Google CEO Sundar Pichai on how AI has changed hiring for engineering and programming jobs: We are making sure ...
is bringing back
in-person interviews
after AI-powered cheating has made
virtual hiring
unreliable, CEO
Sundar Pichai
announced. "We are making sure we'll introduce at least one round of in-person interviews for people, just to make sure the fundamentals are there," Pichai said on the Lex Fridman podcast in June.
The problem has become so widespread that Google employees are demanding management abandon
remote interviews
entirely, as
software engineering interviews
, which involve real-time coding challenges, have become increasingly compromised by candidates using AI tools off-camera to generate answers.
During a February internal town hall meeting at Google, employees directly confronted leadership about the issue. "Can we get onsite job interviews back?" one employee asked, according to audio recordings reviewed by CNBC. "There are many email threads about this topic. If budget is a constraint, can we get the candidates to an office or environment we can control?"
AI is making virtual interviews easier for job seekers but tougher for companies
Brian Ong, Google's vice president of recruiting, admitted the company faces a fundamental challenge. While virtual interviews are two weeks faster and easier to schedule, he acknowledged "we definitely have more work to do to integrate how AI is now more prevalent in the interview process."
Some hiring managers report that over 50% of candidates are now cheating in virtual technical interviews. The problem has become so severe that interviewers are instructed to probe candidates extensively to determine if they actually understand their answers.
Pichai responded to employee concerns by suggesting a hybrid approach: "Given we all work hybrid, I think it's worth thinking about some fraction of the interviews being in person. I think it'll help both the candidates understand Google's culture and I think it's good for both sides."
Google isn't alone, the entire industry is trying to tackle the problem of virtual interviews
The challenge extends far beyond Google's headquarters. Ong noted it's "an issue all of our other competitor companies are looking at," highlighting how AI cheating has become an industry-wide crisis threatening the integrity of technical hiring.
Anthropic, the maker of AI chatbot Claude, now explicitly prohibits AI use during applications, requiring candidates to demonstrate "non-AI-assisted communication skills" and acknowledge they understand the policy. Amazon has begun requiring candidates to acknowledge they won't use unauthorised tools during interviews, according to company spokesperson who spoke with CNBC.
Other major corporations are also implementing new anti-cheating measures. Cisco and McKinsey are among a growing number of companies bringing back or adding face-to-face meetings with candidates at various stages of the interview process. Deloitte reinstated in-person interviews for its UK graduate program.
The shift represents a dramatic reversal from pandemic-era hiring practices, forcing companies to choose interview integrity over the convenience and cost savings of virtual recruitment.
AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
She studied at a top U.S. university, works as a senior techie at Google, yet H-1B visa jitters shadow her American dream
From Brown University to Big Tech You Might Also Like: US computer science degrees from top universities are leaving graduates jobless: Why is top coding education no longer enough? The Weight of Uncertainty Life Plans on Hold Another Risk in the Process — svembu (@svembu) For many, a degree from an Ivy League university and a career with global tech giants like Facebook and Google might sound like a perfect ticket to stability in the United States. For Indian-born Surbhi Madan, however, the story is more complicated. Despite 12 years in the US and nearly a decade at Google, she says the uncertainty of her H-1B visa status continues to shape her life in unexpected 30-year-old senior software engineer recently shared her story with Business Insider, offering a candid glimpse into the hidden insecurities behind a glittering résumé.Madan moved to the US in 2013 to pursue her bachelor's degree at Brown University, inspired by her elder brother's academic journey. After interning at Google's New York office, she secured a full-time role before graduation in 2017. Her first stroke of luck came when she won the H-1B visa lottery on her initial attempt.'I feel like I got really lucky when I compare it to the situation for recent graduates now,' she told Business career path has since been enviable: a stint with Facebook's feed-ranking team, followed by leadership roles in Google Maps infrastructure and AI integrations. But behind the professional success lies a quieter, more fragile working in the US for over a decade, Madan admits that her life often feels temporary. Everyday decisions—from apartment leases to community volunteering—are filtered through the lens of her visa status.'I refrain from volunteering because it means contacting my immigration lawyer to make sure it's safe,' she explained. Even driving mistakes or tax filing errors, she fears, could jeopardize her stay.A comment by a border officer once drove the point home: when she said she 'lived' in the US, the officer corrected her, saying, 'You don't live here; you work here.' The moment, she said, stayed with constraints of the H-1B system affect not only her career mobility but also her personal milestones. Madan has contemplated freezing her eggs but worried about whether she could access them if she lost her work authorization. 'I can't imagine having a person depend on me while I'm on a temporary status tied to having a job,' she ambitions beyond coding also face roadblocks. With a passion for teaching and mentoring women in tech , Madan has thought about transitioning into education, but her visa does not permit alternative career paths outside her sponsoring many immigrants in similar positions, Surbhi's experience underscores the paradox of the American dream: the country welcomes global talent but ties their future to the unpredictability of a lottery system.'I sit down once a year and ask myself if this is still worth it. So far, the answer has been yes,' Surbhi story adds to the growing debate about whether the US immigration system can keep pace with the realities of the modern workforce—especially when even top tech talent with world-class education faces long-term founder Sridhar Vembu recently highlighted another risk: the financial burden of overseas education. In a post on X, he shared the case of a student who borrowed ₹70 lakh (about $80,000) at a steep 12% interest rate to study at a relatively unknown US university, only to struggle repaying the loan amid poor job prospects. Vembu urged students and families to think twice before taking on such heavy debt, warning that 'we should not trap young people in debt in the name of education.'
