The push to defund Planned Parenthood hit other clinics in Maine. Now their group is suing
Maine Family Planning filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration Wednesday seeking to restore the reimbursements.
Accessing health care in Maine — one of the Northeast's poorest states and its most rural — is a challenge in areas far from population centers such as Portland and Bangor.
Vanessa Shields-Haas, a nurse practitioner, said the organization's clinics have been seeing all patients as usual and completing Medicaid paperwork for visits — but not submitting it because it appears the provision took effect as soon as the law was signed.
'Knowing how hard it is to access care in this state, not allowing these community members to access their care, it's cruel," Shields-Haas said.
Maine clinics appear to be only others included in cuts
Republican lawmakers targeted Planned Parenthood in one piece of what President Donald Trump dubbed the 'big beautiful' bill that Congress passed and the president signed earlier this month.
While advocates focused on Planned Parenthood, the bill did not mention it by name. Instead, it cut off reimbursements for organizations that are primarily engaged in family planning services — which generally include things such as contraception, abortion and pregnancy tests — and received more than $800,000 from Medicaid in 2023.
The U.S. Senate's parliamentarian rejected a 2017 effort to defund Planned Parenthood because it was written to exclude all other providers by barring payments only to groups that received more than $350 million a year in Medicaid funds. The not-for-profit Maine organization asserts in its legal challenge that the threshold was lowered to $800,000 this time around to make sure Planned Parenthood would not be the only affected entity.
It is the only other organization that has come forward publicly to say that its funding is at risk, too.
Federal law already bars taxpayer money from covering most abortions. Instead, the money in question involves other health services, such as cancer screenings and tests, and treatment for sexually transmitted infections.
Proponents of that wrinkle in the law say abortion providers use Medicaid money for other services to subsidize abortion.
'This has never been just about Planned Parenthood," Autumn Christensen, vice president of public policy for Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America, said in a statement. "It's about any Big Abortion business or network that performs abortions. Taxpayers should never be forced to prop up an industry that profits from ending human lives.'
The Associated Press has sought comment from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, which is named in the lawsuit.
Maine Family Planning goes beyond abortion
Maine Family Planning operates 18 clinics across the state.
In 2024, it had about 7,200 family planning patients, including 645 who obtained abortions. Services include pregnancy testing, contraception, family planning counseling, breast exams, cancer screenings and treatment of sexually transmitted infections.
Some of the sites also offer primary care services, where there are another 600 or so patients. There are about 800 gender-affirming care patients and about 200 who use its upstart mobile clinic, said George Hill, the president and CEO of the organization.
Hill said that for about two-thirds of its patients, Maine Family Planning is the only place they get medical care in a typical year.
About half of the patients not seeking abortions are enrolled in Medicaid, and the clinics have been receiving about $1.9 million a year in reimbursements, which accounts for about one-fourth of the organization's budget.
'It's a difficult state to provide care in and now we're facing this,' Hill said. In its lawsuit, the group says it has enough reserves to keep seeing patients covered by Medicaid without reimbursement only through October.
Finding health care can be a struggle in this rural state
Maine Family Planning says that if it had to turn away patients, it would be more complicated for them than simply finding another provider. There aren't enough in rural areas, the group notes — and many don't accept Medicaid.
One patient, Ashley Smith, said she started going to Maine Family Planning about five years ago when she could not find other health care she could afford. While she's not enrolled in Medicaid, she fears clinics could be shuttered because of cuts.
'I am so worried that if my clinic closes, I don't know what I'll do or if I'll be able to see another provider,' Smith said.
Maine Family Planning also supports care at more than 40 other health care facilities. Other than the Planned Parenthood locations that receive money from Maine Family Planning, those other providers don't stand to lose their Medicaid reimbursements.
But, Hill said, the loss of Medicaid funding for Maine Family Planning would mean the group would have less to send to partners.
The Maine clinics say the law violates their right to equal protection
The Center for Reproductive Rights, which is representing Maine Family Planning in the challenge, says in its legal filing that the defunding denies it equal protection under the law because it would have funding cut off, but organizations that provide similar services would not.
'The administration would rather topple a statewide safety network than let a patient get a cancer screening at a facility that also offers abortion care,' Meetra Mehdizadeh, a Center for Reproductive Rights lawyer, said in an interview.
Planned Parenthood already sued and won a reprieve from a judge, preventing its Medicaid payments cutoff — at least until July 21 — while a court considers that case.
Planned Parenthood has warned that the law could put 200 of its affiliates' roughly 600 clinics across the U.S. at risk of closing.
