West Coast Councils May Join Forces To Manage And Improve Drinking Water, Wastewater & Stormwater Services
Press Release – Westland District Council
Grey District Mayor Tania Gibson said there were efficiencies to be gained from working together. We are finding ways to do better. Grey District Council chief executive Joanne Soderlund, said the three councils could create a West Coast entity entirely …
West Coast councils are signaling they may join forces to manage and improve drinking water, wastewater, and stormwater services.
Their preferred option for all councils under the Government's Local Water Done Well reform is a multi-council CCO (Council Controlled Organisation) – a water organisation jointly owned by the Grey, Westland and Buller district councils.
This could save ratepayers about $1000 a year, compared to keeping services in-house, as the three waters get much-needed investment. Grey alone needs to spend about $60 million, Westland $90 million and with Buller needing to spend $100 million on water projects.
The alternative option proposed by Councils would see each council continue to deliver its water services through a separate, standalone internal business unit model
The councils believe they will be stronger by working together, and now want to hear what the public think via submissions.
Grey District Mayor Tania Gibson said there were efficiencies to be gained from working together. 'We are finding ways to do better.' Grey District Council chief executive Joanne Soderlund, said the three councils could create a West Coast entity entirely focussed on water.
'This is the most economically viable option, and Coasters would still control and own three waters infrastructure.'
Westland Mayor Helen Lash said the consultation was about ensuring Westland residents had a clear voice in decisions about their water services. 'We are working alongside neighbouring West Coast councils to consider all viable options, but ultimately, feedback from our community will be crucial in guiding what's right for Westland.' Westland District Council chief executive Barbara Phillips, said the consultation would help shape the future of local water services. 'While each council is consulting separately, we've been working closely together to explore a range of options that could benefit the wider region, without disadvantaging our district, and deliver the best outcome for Westland for the future.'
Buller Mayor Jamie Cleine said he had thought for some time that working with other councils was a smart idea, especially if this could bring multiple benefits for residents of Buller. 'Now I look forward to hearing from the community on where we gave got to so far and potentially working further with both Grey and Westland. Government has mandated significant changes, and working collaboratively with others is an essential avenue to explore.'
The Government is reforming the three waters sector, and has made it clear the status-quo is not an option, in the wake of the Havelock North water contamination.
The Grey, Buller and Westland councils are now asking the West Coast public for feedback on different options.
They believe a CCO is most affordable and could save money by procuring joint contracts, supplies, sharing software and vehicles, and streamlining decision making.
Councils – including elected members – would no longer be involved in day-to-day decisions.
The CCO would be responsible for its own funding and charging customers. It would take on council water-related debt.
Property owners without a sewer and water-line to their property – and who use a tank for drinking water and sceptic tank for sewage – would not get a water bill.
Metering water, to charge for use, would be a decision for the new Coast-wide entity, if the councils agree to proceed.
The other option put forward by the Grey and Buller councils would see each continuing to deliver water services as a stand-alone business unit within their council.
This would need more staff to support reporting requirements. An in-house unit would not allow each council to borrow any additional money for water project.
Councils would continue to own their districts' water services assets. Under the stand-alone internal business unit model, councils would still be responsible for daily operations, long-term strategic planning, and managing and developing water services infrastructure, whilst being required to meet the new regulatory requirements and would remain accountable to the community.
Under this option, property owners would pay higher charges than they currently do.
Councils' debt levels increase under this option.
The Grey District Council is planning to meet with stakeholders, and then hold a public drop-in session on June 4 at Monteith's from 5pm to 7pm. A webinar will also be held, and advertised in advance, for those unable to attend.
The Westland District Council is planning to hold a public drop-in session on Wednesday 21 May at Snakebite in Franz Josef from 2.30pm to 4pm and Monday 26 May 10am -12 noon at Council reception.
