No plan to remove ‘secular', ‘socialist' from Preamble: Centre
Meghwal acknowledged that 'certain groups' were seeking the removal of the two words from the Preamble.
'Any discussions regarding amendments to the Preamble would require thorough deliberation and broad consensus, but as of now, the government has not initiated any formal process to change these provisions,' Meghwal told Rajya Sabha.
The words 'socialist' and 'secular' were not part of the Constitution adopted in 1950 and were added in 1976 through the 42nd constitutional amendment.
In November, the Supreme Court dismissed petitions filed by Bharatiya Janata Party leaders Subramanian Swamy and Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay, in addition to a separate plea by a man named Balram Singh, challenging the 1976 amendment.
Citing this ruling, the Union law minister said: 'The court clarified that 'socialism' in the Indian context signifies a welfare state and does not impede private sector growth, while 'secularism' is integral to the Constitution's basic structure.'
The court had said in its order that there was no legitimate justification for challenging the constitutional amendment several decades later.
The minister's response to Samajwadi Party MP Ramji Lal Suman's questions in the Rajya Sabha came about a month after a political row erupted about the inclusion of the words in the Constitution.
The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh in June called for a review of the two terms. The RSS is the parent organisation of the ruling BJP.
A day after the comment by RSS General Secretary Dattatreya Hosabale, Jagdeep Dhankhar, the vice president at the time, had said that the addition of the words 'secular' and 'socialist' to the Preamble of the Constitution during the Emergency was a ' sacrilege to the spirit of sanatana '.
Sanatana dharma is a term some people use as a synonym for Hinduism.
Union ministers Shivraj Singh Chouhan and Jitendra Singh had also voiced their support for a review.
Chouhan had claimed that the words 'secular' and 'socialist' are not core to Indian culture and called for a discussion on their removal from the Constitution.
Congress leader Rahul Gandhi had criticised the RSS for seeking a review of the two words in the Preamble, saying that the Hindutva organisation's ' mask had come off again '.
In 2015, a controversy erupted after the BJP-led Union government's newspaper advertisements on Republic Day featured a Preamble with the two words omitted.
In September 2023, Congress leader Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury claimed that the two words were missing from the Preamble
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
4 minutes ago
- Time of India
Incorrect To Say Op Sindoor Was...': Rajnath Denies Cong's 'Surrender' Charge, Rejects Trump's Role
Defence Minister Rajnath Singh made a fiery intervention in Lok Sabha during the debate on Operation Sindoor, India's powerful military response after the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack. Singh dismissed Donald Trump's claim of pressuring India to pause its strikes, asserting that the mission ended only after achieving strategic objectives. 'This wasn't a war to seize land, but to destroy Pakistan's terror network,' he clarified. Taking a swipe at the Opposition, Singh questioned why no one in Parliament asked how many Pakistani jets were downed. His assertive speech reignited the national security vs political narrative debate and set the tone for a landmark moment in Indian defence politics.#operationsindoor #rajnathsingh #rajnathsinghspeech #loksabha #loksabhalive #donaldtrump #indiandefence #pokstrikes #pahalgamattack #counterterrorism #narendramodi #loksabhadebate #indianpolitics #modidoctrine #bjpvscongress #indiapakistan #trumpclaim #indianairforce #terrorresponse #surgicalstrikes #nationalsecurity #toi #toibharat #bharat #trending #breakingnews #indianews Read More
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
4 minutes ago
- First Post
WATCH: No Modi-Trump phone call took place between April 22 and June 17, says Jaishankar
EAM Jaishankar confirmed in Lok Sabha there was no phone call between PM Modi and President Trump between April 22 and June 17, dispelling rumours of secret negotiations or trade-linked talks amid India's Operation Sindoor. read more External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar clarified in the Lok Sabha that there was no telephonic communication between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and US President Donald Trump from April 22 to June 17, directly contradicting speculation about secret diplomatic dealings surrounding Operation Sindoor and associated border tensions. VIDEO | Speaking on Operation Sindoor in Lok Sabha, EAM S Jaishankar (@DrSJaishankar) said, "...At no stage, in any conversation with the United States, was there any linkage with trade and what was going on. There was no call between the Prime Minister and President Trump… — Press Trust of India (@PTI_News) July 28, 2025 STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Responding to Opposition allegations in the Lok Sabha, Jaishankar said, 'At no stage, in any conversation with the United States was there any linkage with trade and what was going on. There was no call between the Prime Minister and President Trump between April 22, when the President called to convey his sympathy and June 17 when he called the Prime Minister from Canada to explain why he couldn't meet.' He further explained that India's response to the Pahalgam terror attack was independent and decisive. 'After we retaliated against Pakistan's attack, we received messages saying Pakistan was ready to stop. But we conveyed that such a request must come from their Director General of Military Operations (DGMO),' he said. Hailing the government's diplomatic efforts post-Pahalgam attack, the EAM said, 'What we tried to create was a narrative and prepare the diplomacy for launch of Operation Sindoor. The result of that diplomacy was that out of the 190 nations of UN only three, besides Pakistan, opposed Operation Sindoor. 'Overwhelmingly, there was recognition that terror was unacceptable and the country which has been attacked has the right to defend itself and India was doing exactly that,' Jaishankar said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'When Operation Sindoor was launched, we put out our objectives that it was hitting terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. Our actions were focussed, measured and non-escalatory and we were living up to the commitment that those responsible for those attacks will be held responsible,' he said. Jaishankar pointed out that The Resistance Front (TRF) group had been designated as a global terror organisaion by the US due to Indian diplomacy. 