UK will be ‘war-fighting ready' in biggest military shake-up since WW2 as govt ‘secretly' prepares for Russia attack
BRITAIN will return to full 'war-fighting readiness' in the biggest military shake-up since World War Two, Sir Keir Starmer has declared.
In a VE Day speech at the London Defence Conference, the Prime Minister unveiled plans for a sweeping overhaul of the Armed Forces - as fears grow Europe stands on the brink of conflict.
2
2
The PM said the landmark 'root and branch Strategic Defence Review' would be launched in the coming weeks to boost national resilience and overhaul every aspect of defence.
It comes after reports this week claiming Britain is secretly preparing for a direct military attack by Russia.
According to The Telegraph, a classified dossier has been commissioned, which will set out how the Government would respond to a declaration of war.
This would include bunkers to protect the Cabinet and the Royal family, public service broadcasts and the stockpiling of resources.
Sir Keir said: 'Mark my words, the British defence industry will be the engine of national renewal, because this isn't just about increasing our defence. It's also about reform, rebuilding, and in coming weeks, we'll publish a first of its kind, root and branch Strategic Defence Review.
'It will scrutinize every aspect of defence to determine how we can best meet the threats of today and return Britain to war fighting readiness.'
He vowed to deliver the 'largest pay rise for over 20 years' for troops, better homes for service families, and an end to years of underinvestment.
But he argued the most radical pledge was a major cultural shift - to put security front and centre of the entire machinery of government.
The PM said: '(We are going) to see security and defence, not as one priority amongst many others, but as the central organising principle of government, the first thought in the morning, the last at night, the pillar on which everything else stands or falls.
'Because, as in 1945 this has to be a collective endeavour, a national effort, a time for the state, business and society to join hands in pursuit of the security of the nation and the prosperity of its people.'
After announcing a £563 million contract for Rolls-Royce for the maintenance of Britain's fleet of Typhoon fighter jets, he added: 'We're going to do that with the most ambitious programme of work to secure and rebuild our country since 1945.'
Ministers have been keen to stress the boost to jobs and prosperity that plans to increase the UK's defence spending to 2.5 per cent of economic output by 2027 could provide, as they desperately try to grow the economy.
The Strategic Defence Review - or SDR - was ordered by the PM last autumn to deliver the biggest shake-up of Britain's military since the Cold War.
It's being drawn up by top brass including ex-NATO chief Lord Robertson, former forces commander Sir Richard Barrons and Russia expert Fiona Hill, and promises a total overhaul of everything from troop numbers to cyber weapons and next-gen kit.
The PM had planned to unveil a path to 2.5 per cent of GDP defence spending after the review was published.
But after Donald Trump stormed back into the White House, rattling NATO allies, the pledge was rushed out early - partly paid for by slashing Britain's foreign aid budget
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
24 minutes ago
- The Sun
£4million a DAY migrant hotel bill will continue to spiral unless Labour does three things
Trip advisors THE woke brigade in the Home Office who spent years revolting against Tory efforts to curb illegal migration finally have an incentive to drop their opposition. Sensibly, Chancellor Rachel Reeves has said she will spare deep cuts in the department — and potential job losses — IF it saves money on the spiralling hotel bill for migrants. 1 And the faster Home Secretary Yvette Cooper's army of leftie civil servants meet these new targets, the more cash she can keep for other projects. Skint Britain forks out £4million every day to house people who largely have no right to be here. The problem is that the number of new arrivals isn't slowing down. Unless Labour ends the golden ticket to the El Dorado paradise of benefits, free housing and illegal work, that hotel bill will continue to rise. Reform act He has Labour pedalling leftwards over welfare and the Tories rightwards on immigration. The Reform leader's ear is well-tuned to discontent with the Government. A desire for real change has delivered control of local councils to his fledgling party for the first time. His problem now is how to show Reform can actually govern — without falling into mini-meltdowns like the ones caused by the exits of chairman Zia Yusuf and MP Rupert Lowe. Reform's surge has been stunning. But being a one-showman band will only get Farage so far. Court out COULD the days of the European Court of Human Rights ruling over our borders finally be numbered? Even the head of the European Council, which oversees the unelected court, is starting to accept it will have to adapt to the public's concerns. Leaders across Europe are waking up to the problems caused by mass migration and want urgent legal reform. And Tory leader Kemi Badenoch is ready to quit the court — as is Reform. Roll with it Apparently, it all kicked off in Tokyo after tourists saw a waxwork of Greggs' pastry snack at Madame Tussauds. No word yet on whether it tasted better than a vegan sausage roll.
