
China shows signs of tackling price wars taking toll on its EV industry
Empower your mind, elevate your skills
The Chinese government is signalling enough is enough when it comes to the fierce competition in the country's electric car market.China's industrial policy has engineered a remarkable transformation to electric vehicles in what is the world's largest auto market.In so doing, it has spawned far more makers than can possibly survive. Now, long-simmering concerns about oversupply and debilitating price wars are coming to the fore, even as the headline sales numbers soar to new heights.Market-leader BYD announced this week that its sales grew 31% in the first six months of the year to 2.1 million cars. Nearly half of those were pure electric vehicles and the rest were plug-in hybrids, it said in a Hong Kong Stock Exchange filing. The company phased out internal combustion engine cars in 2022.BYD came under thinly veiled criticism in late May when it launched a new round of price cuts, and several competitors followed suit. The chairman of Great Wall Motors warned the industry could come under threat if it continues on the same trajectory."When volumes get bigger, it's just much harder to manage and you become the bullseye," said Lei Xing, an independent analyst who follows the industry.The government is trying to rein in what is called "involution" - a term initially applied to the rat race for young people in China and now to companies and industries engaged in meaningless competition that leads nowhere.BYD has come under criticism for using its dominant position in ways that some consider unfair, sparking price wars that have caused losses across the industry, said Murthy Grandhi, an India-based financial risk analyst at GlobalData.With the price war in its fourth year, Chinese automakers are looking abroad for profits. BYD's overseas sales more than doubled to 464,000 units in the first half of this year. Worried governments in the US and EU have imposed tariffs on made-in-China electric vehicles, saying that subsidies have given them an unfair advantage.The latest bout of handwringing started when BYD cut the price of more than 20 models on May 23.The same day, the chairman of Great Wall Motors, Wei Jianjun, said he was pessimistic about what he called the "healthy development" of the EV market. He drew a comparison to Evergrande, the Chinese real estate giant whose collapse sent the entire industry into a downturn from which it has yet to recover."The Evergrande in the automobile industry already exists, but it is just yet to explode," he said in a video message posted on social media.Two days later, a BYD executive rejected any comparison to Evergrande and posted data-filled charts to buttress his case."To be honest, I am confused and angry and it's ridiculous!" Li Yunfei, BYD's general manager of brand and public relations, wrote on social media. "All these come from the shocking remarks made by Chairman Wei of Great Wall Motors."Next, the government and an industry association weighed in. The China Association of Automobile Manufacturers called for fair competition and healthy development of the industry, noting that major price cuts by one automaker had triggered a new price war panic.On the same day, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology vowed to tackle involution-style competition in the auto industry, saying that recent disorderly price wars posed a treat to the healthy and sustainable development of the sector."That price cut might have been the final straw that irked both competitors and regulators for the ruthlessness that BYD continues to show," Lei said.A promise to pay suppliers within 60 days signals possible shiftThe following month, 17 automakers including BYD made a pledge: They would pay their suppliers within 60 days.One way China's automakers have been surviving the bruising price wars is by delaying the payments for months. The agreement, if adhered to, would reduce financial pressure on suppliers and could rein in some of the fierce competition."The introduction of the 60-day payment pledge is the call of the government to oppose involution-style competition," said Cui Dongshu, the secretary-general of the China Passenger Car Association.It also reduces the risk of an Evergrande-like scenario.Many automakers had stretched out payments by paying suppliers with short-term debt - promises to repay them in a certain period of time - instead of cash. Real estate developers used the same system. It worked until it didn't. When Evergrande defaulted on its debts, suppliers were left holding worthless promises to pay."This practice is seen as a potential cause of a larger crisis, similar to what happened with Evergrande," Grandhi said.The vows to speed up payments and the government calls to rein in the price wars, along with a rollback of some financing offers, point to an effort to reverse downward price expectations, said Jing Yang, a director at Fitch Ratings who focuses on the auto industry."We may watch how effectively these measures are in reversing the price trend and how would that affect EV demand in the coming quarters," she said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Sebi bans Jane Street, says disgorge Rs 4.8k crore
