NIA investigates Maoist hijacking of explosives in Odisha's Sundargarh
BHUBANESWAR: The National Investigation Agency (
NIA
) on Thursday launched an investigation into Tuesday's hijacking of explosive materials by Maoist insurgents from a stone quarry in Odisha's Sundargarh district, bordering Jharkhand, Odisha Police sources said.
The brazen loot of 4 tonnes of gelatin sticks in Rourkela's K Balang police jurisdictions raised serious security concerns.
"This is a matter of grave concern as these explosives could be potentially used for anti-national activities. NIA has stepped in and started their probe. We are working closely with the NIA and Jharkhand police to track and recover the stolen materials,' a senior police officer told TOI.
Security experts warn that the quantity of stolen explosives poses a significant threat.
"Four tonnes of gelatin sticks in the wrong hands could cause devastating damage,' S K Sahoo, a retired cop said.
According to sources, the NIA has formed special teams to track the movement of Maoist groups in the region and recover the stolen explosives.
A high-level meeting was conducted between NIA officials and senior police officers from Odisha and Jharkhand to coordinate the investigation and develop strategic responses.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Trade Bitcoin & Ethereum – No Wallet Needed!
IC Markets
Start Now
Undo
DGP Y B Khurania, who chaired the meeting, has been camping in Sundargarh since Wednesday.
Around 10 am on Tuesday, about 25-30 armed Naxals stormed the quarry under K Balang police limits in Rourkela, near Saranda forests neighbouring Maoist-infested Jharkhand, holding two labourers and a manager at gunpoint after the explosives-laden lorry arrived. The armed group compelled the driver to operate the vehicle under duress.
They released him at Relhatu area under K Balang police station around 5 pm. 'We have intensified patrolling in the area and set up checkpoints at key locations,' DIG (western range) Brijesh Rai said.
The brazen incident marked a significant Maoist operation after an extended period of reduced LWE activity in Odisha, triggering apprehension of a disruption of the Centre's objective to establish a 'Maoist free' India by March 2026.
The daylight theft of 4-tonnes of gelatin sticks has raised concerns as Sundargarh had been declared Naxal-free in April 2024. DIG Rai mentioned that Sundargarh, free from Maoist activities and violence for over ten years, was removed from the left-wing extremism (LWE) affected areas list and the Centre's security-related expenditure (SRE) scheme last year.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
Bus driver suspended for trying to run over woman in Bengaluru
Bengaluru: A BMTC bus driver has been suspended after he allegedly tried to run over a woman during a road-rage incident in central Bengaluru recently. The May 23 incident at Queens Circle came to light after a video clip went viral. Deekshitha Reddy Y, 30, a medical student residing at Vinayaka Layout in Vijayanagar, stated in her complaint to Cubbon Park traffic police that she was driving on Kasturba Road when the bus coming from behind hit her SUV, causing damage to it. When she confronted the bus driver, Puneeth, by standing in front of the vehicle, he allegedly drove it forward. She escaped unhurt by moving to the left side of the bus. A senior officer said it was found that Deekshitha had earlier argued with a truck driver over reckless driving near Hudson Circle. The bus, which happened to be passing by, got stuck in traffic. The bus driver allegedly passed comments at her, prompting her to follow the vehicle and try to block its path. The bus then hit the SUV and the driver fled the scene. Deekshitha stated that she only wanted an apology from the bus driver. A case has been registered against the driver under BNS Section 281 (rash driving) and relevant sections of the IMV Act. The bus has been seized, and action is being taken against Puneeth, police said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Esse novo alarme com câmera é quase gratuito em Rio De Janeiro (consulte o preço) Alarmes Saiba Mais Undo However, Puneeth told the media that the woman was arguing with a truck driver after overtaking from the left and getting between the truck and the bus. As this was causing a traffic jam, he merely pointed out her reckless driving and moved ahead. Puneeth claimed that she then started driving her SUV, attempting to block the bus's path. He maintained that he did not intend to run over her and was only trying to steer the bus to the left side when she was directly in front of the vehicle. He alleged that she tried to stop the bus and even attempted to assault him. BMTC, in its clarification, stated that the incident stemmed from a minor collision. The woman exited her SUV and stood in front of the bus at a signal, blocking its path in an attempt to question the driver. The bus driver allegedly tried to move the vehicle forward while she was still standing in front. Based on initial findings, the driver has been placed under suspension pending a departmental inquiry.