The Sun
33 minutes ago
- The Sun
Keir Starmer is about as frightening as a stick of celery… but I'm more scared of him than Putin – here's why
CAN you imagine what would have happened if Neville Chamberlain – our Prime Minister when Germany invaded Poland – had announced Britain was in grave danger and, as a result, would increase funding for the Armed Forces and therefore be ready to do 'war fighting' by 1975. Or maybe a bit later. Hitler would have just laughed at him. But that's exactly what happened this week when Sir Starmer announced that because of Russia's expansionist tendencies, he was going to totally overhaul our Armed Forces so we'd be ready to fight, and fight hard by, er, some point in the future. He would build 12 new nuclear subs, and a wave of new fighter-bombers that could rain atomic death on our enemies. And in addition, our fighting men and women, and all those who are neither, would be trained to become ten times more effective and lethal. According to Starmer, we'd go from a country that can't even stop a rubber dinghy reaching the shores of Kent to a country that would shake fear into the entire Russian naval machine. It all sounds a bit preposterous, frankly, because first of all, where's the money coming from? He's already spent what little he had on train drivers, junior doctors and solar parks. So how can he suddenly afford 12 new submarines and a murder of fighter jets so complex they haven't even been invented yet. And who's he going to get to operate all this new kit, and run around in the muddy trenches, shooting at Ivan? Back in the Thirties, everyone in the country knew their duty. Not any more. Everyone's too busy shoplifting or choosing a gender or glueing themselves to the road. From tactical nuke to 7,600mph missile & 50k-troop assault…6 ways Putin could respond to Ukraine blitz after Trump call There's another issue too. As we have seen in the Ukraine war, an entire squadron of bombers can now be destroyed by someone with a lorry and a few drones, made from stuff you can buy for a tenner at Dixons. But by far the biggest problem we have is Keir Starmer himself, because he is very possibly the least war-like leader the world has ever seen. He is a stick of celery in a crap suit. Putin ran the KGB. So at one point he will definitely have used his thumbs to push a man's eyes into his brain. Starmer hasn't done that. Starmer is a human rights lawyer. If the balloon went up, he'd be on the side of a trans person who refused to fight until gender-neutral lavatories were provided on the battlefield. He can make as many 'war fighting' speeches as he likes but we know he doesn't even understand what he's on about. He's just making noises to try to make himself look tough. But he isn't tough. He's as frightening as Will from The Inbetweeners. You'd only have to snap his spectacles and he'd give in immediately. And he's in the hot seat for four more years. That scares me more than Putin does. RIGHT OFF THE MARK THE BBC told us this week that because Geert Wilders, the far-right leader of a party in the Netherlands, had left the ruling coalition, the government was in disarray. I'm always confused by the Beeb's idea of 'far right' because I've looked into the man and he's a long way from Hitler. He just wants a firm stance on immigration and an end to what he calls the 'Muslimification' of his country. In short, he's about as far to the right as Starmer is to the left. So how come the BBC never refers to our Prime Minister as 'far left'? Out of the Goop for 40 years 4 4 AS you probably heard, I had a bit of a problem with my heart last autumn. And if you want to know what caused it, have a look at the last two episodes of Clarkson's Farm, which are out now. There's no doubt in my mind that the unbelievable stress of opening a pub while trying to do the harvest caused the issue. Well, that and 40 years of living a life that in no way mirrored Gwyneth Paltrow 's. Game over, kids OBVIOUSLY, when I die, my farm will be confiscated by the Government so they can smother it with solar panels and sustainable houses for hard-working families in the immigrant community. Until then, however, it's mine, which is why I spent a chunk of the week clearing a stream, removing undergrowth and various trees that have fallen over so my grandkids are able to spend their afternoons in it, sploshing about, playing Pooh sticks and building dams. I may have been wasting my time though because a survey by the NSPCC has found that today, many children prefer to sit at home, on their iPads, all by themselves. Only a quarter regularly play with another child. This is a worry because a child that's spent its formative years shooting aliens in the face and watching mindless American cartoons is going to have no understanding of how to behave in society. They're going to meet people they don't like, and hear things they find offensive, and they're going to fall over occasionally and graze their knees. And they will have no idea how to cope. So they'll become intolerant and bitter and angry, lashing out at every little thing. And pretty soon, we'll end up, er… pretty much where we are now. With an entire generation of young adults who learned everything they know from sitting in their bedrooms. And think they can be excused from any responsibility by simply dreaming up an acronym for whatever they think is wrong with them. Hmmm. I'm no businessman and I'm terrible at maths. But if I wanted a flag from this particular battle, I'd probably go for the cheaper one.
Telegraph
33 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Miliband's latest misstep will pile unnecessary costs upon developers
Ed Miliband's attempt to lead this country was resoundingly rejected at the ballot box in 2015. Given his influence within the present Government, he may have had the last laugh. The Energy Secretary appears to have emerged triumphant in a clash with embattled Chancellor Rachel Reeves, securing the future of a £13 billion funding allocation for insulating properties across Britain, and very possibly triggering further tax rises this autumn. Having secured access to the fruits of your wallet, Mr Miliband has now turned his sights to redefining British architecture. Under plans revealed today, developers will be forced to install solar panels in the 'vast majority' of new houses, and gas boilers will effectively be banned in newbuilds in favour of heat pumps. The Energy Secretary claims that the moves could save households £500 a year on their energy bills, but appears to have neglected to consider the likely effect on development costs. There are few objections to people choosing to install solar panels, or choosing to buy a house with a heat pump. That builders confronted with market demand are not already supplying them suggests, however, that any premium people are willing to pay for these features will not cover the costs of installing them. The last thing Britain's capacity constrained housing market needs is another effort to pile unnecessary costs upon developers. Measures to ease building are drastically needed. Regrettably, Mr Miliband seems to think otherwise.
