peers when given the proper support and accommodations.' Seven spoke out against the legislation, including Brittany Stiltner with Sandco Industries, a nonprofit that provides employment skills training to people with developmental disabilities. 'At Sandco, the 14(c) certificate allows us to provide customized, supportive employment opportunities to individuals who may not be able to succeed in a traditional competitive work environment,' Stiltner said in written testimony. 'Phasing out this option entirely would eliminate opportunities for people who depend on it – individuals whose stories too often go unheard in policy conversations.' In Ohio, 41 businesses have obtained federal 14(c) certificates, most of which are nonprofit agencies that 'provide rehabilitation and employment for people with disabilities,' often in a 'sheltered' setting, according to the Labor Department. Intel executive explains why Ohio plant will need to fight for Intel's business Jarrells introduced a similar bill last April, but it only received one hearing and did not progress to the point of receiving a vote. Sixteen states have already legislated or initiated the phase-out of subminimum wages, according to Jarrells. In December, the Labor Department proposed phasing out the practice nationally over three years. The agency has not provided an update on the status of the proposal since. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
The Quest to Bring Young Men Back to the Democrats
In the months leading up to the 2024 election, and particularly after the ascension of Vice President Kamala Harris to the top of the presidential ticket, Democrats found themselves particularly vexed about the best way to reach young men and bring them into their coalition. Their fears that they were falling short in this regard were borne out in November, when the majority of young men between ages 18 and 29 voted Republican. That trend cut across racial lines: Young white men supported President Donald Trump overwhelmingly, but young Black and Latino men swung toward Trump by an even larger margin than their white counterparts from 2020 to 2024—even as majorities supported Harris. Those losses have precipitated soul-searching on the left, as Democrats wonder how to revive their appeal to young men who are struggling financially but intrigued by the machismo promoted by Trump and media figures popular on the right. Republicans are 'exploiting grievances' by connecting economic pressures to shifts in gender norms, said Shaunna Thomas, the co-founder and former executive director of the gender justice organization UltraViolet. Democrats know they need to bring young men back into the fold. But it's a delicate dance: On the one hand, the wrong kind of outreach risks coming across as condescending, but on the other hand, too much focus on the needs of young men might end up alienating the women who have traditionally formed the core of the Democratic base. 'I think Democrats really tend to focus on deficits more than their strengths. They look for the shortest line from point A to point B for success, and they look at what's working on the other side. If they were to mimic that in any way, I think that would be a really great way to weaken the loyalty women have shown to the party,' said Thomas. The right has cultivated the anger of young men using online platforms for years. The vitriolic 2014 Gamergate movement was cultivated and harnessed by then-Breitbart editor and current Trump adviser Steve Bannon. Right-wing impresarios like Andrew Tate, an online influencer accused of sexual assault and trafficking whose winter arrival in the United States appeared to be orchestrated by Trump allies, have envisioned a world of violently enforced traditional gender roles. The endorsement of Trump ahead of 2024 by nominally political figures, such as popular podcaster Joe Rogan, also served to give the impression that Republicans understood young men better than Democrats did. But Thomas worries that trying to replicate a media ecosystem that has been effective for the right could be disastrous for the left. 'Some people employ a methodology where you take very seriously what you see young men responding to on the internet, and your instinct or your strategy is to replicate that. I think that's a mistake,' said Thomas. 'If you try to appeal to young men at the expense of women and gender nonconforming people, not only are you doing the opposition's work for them, you're definitely going to lose your base.' It's a tension that Ilyse Hogue, the former president of the abortion rights group NARAL Pro-Choice America, is trying to reconcile. Along with John Della Volpe, the director of polling at the Harvard Kennedy School's Institute of Politics, Hogue is leading an initiative called 'Speaking With American Men.' The program—which has been met with online skepticism by liberals and conservatives alike—will invest $20 million over two years in research, organizing, and communications focused on young men of different racial and economic backgrounds. The initiative's prospectus promises that the program will serve as a 'research hub' that also works to 'identify and build trust with organic leaders in the largest, relevant online communities in Discord/Reddit and other online platforms.' It also seeks to 'provide a media roadmap' for Democrats to use nontraditional methods of reaching young men, including by investing in YouTube commentary shows and video game digital ads. The initiative's early focus groups found that young men are confused about how they should express masculinity, frustrated by social isolation, and feel unable to reach economic milestones, according to reporting by Politico. Hogue also said that she has seen that young men may share policy preferences with Democrats, but nonetheless do not feel as if the party has their best interests at heart. 'They're not seeing themselves reflected in those sorts of coalitions that progressives claim to care about. And so some of the solutions are really about 'a rising tide lifts all boats,' but we have to actually be able to communicate: 'You are on the boat too,'' Hogue said about how Democrats should think about reaching young men. But Amanda Litman, the co-founder and president of Run for Something, an organization focused on recruiting and supporting young progressive candidates, warned that Democrats may be in search of a political solution to something that may be more of a 'cultural problem.' To a hammer, everything is a nail. To a political strategist, believes Litman, 'everything looks like something you can poll-test your way into.' Litman believes that Democrats are at risk of 'misunderstanding' how to reach young men who have shifted toward the right in recent years, and 'trying solutions that ultimately will be a waste of resources.' 