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
HC acquits DRDO officer in rape case, citing major lapses in probe
1 2 Hyderabad: The Telangana high court has acquitted an administrative officer at DRDO, Shameerpet, who was previously convicted of rape and criminal intimidation. A division bench, comprising Justices P Sam Koshy and N Tukaramji, overturned the special sessions court's Sept 2024 verdict, finding the prosecution's case riddled with inconsistencies and lacking credible evidence. The allegations dated back to Jan 2017, when a minor girl accused the officer—a close friend of her divorced mother—of sexually assaulting her in her mother's absence. Based on her claims, he was convicted under IPC sections 376(2)(f)(n) (rape of a minor by a person in authority) and 506 (criminal intimidation) and sentenced to life imprisonment for impregnating the minor. However, the high court found the prosecution failed to establish the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The foetal sample submitted for forensic analysis was too decomposed for conclusive DNA testing. Further weakening the case, the officer produced a 2005 sterilisation certificate indicating he had undergone a vasectomy—casting serious doubt on his biological ability to father a child. Medical documentation essential to corroborate the pregnancy and abortion claims, including ultrasound reports and compliance with the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, were notably absent. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Dermatologista recomenda: simples truque elimina o fungo facilmente Acabe com o Fungo Undo The court also highlighted the victim's contradictory statements about her mother's whereabouts at the time of the alleged incident and the unexplained delay of seven days in filing the FIR. Criticising the investigation as lackadaisical, the high court bench noted procedural lapses such as failure to examine the doctor who allegedly performed the abortion and poor handling of forensic evidence. The prosecution's reliance on uncorroborated circumstantial evidence, in violation of established legal standards (as per Sharad Birdhi Chand Sarda versus state of Maharashtra), was also condemned. The bench emphasised that conviction cannot rest solely on the female prosecutor's inconsistent testimony without supporting evidence of 'sterling quality.' The court ordered Sharma's immediate release and called for urgent reforms in investigative procedures, including specialised training, independent supervision, and continuous professional development. Justice Tukaramji, in a separate note, urged the formation of dedicated investigative teams for sensitive cases and the establishment of independent oversight bodies to ensure transparency, accountability, and public trust in the criminal justice system.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Karnataka high court orders demolition of illegal building, recovery of costs from BBMP officials
Bengaluru: In a strong move against civic apathy and unauthorised construction, the high court ordered the demolition of an illegal building at JP Nagar 5th Phase and directed that the costs be recovered from BBMP officials who failed to prevent the violation. The case centres around a residential building at Nanjundeshwara Layout, which local residents alleged was coming up without an approved building plan. Complaints were raised in Feb 2020, and during a site inspection, a BBMP joint commissioner confirmed the structure had no sanctioned plan. He assured the residents that the building would be demolished. But action never came. Instead, the builder allegedly colluded with BBMP engineers to procure a backdated plan. "They issued a 2021 plan and backdated it to 2020 to show as if it had been obtained before the construction. But the document was forged. The Anti-Corruption Bureau confirmed this during its inquiry," said a resident who closely followed the case. Despite a Karnataka Appellate Tribunal ruling in favour of its demolition, BBMP remained inactive. The builder then moved the high court with the same forged documents. However, the court wasn't convinced. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Descubra ofertas de voos imperdíveis Voos | Anúncios de Pesquisa Saiba Mais Undo The involvement of BBMP officials came to light after the case was escalated in court by the building owner himself. Justice Sanjay Gowda, in his April 26 order, pulled no punches. He pointed out that the building plan was approved on March 6, 2021, while the spot inspection by the joint commissioner had occurred earlier, on Feb 28, 2021. The assistant director of town planning (ADTP) not only approved the plan but also issued a building licence on March 24, 2021. "The fact that the engineer was able to provide the licence plan number and the date itself indicates the nature of collusion between the applicant and the engineers concerned," the court noted. The building had massive deviations from the sanctioned norms. "As could be seen from the above, in respect of setback, there are deviations ranging from 20% to 95%. In respect of coverage, there is a deviation of 48.1%, in respect of built-up area, there is a deviation of 73.2% and in respect of FAR, there is a deviation of 73%. The report also points out that there is a violation of the sanctioned height by about 2.2 metres and there is an extra floor constructed. The report also indicates that there is a deviation to the extent of 48.1% in respect of all floors put up and this would therefore fundamentally indicate that there is a gross violation from the sanctioned plan which in fact was cancelled," the court said. Citing Section 321-B of the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, the court clarified that if BBMP officers fail to stop illegal construction, they can be penalised. The more violations they overlook, the heavier the penalties. The court has now directed BBMP to take strict action. This includes holding an inquiry into officials, including retired ones who were involved in sanctioning the post-demolition plan. The court said BBMP should also recover the cost of demolition from these officials. "BBMP would also have to take action against the ADTP who sanctioned the plan after the order of confirmation was passed on March 19, 2021," the court noted. —-——- Box A wake up call, says neighbour VV Madhusudana Rao, the neighbour who complained about the violation to BBMP told TOI, "This is purely a residential society and how can we have a building built in violation (of rules)? There were a lot of twists and turns in the case with the petitioner complaining to BBMP that even my building is in violation... The HC in fact noted that the petitioner has wasted BBMP's and the court's time with false complaints. Such verdicts should be a wake up call for people building multiple floors and officials approving the plans and turning a blind eye to such violations. "
