Trump calls own supporters 'weaklings' as MAGA's Epstein backlash grows
In a post on his Truth Social platform, Mr Trump labelled the furore around the so-called Epstein files a "SCAM" and said his "PAST supporters have bought into this 'bullshit'".
It comes amid a growing rift within his Make America Great Again (MAGA) Republican coalition over the Epstein files and a "client list" which the FBI last week announced did not exist.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) last week announced it would not release any further documents related to Epstein or his suicide in a New York jail cell.
Claiming the Democrats were peddling "fake news", he wrote lashing out at Republicans: "I have had more success in 6 months than perhaps any President in our Country's history, and all these people want to talk about, with strong prodding by the Fake News and the success starved Dems, is the Jeffrey Epstein Hoax.
"Let these weaklings continue forward and do the Democrats work, don't even think about talking of our incredible and unprecedented success, because I don't want their support anymore!"
He later told reporters those calling for the release of the files were "some stupid Republicans" and "wasting their time".
"Don't even think about talking of our incredible and unprecedented success, because I don't want their support anymore!"
The Justice Department and the FBI also acknowledged that Epstein did not maintain a "client list" to whom underage girls were trafficked.
The "client list" has been the central pillar of a number of conspiracy theories surrounding Epstein, and senior members of Mr Trump's administration, including Attorney General Pam Bondi, had previously promised to release it.
Mr Trump has been under pressure over the issue, with the saga threatening to undermine the loyal support he receives from the MAGA base of the Republican Party.
A number of high profile conservative influencers have also criticised the FBI's statement and attorney general's response, but the president has so far backed Ms Bondi.
But in recent days he has also appeared willing to discredit the theory, describing it as the "Jeffrey Epstein Hoax".
In his Truth post, the US president compared the Epstein client list to other high-profile sagas, including allegations Russia interfered in the 2016 election.
He also pointed blame at the Democrats for peddling the story.
"The Radical Left Democrats have hit pay dirt, again!"
Mr Trump knew Epstein socially in the 1990s and early 2000s.
During the 2021 trial of Epstein's associate Ghislaine Maxwell, the financier's longtime pilot, Lawrence Visoski, testified that Mr Trump flew on Epstein's private plane multiple times.
Mr Trump has denied ever being on the plane and has not been accused of any wrongdoing.
ABC/Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
9 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Trump, Murdoch, Epstein and MAGA: Bannon predicts firestorm, but it's not clear who will get burnt
Most damaging to Trump was the letter's closing line on the occasion of Epstein's 50th: 'Happy Birthday – and may every day be another wonderful secret.' The president phoned Murdoch in an effort to kill the story, but the Journal published nevertheless. Trump denounced it as fake and sued Murdoch for a minimum claim of $US10 billion for defamation. It would be 'an interesting experience' to get Murdoch into the witness box, said the president. But, to Bannon, it was not a problem. It was an opportunity. 'The real enemy has revealed itself,' he exclaimed. Immediately, he rallied the MAGA movement in defence of Trump. And in pursuit of Murdoch: 'This was a kill shot by Murdoch,' Bannon tells me in a Monday phone call, meaning a political hit rather than a kinetic one. 'All of MAGA will rally around because of the attack on President Trump,' he predicted. 'This is going to blow up the Murdoch empire in the US. People will turn on him. Already, the streaming services have a bigger audience than Fox News' – the Murdoch cable TV channel which created the far-right-wing ecosystem to incubate Trump's first presidential candidacy. 