Judicial system needs ‘shake-up' after trader convictions, says Sir David Davis
The former UBS trader and the ex-vice president of euro rates at Barclays bank were said to have manipulated the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (Libor) and the Euro Interbank Offered Rate (Euribor).
Speaking at a press conference following the Supreme Court judgment, Sir David described the two men as 'scapegoats for the sins that led to the financial crisis'.
He said: 'The implications are far-reaching and of course have been devastating for those caught up in it.
'There were several other people convicted of rate rigging, dozens of others who were either prosecuted, acquitted or not prosecuted. Their lives were upended too.
'This scapegoating exercise happened as a result of collusion between the banks and government agencies, including the SFO (Serious Fraud Office) and FCA (Financial Conduct Authority) and we're not done with that.
'This scandal also highlights the need for urgent reform within our justice system on a range of issues – the handling of expert witnesses right through to the rigidity of the appeals system.'
In an 82-page judgment, with which Supreme Court president Lord Reed, Lords Hodge and Lloyd-Jones and Lady Simler agreed, Lord Leggatt said judges' misdirection to the juries had led to the men's wrongful convictions.
He said: 'The history of these two cases raises concerns about the effectiveness of the criminal appeal system in England and Wales in confronting legal error.'
Sir David said the Supreme Court justices 'did not unpack' why the appeal system fell into error in these cases.
He said: 'I think the judicial system needs a shake-up, and this is the latest demonstrator of it, and we will be returning to it in the future.'
Mr Hayes said he believes the trials of the two men became caught up in the politics of the financial crisis, adding that there was a 'big desire from institutions and politicians, acting in their own interest largely', for traders to go to prison.
Asked about his thoughts on what role juries play in cases like his and Mr Palombo's, he said it was a 'dangerous idea' for complicated fraud and financial cases to be heard only by a judge.
The former trader added: 'The jury is the last defensive barrier that every citizen in this country has between them and a wrongful conviction.
'And are juries perfect? No, they're not. Do they make mistakes? Yes, they do. And you know, it's the best of a whole load of options, none of which is perfect.'
Ben Rose, part of Mr Palombo's legal team, said Wednesday's Supreme Court judgment is 'likely to offer a route' by which others who have been convicted in similar circumstances 'can right the wrong that has been done to them'.
He also said there was a 'fundamental error' in the way the case was prosecuted and that the role of the jury was 'overridden and usurped' by the judges.
The lawyer added: 'That should not happen in a country that abides by the rule of law.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
North Wales Chronicle
an hour ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Judge denies justice department request to unseal Epstein grand jury transcripts
The ruling on Wednesday by Judge Richard Berman in Manhattan came after the judge presiding over the case against British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's former girlfriend, also turned down the government's request. Maxwell is serving a 20-year prison sentence after her conviction on sex trafficking charges for helping Epstein sexually abuse girls and young women. Epstein died in jail awaiting trial. A US justice department spokesperson declined to comment. Judge Berman said the information contained in the Epstein grand jury transcripts 'pales in comparison to the Epstein investigative information and materials in the hands of the Department of Justice.' According to his ruling, no victims gave evidence before the Epstein grand jury. The only witness, the judge wrote, was an FBI agent 'who had no direct knowledge of the facts of the case and whose testimony was mostly hearsay'. The agent gave evidence over two days, on June 18 and July 2 2019. The rest of the grand jury presentation consisted of a PowerPoint slideshow shown during the June 18 session and a call log shown during the July 2 session, which ended with grand jurors voting to indict Epstein. Both of those will also remain sealed, Judge Berman ruled. Maxwell's case has been the subject of heightened public focus since an outcry over the justice department's statement last month saying that it would not be releasing any additional documents from the Epstein sex trafficking investigation. The decision infuriated online sleuths, conspiracy theorists and elements of US President Donald Trump's base who had hoped to see proof of a government cover-up. Since then, Trump administration officials have tried to cast themselves as promoting transparency in the case, including by requesting from courts the unsealing of grand jury transcripts. 'The government is the logical party to make comprehensive disclosure to the public of the Epstein file,' Judge Berman wrote in an apparent reference to the justice department's refusal to release additional records on its own while simultaneously moving to unseal grand jury transcripts. 'By comparison,' he added, 'the instant grand jury motion appears to be a 'diversion' from the breadth and scope of the Epstein files in the government's possession. The grand jury testimony is merely a hearsay snippet of Jeffrey Epstein's alleged conduct.' Meanwhile, Maxwell was interviewed at a Florida courthouse weeks ago by US deputy attorney general Todd Blanche, and the house oversight committee had also said that it wanted to speak with Maxwell. Her lawyers said they would be open to an interview but only if the panel were to ensure immunity from prosecution. In a letter Maxwell's lawyers, representative James Comer, the committee chairman, wrote that the committee was willing to delay the deposition until after the resolution of Maxwell's appeal to the Supreme Court. That appeal is expected to be resolved in late September. Mr Comer wrote that while Maxwell's testimony was 'vital' to the Republican-led investigation into Epstein, the committee would not provide immunity or any questions in advance of her testimony, as was requested by her team.
