Business Editor Sion Barry gives his verdict on Rachel Reeves' rail investment for Wales
She confirmed £445m over ten years but is that the real figure?
Rachel Reeves congratulated by the Prime Minister after delivering the Comprehensive Spending Review.
(Image: PA )
In her Comprehensive Spending Review Chancellor Rachel Reeves made scant reference to Wales, but on addressing rail funding she was unequivocal.
To cheers on her side of the House she said: 'For 14-years the Conservatives failed the people of Wales. Those days are over. Following representation from my right honourable friend the Welsh Secretary ( a smiling Jo Stevens) the First Minister for Wales (Eluned Morgan) and Welsh Labour MPs I am pleased to announce today £445m for rail in Wales over ten years.
"That's the difference made by two Labour governments (London and Cardiff) working together to undo a generation of under-funding and neglect.'
Hang on a minute £445m over ten years, did I hear that right? That would frankly be an utter joke and anualised at just £44.5m... cue incoming nukes from the opposition parties.
With £80bn of rail enhancement projects in England identified up to 2040, and with Wales having around 10% of the England and Wales rail network, that would be a derisory settlement. It has been getting a rail enhancement allocation of less than 2% going back decades and under UK governments of different political colours.
But what she should have clarified (and yes she had a lot to get through) is that around £300m from the ten year figure will be released over the next four years.
Article continues below
It also means that once projects are signed off - and we have yet to see the confirmed list - they will receive further tranches of funding in the next comprehensive spending review as they will take more than four years to complete. So, over the next decade investment in Wales should be significantly more than the £445m referenced by the Chancellor.
What we now need to see is what projects will go into the Department for Transport's network rail enhancement pipeline for Wales over the next decade and potentially beyond. This is expected in the coming weeks.
Once we have that, with capital expenditure assigned, it will be relatively easy to work out whether Wales is getting an equitable deal on rail investment or not. if it is getting a fair slice of projects deemed as Wales and England, then most people would be happy with that - although I believe there is still a strong case for rail to be fully devolved to Wales.
So, until we have that definitive list, and whether that will include, as seems likely, the five Burns stations on the South Wales Mainline, it is like trying to complete a jigsaw without the picture on the box.
Perhaps if it was' bright and shiny' then the UK Government would be announcing, as they done in England, headline grabbing Welsh rail projects with total costs running into billions and delivered over a number spending review periods.
All that was mentioned by the Chancellor was the Cardiff West Junction project - needed to increase the number of trains per hour from the current two to four on the City Line that runs through Cardiff - with an estimated cost of £30m and work at Padeswood sidings in Flintshire, what will increase the number of trains able to run between Wrexham and Merseyside .
In the £445m is a one off settlement of £48m for the Welsh Government for the devolved Core Valley Lines.
Some £90m of the £450m is also be being kept back to effectively profile new projects that could be taken forward beyond the current four year comprehensive spending review period in a ten year rail plan for Wales.
That leaves around £300m in the tank for non-devolved rail projects in Wales over the next four years, of which around £60m the Chancellor has signalled is already allocated for the Cardiff West Junction (on a section of the City Line that comes under Network Rail) and the Padeswood sidings projects.
On the £48m for the Core Valley Lines, where the £1bn rail electrification project is nearing completion, that really isn't going to go very far. Some 100 kilometres of new electrified lines and infrastructure such as signalling, will require more maintenance work under so called operation, maintenance and renewal (OMR).
In the process of the Core Valley Lines asset being devolved to the Welsh Government, Network Rail had initially put a fanciful book value on it running into tens of millions of pounds. If the UK Government were looking to transfer the asset say to sovereign wealth fund then fair enough, but looking to charge another government in the UK?
They had seemingly forgotten that they were just custodians of a public rail asset paid for and maintained by the UK taxpayer - which of course includes those in Wales.
The Welsh Government managed to agree a nominal sum of £1. However, the UK Treasury should have agreed an allocation in the annual block grant to the Welsh Government to fund the required OMR work on the Core Valley Lines.
As it stands £48m over four years, and the Welsh Government has yet to confirm it will be deployed for that purpose, is far short of what is required.
As well as a fairer OMR funding deal for the Core Valley Lines, the UK Government also needs to recognise, for Barnett consequential purposes, that this significant part of the rail network in Wales is devolved.
That would provide a higher comparative figure for Wales which triggers the level of Barnet Formula consequentials the Welsh Government gets from an overall rise in DfT spending. For Wales the comparative figure is now just 33.5%, while for Northern Ireland and Scotland it is nearly 96%.
What has been confirmed is a step in the right direction after years of rail underinvestment in Wales. The Wales Rail Board, has worked up a priority list of much needed rail enhancement projects for Wales. For them all to be realiised then Secretary of State for Transport, Heidi Alexander, will have to assign a bigger share of her departmental budget to Wales.
Even if the £300m leverages additional funding in further spending reviews, and while yes a significant improvement, Wales should be getting a rail enhancement project investment of between £200m to £300m annually over the next 15 years to deliver up to £4bn of new rail investment.