'Their audience will turn against Murdoch for trying to smear the president of the US. Besides, President Trump is suing him for $10 billion. The Achilles' heel of the Murdoch empire is Murdoch.' Trump and Murdoch have had ructions over the years, but the two men have maintained a cordial relationship. Indeed, Trump entertained Murdoch in his box at the FIFA Club World Cup final five days before the WSJ story ran. But why would Murdoch unleash a political 'kill shot' against the president only six months into a four-year term? Bannon has two explanations – one immediate and one larger. The immediate reason, he says, was to deflect attention from an imminent news event. On Friday, US time, the day after the WSJ 's story ran, Trump's director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, was due to release an investigation into the claims of Russian interference in the 2016 election. She duly did. Gabbard sought to discredit the US intelligence community's finding that Vladimir Putin had meddled to harm Hillary Clinton's campaign and to help Trump's. Gabbard accused Obama administration officials of 'treasonous conspiracy' in confecting the claims of Russian interference and referred documents to the Justice Department for possible investigation. Loading The WSJ published story of the Trump letter 'to thwart the Tulsi Gabbard files,' says Bannon. But why would Murdoch and his newspaper want to do that? Because Murdoch is in league with the so-called 'deep state', the career officers of the US intelligence agencies. 'It's the deep state, with their media partners, led by Murdoch, that's out to destroy Trump,' Bannon told The Washington Post. Murdoch and the intelligence services want to foment suspicions that Trump was involved with Epstein's sex-trafficking ring, he says. 'Epstein is tied to the intelligence services.' I ask Bannon outright whether, if there is a list of Epstein clients, he thinks Trump might be on it. 'Zero chance,' he replies. 'The No.1 thing we have to do now is to take down the deep state,' he tells me. 'Who governs us?' He cites the two attempts to assassinate Trump last year. 'The FBI hasn't released all its files,' he says, implying possible complicity. 'Who governs this country? The intelligence agencies, the CIA, Mossad, the FBI, the Five Eyes?' The Five Eyes is an intelligence-sharing arrangement that sprang up in World War II between five allies – the US, UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. Loading 'Who governs your country?' he poses to me, hinting that a conspiracy of the five countries' intelligence agencies might secretly control Australia as well as the US. 'This is of vital importance to Australia too. Do elections mean anything? This is bigger than Watergate.' He has no answers, but many questions. Bannon gave Trump a way out of his MAGA crisis – he urged the president to order Bondi to ask the courts to release any 'pertinent' Epstein testimony held under seal – and the president took it. Bannon says, approvingly, that 'it's a dramatic first step – it's going to be a firestorm'. But he demands that Trump go further by appointing a special counsel to investigate the Epstein case. So the pressure remains on the president to restore faith with his base. But Bannon is confident that MAGA will emerge intact. Besides, there are yet more enemies to be confronted: 'The biggest schism is not the Epstein case, it's with the tech bros.' But that's a conspiracy for another day.
The Age
9 minutes ago
- The Age
Trump, Murdoch, Epstein and MAGA: Bannon predicts firestorm, but it's not clear who will get burnt
Most damaging to Trump was the letter's closing line on the occasion of Epstein's 50th: 'Happy Birthday – and may every day be another wonderful secret.' The president phoned Murdoch in an effort to kill the story, but the Journal published nevertheless. Trump denounced it as fake and sued Murdoch for a minimum claim of $US10 billion for defamation. It would be 'an interesting experience' to get Murdoch into the witness box, said the president. But, to Bannon, it was not a problem. It was an opportunity. 'The real enemy has revealed itself,' he exclaimed. Immediately, he rallied the MAGA movement in defence of Trump. And in pursuit of Murdoch: 'This was a kill shot by Murdoch,' Bannon tells me in a Monday phone call, meaning a political hit rather than a kinetic one. 'All of MAGA will rally around because of the attack on President Trump,' he predicted. 'This is going to blow up the Murdoch empire in the US. People will turn on him. Already, the streaming services have a bigger audience than Fox News' – the Murdoch cable TV channel which created the far-right-wing ecosystem to incubate Trump's first presidential candidacy. 'Their audience will turn against Murdoch for trying to smear the president of the US. Besides, President Trump is suing him for $10 billion. The Achilles' heel of the Murdoch empire is Murdoch.' Trump and Murdoch have had ructions over the years, but the two men have maintained a cordial relationship. Indeed, Trump entertained Murdoch in his box at the FIFA Club World Cup final five days before the WSJ story ran. But why would Murdoch unleash a political 'kill shot' against the president only six months into a four-year term? Bannon has two explanations – one immediate and one larger. The immediate reason, he says, was to deflect attention from an imminent news event. On Friday, US time, the day after the WSJ 's story ran, Trump's