Times
3 hours ago
- Times
Is this a good time to buy shares in Convatec?
After a volatile year for shares in Convatec they received a welcome boost on Wednesday when the FTSE 100 medical equipment company launched a share buyback of up to $300 million. The programme, representing up to 5 per cent of Convatec's market capitalisation, will run until the end of the year. The return of surplus capital to shareholders lifted the shares 5.6 per cent, gaining 13p, to close at 244¼p on the London Stock Exchange, the session's biggest riser on the premier share index. The buyback, being handled by UBS, was received by the market as a sign of health in the outlook for Convatec, whose shares, which were up 30 per cent in the first half of the year, have de-rated since June on concerns about product reimbursement cuts in the United States, its largest market, where the Trump administration has launched an efficiency drive. Despite the stock having seemingly priced in the exposure, some investors have remained on the sidelines, concerned that changes to US federal reimbursement in chronic care and skin substitutes could hit Convatec's sales and forecasts more than expected. Convatec has quantified the potential impact. It guided at its half-year results at the end of July for a potential 1 per cent to 2 per cent headwind on its 2026 revenues and the same range in 2027. The company also reiterated its forecasts for the current financial year, of group organic revenue growth of between 5.5 per cent and 7 per cent. This excludes sales of at least $75 million from InnovaMatrix, a wound treatment whose sales are uncertain because of the prospect of a curtailment of Medicare coverage, a US health insurance scheme. Convatec also reiterated an adjusted operating margin between 22 per cent and 22.5 per cent for this year and said it remained on course to 'consistently deliver' medium-term targets of 5 per cent to 7 per cent organic revenue growth and to reach a 'mid-20s' percentage adjusted operating margin by 2026 or 2027. Sellside bulls argue that investors have overlooked Convatec's results. Uncertainty, though, increased this month when Convatec announced, in a brief statement, that Karim Bitar, its well-regarded chief executive, was taking an indefinite medical leave of absence from the company. He has been replaced by Jonny Mason, the chief financial officer, on an interim basis, and Fiona Ryder, the group financial controller, will in turn take Mason's place as chief financial officer in the interim. Since Bitar, 60, was parachuted in as chief executive by Novo Holdings, a top shareholder, in 2019, he has led the turnaround of the FTSE 100 company after a period of profit warnings and boardroom upheaval. Convatec, founded in 1978, employs about 10,000 people globally and operates in around 90 countries. The company's strategy centres on four chronic care categories — including ostomy and continence care — and prioritises 12 key markets, with the United States as its largest. Since 2019 revenue growth has risen from 2.3 per cent; Convatec has delivered six straight years of accelerating growth; its annual research and development expenditure has doubled to about $100 million; and it has replenished its pipeline of new products. Amid the US and leadership uncertainty, then, the share buyback has helped reinforce the bull case. The buyback was consistent with Convatec's capital allocation plans, under which it targets a 2 times net debt/ebitda leverage ratio. Analysts at UBS, Convatec's house broker, forecast a year-end ratio of 1.3 times, rising to 1.7 times following the buyback. The broker, which reiterated its 'buy' rating and 231p price target, believes Convatec has the cashflows for a consistent buyback programme, which excluding mergers and acquisitions, could return up to $2 billion, or one third of Convatec's existing market capitalisation over the next four years. Similarly, Berenberg told clients on Wednesday, before the buyback was announced, that the 20 per cent de-rating in Convatect's shares since June was a 'buying opportunity', with the company trading on a 16 times price-earnings ratio. Advice Buy Why Buyback underpins confident outlook and shares have de-rated since Tempus's recommendation in February
The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
Brazil police accuse Bolsonaro of planning to flee to Argentina to seek asylum
Brazilian police have told a court they have found a document on the mobile phone of former president Jair Bolsonaro suggesting he had planned to flee to Argentina ahead of his judgment for allegedly plotting a military coup. The far-right populist is facing a jail term of over 40 years when Brazil's supreme court convenes next month to decide whether he is guilty of conspiring to overturn the result of the 2022 presidential election, which Bolsonaro lost to his leftwing opponent Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. Bolsonaro denies the charges but some legal and political experts believe the weight of evidence means his conviction and a heavy sentence are virtually guaranteed. On Wednesday, Brazilian media reported that federal police investigators had filed a report in the supreme court matter claiming to have found a document that was saved on the ex-president's phone in February 2024 – two days after his passport was seized as a result of the coup investigation – which indicated he was planning to seek political asylum in Argentina, which is governed by his far-right ally Javier Milei. 'In my country of origin I am being persecuted for essentially political reasons and crimes,' Bolsonaro's alleged draft asylum request reportedly claims, describing the former president as 'a politically persecuted person'. The undated letter was reportedly addressed to 'the most excellent president of Argentina Javier Gerardo Miliei [sic]'. In their report to the supreme court, federal police alleged the letter indicated that Bolsonaro had 'planned to flee the country, in order to prevent the law being enforced'. More to follow …