___
Mulvihill reported from Cherry Hill, New Jersey.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
President Trump working on executive order intending to 'preserve' college sports from 'threat'
WASHINGTON, D.C. — A draft of the long-discussed presidential executive order intends to 'preserve' college athletics from 'unprecedented threat' and destruction, it says, by implementing new policies related to athlete compensation, antitrust protection, athlete employment, state law uniformity and Olympic sport participation. The draft, though not believed to be the final version, is expected to align closely with the order that President Donald Trump has long been exploring and offers a window into his thinking. It is not clear when, or even if, Trump will announce an executive order, which for four months has been discussed in the public sphere. The draft was provided to Yahoo Sports by three different congressional sources, all confirming that the document is believed to have originated from the White House. Attempts to reach White House staff were unsuccessful. The draft, seven pages long and titled 'SAVING COLLEGE SPORTS,' outlines directives from Trump to members of his Cabinet to create policy related to various aspects of college athletics. Those aspects primarily include directing the attorney general and Federal Trade Commission to: (1) provide college leaders with protection from antitrust law around the 'long-term availability' of scholarships and opportunities for athletes; (2) prevent 'unqualified and unscrupulous agents' from representing athletes; and (3) support uniformity by, presumably, preempting the varying NIL state laws. The draft also requests that the assistant to the president for domestic policy work with the U.S. Olympic team to provide 'safeguards' for NCAA Olympic sports; and directs the secretary of education and National Labor Relations Board to implement policy 'clarifying that status' of athletes, presumably as students and not employees. In its introduction, the order purports that such directives are necessary to preserve an industry in chaos and on the brink of destruction. 'It is no exaggeration to say that America's system of collegiate athletics plays an integral role in forging the leaders that drive our Nation's success,' the order says. 'Yet the future of college sports is under unprecedented threat.' Court rulings, the order says, have "eliminated limits on athlete compensation, recruiting inducements, and transfers between universities, unleashing a sea change that threatens the viability of college sports.' While some of these changes are 'long overdue,' the order says that the inability to maintain rules 'will destroy what Americans recognize today as college sport.' 'It is the policy of my Administration that college sports should be preserved,' the draft reads. The order says that the House settlement 'provides little assurance' in preserving the sport and expects it to be 'upended soon' by new litigation over increased compensation and fewer rules. The order describes a potential athlete-employment model as making the industry "financially untenable.' Steve Berman, one of the co-lead plaintiff attorneys in the House settlement, released a statement to Yahoo Sports calling a potential executive order as 'unwarranted' and describing it as flouting the president's "own philosophy on the supposed 'art of the deal.'" 'Plain and simple, college athletes don't need Trump's help, and he shouldn't be aiding the NCAA at the expense of athletes,' Berman, managing partner and co-founder of Hagens Berman, said in a statement to Yahoo Sports. 'Step back, Mr. President. These fabulous athletes don't need your help. Let them make their own deals. And the Supreme Court with your appointee, Justice Kavanaugh, condemned the NCAA's compensation rules as a violation of the antitrust laws. Why give them immunity, Mr. President, in light of that ruling?" The order gives the attorney general and Federal Trade Commission 60 days to make necessary revisions to new policy and gives the secretary of education and secretary of the treasury 120 days to develop financial education for athletes. Any timing on the release of the order — if it is released at all — remains a murky topic. Trump has been determined to get involved in college athletics. Most recently, he held a golf outing with two of the sport's most notable names, SEC commissioner Greg Sankey and Notre Dame athletic director Pete Bevacqua. Reports of an executive order surfaced in late April, as well as plans to form a presidential commission to study the industry. In fact, the executive order appears to create a commission (though it does not describe it as such) of 'individuals and organizations involved in collegiate athletics, including athletes, schools, conferences, governing bodies, and leaders with experience relating to college sports, as well as the Congress and State governments' to assure that college sports is being preserved. Trump's plans — both the order and commission — were 'paused' in May as congressional lawmakers urged White House leadership to give them more time to agree to college sports legislation. A congressional bill governing the sport is believed to be a more permanent solution than an executive order that is subject to legal challenges. The pause in White House action in May provided a runway for House and Senate negotiations over college sports legislation. More movement has taken place in the House, where a bipartisan bill, the SCORE Act, is expected to soon go before a full House committee for vote, at which point it could land on the House floor — the furthest that any all-encompassing college sports legislation has advanced since the NCAA's lobbying effort began five years ago. However, the bill faces steep odds in gaining enough Democrat support for passage in the Senate, where filibuster rules require a 60-vote minimum. There are 53 Republicans in the Senate. The Senate, though, has been working toward the introduction of its own legislation, led by Sen. Ted Cruz, who, much like Trump, has made college sports regulation a priority. He's been in negotiations now for months with several Democrats, most notably Chris Coons, Richard Blumenthal and Cory Booker. No agreement has been reached despite more than a year of intense talks. Though at first deemed to be a 'bipartisan issue,' college sports legislation has created significant enough differences among Democrats and Republicans that no single bill has reached the House or Senate floor despite the introduction of more than a dozen pieces of legislation over five years. Dividing the two parties is an array of issues, most notably the idea of preventing athletes from being deemed employees. Democrats are less inclined in such a provision because of their relationship with trial lawyers and labor unions, Cruz said during an interview in September of 2023. On the same day and at the same event, Chris Murphy, a Democrat from Connecticut, and Rep. Lori Trahan, a Democrat from Massachusetts, pushed college leaders to examine a model to share revenue with athletes and collectively bargain with them. 'You might disagree,' Murphy said, 'but I think it feels and smells a lot like employment at the highest level of the sport.' But there are other problematic concepts. For instance, the oversight and enforcement of the college athletics industry (should the NCAA or College Sports Commission be granted such authority or a federal entity, something that many Democrats support); guarantees around long-term athlete healthcare for lower-resourced Division I schools that cannot afford such (will the power conference schools subside?); and how limited is the liability or antitrust protection for the leadership of college sports? Meanwhile, as lawmakers continue negotiations, college administrators are mired in legal negotiations of their own related to the new House settlement and revenue-sharing concept. The settlement's primary goal — to shift athlete pay from NIL booster collectives to the schools — is at risk of crumbling as House plaintiff attorneys contend that college leaders are violating terms of the settlement by denying certain collective contracts.
