The silent killer in your portfolio: Why one stock could wreck it all
When equity markets rally, portfolios with concentrated bets often look like winners.
Investors in stocks like Gensol Engineering or Mazagon Dock in 2023 may have flaunted triple-digit returns. But beneath that temporary high lies a quiet but dangerous threat: concentration risk.
Concentration risk refers to excessive exposure to a single stock, sector, or strategy. While it can magnify gains, it also amplifies losses when things go wrong.
In a country where stock investing is now mainstream and mutual funds manage over ₹55 lakh crore (as of April 2025), this risk often goes unnoticed—until the tide turns.
Also read: Devina Mehra: Diversified or concentrated portfolio? It's an easy choice
The temptation of overconfidence
In recent years, retail investors in India have been shifting away from diversified mutual funds and toward direct stock picking. Fuelled by Finfluencers, demat apps, and FOMO, many investors now chase recent winners highlighted under 'top gainers in 1 year" filters.
The pattern is familiar: someone sees a stock that has returned 300% over 18 months and bets big, assuming the past will repeat.
But markets are rarely so kind.
The Gensol lesson
Take Gensol Engineering. The stock soared over 200% in 2023. But by early 2024, after reports of financial irregularities and broader corrections, it plunged nearly 30% in just weeks. For those who had 40–50% of their portfolio in Gensol, the damage was severe—even though broader indices were stable.
Data speaks: The price of concentration
According to the CFA Institute, a well-diversified portfolio needs at least 20–25 uncorrelated stocks. In India, mutual funds typically hold 40–60 stocks. Yet many DIY investors own just 5–8 stocks—often clustered around themes like capital goods, defence, or small caps.
The difference isn't theoretical—it's the line between staying invested and panic selling during volatility.
Diversification vs. diworsification
Many investors argue that too much diversification dilutes returns. It's true—diversification doesn't guarantee the highest return, but it protects against catastrophic loss.
Also read: Diversification isn't about how many stocks or funds you own—it's about which ones
Let's say you own five stocks. If one stock crashes 80%, and it made up 40% of your portfolio, your entire wealth drops by 32%—even if the rest stay flat. A diversified fund with the same stock at 3% allocation would suffer less than 2.5% impact.
Think of diversification like a cricket team. You might have Virat Kohli, but if the other 10 are debutants, your tournament odds shrink. A steady, well-balanced lineup gives you better consistency—even if a star underperforms.
Mutual Funds: The diversification you forgot
In chasing alpha, many investors have abandoned mutual funds—especially actively managed ones. But mutual funds offer built-in benefits: diversification, professional management, risk-adjusted returns, and regulatory safeguards.
Some points to consider:
Instead of ditching mutual funds completely, consider a blend. For instance, a 70-30 split between diversified funds and direct equity can offer growth with a cushion.
10/10/10 rule for safer investing
To control concentration risk, follow the 10/10/10 rule:
Review your SIPs, holdings, and direct investments every six months. If one idea has grown disproportionately, consider trimming it.
Final thought
In investing, silent risks are often deadlier than visible ones. Concentration risk doesn't show up in daily NAVs or dashboards—it shows up in sleepless nights during market corrections. A portfolio should not just perform in bull runs; it should survive the bear phases.
As markets evolve and choices multiply, managing risk is not just about avoiding losses—it's about staying in the game. And for that, diversification isn't optional. It's essential.