'On May 10, we received phone calls sharing the impression of other countries that Pakistan was ready to cease the fighting. Our position was that if Pakistan was ready, we needed to get this as a request from the Pakistani side through the DGMO channel. That is exactly how that request came,' Jaishankar said. 'I want to make two things very clear – at no stage in any conversation with the US was their any linkage with trade and what was going on. Secondly, there was no call between the prime minister and President Trump from April 22 – when President Trump called up to convey his sympathy – till June 17, when he called up, the PM who was in Canada,' he said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Talking about the post-Pahalgam actions of the government, Jaishankar said that the Cabinet Committee on Security had decided that the Indus Waters Treaty would be held in abeyance until Pakistan abjures its support for terrorism, along with a host of other steps. 'It was very clear that after the steps, India's response to the Pahalgam attack will not stop there. Our responsibility from a foreign policy approach was to shape the global understanding of the Pahalgam attack,' he said. Jaishankar said that Indian diplomacy then tried to bring out Pakistan's long-standing support to terrorism and how the Pahalgam attack was targeted at Jammu and Kashmir's economy and sow communal discord. 'Messages were two – zero tolerance for terrorism and right to defend our people against terrorists. All diplomatic briefing were aimed at these two objectives,' he said. Jaishankar's remarks came after Congress' Deputy Leader in the House Gaurav Gogoi slammed the government over US President Donald Trump's claim made '26 times', that he used trade to bring about a ceasefire between India and Pakistan. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The Congress has been repeatedly attacking the government over Trump's remarks. Since May 10, when Trump announced on social media that India and Pakistan had agreed to a full and immediate ceasefire after a long night of talks mediated by Washington, he has repeated his claim on several occasions that he helped settle the tensions between India and Pakistan. However, India has been consistently maintaining that the understanding on cessation of hostilities with Pakistan was reached following direct talks between the Directors General of Military Operations (DGMOs) of the two militaries. In a nearly 35-minute phone call with Trump last month, Modi firmly stated that India does not and will 'never accept' mediation and that the discussions between Indian and Pakistani militaries on cessation of military actions were initiated at Islamabad's request. India launched Operation Sindoor on May 7, targeting terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir in retaliation for the Pahalgam attack that killed 26 civilians. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD India and Pakistan reached an understanding on May 10 to end the conflict after four days of intense cross-border drone and missile strikes. With inputs from agencies
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
4 minutes ago
- Business Standard
No Modi-Trump call took place, Jaishankar clarifies on Operation Sindoor
External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar strongly defended the Modi government's handling of Operation Sindoor and its response to recent terror attacks, while taking sharp aim at the Opposition during a fiery intervention in the Lok Sabha on Monday. Jaishankar responded with scathing criticism to Opposition questions over the government's counter-terror operations and diplomatic decisions following the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack, which killed 26 civilians and triggered a sharp escalation in hostilities with Pakistan. 'People who did nothing have the temerity to question the government which brought down Bahawalpur and Muridke terror sites,' said Jaishankar, referencing the Indian strikes that targeted major terror hubs in Pakistan. Jaishankar on 'ceasefire' and US Involvement Addressing speculation around the de-escalation that followed Operation Sindoor, Jaishankar clarified the sequence of diplomatic and military contacts: 'After we retaliated to the Pakistan attack, we got phone calls saying Pakistan was ready to stop; but we told them the request has to come from the DGMO,' he told Parliament, reiterating that the crucial proposal for a halt came directly via military channels. Firmly rebutting claims of external mediation, he stated, 'No phone call took place between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and US President Trump between April 22 and June 17.' This directly contradicts US President Trump's earlier public assertions that he had personally brokered the ceasefire, a claim the Indian government had previously denied. Jaishankar on diplomatic success Jaishankar highlighted broad international backing for India's counter-terror position: 'The German foreign minister said India has every right to defend itself against terror and will support us; so has France and the EU.' He noted that multilateral groups like the Quad and Brics, as well as numerous countries, had condemned the Pahalgam attack. Thanks to Indian diplomacy, Jaishankar added, 'The Resistance Front (TRF) — which owned up to the Pahalgam attack — has been designated a global terrorist organisation.' Jaishankar on China Policy The minister dismissed warnings about Pakistan-China collaboration as nothing new: 'We are getting warnings about Pak-China collaboration, when this has been going on for 60 years,' he said, taking a swipe at Congress for what he described as years of soft-pedaled engagement. 'Opposition lectures us on dealing with China but they allowed 2G and 3G from China; our government made indigenous 5G.' On relations with China, Jaishankar clarified, 'We did not go to China for Olympics, secret deals; we went there to make India's stand clear on terror, trade and de-escalation.' He also pointed out that Pakistan remained under the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) grey list for the longest period during the Modi government's tenure, underscoring India's success in keeping up international pressure.