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
She Thought Her Pregnancy Was Going as Planned. Then She Saw the First Sign of a Heartbreaking Loss (Exclusive)
NEED TO KNOW Sarah Thuleen thought her pregnancy was progressing normally until one moment at home turned everything upside down What began as a simple keepsake became the centerpiece of a story about love, grief and resilience on TikTok Sarah's path through heartbreak has led her to honor her baby in deeply personal, unexpected waysShe thought her pregnancy was going as planned until the morning she woke up and saw the first sign of a heartbreaking loss. Now, one mother is sharing her story of love, grief and the tiny hat that has come to symbolize it all. Sarah Thuleen's video has resonated with millions, opening a window into the most vulnerable chapter of her life. 'This is literally how tiny she was,' Sarah tells PEOPLE, her voice tender as she holds up the hat that once fit her daughter, Eileen. The TikTok struck a chord with viewers around the world, showing the tiny clothes and keepsakes Sarah was given at the hospital. In her caption, she wrote simply: 'My little teeny tiny baby, she was 4.4 oz and 7 inches.' Sarah's pregnancy began unexpectedly but with deep excitement. 'We found out we were pregnant on February 6, so like, right away,' she says. Becoming a mother had been her dream for as long as she could remember. 'It's truly been my dream forever,' she says. Though she and her baby's father had only just started dating, she felt ready to embrace motherhood. 'You have all the feelings of, like, scared but excited, unknown,' she recalls. She remembers the rush of emotions that came with seeing a positive pregnancy test. 'I was thrilled, really,' she says. But as her pregnancy progressed, Sarah began experiencing unusual pain during a trip with a friend. She chose to wait for her scheduled 16-week appointment rather than seek immediate care. 'I was like, worst case scenario, I go to the doctor,' she says. 'I have my 16-week appointment on that Monday.' At that appointment, everything seemed fine. Her baby's heartbeat was strong, and her doctor reassured her it was likely just round ligament pain. 'She's great,' the doctor told her. But five days later, everything changed. Early Saturday morning, Sarah woke up to a terrifying rush of liquid. 'I looked down, and the cord was falling out of me,' she says, the memory still sharp. She called her friends and a nurse's line, still hoping it wasn't serious. 'I honestly thought it was going to be fine,' she says. 'Like, we just shove it right back up, and everything resumes as normal.' At the hospital, she learned the devastating truth. 'They looked and said, 'Oh yeah, that is a cord,' ' Sarah recalls. Doctors told her there was nothing they could do to save her baby at that gestational age. 'We're just gonna have to watch her heart rate go down, and she's just gonna die,' she remembers hearing. 'It was the most heartbreaking moment of my life.' Initially, doctors suspected an incompetent cervix, but later discovered the cause was a prolapsed cord. 'For whatever reason, my cervix opened just the tiniest bit for my water to break and the cord to fall out,' she explains. Even after a full autopsy, no clear reason emerged. 'She was perfect, like, literally everything about her was perfect,' Sarah says. 'There's no reason she shouldn't be here today.' Meeting her daughter remains one of Sarah's most treasured memories. 'She just fit in, like, the palm of my hand,' she says. 'She had all of her hands and all of her toes, and we literally just, like, sat there and stared at her for hours. She was perfect.' Among the keepsakes from the hospital was the tiny hat that later became the centerpiece of her TikTok. 'They put the hat on her, and it all just, like, fell into place,' she says. 'Now I get it.' Her mother has since begun crocheting hats for a nonprofit that supports grieving families. 'That's how my mom is choosing to honor my baby,' Sarah says. Grief, Sarah explains, is complex and often misunderstood. She wishes more people realized that postpartum depression can also follow pregnancy loss. 'My milk came in, and that was a whole thing because my baby's not here,' she says. 'That just puts you through another level of grief.' She also wishes people would be more mindful about how they offer support. For her, the most meaningful gestures were the simplest. 'Sending me a DoorDash gift card or Starbucks gift card. Then I could decide when I wanted to use them,' she says. In time, Sarah began sharing her story online, hoping to offer comfort to others. 'I wanted to be that source of, like, what's after, for that person who's also in that place that I was,' she says. The response to her TikTok has been overwhelming and deeply validating. 'There is truly such a range of women that have experienced this, and it's all shared, you know what I mean?' she says. 