'I think Democrats, especially in the last 15 years, have started to micro-target our way into oblivion,' said Litman. 'We can't pretend we can 'focus group' our way into a solution here.' Litman argued that focusing on underlying policy goals was the better way to reach young men, without isolating them as a specific demographic that needs to be wooed. Ross Morales Rocketto, a Democratic strategist who served as lead organizer of White Dudes for Harris ahead of the 2024 election, believes that, after an electoral loss, Democrats tend to focus on 'shiny objects': the topics that they believe will appeal to voters—and donors—without necessarily giving thought to effective strategy. Morales Rocketto believes that the Democrats' desperate focus on clawing back support from young men is the latest shiny object upon which the party has fixed its gaze. But he worries that treating young men as a prize to be won assumes that they already might be lost. 'I get maybe a little bit frustrated when I see things that are like, 'Well, all we need to do is do some polling, and then we'll have the messages that work for them, and then like, everything will be OK,'' Morales Rocketto said. Much has been written about the social isolation that many men feel. But Democrats should not be surprised if young women are 'collectively eye-rolling' over the recent emphasis on young men voters, said Thomas. She argued that there is still a very clear power imbalance in American society, highlighted by such occurrences as the overturning of the federal right to an abortion and the election of Trump instead of two different female candidates in 2016 and 2024. Neither loneliness nor economic hardship are the exclusive domain of men. People are more likely to feel loneliness in early adulthood and old age, regardless of gender; some studies have shown that women and men also report equal rates of loneliness. Recent polling by the Pew Research Center found that men are not more likely than women to say that they feel lonely or have few close friends, although they are less likely to turn to their networks for connection and support. Then there are the universal worries about economic uncertainty. According to the most recent Harvard Youth Poll, young women are more likely than young men to say that they are struggling to make ends meet; by contrast, young men are more confident than young women that they will accumulate significant wealth. Litman argued that Democratic candidates needed to address the 'root causes' of inequality, such as addressing the cost of living or investing in health care, which would, in turn, assist citizens across the entire demographic spectrum. 'I think the right candidate or elected official who can … thread the needle of, 'We can lift up men without bringing down women,' the one who can talk about how we need to care for mental health without making it 'women need to solve their problems'—that's what we need,' Litman said. Hogue said that the purpose of the initiative was not to focus on men at the detriment of women, but to assert that Democrats are not 'ceding a generation' of young men to the right by reaching them where they are. She also argued that outreach to young men was not a 'zero-sum game' that would automatically alienate other demographics. 'Why do we feel like we can't actually reflect the needs of both men and women in our coalition and not pit them against each other?' asked Hogue. 'It's not about going after a new constituency. It's about reaffirming our commitment to young people to a better future regardless of their gender.' Still, speaking generally about the party's efforts to reach young men, Thomas warned that while the right may be better at 'exploiting' young men's worries about shifting gender norms, it would be a mistake for Democrats to assume these concerns are the 'main event.' 'It's strange, the extent to which we are focusing on this data about young men, as if it's limited to them, as if they're the only people experiencing this,' said Thomas. 'These issues are just not isolated to men, and it's silly to try to create a strategy as if it is.'
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
New Columbus drone manufacturer providing weapons for Ukraine
COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) – Military analysts are still studying Operation Spider Web, the unprecedented weekend assault on Russia's nuclear-capable, long-range bombers. More than 100 Ukrainian drones struck air bases deep inside Russia, with explosions reported in five separate regions. The operation was said to be in the planning stages for 18 months, and a new Columbus defense contractor might have been part of that plan. Unsolved Ohio: Who killed Amy Jo Nelson? Family wants answers in 2017 homicide Anduril is building its newest manufacturing facility near Rickenbacker air base, but its vice president for strategy said it is already supplying autonomous weapons — including drones — to the United States and its allies, including Ukraine. 'I think the biggest lesson to take away from Ukraine is not just what they can do, but what's needed, the timelines on which they are needed that very much animates what we're building here in Columbus, Ohio, at our Arsenal One campus,' Anduril Senior Vice President of Strategy Zachary Mears said. And what a campus it will be; five million square feet of manufacturing space that will eventually employ 4,000 people. Anduril is the nation's newest defense contractor and it is changing the landscape for the military-industrial complex. 'Central Ohio is going to be vital to the future of what we do,' Mears said. 'Many of the products that we've designed and built are literally going to be made here over the next many decades.' After faculty overwhelmingly voted to unionize, Ohio University is suing them again Unlike other defense suppliers who come up with a proposed weapon and ask the Pentagon to pay for research, development and production, Anduril uses its own capital to design and build high-tech software and weapons that are ready for market. 'Well, we, we very much ascribe to the view that we're providing capabilities to defend the West,' Mears said. And to defend America's allies around the world with a never-before-seen business model. 'We think competition within the industrial base is overdue, and our model, our way of producing product, our way of investing in that product, is different than your traditional defense prime, and they need that healthy, healthy dose of competition,' Mears said. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