Article continues below
What the Chancellor has announced will fall short of that.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
a minute ago
- Spectator
Labour is incapable of fixing the migrant crisis
The news that over 50,000 migrants have arrived on small boats since Labour took office last year is of no surprise. If things don't change soon another 50,000 are sure to follow and then another. The causes of the Channel migrant crisis are quite clear. Yet public frustration is at fever pitch partly because none of our political elites – red, blue or turquoise – have any idea how to solve the problem. Both establishment parties reacted to the migrant crisis in the same way – not with substantial change but with slogans and ineffective schemes. Just as the Rwanda plan was, essentially, a publicity stunt, so is Keir Starmer's 'Smash the Gangs' catchphrase. Virtually all of the countermeasures Labour offered voters at the 2024 general election already being done by the Home Office, UK Border Force, Border Security Command and the National Crime Agency. The badly drafted, unsecure and unscalable 'one in one out' treaty with France is quite risible. Meanwhile, Reform UK's 'push back the boats' proposals would not survive the first major boat sinking – and quite righty. Channel asylum migrants are acting rationally. For as little as 5,000 euros they are buying the prospect of gaining permanent access to the British 'social wage' which entitles them to health, housing, education and other benefits, without having made any contributions to the system. And through later family reunion routes, their loved ones are likely to join them in a peaceful western jurisdiction with long established embedded rights such as freedom of religion and freedom of both speech and association. The prize is huge. Why wouldn't anyone living in a war zone or a simply corrupt, poverty-stricken state want to come here? Those who claim that the illegal migrants' principal partner is not the smuggling gangs but, rather, the British government are not entirely wrong. Labour – like the Tories before them – are making the world's poor an offer they can't and won't refuse. So the flow continues. While the benefits of this type of migration are obvious to the asylum seeker, the costs to the recipient state have, until recently, been rather opaque. Thankfully, right across Europe this is changing. In a 2023 paper called 'Borderless Welfare State' Jan van de Beek and his colleagues at the University of Amsterdam calculated the net cost to the Dutch State's public finances by migration category. It found that asylum migration from Africa cost an astonishing 625,000 euros per person on average. Van de Beek's team rated labour migration as more productive than asylum migration in all categories. Even the UK's own Office for Budget Responsibility has belatedly discovered that a 'low wage migrant worker' wave is hugely fiscally negative. At some stage it will occur to the ruling elite of a country currently borrowing billions to pay interest on its national debt that we can't afford this. The cost to social trust and solidarity are rather more difficult to calculate but very substantial. Solving the crisis requires two things. First, Britain needs to part from the international legal architecture which supports the present outdated system. Namely, the 1951 Refugee Convention (and the 1967 protocol) and the 1953 European Convention on Human Rights. Secondly, all unsolicited arrivals must be intercepted, transported and secured in an offshore detention facility within a British Overseas Territory – such as Ascension Island or South Georgia – and then returned to their country of origin or a third country. As the Australians have already proved, the flow would cease. Overnight. Can Labour deliver? I doubt it. The means to solve the crisis outlined above are, politically, well beyond the parameters of what Labour could ever implement. Labour's frontbench is comprised of post-national progressive politicians whose concern is global welfare rather than the particular interests of British citizens. Such misguided attitudes are baked into their mentality and shambolic episodes like the Chagos giveaway prove it. Labour's backbenchers are no better – they are unable to agree even a modest reform of the disability welfare system without widespread revolt. The idea that they would contemplate withdrawal from the post-war legal asylum system is for the birds. It will not happen. Which is why, from the country's point of view, the Labour government is now an absolute impediment to border security. The migrant flow will continue and grow across the world until the generous offer made by western states is closed down. The public is gasping for help on this – but they won't find it in Downing Street.