'It just feels so validating.' Not all responses have been easy to navigate. Sarah remains cautious about sharing too much, especially photos of her daughter. 'I'm always weary about showing pictures of her because I don't want to alarm anyone,' she says. 'She didn't really have skin...' Still, the tiny hat remains a powerful symbol of her daughter's brief but meaningful life. It serves as a quiet reminder of the love and grief Sarah carries with her every day. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. Today, Sarah continues to honor her daughter in deeply personal ways. She has spread her daughter's ashes in places that hold special meaning, from Florida to Colorado to Grand Cayman. 'I call it, showing her the world,' she says. 'Every time I go to the ocean, anywhere, I know she's a part of the ocean.' Moving forward has meant making choices rooted in healing and self-care. She moved to Dallas on what would have been her daughter's birthday – a decision that brought her a new beginning. 'It was the happiest, best decision I've ever made for myself,' she says. 'Every day, I see and do things, and I just think, she's telling me, 'I'm proud of you, Mom.' ' Sarah encourages others facing loss to seek help, whether through therapy, medication, or time away from work. 'I finally had the motivation to, like, start to grow,' she says. Sharing her story has also helped her heal. 'Talking about things that you go through, and talking about just creating that community has truly helped me heal so much,' Sarah says. Read the original article on People Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
PepsiCo to rebrand Lay's, Tostitos without artificial dyes, flavors
By Jessica DiNapoli and Juveria Tabassum (Reuters) -PepsiCo is planning to highlight what will no longer be in its potato or tortilla chips - artificial colors or flavors - when it re-launches its Lay's and Tostitos brands later this year, executives said on Thursday. The overhaul for the company's top-selling snack brands comes as U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. pushes Americans to eat "whole foods" and pressures manufacturers to ditch dyes. U.S. food makers have been announcing plans to remove dyes from their products and introduce new ones without the colors under pressure from Kennedy and the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) social movement backing him. "We're trying to elevate the real food perception of Lay's. If you think about the simplest and most natural snack, it is a potato chip; it's a potato, it's oil, and it's a little bit of salt—the most simple, no artificial ingredients," said CEO Ramon Laguarta in a call with investors. The company also said it was expanding use of avocado and olive oil across its brands, rather than the canola or soybean oil it uses. The MAHA movement has questioned the health benefits of certain food oils. In April, PepsiCo said it planned to migrate its entire portfolio to natural colors, or give consumers the option to have a product without a synthetic dye. Its Cheetos snacks and Gatorade drinks rely on synthetic dyes for their bright hues. It already offers Lay's and Doritos without artificial colors or flavors under its Simply segment. 'The Simply line extension for existing chip brands is still in early innings - consumers have not engaged so far, and given that, it will be seen how consumers react to a rebranding of Lay's and Tostitos over the next couple of quarters,' said Christian Greiner, F/m Investments senior portfolio manager. COSTLY PREMIUM PRODUCTS? The soda pop maker also said on Thursday it would use sugar in its products like Pepsi beverages if consumers want it. On Wednesday, President Donald Trump said Coca-Cola will start using cane sugar in its beverages in the U.S., a dietary preference of Kennedy's MAHA movement. Both Pepsi and Coke use high-fructose corn syrup for their sodas, which is generally more cost-effective. The moves come at a time when packaged food companies like PepsiCo are seeing consumers reel in their spending after the industry raised prices over the years since the COVID-19 pandemic to shield their margins. PepsiCo has been offering more products at lower price points and smaller pack sizes in its food segment to meet the demand for affordable snacks. "While there is clearly demand for cleaner ingredients in food and beverage products, it remains to be seen if consumers will be willing to pay up for these more premium products, especially in today's inflationary environment and more price-sensitive consumer base," said Arun Sundaram, analyst at CFRA Research. Laguarta also said on Thursday the company would be entering the "liquid protein" space, as protein shakes grow increasingly popular. He also said the company would be adding protein options to its popcorn brand PopCorners and Quaker snacks. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