director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, was due to release an investigation into the claims of Russian interference in the 2016 election. She duly did. Gabbard sought to discredit the US intelligence community's finding that Vladimir Putin had meddled to harm Hillary Clinton's campaign and to help Trump's. Gabbard accused Obama administration officials of 'treasonous conspiracy' in confecting the claims of Russian interference and referred documents to the Justice Department for possible investigation. Loading The WSJ published story of the Trump letter 'to thwart the Tulsi Gabbard files,' says Bannon. But why would Murdoch and his newspaper want to do that? Because Murdoch is in league with the so-called 'deep state', the career officers of the US intelligence agencies. 'It's the deep state, with their media partners, led by Murdoch, that's out to destroy Trump,' Bannon told The Washington Post. Murdoch and the intelligence services want to foment suspicions that Trump was involved with Epstein's sex-trafficking ring, he says. 'Epstein is tied to the intelligence services.' I ask Bannon outright whether, if there is a list of Epstein clients, he thinks Trump might be on it. 'Zero chance,' he replies. 'The No.1 thing we have to do now is to take down the deep state,' he tells me. 'Who governs us?' He cites the two attempts to assassinate Trump last year. 'The FBI hasn't released all its files,' he says, implying possible complicity. 'Who governs this country? The intelligence agencies, the CIA, Mossad, the FBI, the Five Eyes?' The Five Eyes is an intelligence-sharing arrangement that sprang up in World War II between five allies – the US, UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. Loading 'Who governs your country?' he poses to me, hinting that a conspiracy of the five countries' intelligence agencies might secretly control Australia as well as the US. 'This is of vital importance to Australia too. Do elections mean anything? This is bigger than Watergate.' He has no answers, but many questions. Bannon gave Trump a way out of his MAGA crisis – he urged the president to order Bondi to ask the courts to release any 'pertinent' Epstein testimony held under seal – and the president took it. Bannon says, approvingly, that 'it's a dramatic first step – it's going to be a firestorm'. But he demands that Trump go further by appointing a special counsel to investigate the Epstein case. So the pressure remains on the president to restore faith with his base. But Bannon is confident that MAGA will emerge intact. Besides, there are yet more enemies to be confronted: 'The biggest schism is not the Epstein case, it's with the tech bros.' But that's a conspiracy for another day.
ABC News
3 hours ago
- ABC News
Trump vs Rupert Murdoch over an Epstein article
Sam Hawley: On the one side, there's a media tycoon. On the other, the President of the United States. It has all the makings of a fascinating courtroom drama. Donald Trump is suing Rupert Murdoch and The Wall Street Journal over an article alleging the US President sent a lewd birthday message to Jeffrey Epstein in 2003. Today, media expert Rod Tiffin on the complex relationship between Trump and Murdoch and how the legal proceedings are likely to play out. I'm Sam Hawley on Gadigal land in Sydney. This is ABC News Daily. Sam Hawley: Rod, we're going to have a look at the relationship between two of the most powerful men in the world, that is Donald Trump and Rupert Murdoch, which has dramatically re-entered the spotlight in the last few days. This revolves around a Wall Street Journal article, which is owned, of course, that newspaper by Rupert Murdoch. Just tell me what this article alleged when it appeared in the paper last Friday. Rod Tifffen: Well, it alleges that Donald Trump years ago sent a birthday greeting to Jeffrey Epstein with a sketch of a girl on it. News report: Donald Trump launching yet another lawsuit against the press, this time targeting media mogul Rupert Murdoch and his News Corp empire over an article in The Wall Street Journal. News report: He denies writing the letter, which the journal said included a sexually suggestive drawing and ended with the line, Happy birthday and may every day be another wonderful secret. News report: The president dismissed the letter as fake, saying 'These are not my words, not the way I talk. Also, I don't draw pictures.' News report: The paper says it happened in 2003, which is before Epstein was convicted. It's all adding to the pressure Donald Trump is under over his handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case. Sam Hawley: Now, as soon as this was published, Donald Trump threatened to sue. He said in a post on his social media platform Truth Social he was looking forward to getting Rupert