Scotsman
a minute ago
- Scotsman
Warning SNP's benefits agency is failing thousands of disabled Scots
Disabled Scots 'are being failed' by Scotland's benefits agency | PA Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Scotland's benefits agency is failing to implement safeguards designed to protect thousands of disabled Scots. Measures were introduced to prevent financial abuse and fraud in the wake of the murder of vulnerable teenager Margaret Fleming. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Miss Fleming was killed by her carers in Inverclyde, who hid her death for 17 years while continuing to claim her benefits. Her body has never been found. When a person is incapable of dealing with their financial affairs and they do not have a guardian or power of attorney, an 'appointee' is allocated to receive benefits on their behalf. New legislation was passed that states Social Security Scotland is legally required to carry out face-to-face checks on those who have been deemed unable to mange their own money and their appointee. However, new figures released under freedom of information legislation show just 8600 recipients out of 33,000 have so far received in-person checks. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad That means more than 20,000 disabled Scots have had control of their finances removed without any further oversight. Of those DWP appointees who have been checked, nearly one in four were found to be capable of managing their own benefits. The result is people who are capable of managing their financial affairs are being denied access to their own money. A total of 138 were found to have unsuitable appointees. A review of failings by Inverclyde Council made recommendations on how authorities monitor people with learning disabilities, including that appointees should be monitored. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'Deeply concerning' Scottish Conservative shadow cabinet secretary for social security Alexander Stewart MSP said: 'Given how appallingly Margaret Fleming was failed by the authorities, these figures are deeply concerning. 'If these concerns are not urgently addressed, there is a genuine risk that more vulnerable people slip under the radar and are open to exploitation.' Alexander Stewart MSP said the figures were "deeply concerning" | Contributed Scotland's benefits agency was built on the principles of dignity and respect, according to the Scottish Government, and designed to be fairer and more equitable than Westminster's Department for Work and Pensions. A government insider said: 'It's another example of Social Security Scotland paying lip service to dignity and respect but as soon as it becomes difficult or more expensive to respect the rights and needs of disabled people they don't live up to the rhetoric. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'And if you think, these disabled people are the most disabled people in the whole system, they are people who are unable to act for themselves, they are the most vulnerable group and this system is set up to make sure they are not financially abused. 'The idea that they are prioritising other things over this is scandalous.' Guardians, who are appointed by a judge, must file accounts for how any money is spent and their position is reviewed every three years. The use of an appointee is easier and quicker because appointeeship has far less oversight and is not regularly reviewed. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad In the case of Miss Fleming, her appointeeship fell to her mother and then to Edward Cairney and his partner Avril Jones before she dropped out of the system entirely. Previously, personal independence payment (PIP) was administered by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) but the benefit was one of a number of disability benefits devolved to Social Security Scotland. The benefit was renamed Adult Disability Payment (ADP) when it was transferred to Scotland. Concerns about the limited safeguards in the appointeeship system were raised by MSPs and steps taken to improve safety. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Statutory guidelines state that SSS staff must see a benefits recipient face-to-face to directly determine whether or not they are incapacitated. The person should be asked who they want as their appointee and that person's suitability is then cross checked with others. Scotland's rules are now - on the face of it - far more robust than the DWP's, meaning all new clients being transferred from the DWP to SSS need to be assessed. Yet the figures show these checks are not happening. It is understood that the number of staff tasked with carrying out these checks has been drastically reduced, leading to a backlog of tens of thousands of cases. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Such were the concerns about the appointee system that during the consultation period the Law Society of Scotland called for the system to be abolished and each appointee considered by judicial review. Mr Stewart added: 'It's all very well Social Security Scotland having safeguards to protect the most vulnerable, but if the SNP government is starving its quango of the resources needed to carry out these face-to-face checks with every disabled person affected, they are not fit for purpose. 'It's vital that SNP ministers work with Social Security Scotland to ensure that they have the necessary staff to implement these vital safeguards.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Miss Fleming was 19 years old when she was last seen by anyone other than Cairney and Jones. Cairney and Jones, of Inverkip, Inverclyde, were both convicted in 2019 of killing Miss Fleming between December 1999 and January 2000, and each sentenced to life in jail with a minimum term of 14 years. Cairney died in 2023.
Leader Live
31 minutes ago
- Leader Live
MS reacts to report about Wales' economic position
MS for North Wales A new report has revealed that Wales ranks lowest in a comparative assessment of economic competitiveness across the regions of England and Wales. The NICE Index (Networks, Innovation, Creativity and Entrepreneurship), developed by Professor Robert Huggins (Cardiff University) and Professor Piers Thompson (Nottingham Trent University), paints a troubling picture of Wales's economic position. The report places Wales below every English region, with many Welsh local authorities languishing at the foot of the league table. Prof Huggins said: 'Unfortunately, Wales remains economically cut off from many parts of the rest of the UK, indicating that despite some positive policy developments there is still much to do. "Our findings reveal that Welsh communities are not just struggling with physical infrastructure deficits in terms of transport and housing, they're suffering from profound behavioural barriers that prevent them from creating the networks, innovation, and entrepreneurial cultures essential for modern economic success.' He added: "We're not dealing with a simple infrastructure problem that can be solved by building roads or broadband networks, Welsh communities need behavioural interventions that help people rebuild confidence, create networks, and develop entrepreneurial cultures. "The UK Government has recently launched a new industrial strategy, and while this may produce some benefits for parts of Wales it will not address these more fundamental behavioural challenges." The report confirms what Welsh Conservatives have long stated, that under Labour our economy is broken in Wales and the only way it can fixed is by creating a Wales that is open for business. To achieve this, we would remove the regulatory stranglehold on our economy by overhauling the current business rates system, abolish rates for small businesses to revitalise our town centres, and axe the damaging Tourism tax. Meanwhile, another report, this time by the Bevan Foundation, has revealed that high childcare costs in Wales are pushing more families into poverty and out of work. The report concluded that the soaring cost of childcare is beyond the reach of many, with some families now limiting the number of children they are having due to costs. The UK Government has outlined proposals that by September 2025 it will extend 30 hours of free childcare to eligible working parents, for every child over the age of 9 months. It is disappointing that the Welsh Labour Government has not made this same commitment, despite receiving additional funding from the UK Government to match this – they should be supporting Welsh parents to stay in work and contribute to their communities. For help, email or call 0300 200 7219.
