logo
No interprovincial trade barriers by Canada Day? Why Carney faces uphill battle

No interprovincial trade barriers by Canada Day? Why Carney faces uphill battle

Global News07-05-2025

The clock is ticking on one of Prime Minister Mark Carney's signature promises — removing interprovincial trade barriers and making it easier for Canadians to trade with each other.
In his first post-election press conference on Friday, Carney reiterated his commitment to dismantle trade barriers by Canada Day. On Wednesday, Carney met with Canada's premiers to brief them on his meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump and discuss ending interprovincial trade restrictions.
But experts say Carney is facing a tall order.
'The rules and regulations that are those interprovincial barriers that he wants to remove are not entirely within his control. He can't compel provinces to remove their barriers,' Moshe Lander, economist at Concordia University, said.
2:11
MOUs signed to eliminate Canada's interprovincial trade barriers
Roadblocks
The 2024 fall economic statement said Canada could increase its GDP per capita by as much as 4 per cent — or $2,900 per capita — if it knocked down internal trade barriers.
Story continues below advertisement
'He (Carney) intends to introduce legislation by July 1. That legislation will look at everything from recognition of credentials (across provinces), trying to reduce those barriers, and even the idea of impact assessments (for large projects),' Darby said.
For some sectors, like alcohol, overcoming trade barriers will take more than just federal legislation.
Michelle Wasylyshen, president and CEO of Ontario Craft Wineries, said some of her organization's members find it easier to sell Ontario wine to international markets like Japan compared to selling across the Ottawa River in Quebec. And it all comes down to what rules the provinces have.
'Federal restrictions can come down in a heartbeat. It's the provincial beverage alcohol regulations that need to change in order to create a more conducive cross border dynamic. Specifically, technical barriers and mark-up structures make it difficult to sell wines into other provinces,' she said.
Get breaking National news
For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
'For example, if my member wishes to sell into Nova Scotia, their mark-up structure is so high that there is no incentive to do so. Ditto for other provincial markets. For example, the SAQ's mark-up structure is 25 per cent higher than the LCBO's,' Wasylyshen added.
She said some provinces, like B.C., see Ontario wine makers as competitors.
Lander said this kind of protectionist push is what gave rise to trade barriers.
Story continues below advertisement
'When those interprovincial barriers were created, there were vested interests that were arguing for them to be put in place. There are going to be people who jump up and make the news cycle, saying the removal of this barrier has cost me my job or has cost me my way of life,' he said.
2:04
Carney praised as 'serious person' by Trump administration ahead of White House visit
What are internal trade barriers?
A product made in one Canadian province faces several hurdles before it can be sold in another province. This net of rules that regulates this trade across provincial lines is collectively referred to as interprovincial trade barriers.
Story continues below advertisement
It's not just goods and services. It also applies to a person who works in a regulated profession that needs a licence, like a person who works in the trades or as a massage therapist or even a hairdresser. If such a person wants to move to work in another province, they would have to go through the entire process of getting their licence.
Most trade barriers have to do with red tape and regulations, which probably means you'd have to pay a higher mark-up on a bottle of wine from another province or your provincial liquor board may not even stock alcohol from provinces it considers a threat to its own industry.
Canada's uneven transportation policy can also come in the way of trading with other provinces. Different provinces have different maximum weight requirements or safety requirements for trucks, which makes it difficult to transport goods across the country by road.
'Each of the provinces has rules regarding when trucks can be on the road, what kind of tires they have or what kind safety kits they have,' Dennis Darby, president and CEO of Canadian Manufacturers and Exporters, said.
Momentum building?
Darby said the last four months have seen unprecedented momentum in the move to end trade barriers within Canada, which might be the push the provinces need to get on board. And he says the consensus seems to be building because of one crisis alone — Donald Trump's trade war against Canada.
Story continues below advertisement
'With that existential threat of the U.S. and the threat to our ability to trade, what better time to look at ways to be able to move all those things and all those people and all the products across Canada?' he said.
Some provinces have already started moving. In February, Nova Scotia introduced a bill to remove barriers to trading with other provinces. In April, Ontario and Prince Edward Island followed suit.
Wineries in B.C. can now directly ship wine to customers in Alberta, the result of an interprovincial deal that was agreed to last year.
The process allows Albertans to order wine from more than 300 B.C. wineries in exchange for the Alberta government getting its share of applicable taxes.
Wasylyshen said the next step should be to go beyond direct-to-customer sales and allow wine makers to sell to businesses as well.
'Restaurants are now looking to get Ontario (wine) products onto their menus. Because consumers are asking for them,' she said.
Lander said while changing regulations in all 10 provinces and three territories will be a long process, the federal government could get them all to agree to something called a 'mutual recognition' program.
Mutual recognition means while provinces will continue to have their own set of rules, they will recognize and respect each other's standards.
Story continues below advertisement
'So, if a truck was approved in B.C. as being able to drive on its highways, then Alberta should maybe recognize that (and say) OK, it's safe to drive on our highways,' he said.
Darby said a good analogy for a mutual recognition was drivers' licences. Every province issues its own, but you can use an Ontario licence to drive in the United States.
He said a federal mutual recognition program could also work for people in the licensed trades who want to work in another province.
'If you're qualified to repair a compressor or to do welding on a high-pressure vessel in Quebec or Ontario, that should suffice in Alberta or Saskatchewan,' he said.
Lander said removing internal trade barriers will not offset the losses from protracted tariffs from the U.S. tariffs.
'There is no substitute for having unfettered access to the U.S. economy,' he said.
'What it allows us to do is withstand the tariff war a little longer than we otherwise would. If that buys us an extra six months, if it buys us an extra year because we have a little bit more of a cushion, then that's great. In terms of negotiation, we're not as weak as we otherwise would be.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