US fund Jane St banned from D-St over 'mkt manipulation' MUMBAI: Markets regulator Sebi late on Thursday banned US-based foreign fund Jane Street from the Indian market for manipulating stocks and derivatives segments over several years to make huge illegal gains. Jane St, known for their quant-based trading strategies, has also been asked to disgorge nearly Rs 4,850 crore - illegal gains accrued to them by trading on the NSE between Jan 2023 and March 2025, a Sebi order said. This is the highest-ever disgorgement amount ordered by Sebi for any kind of illegal activity in the market. In an interim order, Sebi banned JSI Investments, JSI2 Investments, Jane Street Singapore and Jane Street Asia Trading, from trading in the Indian market until further notice. The markets regulator's investigation will continue. Multiple Strategies: So far, Sebi has identified two types of manipulative strategies. One was to buy heavily in Bank Nifty's 12 constituent stocks and futures in the morning session, then buying put options on the index, selling the stocks aggressively in the afternoon to pull down Bank Nifty that in turn pushed up index options prices to eventually make huge profits. The other strategy was to push for concentrated selling or buying in the last two hours of the expiry day to swing index levels and make investigation report noted that although Jane St incurred some losses in some parts of the trades, profits from the rest more than made up for the losses. Rs 36,502 cr profits: Sebi's interim investigation showed that between Jan 2023 and March 2025, Jane St had made a total profit of Rs 36,502 crore. During that period, on Jan 17, 2024, the trading firm had made a profit of Rs 735 crore, the highest single-day gain for the now-banned foreign fund. NSE caution letter: While Sebi was investigating Jane St's trading activities, on Feb 6, 2025, NSE had issued a caution letter to Jane Street Singapore and its related entity, asking them to refrain from taking large positions in the Indian market and to refrain from undertaking certain trading patterns. However, in disregard of NSE's caution letter, and the group's commitments to the exchange, "Jane St was observed to continue to run very large (trading) positions in index options", Sebi's report said there is a strong case that the period of investigation as well as exchanges on which Jane St had traded could be expanded to unearth the full scale of manipulation in the Indian market by the US-based global quant trading giant. "The interim order has only looked at 18 major days of prima facie Bank Nifty index manipulation on expiry day between Jan 2023 and March 2025), and three days of nifty index manipulation on expiry day during May 2025," sources said. "Investigations into other expiry days, other indices (including across exchanges), and other potential patterns besides the two highlighted in the order will need to continue." "There should not be any major market impact from this enforcement action," sources said. "In the long run, the growth in market confidence, and a free and fair market, should aid responsible investing and capital formation."


India Gazette
2 hours ago
- India Gazette
Zerodha founder Nithin Kamath lauds SEBI for
New Delhi [India], July 4 (ANI): Founder and CEO of stock brokerage firm Zerodha, Nithin Kamath, on Friday lauded SEBI for 'going after' Jane Street, a US-based investment firm that has been alleged of index manipulation. In the 105-page interim order, SEBI has imposed to recover one of the highest ever illegal gains made by the group of Rs 4,843.57 crore. The order targets four key entities under the Jane Street Group umbrella: JSI Investments Pvt Ltd, JSI2 Investments Pvt Ltd, Jane Street Singapore Pte Ltd, and Jane Street Asia Trading Ltd. 'You've got to hand it to SEBI for going after Jane Street. If the allegations are true, it's blatant market manipulation,' Kamath wrote on X. 'The shocking part? They kept at it even after receiving warnings from the exchanges. Maybe this is what happens when you're used to the lenient U.S. regulatory regime. Think about the structure of U.S. markets: dark pools, payment for order flow, and other loopholes that allow hedge funds to make billions off retail investors. None of these practices would be allowed in India, thanks to our regulators,' he added. SEBI in its order today noted that the US-based firm used a profit maximising scheme to manipulate the market and booked substantial profits in index options, while incurring smaller losses in the cash and futures segments. The case stems from media reports in April 2024, pointing to legal disputes involving Jane Street's proprietary strategies in Indian markets. SEBI further stated that Jane Street Group entities, despite caution letters from NSE in February 2025 and their own commitments to refrain from certain trading behaviours, continued to deploy the same high-risk and market-distorting strategies. Given the gravity of violations and ongoing disregard for regulatory warnings, SEBI concluded that urgent intervention was necessary to protect market integrity and investor interest. (ANI)


The Print
3 hours ago
- The Print
Umakant Dash named new VC of Pune's Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics
The position of Vice-Chancellor of GIPE had been lying vacant since economist Ajit Ranade's resignation from the post in November 2024. Dr Shankar Das is currently holding the interim post of VC at the institute. Dash will assume office for a term of five years effective from July 29, 2025, the institute said in a release. Pune, Jul 4 (PTI) Academician Dr Umakant Dash has been appointed the new Vice-Chancellor of the Pune-based Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics (GIPE), the institute said on Friday. The GIP was established in 1930 by the Servants of India Society, a body founded by freedom fighter Gopal Krishna Gokhale in 1905. The 95-year-old institute has been in the eye of the storm for the last few months. It saw dramatic developments over the chancellor's post as well as the arrest of a functionary for alleged misappropriation of funds. According to GIPE website, it is the oldest research and training institute in economics in the country. The institute is dedicated to research into the socio-economic dimensions of Indian society and carries forward the legacy of Gokhale. Over the decades, the institute has established strong credentials in empirical and analytical research, said the website. The institute, registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, and the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950, was awarded the status of deemed to be a university in 1993. PTI SPK RSY This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.