&w=3840&q=100)
Iran's president got injured during Israeli strikes, confirm US intelligence sources
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian was hurt during last month's Israeli missile strikes, US intelligence officials have said.
Last week, Iranian state media claimed that President Pezeshkian was attending a Supreme National Security Council meeting when an Israeli strike hit the gathering, injuring him in the leg as he escaped through an emergency shaft.
Two US intelligence officials have told CBS News that the Iranian state media reports are accurate. It is, however, not clear whether Israel targeted Pezeshkian deliberately or not.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Meanwhile, in an interview with Tucker Carlson earlier this month, the Iranian president claimed that Israel tried to assassinate him by bombarding an area where he was holding a meeting.
'It was not the United States that was behind the attempt on my life. It was Israel. I was in a meeting. We were discussing the ways to move forward. But thanks to the intelligence by the spies that they had, they tried to bombard the area…in which we were holding that meeting,' Pezeshkian said.
Videos shared on social media during the 12-day war captured repeated strikes on a mountainside in north-western Tehran.
It has now been revealed that, on the fourth day of the conflict, those strikes targeted a secret underground facility in Tehran that was housing Iran's top leaders at the time.
While Israel has neither denied nor confirmed the strikes on the national security council meeting, the country has said that it did try to target Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Khamenei, during the conflict.
Earlier this month, Iran said it has not made any request for talks with the United States, after President Donald Trump said Tehran was seeking negotiations following last month's war with Israel.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'No request for a meeting has been made on our side to the American side,' said Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei, according to Tasnim news agency.
With inputs from agencies
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
15 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Ministers gather at UN for delayed meeting on Israel, Palestinians
Dozens of ministers will gather at the United Nations on Monday for a delayed conference to work toward a two-state solution between Israel and the Palestinians, but the US and Israel are boycotting the event. The 193-member UN General Assembly decided in September last year that such a conference would be held in 2025. Hosted by France and Saudi Arabia, the conference was postponed in June after Israel attacked Iran. The conference aims to lay out the parameters for a roadmap to a Palestinian state, while ensuring Israel's security. French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot told newspaper La Tribune Dimanche in an interview published on Sunday that he will also use the conference this week to push other countries to join France in recognizing a Palestinian state. France intends to recognize a Palestinian state in September at the annual gathering of world leaders at the United Nations General Assembly, President Emmanuel Macron said last week. 'We will launch an appeal in New York so that other countries join us to initiate an even more ambitious and demanding dynamic that will culminate on September 21,' Barrot said, adding that he expected Arab countries by then to condemn Palestinian militants Hamas and call for their disarmament. The conference comes as a 22-month war between Israel and Hamas in Gaza still rages. The war was triggered on October 7, 2023, when Hamas killed 1,200 people in southern Israel and took some 250 hostages, according to Israeli tallies. Since then, Israel's military campaign has killed nearly 60,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza health authorities. The US will not attend the conference at the United Nations, said a State Department spokesperson, describing it as 'a gift to Hamas, which continues to reject ceasefire proposals accepted by Israel that would lead to the release of hostages and bring calm in Gaza.' The State Department spokesperson added that Washington voted against the General Assembly last year calling for the conference and would 'not support actions that jeopardize the prospect for a long-term, peaceful resolution to the conflict.' Israel is also not taking part in the conference, 'which doesn't first urgently address the issue of condemning Hamas and returning all of the remaining hostages,' said Jonathan Harounoff, international spokesperson at Israel's UN mission. The UN has long endorsed a vision of two states living side by side within secure and recognized borders. Palestinians want a state in the West Bank, east Jerusalem and Gaza Strip, all territory captured by Israel in the 1967 war with neighboring Arab states. The UN General Assembly in May last year overwhelmingly backed a Palestinian bid to become a full UN member by recognizing it as qualified to join and recommending the UN Security Council 'reconsider the matter favorably.' The resolution garnered 143 votes in favor and nine against. The General Assembly vote was a global survey of support for the Palestinian bid to become a full UN member – a move that would effectively recognize a Palestinian state – after the US vetoed it in the UN Security Council several weeks earlier.
Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘He knew where to hit us': Did Trump strongarm EU into signing trade deal? Steep price for shaky peace
The United States and the European Union have averted a full-scale trade war, but the price of peace is steep. In a high-stakes, hastily arranged meeting at President Donald Trump's golf resort in Turnberry, Scotland, Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced a trade deal that will impose a 15% baseline tariff on most EU goods entering the US: a compromise designed to stave off Trump's threatened 30% tariff if no agreement had been reached by August 1. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Trump hailed the agreement as 'the biggest-ever,' while von der Leyen called it 'the best we could get.' But behind the triumphant rhetoric lies a deal many in Brussels quietly acknowledge as a strategic retreat. A deal under pressure The deal, struck in under an hour, came after months of threats, stalled talks, and tariff escalations that rattled European markets and unnerved EU leaders. According to CNN, the US president had threatened tariffs as high as 50%, pushing the EU to the negotiating table under mounting economic pressure and fears of NATO destabilisation. Trump's administration insisted on a 15% blanket tariff, covering cars, semiconductors, pharmaceuticals, and more. Although von der Leyen claimed some strategic products such as aircraft, select chemicals, and agricultural goods would see zero tariffs, many sectors remain exposed. The AP reported that energy and defence purchases sweetened the deal — with the EU agreeing to spend $750 billion on US energy and invest a further $600 billion in American industries. Yet steel and aluminium will still be hit with 50% tariffs. Trump was blunt: 'Steel stays the way it is.' Von der Leyen maintained that a quota system would eventually moderate those terms, but no final text has been released. EU countries must now ratify the agreement. Ireland said it 'regrets' the baseline tariff, and Germany's powerful BDI industry group warned of 'considerable negative repercussions.' The VCI chemicals association simply called the tariffs 'too high.' Tired of too many ads? go ad free now As CNN noted, while markets responded positively with the Dow rising 0.3% few in Europe are celebrating. Europe's pain threshold — and trump's street fight Multiple reports, including from Financial Times and BBC, paint a picture of a bloc outmanoeuvred. Trump's early-April 'Liberation Day' tariffs sent markets reeling, forcing Brussels to suspend retaliation and enter talks under duress. FT reported that EU diplomats believe the bloc's fragmented stance — especially Germany's desire to shield its car industry — prevented a stronger response. One EU diplomat told FT, 'He's the bully in the schoolyard and we didn't join others in standing up to him.' Former Commission negotiator Georg Riekeles said the EU 'would have been better off answering the US vigorously in April in a one-two combo with China.' The Commission had originally drawn up a strategy to offer purchases and tariff reductions. But the Trump administration moved faster, levying 25% tariffs on steel, aluminium, and vehicles. Meanwhile, internal divisions saw some states pushing for tough retaliation and others urging caution. Irish Trade Minister Simon Harris was reportedly a vocal advocate for protecting Irish pharmaceuticals and spirits, according to FT. The Trump camp saw opportunity in these divisions. He rejected a July proposal for a 10% 'reciprocal' tariff, demanding instead 15% across the board. As BBC pointed out, Trump viewed the EU as exploiting US openness while restricting access to its own markets — a sentiment echoed by his claim that the union was 'nastier than China.' Symbolic win? The final deal delivers predictability and avoids escalation — but at a cost. Most European exports now face higher tariffs than under the previous regime, where the US average was around 1.6%, FT found. The 15% rate, while lower than Trump's threats, is still a substantial barrier and could erode the EU's export competitiveness. Car manufacturers are particularly exposed. Volkswagen has already taken a $1.5 billion hit this year, and Mercedes-Benz warned of 'significant increases' in US prices. While Trump said pharmaceuticals were not part of the deal, von der Leyen later insisted they were 'on a separate sheet of paper' — hinting at continuing negotiations. Still, there's relief that a deeper trade war was averted. BBC noted that Brussels' chief concern was avoiding Trump's wrath spilling over into security cooperation, especially in Eastern Europe and Ukraine. The EU is now betting that stability is worth the compromise. In Trump's words: 'This was the big one.' For von der Leyen and EU officials, the deal may mark not a victory, but the moment the US president 'worked out exactly where our pain threshold is.'
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
Parliament Set For Crucial Debate On Pahalgam Terror Attack And Military Response
Following a week of parliamentary disruptions, the Monsoon Session is poised to commence substantive deliberations regarding the Pahalgam terror incident and Operation Sindoor beginning Monday. Both the ruling NDA coalition and opposition parties have prepared their senior leadership to participate in comprehensive debates scheduled across the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha chambers. The government's response will be articulated by key cabinet members including Home Minister Amit Shah, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh, and External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar. Unofficial sources suggest Prime Minister Narendra Modi might also participate in the proceedings, though no formal confirmation has been issued. Parliamentary leadership has arranged for a 16-hour debate format spanning both houses, focusing specifically on the April 22 attack that resulted in 26 civilian casualties and the subsequent military operation. The discussion framework was mutually agreed upon by government and opposition representatives on July 25. The Congress party has designated Gaurav Gogoi to initiate the opposition's arguments, with subsequent contributions planned from Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, Deependra Hooda, Praneeti Shinde, Saptagiri Ulaka, and Bijendra Ola. Opposition Leader Rahul Gandhi is scheduled to deliver his remarks during Tuesday's session. Notable among the confirmed speakers are representatives from various political parties including Rajnath Singh, Bajyant Panda, Tejaswi Surya, Sanjay Jaiswal, Anurag Thakur, and members from TDP, SP, AITC, DMK, and NCP factions. A significant development concerns Congress MP Shashi Tharoor's participation status. Internal party sources indicate Tharoor will likely abstain from the debate, having failed to submit the required speaking request to the Congress Parliamentary Party office. This absence could generate controversy given Tharoor's recent leadership of an international delegation addressing the India-Pakistan situation, which reportedly conflicted with his party's official position. Tharoor's public endorsement of government policies and the temporary cessation of hostilities has created friction within Congress ranks, particularly among members who maintain critical stances toward the administration's approach. Opposition leadership, spearheaded by Rahul Gandhi, has consistently challenged the government over alleged intelligence shortcomings and questioned India's international diplomatic support. These criticisms have intensified following claims by US President Donald Trump regarding American mediation efforts between India and Pakistan, assertions that the Indian government has categorically refuted. The parliamentary debate represents a crucial moment for both government accountability and opposition scrutiny regarding national security responses and diplomatic strategies in the region.