First Nations youth say they're ‘starting a movement' against major projects bills
First Nations youth say they're ‘starting a movement' against major projects bills

Toronto Star

time32 minutes ago

  • Toronto Star

First Nations youth say they're ‘starting a movement' against major projects bills

OTTAWA - First Nations youth leaders are warning Canadians can expect a long, tense summer of protests as governments push forward with plans to fast-track major projects — and young people will be leading the charge. 'You will see us in your cities, your city's hubs,' said Ramon Kataquapit, a youth councillor with the Chiefs of Ontario and Nishnawbe Aski Nation and a member of Attawapiskat First Nation in northern Ontario.

EDITORIAL: Whose rights prevail in ‘nation-building'?
EDITORIAL: Whose rights prevail in ‘nation-building'?

Toronto Sun

time2 hours ago

  • Toronto Sun

EDITORIAL: Whose rights prevail in ‘nation-building'?

Prime Minister Mark Carney is pictured during an Outreach Session at the Group of Seven (G7) Summit at the Pomeroy Kananaskis Mountain Lodge in Kananaskis, Alta., on June 17, 2025. Photo by TERESA SUAREZ / GETTY IMAGES The Supreme Court of Canada has ruled that Indigenous groups do not have veto power over projects such as pipelines that cross their territory, but the government must meaningfully consult them and accommodate their legitimate concerns. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account But, what happens when a group is so opposed to a project that nothing will satisfy them, no matter how many concessions are made? In that case, who has the ultimate power to decide on the merits of the project — the government or the protesters? Many environmental groups that have no intention of ever consenting to any fossil fuel energy project, no matter what concessions are made to address their concerns, routinely launch court challenges with the goal of slowing down the approval process to the point where the project becomes economically unviable. This seems inevitable given the passage of the Liberal government's One Canadian Economy Act on Friday, supported by the Conservatives, to green-light 'nation-building projects' such as pipelines, mines and energy infrastructure that cross Indigenous territory where treaty rights apply. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Prime Minister Mark Carney has said the government will not approve fast-tracking projects opposed by Indigenous groups — but what does that mean? Does it mean in a jurisdiction where consent is necessary from multiple Indigenous groups that every one of them must agree to the project, or only a majority and, if so, what kind of a majority? Does a majority mean 51% or 99% approval and what does a reasonable effort to accommodate concerns mean? These are relevant questions because Indigenous protests that blockade rail lines and highways to protest government decisions in this regard will be damaging to our economy at a time when it is already being weakened by the tariff and trade war launched against us by U.S. President Donald Trump. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Ideally, nation-building projects approved by the federal government will have substantial support from Indigenous communities under agreements which include significant economic benefits from projects crossing their territory. From existing court decisions, we already know that projects which run roughshod over Indigenous rights will not survive the judicial process. But, at some point, decisions will have to be made on who is the ultimate authority — the government or groups who will always oppose these projects no matter what accommodations are made? Read More Columnists Columnists Toronto & GTA Columnists Toronto & GTA

GOLDSTEIN: Prepare for more billion-dollar boondoggles
GOLDSTEIN: Prepare for more billion-dollar boondoggles