Also read: Unlocking global markets: How Indian investors can diversify with portfolio management services
Viral Bhatt, founder, Money Mantra— a personal finance consultancy
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
4 hours ago
- Mint
The good, the bad and the ugly of the IPL phenomenon
The Indian Premier League (IPL) for Cricket is the second largest sports league in the world after the American National Football League (NFL). You read that right, second largest in the world! And the IPL is a toddler, only 18 years old, compared to over 125 years of the American Major League Baseball's existence, 100 years of the NFL's and 75 years of Formula One's. The NFL dominates all revenue metrics like total revenue (nearly $20 billion), revenue per team ($600 million) and revenue per match ($67 million). The last of these metrics is considered the most relevant for comparison across geographies and formats, and the IPL comes in second with nearly $17 million per match. Justifying its position as a young league, the IPL has been growing revenue at a compounded annual rate of above 20% compared with about 8-10% for other major sports leagues like the NFL. Also Read: IPL cricket is a fine example of free-market capitalism The Board of Control for Cricket in India, widely known by its four-letter abbreviation BCCI, sits atop the IPL pyramid. It is a tax-exempt organization that oversees this entertainment juggernaut. Like for most major sports leagues around the world, the revenue model is made up of TV and digital rights revenue, central sponsorships, franchise level sponsorship, stadium receipts and merchandise revenue. The BCCI struck a five-year $6 billion deal with Disney/Viacom 18 for TV and digital rights revenue from 2023 through 2027. In addition to this annual $1.2 billion, the Board earns another $100-200 million from central sponsorships. The BCCI shares half of this with the ten franchise teams. So, each franchise team makes about $60 million directly from the Board and another $10 million or so at the franchise level. The BCCI imposes a total salary cap of ₹146 crore ($17 million) for cricketers and if you add about $3 million in miscellaneous expenses, each franchise stands to make a whopping operating profit of about $50 million per season. Also Read: Brands pile in, ads get shorter: IPL 18 rewrites the rules of cricket-time marketing: Report There are many ingredients that make up the magic sauce for the IPL. The demographics of the country naturally lend themselves to a newly introduced short form of the game. A remarkable 40-50% of IPL fans are women (thus dramatically expanding the ad market). Some stars like Virat Kohli have a 'gram' followership (280 million) that is in the league of Kendall Jenner and Taylor Swift. The only sportspersons with a greater following are footballers Cristiano Ronaldo and Lionel Messi. Even though we in India are shocked by the vast sums of money that IPL players are auctioned for; in comparison with other major leagues around the world, IPL's 'talent cost' as a percentage of total revenue is among the lowest. Inevitably, the number of teams and the playing season will expand, perhaps as soon as the next media auction in 2027. By my estimate, over the next ten years or so, media rights for the IPL should roughly be 10 to 12 times the current value of $1.2 billion a year. The BCCI will make a profit each year of over $5 billion. The Board pays no taxes on this profit. Also Read: Mint Explainer: BCCI and media rights - an affair since 1992 A main reason why the IPL has remained exciting in sporting terms is that literally any team can win in a given year. This is enabled by a 'mega auction' every three years, during which all but four players per team have to be released. Each team is required to have a minimum of 18 players and a maximum of 25. Each team can only have a maximum of eight international players. So, the mega auction releases somewhere between 150 and 200 players into the fray. In the intervening years, auctions are held for new players, for international players who elect not to return, and for a few who are released. This unique process ensures that a small group of players fly the franchise flag (such as Kohli for Royal Challengers Bengaluru or Rohit Sharma for Mumbai Indians), but others get thrown in the great pot with any team being able to bid for their services. This ensures that each game remains competitive, which makes any outcome possible. Multi-year dominance by any single team is unlikely; eight different teams have won in 18 years. Also Read: FIFA World Cup 2026: Will US hostility trump its hospitality? That's the good part of the story. A fast-growing, world-scale sporting league with structural elements that will keep it exciting and growing fast. In the early years, the IPL was rocked by 'fixing' scandals rendered worse by the fact that insiders seemed to have the biggest hand in those scandals. Fortunately, large-scale fixing seems to have been eliminated. Informal and international (where sports betting is legal) betting continues, but it appears that insiders are much less involved today. The 'bad' part of the story today comes from the unbridled consumerism that has taken hold, indulging everything from binge drinking to unhealthy eating. The 'ugly' part was visible in Bengaluru with the tragic death of 11 fans and injuries sustained by scores of others during a 'victory party' at the RCB stadium. Officials were hopelessly overwhelmed by the size of the crowds and their apathetic complacency resulted in a needless tragedy. The IPL juggernaut is likely to crush on at its current growth rate for at least a few more years. The BCCI must reallocate some of its astonishing profits and work with cities to move stadiums to zones that are well connected by mass transit and are built to be disaster proof. Planning and systematism will be required everywhere to realize the full potential of the IPL phenomenon. P.S: 'The great wheel of fate rolls on like a juggernaut, and crushes all in turn, some soon, some late," said the writer H. Rider Haggard The author is chairman, InKlude Labs. Read Narayan's Mint columns at
India.com
11 hours ago
- India.com
Poor Pakistan's rich cricketer: Babar Azam owns property worth Rs..., while Virat Kohli owns...
