
Lebanon aims to woo back Gulf tourists and investors, but is it enough to save the economy?
With its sun-soaked beaches, pine-covered mountains and buzzing summer nightlife, Lebanon is hoping to once again become the playground of wealthy Gulf tourists. After years of strained relations, Beirut is making concerted efforts to reset its ties with the Gulf – a region long seen as both a political ally and economic lifeline.
Since taking office in January, President Joseph Aoun has placed rebuilding Lebanon's relationship with the Gulf countries at the centre of his foreign policy agenda. The former army chief, elected after more than two years of presidential vacuum, wasted no time in launching a diplomatic charm offensive. Mr Aoun has so far visited the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Kuwait, in an effort to re-establish Lebanon as an open destination for both tourists and investors.
Gulf states have historically played a major role in rebuilding Lebanon, including after the 1975–1990 civil war and the 2006 Israel-Hezbollah conflict. Gulf tourists and investors − particularly from Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and the UAE − significantly boosted Lebanon's economy for decades by driving its tourism, real estate and hospitality sectors, especially in Beirut and mountain resort areas.
However, in recent years, Lebanon's relations with its Gulf neighbours began to sour due to Iran 's growing influence over Lebanese affairs. This was primarily through its backing of the Lebanese armed group Hezbollah, which held significant sway over the country's political and military landscape.
This dynamic has shifted following a year-long war between Hezbollah and Israel that ended last November. Israel's military campaign destroyed much of Hezbollah's infrastructure, eliminated the group's leader and top commanders and infiltrated its security network.
Now, Lebanon seeks to revive its economy, which has been mired in crisis since 2019. The national currency has collapsed, the banking sector is in disarray and basic public services have all but crumbled. The war between Israel and Hezbollah only worsened conditions, leaving much of southern Lebanon and Beirut's southern suburbs in ruins. The World Bank estimated recovery and reconstruction needs at $11 billion.
Lifting travel bans
The UAE and Kuwait have both lifted years-long travel bans on Lebanon after President Aoun's recent visits, opening the door for their citizens to return to the country.
'Lebanon is moving in the right direction, getting back to the Arab fold – and that's a Lebanese demand before anything else,' Fouad Dandan, Lebanon's ambassador to the UAE, told The National.
' Emiratis love Lebanon. They don't go there just for tourism. Many have properties in Lebanon, and some may even invest in the country – which would create a boost that is not only seasonal and would help the economy,' he said.
Lebanon is also seeking to benefit from the UAE's expertise in key sectors, including security and renewable energy, added Mr Dandan. Emirati technical teams have already visited Beirut to explore co-operation and knowledge transfer. 'We have a golden opportunity,' he said.
All eyes are now on Saudi Arabia to see whether it will follow suit. But Riyadh remains cautious, and a key sticking point is security, according to sources.
Saudi Arabia has banned its citizens from travelling to Lebanon since 2021 because of security concerns. The kingdom was Lebanon's top destination for agricultural exports in 2019, accounting for 22.1 per cent of total shipments, according to a Lebanese government report published in 2020. However, Riyadh suspended imports of Lebanese fruits and vegetables in April 2021, citing drug-smuggling concerns and accusing Beirut of failing to take action.
Lebanon's security forces say they are stepping up efforts to protect key sites, especially Beirut's international airport and tourist hotspots.
'Preparations are under way to welcome tourists, though the state is working with a limited budget. Efforts have been made to improve visitors' experience: the road from the airport to Beirut has been repaired, and political banners and posters were removed months ago,' a senior security official involved in the operations told The National.
'What's new is the increased police presence near airport routes, especially at night. Police staffing has recently expanded to accommodate these new duties, and additional checkpoints are now active, with clear instructions to search suspicious vehicles and fine violators,' the source added.
'Overall, the security situation is stable. The main concern remains the potential for Israel to disrupt the atmosphere, but internally, the focus is firmly on ensuring safety for both residents and visitors.'
Despite a ceasefire agreed in November between Israel and Hezbollah, the Israeli military continues to carry out strikes in Lebanon. Last week, just before Eid Al Adha, at least 10 strikes hit Beirut's southern suburbs – a sprawling area known as Dahiyeh. It was the fourth time that Dahiyeh has been bombed since the November truce.
Israel also continues to bomb southern Lebanon almost daily and maintains control over five military posts along the southern border.
The ceasefire says Hezbollah must pull all military equipment and fighters out of southern Lebanon and says all non-state militant groups must be disarmed across the country. Lebanon remains under international pressure to reassert full state sovereignty. Mr Aoun has repeatedly said the decision to centralise arms under state authority has been taken, but says this can only be achieved through dialogue rather than force.
Promising summer amid challenges
Many in Lebanon are hopeful for a booming summer season.