Toronto Sun

time3 hours ago

  • Toronto Sun

GOLDSTEIN: Prepare for more billion-dollar boondoggles

Reports by financial watchdogs of government spending suggest there are major concerns about how public infrastructure projects will be approved Get the latest from Lorrie Goldstein straight to your inbox Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney speaks as he attends a tour of the Fort York Armoury in Toronto on June 9, 2025 in Toronto, Canada. Photo by Cole Burston / Getty Images What happens when Prime Minister Mark Carney's promise of massive new federal spending on public infrastructure and speedy approval of 'nation building projects' runs into the fact the federal public service routinely ignores the rules for spending public money and approving such projects? This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account The answer, potentially, is the waste of mega-billions of public dollars on projects that are so poorly administered, some may never be completed. The issue isn't the policies themselves. Carney's Liberals and the official opposition Conservatives agree with streamlining the process for green-lighting projects such as pipelines, mines and other forms of energy infrastructure, if they are endorsed by the province and Indigenous groups where they occur. That was evidenced by their rapid approval of Bill C-5, the One Canadian Economy Act on Friday, before Parliament adjourned for the summer. Liberals and Conservatives passed the legislation intended to boost the Canadian economy given the damage caused by President Donald Trump's tariff war and the fact the U.S. is no longer a reliable trading partner or ally of Canada. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. The legislation is now headed to the Senate, scheduled to sit until June 27, for final approval before Canada Day on July 1. Read More But recent reports by Parliament's two financial watchdogs of government spending – Auditor General Karen Hogan and Parliamentary Budget Officer Yves Giroux – suggest there are major concerns about how these projects will be approved. Hogan reviewed the Liberal government's approval of the notorious ArriveCan app that was supposed to cost $80,000 and ended up costing about $60 million, as well as 106 other professional services contracts awarded by 31 federal departments and agencies and one Crown corporation to IT staffing firm GCStrategies Inc. from 2015 to 2024. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. They totalled up to $92.7 million – of which, $64.5 million was paid out. Hogan found a widespread failure within the federal public service to follow the rules in awarding these contacts intended to ensure taxpayers get good value for money. She said the same thing happened when she examined 97 contracts awarded by 20 federal departments agencies and Crown corporations valued at $209 million, with $200 million paid out, to management consulting firm McKinsey & Company, from 2011 to 2023. 'I said it back then and I'll repeat it now – I have no reason to believe this is unique to two vendors and that's why I believe the government needs to take a step back and look at why this is happening,' Hogan warned. Hogan took the unusual step of not making any recommendations on her findings, saying the problem isn't a lack of rules but the federal bureaucracy ignoring them. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. In a separate report, Hogan estimated the cost of replacing Canada's aging fleet of CF-18 fighter jets with 88 new F-35s, increased by almost 50% within two years – from $19 billion in 2022 to $27.7 billion in 2024. In addition, another $5.5 billion will be needed for infrastructure needed to make the new jet fighters fully operational, because the government relied on outdated data and failed to develop contingency plans for managing financial risks associated with the project. She also noted a long-standing shortage of trained fighter pilots. In a report released Thursday, parliamentary budget officer Yves Giroux said because Carney has delayed the federal budget until fall, he can't determine whether his claim he will balance the federal operating budget by 2028-29 is credible. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Nor can he determine whether Carney will achieve his commitment to increase federal spending on defence to the NATO target of 2% of GDP this fiscal year, and whether the government's overall financial plan is fiscally sustainable. In his election platform Carney's outlined $130 billion in new spending over four years with total deficit spending of $224.8 billion. That's 71% higher than the $131.4 billion in deficit spending the Trudeau government predicted during the same period last December. The problem, Giroux said, is that Carney is claiming he can balance the operating budget, the cost of running the government, within three years, while financing new capital spending on infrastructure with more public debt. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. 'There is no commonly accepted definition of what is defined as 'operating' or 'non-operating capital' spending,' Giroux wrote, meaning he 'is unable to assess whether the government's recent policy initiatives presented in Parliament … are consistent with achieving its new fiscal objective … This means the government could achieve its fiscal objective and yet be fiscally unsustainable.' Unless the federal government addresses the concerns of the auditor general and parliamentary budget officer, expect for more billion-dollar boondoggles of the type we've seen so often in the past. lgoldstein@ Columnists Toronto & GTA Columnists Toronto & GTA Sunshine Girls

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store