Home insurance explained: Everything homeowners need to know
Home insurance is an ongoing cost tied to homeownership. Most Americans can't avoid it — mortgage lenders require coverage before closing a loan — and this type of coverage is typically imperative even if you don't have a loan on your home. Yet as insurance costs climb, many homeowners are unclear on what their policies cover and how much protection they truly need.
To cut through the confusion, we asked insurance experts to break down the essentials. Below, they share insights on coverage basics, policy exclusions, typical costs and ways to get affordable coverage.
Learn more about your home insurance options now.
Imagine flames tearing through your neighborhood. At that moment, the last thing you would want to do is frantically search through policy documents, wondering if you're covered. Learning the basics of home insurance now can prevent a crisis from becoming even more overwhelming.
What is home insurance?
Home insurance acts as a financial safety net for large losses that most homeowners couldn't afford to pay for on their own, according to Ashleigh Trent, personal lines director and co-founder of Tower Street Insurance. Your policy will typically pay to repair or replace your home and belongings if a fire, storm or theft causes damage. It may also cover medical and legal costs if someone gets hurt on your property.
Compare home insurance policies to find the right coverage today.
How does home insurance work?
Home insurance works in a relatively straightforward manner: You pay monthly or annual premiums to your insurance company. In return, when disaster strikes and you notify the insurance company, "[they] will investigate the incident, inspect the damage and pay for expenses [up to your policy's limit]," explains Belen Tokarski, president and COO of Mylo. But you must pay your deductible before insurance kicks in.
What does home insurance cover?
Here's what a standard home insurance policy typically includes, according to Tokarski:
Dwelling coverage repairs or replaces your home if damaged by fire, storms or other covered events.
Personal property coverage helps you replace your possessions, such as furniture, electronics and clothing.
Other structures coverage covers detached structures such as garages, fences and sheds.
Loss of use coverage pays for temporary housing if you can't live in your home during repairs.
Personal liability coverage handles legal and medical costs if someone gets hurt on your property.
What doesn't home insurance cover?
While home insurance protects your property from many risks, exclusions exist. "Floods, earthquakes, mold, pests and wear and tear usually aren't covered," says Brent Thurman, owner of Keystone Insurance.
You'll generally need separate insurance for these items:
Flood damage: You can get a separate flood insurance policy through the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).
High-value belongings: A Valuable Articles Endorsement covers expensive jewelry, art and collectibles.
Equipment breakdown: Equipment breakdown coverage protects appliances and home systems such as your furnace, air conditioner and refrigerator.
Earthquake damage: Separate earthquake insurance may be worth getting if you live in an at-risk area.
Regular maintenance: This is your responsibility, but a home warranty may help with some repair costs.
How much does home insurance cost?
Home insurance costs an average of $1,500 to $2,500 per year, according to Thurman. Your actual cost depends on location, home value, construction type, roof age, credit score and local risks such as hurricanes or wildfires. For example, you might see higher insurance costs if you live somewhere that's prone to natural disasters.
Who needs home insurance?
Home insurance is mandatory for homeowners with a mortgage. But even after paying off your home, experts, including Trent, encourage keeping this type of coverage to protect such a large asset.
Who doesn't need home insurance?
You can technically skip home insurance if you've paid off your mortgage, but experts strongly advise against it. Trent warns that going without insurance is risky considering threats against a home from things like inclement weather. Unless you're wealthy enough to self-insure or own a low-value property, it's typically wise to buy home insurance.
How do you find inexpensive home insurance?
Industry professionals recommend these five ways to secure home insurance at the best possible rates:
Shop around: Ask a broker to compare policies from several carriers to find the best combination of price and coverage.
Conduct annual reviews: Don't automatically renew your policy. Instead, have your broker check for better options before expiration.
Bundle policies: Combine your home and auto insurance with one company for potential discounts.
Raise your deductible: A higher deductible often results in paying a lower monthly premium.
Improve your home security: Installing safety features such as alarm systems and smoke detectors may qualify you for lower rates.