'Eid Al Adha gives a glimpse of how this summer will look,' Jean Abboud, president of the Association of Travel and Tourist Agents in Lebanon, told The National. 'We're seeing new nationalities this year: Emiratis, Kuwaitis and Qataris. Gulf tourists tend to spend more time and money in the country.'
'In May, airport traffic rose 11 per cent compared to the same period last year. The momentum is encouraging.'
But analysts caution that this is not enough to lift the country out of its deep economic crisis.
'Tourism accounts for 20 per cent of GDP, and Gulf tourists generate 50 per cent of tourism revenue. While the rebound in Gulf tourism and renewed investment are essential catalysts, they alone cannot secure Lebanon's full recovery or eliminate the need for IMF support,' said Lebanese economist Walid Abousleiman.
'The scale of Lebanon's financial crisis and the depth of required reforms mean that international assistance potentially including an IMF programme remains necessary to restore fiscal and monetary stability, restructure debt and rebuild confidence in the banking sector.'
Since the 2019 crisis, which saw the Lebanese currency lose over 90 per cent of its value and bank deposits decimated, with losses estimated at more than $70 billion, Lebanon has failed to implement most of the IMF's demanded reforms.
Economy Minister Amer Bisat told The National last month that the country faces deep-rooted challenges across multiple sectors − including banking, electricity, production costs, infrastructure and governance. 'I don't think that small and quick steps will bring back the confidence of investors. What will bring it back is when investors see we are addressing these issues,' said the minister.
Mr Abousleiman noted that "Gulf tourists bring vital foreign currency and support key sectors but cannot alone restore Lebanon's economy to pre-crisis levels".
'Lebanon's path to recovery is a marathon, not a sprint. Gulf tourism and investment are promising first steps, but real, lasting change requires deeper reforms and international support,' he added.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The National
an hour ago
- The National
Iraq arranges land transport for its stranded travellers, including Hajj pilgrims
The Iraqi government has begun arranging land transport for Hajj pilgrims and other Iraqi travellers who are struggling to return home after the sudden eruption of hostilities between Iran and Israel, a government statement said on Saturday. At dawn on Friday, Israel launched a wave of bold strikes against dozens of targets inside Iran, killing senior Iranian military leaders and damaging military infrastructure. In retaliation, Iran fired hundreds of ballistic missiles towards Israel. The exchange of strikes continued on Saturday with the two sides reporting civilian casualties and injuries. The new escalation has prompted widespread airspace closures throughout the region since Friday, grounding flights and throwing travel plans into disarray. Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia Al Sudani ordered the Ministry of Transport to 'begin immediate work' to facilitate the return of citizens, in co-ordination with the relevant authorities in Jordan, Kuwait and Turkey, according to his office. Among those affected are Iraqi pilgrims returning from Hajj. The High Commission of Hajj and Umrah said it 'took urgent measures to secure buses to transport pilgrims to the Arar border crossing' with Saudi Arabia. Pictures from inside airports in the region showed scenes of exhaustion, confusion and growing frustration as thousands of passengers found themselves stranded. With no clear timeline for airspace reopening, many Iraqis have turned to public Facebook groups in search of guidance on how to reach Iraq's neighbouring countries by land. Earlier on Saturday, Iraq aviation authorities extended the airspace closure until afternoon. Lebanon reopened its airspace on Saturday at 10am local time and said it would shut it down again starting from 10:30pm until 6am local time on Sunday, according to state-run news agency. Syrian Airlines announced the 'gradual resumption' of flights, saying that initial operations will resume to Kuwait, Doha and Sharjah. The airline noted that all flight schedules remain subject to change depending on 'developments in the current security situation.'


Sharjah 24
an hour ago
- Sharjah 24
Jordan, Syria, Lebanon reopen airspace as Israel, Iran trade fire
Diplomatic relations with Israel All three countries neighbor Israel, but only Jordan has formal diplomatic relations with it. Leadership changes in Syria Syria was long ruled by Bashar al-Assad, an ally of Iran. However, since his ouster in December, the country has been led by Islamist former rebels. The situation in Lebanon Lebanon hosts Hezbollah, a militant group that was significantly weakened in a war with Israel ending in late 2024. Since then, the Lebanese government has been working to implement a ceasefire, which requires Hezbollah to hand over its arsenal and withdraw from areas near the Israeli border. Jordan's airspace reopening "Jordan has reopened its airspace starting 7:30 am (0430 GMT)," announced Haitham Misto, chairman of the Jordanian Civil Aviation Regulatory Commission. Lebanon's airspace reopening Lebanon's Transport Minister Fayez Rassamni also announced the reopening of the country's airspace from 10:00 am (0700 GMT) Saturday. Syria's airspace update In Syria, the aviation authority confirmed the reopening of the country's airspace to civilian aircraft.