Murdoch to testify in his lawsuit against him. And in Donald Trump's words, the pile of garbage newspaper. So Donald Trump was furious. Rod Tifffen: Murdoch has three main media outlets in the States. He has Fox News, which is unfailingly loyal to Trump. He has the New York Post, which swings around a bit. And he has the Wall Street Journal, where the market incentives are very different. The Wall Street Journal has to keep its credibility with a high flying business audience. Otherwise, they'll go to the New York Times or Washington Post or somewhere. So the Wall Street Journal's coverage of Trump is typically more independent and more probing than, say, Fox News is. So I would imagine that Rupert didn't know this was going to appear before it appeared because he's sort of, you know, at 94 years old, he's more hands off these days and he doesn't actually have the role of chief executive anymore. But I think that the key thing is the Wall Street Journal has to keep up its credibility with its audience. Sam Hawley: But just to put that in context, once upon a time, of course, Rupert Murdoch had great control over what was in these newspapers. He certainly would have been told beforehand if an article like this was to appear. Rod Tifffen: Yes, that's true. Certainly, let's say during Trump's first term, if this appeared, Murdoch would have known in advance. But I'm not at all sure that he knew this in advance. Sam Hawley: All right. Well, he's now involved in an almighty fight with the US president who has indeed sued in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida. So he's going all out Donald Trump here. Rod Tifffen: Yes. I think the thing is, he's had a record of success since he was reelected, Donald Trump. He's got a settlement from ABC and, you know, CBS paid out a huge settlement for a case that had no substance at all. News report: Paramount has agreed to pay Donald Trump more than 24 million dollars after settling a lawsuit over a televised interview with Kamala Harris. In the lawsuit, Mr Trump alleged the media group deceptively edited an interview with the former Democratic presidential candidate on its 60 Minutes program on CBS. Rod Tifffen: And basically that was seen as its parent company, Paramount, wanting to do favours for Donald Trump. The Washington Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, is leaning over backwards to be nice to him. I think the difference, though, is like Bezos is very keen to get government contracts for his space program. And CBS and ABC have other business interests which depend a lot on the favour and patronage of the president. And this president is all about favour and patronage. But Murdoch doesn't have that. So I'd be certainly very surprised if Murdoch settled any time soon. It would be a huge step down in credibility. It would be a huge blow to his ego because he doesn't like giving in, surrendering on these sorts of things. And he doesn't have any ulterior motives and interests like the other major media corporations do. Sam Hawley: All right, well, Trump is suing News Corp. He's suing Mr. Murdoch. He's suing News Corp's founder, Robert Thompson. News Corp's chief executive. He's suing Dow Jones, the publisher, and he's suing the two journalists involved. So there's a lot of people involved in this lawsuit. That's for sure. Rod Tifffen: All over a birthday card. Yeah. Sam Hawley: Oh, yeah. It's a rather damaging birthday card if the allegations are, in fact, true. And we are not insinuating that they are. But Trump is also after huge damages, not less than $10 billion, he says he wants. Rod Tifffen: Yes, I mean, it's serious, but it's very funny at the same time. The one thing that would make News Corp, make Murdoch settle is if Murdoch was forced to testify in court, because I think he's not really up to doing that anymore. And I think that would be the one threat that would make Murdoch settle. Sam Hawley: Hmm. All right. Well, let's come to the history of this relationship in just a moment. As you mentioned, you don't think Rupert Murdoch will settle. The newspaper is absolutely sticking by its reporting. It's not removed the article. It's still up there for everybody to see. So it's backing in its own journalism at this point, isn't it? Rod Tifffen: It is. And one imagines they went through a pretty strenuous process before they published. I mean, this isn't a fly by night newspaper. It's one of the leading newspapers in America. And it wouldn't publish something like this without doing due diligence beforehand. Sam Hawley: All right, let's get into the history of this relationship, because it has been rather volatile, hasn't it? It's been interesting to watch Rupert Murdoch and his almost reluctance to back Donald Trump, but then sort of falling into line. Just