Image credit: Source: Instagram In these collection of pictures, we compare the net worth of star India and Pakistan cricketers Virat Kohli and Babar and the properties they own. Image credit: Source: Instagram Babar Azam will get salary of about Rs 2.35 crore from Sydney Sixers on BBL debut, according to media reports. Babar will be playing in the BBL 2025-26 season. Image credit: Source: Instagram Former Pakistan captain Babar Azam has reported net worth of Rs 168 crore, according to media reports. Image credit: X (Formerly Twitter) Babar Azam owns a luxurious bungalow in Lahore which is situated in upscale DHA Phase 5 area. Image credit: X (Formerly Twitter) Babar Azam also own farmhouse in Lahore which is called Azam Farm House. This farmhouse is quite luxurious and stylish, with a magnificent gate. Image credit: X (Formerly Twitter) Babar Azam owns property worth around Rs 41 crore, according to media reports. Star India cricketer Virat Kohli owns property worth nearly Rs 200 crore. It includes bungalow in Gurgaon worth Rs 80 crore, a sea-facing home in Mumbai woth Rs 35 crore and a Alibaug holiday home worth Rs 32 crore, according to media report apart from other properties. Virat Kohli's net worth is almost 10 times more than Babar Azam. Former India captain's net worth is about Rs 1050 crore reportedly while Babar Azam's net worth stands at only Rs 168 crore.
Mint
12 hours ago
- Mint
The silent killer in your portfolio: Why one stock could wreck it all
When equity markets rally, portfolios with concentrated bets often look like winners. Investors in stocks like Gensol Engineering or Mazagon Dock in 2023 may have flaunted triple-digit returns. But beneath that temporary high lies a quiet but dangerous threat: concentration risk. Concentration risk refers to excessive exposure to a single stock, sector, or strategy. While it can magnify gains, it also amplifies losses when things go wrong. In a country where stock investing is now mainstream and mutual funds manage over ₹55 lakh crore (as of April 2025), this risk often goes unnoticed—until the tide turns. Also read: Devina Mehra: Diversified or concentrated portfolio? It's an easy choice The temptation of overconfidence In recent years, retail investors in India have been shifting away from diversified mutual funds and toward direct stock picking. Fuelled by Finfluencers, demat apps, and FOMO, many investors now chase recent winners highlighted under 'top gainers in 1 year" filters. The pattern is familiar: someone sees a stock that has returned 300% over 18 months and bets big, assuming the past will repeat. But markets are rarely so kind. The Gensol lesson Take Gensol Engineering. The stock soared over 200% in 2023. But by early 2024, after reports of financial irregularities and broader corrections, it plunged nearly 30% in just weeks. For those who had 40–50% of their portfolio in Gensol, the damage was severe—even though broader indices were stable. Data speaks: The price of concentration According to the CFA Institute, a well-diversified portfolio needs at least 20–25 uncorrelated stocks. In India, mutual funds typically hold 40–60 stocks. Yet many DIY investors own just 5–8 stocks—often clustered around themes like capital goods, defence, or small caps. The difference isn't theoretical—it's the line between staying invested and panic selling during volatility. Diversification vs. diworsification Many investors argue that too much diversification dilutes returns. It's true—diversification doesn't guarantee the highest return, but it protects against catastrophic loss. Also read: Diversification isn't about how many stocks or funds you own—it's about which ones Let's say you own five stocks. If one stock crashes 80%, and it made up 40% of your portfolio, your entire wealth drops by 32%—even if the rest stay flat. A diversified fund with the same stock at 3% allocation would suffer less than 2.5% impact. Think of diversification like a cricket team. You might have Virat Kohli, but if the other 10 are debutants, your tournament odds shrink. A steady, well-balanced lineup gives you better consistency—even if a star underperforms. Mutual Funds: The diversification you forgot In chasing alpha, many investors have abandoned mutual funds—especially actively managed ones. But mutual funds offer built-in benefits: diversification, professional management, risk-adjusted returns, and regulatory safeguards. Some points to consider: Instead of ditching mutual funds completely, consider a blend. For instance, a 70-30 split between diversified funds and direct equity can offer growth with a cushion. 10/10/10 rule for safer investing To control concentration risk, follow the 10/10/10 rule: Review your SIPs, holdings, and direct investments every six months. If one idea has grown disproportionately, consider trimming it. Final thought In investing, silent risks are often deadlier than visible ones. Concentration risk doesn't show up in daily NAVs or dashboards—it shows up in sleepless nights during market corrections. A portfolio should not just perform in bull runs; it should survive the bear phases. As markets evolve and choices multiply, managing risk is not just about avoiding losses—it's about staying in the game. And for that, diversification isn't optional. It's essential. Also read: Unlocking global markets: How Indian investors can diversify with portfolio management services Viral Bhatt, founder, Money Mantra— a personal finance consultancy