The bottom line
Home insurance protects your most valuable asset, so don't choose a policy based on price alone. Thurman advises working with an independent insurance agent. Beyond finding you the right coverage at a fair price, they'll explain your policy in layman's terms and answer questions you didn't even know to ask.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's FTC is digging into Elon Musk's claims about an advertiser ‘boycott'
Happy Tuesday! Here's your weekly Tech Drop, a roundup of the past week's top stories from the intersection of technology and politics. Elon Musk's ostensible departure from the White House and its contentious aftermath certainly haven't stopped the Trump administration from working to further Musk's commercial interests. The Federal Trade Commission recently demanded documents from some of the world's largest ad agencies, following on from Musk's allegations that companies have been engaged in a 'boycott' when they chose not to purchase ads on X due to the prevalence of disinformation and hate speech on the platform. (Several major corporations recently asked a judge to dismiss a related lawsuit brought by X.) Read more at The Wall Street Journal. Meta is making a foray into military technology, starting with plans to develop a virtual reality–enabled headset to train U.S. troops. I laid out some glaring security concerns in a recent post that highlights the company's history of being used by illiberal forces to spread disinformation and promote propaganda linked to violence. Read more at MSNBC. Amid protests in Los Angeles over the Trump administration's authoritarian, anti-immigration raids, several MAGA world figures, including Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas, spread videos on social media that they falsely claimed depicted the city in a state of chaos. In reality, many of the images they shared don't come from the protests at all but were either taken at different times or in other countries entirely. Read more at Meidas Touch. Khaby Lame, a TikTok influencer who is reportedly the most followed person on the app, was forced to leave the U.S. after being detained by ICE agents last week. The agency said that Lame had overstayed his visa and was given the opportunity to leave voluntarily. Read more at MSBNC. Far-right influencer Steve Bannon's podcast, 'WarRoom,' has been welcomed back to Spotify. The audio streaming platform removed Bannon's content in 2020 after he said he'd like to see government officials — like then-FBI Director Christopher Wray and leading immunologist Anthony Fauci — beheaded and their heads put on pikes 'at the two corners of the White House as a warning to federal bureaucrats.' 'Following its temporary suspension and a constructive dialogue with the show's team, new 'Bannon's WarRoom' episodes are available on Spotify,' a spokesperson said in a statement. Read more at the New York Post. In a report released last week, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., highlighted more than 100 instances of possible corruption by Musk and other White House officials who appear to have advanced his business interests during his time as a 'special government employee.' A White House official referred to the report as 'toothless' in a statement to MSNBC and claimed Musk has done more than Warren to improve Americans' lives. But the statement didn't address any specific allegations. Read more at MSNBC. The University of Michigan says it is ending its contracts with outside vendors that provide plainclothes security, including a technology-focused security company, the Guardian reports. The outlet had previously reported that private investigators had been trailing and recording pro-Palestinian demonstrators. The university said it ended its contract after one of the company's employees engaged in behavior the school said went 'against our values and directives.' Read more at The Guardian. The Trump administration's rush to install AI tools across the federal government continues to run into some snags. An artificial intelligence tool developed by the so-called Department of Government Efficiency has caused some problems at the Department of Veterans Affairs over its tendency to spit out false information. Read more at ProPublica. A new report in Wired highlights how the term 'nonlethal,' used in reference to weapons that are often deployed against protesters, doesn't give the full picture of how harmful these weapons can be — or the extent to which their use on civilians is frowned upon in other nations. Read more at Wired. This article was originally published on
Axios
2 hours ago
- Axios
Starbucks taps into health trends with protein coffee test
LAS VEGAS — Starbucks is tapping into the growing demand for protein-packed drinks as consumers seek to boost their intake for health and wellness. Why it matters: The world's largest coffee chain unveiled Tuesday that it is testing protein in its cold foam as part of its "Back to Starbucks" plan. CEO Brian Niccol is trying to reverse a decline in foot traffic and sales by returning to its roots. The big picture: Protein is hot and having a moment beyond social media influencers sharing order hacks. Restaurant brands like Dutch Bros Coffee and Smoothie King have added more protein to their products to cater to changing consumer appetites. Eating a high-protein diet is important to maintain muscle for people taking appetite-suppressing injectable treatments like Ozempic and Wegovy, research shows. Nearly 18 million Americans are expected to be taking versions of GLP-1 drugs by 2029, according to investment bank UBS. Zoom in: Niccol told Axios in an interview Tuesday that the protein cold foam being tested is for a number of different consumer groups including 20-year-old males, 50-year-old females and people taking GLP-1s. "I was watching people coming to our stores, they would get three shots of espresso over ice," Niccol said. "And in some cases, they pull their own protein powder out of their bag, or in other cases, they have a protein drink, like a Fair Life and they'd pour that into their drink." "I'm like, well, wait a second, we can make this experience better for them," he said. "The good news is now I think we're right on trend, and we can do it I think arguably better than anybody else." Flashback: Starbucks had protein smoothies in the past and launched its Vivanno shakes in 2008. They were discontinued in 2018. The company also launched a protein drink in the U.K. last year. The intrigue: Starbucks said the protein powder should be able to be added to any of its cold foam flavors. What's next: Starbucks is testing protein cold foam in five locations in the U.S. under its Starting Five model.