tell me what it was like in the beginning, I guess, back in 2016 during Trump's first pitch for the White House. Rod Tifffen: Well, the beginnings go back even further than that. Rupert Murdoch took over the New York Post in 1976, and Trump was an absolute publicity whore. He was always wanting to get into the paper. And they have a page six column, which is all gossip about politicians and celebrities and so on. And he often featured in that and was often a source for it. And he more or less divorced his wife in the pages of the New York Post. And they were willing to play the game because Trump, they thought Trump was good copy. But Murdoch saw him as just a lightweight, a crooked property developer. So Murdoch was happy to give him publicity, but never had any high opinion of him, either morally or intellectually. Sam Hawley: Hmm. All right. But by 2016, he'd sort of come around, had he? He supported Trump. Rod Tifffen: Well, 2016, Fox News is locked into being on the Republican side of politics. And initially, Murdoch didn't think Trump would be a good candidate. But once Trump won the nomination for the Republicans, Fox News in particular, just and all of the Murdoch empire actually just fell in behind Trump. After the election, Fox News was a faithful outlet for Trump all through the next four years. But then we get to the 2020 election and Trump loses to Biden. And then we've got Trump refusing to accept the result. Got the terrible attack on the Capitol building on January the 6th, 2021. And Murdoch is absolutely appalled. He sees this as an attack on American democracy, American institutions. And he really can't stand the way Trump was behaving. At the same time, though, Fox News had created this audience that believed everything that Trump said. And after the election, Fox's ratings were falling. And in a panic meeting, Murdoch and others said, well, we've got to start going along more with Trump. And then they locked themselves into this false narrative that there was something fishy about the 2020 election. Now, Murdoch was reluctant to go along with this. And in fact, there's evidence of him saying he wants to make Trump history and all this sort of thing. But in the end, the commercial incentives are such that he he toes the line. So you get to 2024 and Fox News is locked in behind Trump. And then, of course, Trump wins. And now the power relationship is all around the other way. Here's Murdoch wanting to be part of the action again. And Trump saying, maybe, maybe not. Sam Hawley: All right, well, Rod, this relationship between Donald Trump and Rupert Murdoch is clearly volatile, but it really is at a new low right now. How ugly do you think this could get? Rod Tifffen: Well, Trump's not known for his subtlety. You know, we've already seen, you know, I'm going to sue his ass and all this sort of talk. I think that it could get very all depends a bit on how the Murdochs respond. And my guess is they will want to take the heat out of it a bit. But I think the Epstein stuff is, it's hard to know because, I mean, Trump has survived so many scandals it would have sunk any other politician. But it seems to me the Epstein stuff and the different excuses they've given for not releasing information and whatever, this seems to be dividing Trump's MAGA base, you know. And it could be that both sides think it's in their interest to keep, you know, for all this to go away. But Trump's drawn a lot more attention to the article than it would have got, you know, by all this. So if I was a spin doctor, I'd say this wasn't a very rational strategy. But maybe that's why I'm not a spin doctor. But, you know, I would think that it could get very ugly. And certainly I can't see the Wall Street Journal rolling over and saying, yes, we got it wrong. Sam Hawley: And who do you think will be the victor then, Murdoch or Trump? We know, don't we, that when things proceed to court, all sorts of information might come to light. Rod Tifffen: Yes. And I think Rupert Murdoch wouldn't want to be having to testify in court. But equally, Trump wouldn't want to have to testify in court where he's cross-examined on his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. That would be just a nightmare for him. They've got various things in America where president can't be sued during their term of office and that sort of thing. So it could all just be put off until after the next election. Who knows? Maybe it will just peter out. But it doesn't show any sign of that yet. Sam Hawley: Rod Tiffen is an emeritus professor in government and international relations at the University of Sydney. This episode was produced by Sydney Pead and Sam Dunn. Audio production by Cinnamon Nippard. Our supervising producer is David Coady. I'm Sam Hawley. Thanks for listening.