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Google agrees $36 million fine for anti-competitive deals with Australia telcos
Google agreed on Monday to pay a A$55 million ($35.8 million) fine in Australia after the consumer watchdog found it had hurt competition by paying the country's two largest telcos to pre-install its search application on Android phones, excluding rival search engines. The fine extends a bumpy period for the Alphabet-owned internet giant in Australia, where last week a court mostly ruled against it in a lawsuit brought by Fortnite maker Epic Games accusing Google and Apple of preventing rival application stores in their operating systems. Google's YouTube was also last month added to an Australian ban on social media platforms admitting users aged under 16, reversing an earlier decision to exempt the video-sharing site. On anti-competitive tie-ups with Australian telcos, the country's consumer watchdog on Monday said Google struck deals with Telstra and Optus , under which the tech giant shared with them advertising revenue generated from Google Search on Android devices between late 2019 and early 2021. Google admitted the arrangement had a substantial impact on competition from rival search engines, and has stopped signing similar deals while also agreeing to the fine, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission ( ACCC ) added. "Today's outcome ... created the potential for millions of Australians to have greater search choice in the future, and for competing search providers to gain meaningful exposure to Australian consumers," ACCC Chair Gina-Cass Gottlieb said. Google and the ACCC have jointly submitted to the Federal Court that Google should pay the A$55 million fine. The court must still decide if the penalty is appropriate, the ACCC said, but the cooperation between the regulator and Google has helped avoid lengthy litigation. A Google spokesperson said the company was pleased to resolve the ACCC's concerns which involved "provisions that haven't been in our commercial agreements for some time". "We are committed to providing Android device makers more flexibility to pre-load browsers and search apps, while preserving the offerings and features that help them innovate, compete with Apple, and keep costs low," the spokesperson added. Google owns Android. A Telstra spokesperson referred Reuters to an earlier statement saying it and Optus, owned by Singapore Telecommunications, had fully cooperated with the ACCC and promised not to sign agreements with Google to pre-install its search product since 2024.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
'Very worried about China', says OpenAI CEO Sam Altman with a warning for America and the new 'China-Safe' chips policy
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has issued a stark warning that America may be underestimating the complexity and seriousness of China's advancements in artificial intelligence. During a rare on-the-record briefing with a small group of reporters, Altman said that relying on export controls alone is likely not a reliable solution to the geopolitical AI race. "I'm worried about China," Altman stated, speaking over Mediterranean tapas in San Francisco's Presidio, last week. According to a report in CNBC, he emphasized that the US–China AI race is deeply entangled, encompassing more than just who is ahead on a simple scoreboard. Altman detailed the various layers of the AI landscape, including inference capacity, research, and product development. "I don't think it'll be as simple as: Is the U.S. or China ahead?" he said, adding that China might be able to build inference capacity faster. 'China-Safe' chips policy not enough Despite the escalating U.S. export controls on semiconductors, Altman expressed skepticism that these policies are keeping up with the technical reality. When asked if it would be reassuring to have fewer GPUs reaching China, he responded, "My instinct is that doesn't work." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like TV providers are furious: this gadget gives you access to all channels Techno Mag Learn More Undo Altman elaborated on the challenges of a purely policy-driven approach, suggesting that export controls on one specific item might not be effective. "You can export-control one thing, but maybe not the right thing… maybe people build fabs or find other workarounds," he noted, referring to semiconductor fabrication facilities. "I'd love an easy solution," he added, "But my instinct is: That's hard." Altman's comments come as Washington continues to adjust its policies aimed at curbing China's AI ambitions. While the Biden administration initially tightened export controls, President Donald Trump went a step further in April by halting the supply of advanced chips altogether. However, just last week, the U.S. created an exception for certain "China-safe" chips, allowing sales to resume under a controversial agreement that requires chipmakers like Nvidia and AMD to give the federal government a percentage of their China chip revenue. The result is a complex and often contradictory set of rules that may be easier to navigate than to enforce. While U.S. companies deepen their reliance on chips from key American firms, Chinese companies are actively developing alternatives from domestic suppliers like Huawei. This raises questions about whether the strategy of cutting off supply is having its intended effect, or simply accelerating China's push for self-sufficiency in AI technology. AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