The National
2 hours ago
- The National
'We were negotiating': why Israel's attack caught Iran off guard
Less than a month ago in Tehran, senior Iranian diplomats engaged foreign journalists and analysts with a clear message: Iran sought dialogue, not confrontation. It wanted better relations with its Middle Eastern neighbours, they said, and, under the right conditions, with Western nations with which it had long been at odds. There was some optimism – albeit very cautious – about the prospects of reaching an agreement with the US for limitations on its nuclear programme in exchange for much-needed sanctions relief. Senior officials past and present stressed that Iran and its neighbours needed to look at what was possible, rather than be constantly on the look out for perils. 'One of my criticisms of my own country is that we have to depart from a threat-based perspective,' one former senior official said in a background briefing. 'We want an opportunity-based outlook, not a threat-based outlook.' In a glossy cobalt blue book of essays that accompanied the Tehran Dialogue Forum, a conference held by an Iranian Foreign Ministry-affiliated think tank, former Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi argued that US President Donald Trump was hesitant to drag the US into more wars. Saber-rattling would keep Iran on its toes and strengthen Washington's negotiating position 'without actually unleashing a ruinous conflict', Mr Salehi wrote. Iranian officials attempted to emphasise diplomacy, knowing well that Israel favoured military options, and the US had threatened action should nuclear talks collapse. In the following weeks, Iranian officials and observers made clear that they believed Israel wanted to strike, and that any attack could not take place without US knowledge and backing. 'We will immediately respond to the Zionist regime's possible attack on the country's nuclear facilities,' Iran's Supreme National Security Council said in a statement last week, before the Israeli strikes began. Iranian officials and analysts did not expect an attack to happen while there were active plans for more negotiations. US and Iranian officials have been planning to meet for a sixth round of discussions in the Omani capital Muscat on Sunday. 'We were in a limited negotiation process and did not expect military [action],' a senior Iranian government foreign policy researcher told The National on Friday. 'In fact, the Israeli regime sabotaged the diplomacy entirely with military action.' Hassan Ahmadian, assistant professor of West Asian Studies at the University of Tehran, said that 'Israeli warmongering against Iran was obvious and so the attack was never ruled out at any point'. 'Yet many in Iran believed that now the US had chosen dialogue with Tehran, it wouldn't unleash the Israelis against it,' he told The National. That moment came quicker than expected, though. For many in Iran, diplomatic talks have not yet failed, although they were facing significant headwinds over differing stances in Tehran's rights to uranium enrichment. President Trump appeared to justify Israel's attacks, which he later said took place with Washington's knowledge, by noting that a 60-day deadline he had imposed for nuclear talks to succeed had ended on Thursday. The point is that we were in a diplomatic process and we expected the other side to respect this joint diplomatic effort. Iranian government foreign policy researcher Some observers argue that Iran miscalculated the time it had available for negotiations, and Israel's willingness to really go through with an attack. In Tehran, however, many believe Israel miscalculated too, encouraged by what they see as international inertia over its bombing campaigns in Palestine, Lebanon and Syria. And because of the perception of US complicity, Washington is being held responsible as well. 'It's not about underestimating [Israel],' the government foreign policy researcher said. 'The point is that we were in a diplomatic process and we expected the other side to respect this joint diplomatic effort.' The US president was swayed from diplomacy to not saying no to military action, Iranian officials believe. Influence of, "Zionist lobbies" on the US government and "extremists" in US decision-making frameworks "should be considered the reason for this change in approach and finally, Israel carried out this attack," a second senior Iranian government official told The National. Israel's multipronged attack on Iran's nuclear and defence infrastructure has dramatically changed the playing field. As it pledged, Iran has responded, and there is room for further escalation if the exchange of strikes and counterstrikes continues. It has named its continuing strikes against Israel as 'Operation True Promise 3', linking it to previous operations of the same name on the country. Unlike past responses, which carefully balanced force with restraint to avoid spiraling escalation, such caution may now be less of a priority. ' Iran 's response cannot be similar to what happened in October or April 2024,' a regional source close to Iranian thinking and military circles, told The National. 'The proportionate retaliation must be strong enough to deter further Israeli aggression.' The escalation has endangered both the possibility of nuclear talks continuing and the likelihood of them succeeding, even if they resume. Iran's position on attending the negotiations scheduled for Sunday is unclear, its Foreign Ministry spokesman said on Saturday. The framework of thinking in Iran is shifting from diplomacy to war, observers believe. 'I suspect it's [Iran's] preferred diplomatic approach not to go ahead in parallel with the continuing military confrontation with Israel,' said Mr Ahmadian. 'And so, it's war now – diplomacy can only come afterwards.'