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Mayor Adams' ‘emergency' spending is out of control — now NYC must hit the brakes
New Yorkers, like all Americans, tend to stock up when any crisis is about to hit: We fill up our gas tanks, empty the bread and egg shelves at grocery stores and buy enough toilet paper to last for months. It's human nature — and for far too long, New York City's government has been behaving the very same way. But City Hall's panic reaction is far worse, and does far more damage. Advertisement In recent emergencies, like the COVID-19 pandemic and the asylum-seeker influx, city government kept on 'crisis buying' for more than a year, without ever comparing prices or rooting out contractor abuse, fraud and waste. It's time for drastic change: We must reform the city's out-of-control emergency procurement practices and add vital checks and balances. Currently, when the mayor declares a state of emergency, the city's comptroller and corporation counsel suspend their ordinary oversight regarding contracts and procurement. Advertisement In theory, this allows City Hall to respond quickly and obtain necessary goods and services to alleviate the crisis. In practice, it means the city can award no-bid contracts for up to one year — contracts that, having bypassed the competitive bidding that's normally required, can be rife with waste and abuse. Imagine purchasing a car or searching for your next apartment without competitively price-shopping for those big-ticket items. That's what City Hall does whenever the mayor declares an emergency. City agencies aren't even required to send 'emergency' contracts to the comptroller for auditing before laying out taxpayer cash. In fact, 84% of such contracts filed between January 2022 and September 2023 were submitted more than 31 days after the contract start date. Advertisement Both Mayor Eric Adams and former Mayor Bill de Blasio spent billions of dollars on the asylum-seeker and COVID crises, respectively, drawing multiple allegations of corruption and pay-to-play politics. This uncontrolled spending was especially acute during the pandemic, as de Blasio extended 'emergency' contracts a whopping 100-plus times and spent nearly $7 billion on emergency supplies with no oversight or limiting guardrails. In the private sector, affordability is a prime factor when choosing bids on contracts. The city's emergency procurement process throws such considerations to the wind, leading to reckless overspending. During COVID, City Hall paid top dollar for ventilators and N95 masks it never received — and in one case, paid an absurd $7.50 apiece for cloth masks. Advertisement Its fire sale of nearly $224 million worth of COVID-era surplus items, from ventilators to face shields, only recouped $500,000, a downright outrage. The current administration is no better, awarding a $432 million emergency contract for asylum-seeker services to an untested company called DocGo. Its dreadful performance — with problems like chronic food waste, moldy hotel rooms, unlicensed security guards and an uncredentialed CEO who was forced to resign — resulted in an investigation by the state attorney general. Even in non-emergency circumstances, the city has never reined in city contractors who utilize loopholes to enrich themselves. Take the company owned by David Levitan, listed as one of New York City's worst landlords. For over a quarter century, the city has repeatedly used Levitan's properties as homeless shelters — buildings with rotted floors, broken elevators, rat infestations and peeling lead paint. Levitan has even required some of the nonprofits operating shelters within his buildings to subcontract with his own maintenance or extermination companies to service the properties — reaping even more revenue from our tax dollars. It's time for reform, top to bottom. Advertisement Emergencies, by their very definition, are short in duration. Accordingly, they should necessitate a strictly time-limited use of no-bid contracts, for instances when competitive bidding will truly hinder the city's response. That's why I am introducing two bills in the New York City Council this week to update our lackadaisical, irresponsible procurement processes. These bills will limit all emergency contracts to 30 days, unless both the comptroller and corporation counsel approve of an extension. If passed, the laws will require all contracts be sent to the comptroller for auditing within 15 days of signing, and will increase subcontractor transparency with fines of up to $100,000 for not disclosing to the city any conflicts of interest or competing contractual obligations. Advertisement New York's broken contracting system has price-gouged our taxpayers for far too long — and recent mayoral administrations have shown no appetite to follow good-government procurement practices. It's up to the City Council to advance this vital legislation, saving precious fiscal resources, restoring responsibility and rooting out corruption. City Council Member Julie Menin (D) represents the East Side of Manhattan and chairs the Consumer and Worker Protection Committee.