Submissions close on June 16.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
1News
18 minutes ago
- 1News
NZ's natural gas supply running out faster than thought
The country's natural gas supply is running out faster than previously thought. The Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment said previous forecasts showed annual gas production falling below 100 petajoules by 2029, but revised forecasts indicated that level would be reached by next year. A petajoule, or PJ, is a unit measurement of energy use commonly used for large-scale energy use, with one petajoule equal to one million billion joules. MBIE also said as of January this year, natural gas reserves were down 27% compared to last year - also falling faster than previously estimated. "In 2024, natural gas proven plus probable (2P) reserves reduced from 1300 PJ to 948 PJ," MBIE head of data service delivery Karlene Tipler said. ADVERTISEMENT "The reduction in natural gas reserves is largely driven by field operators reducing their estimates of gas readily extractable in the ground by 234 PJ." MBIE said contingent gas reserves, or gas that existed in the ground but could not be extracted for various reasons such as economic or technical, increased by 184 PJ or 10% on last year. "Some of this increase can be attributed to natural gas reserves being downgraded to contingent resources," Tipler said. "A significant contributor to this is Pohokura field, which included a large volume of contingent gas which had previously not been reported." Tipler said some contingent gas may have the potential to be upgraded to 2P if there were changes to economic or technical conditions. Govt says data proves it's 'correct to act now' Resources Minister Shane Jones said the decline in gas reserves was a "stark reminder" of why the Government was seeking greater investment in exploration and production. ADVERTISEMENT "New Zealand needs a secure supply of affordable and reliable gas for industry to continue and for Kiwis to keep the lights on," Jones said. "A 27% year-on-year decline in our natural gas reserves is further proof that the coalition Government has made the right decisions in overturning the oil and gas ban, and is willing to become a cornerstone investor in gas production," he said. As part of Budget 2025, the Government announced $200 million over four years for co-investment in new domestic gas field developments.
Newsroom
2 hours ago
- Newsroom
The science sector sounds the alarm
New Zealand's science sector, once hailed for its agility and ingenuity during the pandemic and natural disasters, is now grappling with what researchers say is a crisis of confidence, fuelled by shrinking budgets, unstable funding pathways, and policy decisions that increasingly favour commercial returns over long-term public good. Last month, a total of $212 million was cut from the science sector in this Budget, which reprioritises existing research funding towards commercially focused science and innovation. A sizeable portion goes to Invest NZ and a new gene tech regulator. The Government says it backs the sector and is prioritising industry partnerships, private-sector investment, and 'innovation outcomes with measurable economic impact.' While officials insist the move reflects 'fiscal discipline and real-world alignment,' many in the sector say it amounts to a dismantling of the research base. Newsroom political journalist Fox Meyer tells The Detail 'the scale of the cuts is not great for the sector, but it's also more about the lack of investment'. 'It's one thing to have cuts and reprioritisation, but people have been calling for more of just anything for some time now. Now, there is a lot of frustration. 'Science funding has been stagnant or declining for years now, and a decision to reprioritise stuff is not necessarily going to put money in the Government's pocket like they think.' With a focus on the bottom line, is this the Government pulling off a Sir John Key 'show me the money' moment, with a scientific bent? 'That actually goes both ways,' says Meyer. 'Scientists are looking at the Government saying, 'Show me the money if you want me to produce more money', and the Government is looking back at the scientists and saying, 'Well, you show me the money, what are you bringing in, how are you lifting your weight?'. 'That is going to be a hard one to reconcile unless the Government is willing to pony up and make the investment.' He worries the fall-out will include a 'brain drain' with our country's brightest and best scientists and researchers opting to take up positions overseas. 'My connections in the science world – plenty of them – have moved. 'The chief science adviser for the Department of Conservation has moved to Australia … that's an expert in a cutting-edge field that we have lost to a company in Australia. 'And it's not the only example of this sort of thing. We invest so much in training up these scientists, and they are very skilled scientists, and then to not give them what they are asking for and what they need, I feel it falls short of our own investment.' In fairness, it is not all doom and gloom. 'So, the positives, there is a new funding pool for Māori-related science, that's a good thing. There's the sector-wide report that has come out, which has given us a good look at the sector. We know more now, that's a good thing. And the chief science adviser has been appointed, and the panel around him has been appointed, that's a good thing there.' Meyer says the sector is crucial to all parts of New Zealand. 'The science sector is about answering questions. If you have questions, science is a method, and it is used to answer a lot of those questions … the more money that we put into this sector, the more questions we can answer. And the more questions we can answer, the more answers we can sell. 'If the Government is worried about economic growth, and they want to champion this sector, then you've got to put your money where your mouth is. 'I am going to be curious to see how they can steer the ship of science, when maybe what they are most suited for is selling the fruits of science.' Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail here. You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on Facebook or following us on Twitter.
Newsroom
2 hours ago
- Newsroom
The slippery question of how to define a wetland
Analysis: By deciding pasture-based wetlands are wetlands, the Government's resource management changes give convenience to farmers at the expense of infrastructure. The change in definition comes as part of sweeping reform of the Resource Management Act, and is a windfall for industry groups who have struggled to operate within protections set by the previous Labour government.
