Colorado Bill Would Force Judges To Consider 'Misgendering' a Form of 'Coercive Control' in Custody Cases
A recently introduced Colorado bill seeks to require judges to consider "misgendering" as a form of "coercive control" during child custody disputes. If passed, the bill would pose a major threat to parents' First Amendment rights and prevent judges from considering the individual circumstances surrounding family conflict over a child's gender identity.
The bill, the Kelly Loving Act, requires that "when making child custody decisions and determining the best interests of a child for purposes of parenting time, a court shall consider deadnaming, misgendering, or threatening to publish material related to an individual's gender-affirming health-care services as types of coercive control." Since the bill defines coercive control as a "pattern of threatening, humiliating, or intimidating actions, including assaults or other abuse, that is used to harm, punish, or frighten an individual," it would essentially force judges presiding over custody disputes to consider it form of child abuse when a parent refuses to use a child's chosen name.
"In some custody disputes, 'misgendering' or 'deadnaming' could be part of the kind of 'coercive control' courts can consider—a pattern of threatening, humiliating, or intimidating actions used to harm, punish, or frighten," Aaron Terr, director of public advocacy at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, tells Reason. "But treating that speech as inherently coercive or abusive, regardless of context, risks punishing parents simply for disagreeing with the state's preferred views on gender. That veers into constitutionally suspect territory."
The bill leaves little room to allow judges to look at conflict over a child's gender identity on a case-by-case basis—including the possibility that a parent may object to their child's social transition for perfectly understandable reasons. Instead, the law would automatically take the side of the affirming parent and brand the resistant parent as essentially abusive.
But children identify as transgender for a wide range of reasons, and transition isn't the right answer in every case, especially as many clinicians themselves disagree about whether unquestioning affirmation is the correct solution for every case of childhood gender dysphoria. "Not only are there an increase in numbers of kids coming to gender clinics—and there are more gender clinics, particularly in North America—but the composition of the population coming to the gender clinics has changed from a fairly homogeneous group of kids to a very heterogeneous group of kids dominated by natal females," a clinical psychologist and former president of the United States Professional Association for Transgender Health told Reason earlier this year. "There are some of us who feel that we don't have a sufficient evidence base to decide which of these heterogeneous kids are best suited for medicalization."
Terr points out that, even if people find misgendering offensive, the state shouldn't try to punish people for engaging in speech it doesn't like. "The First Amendment largely exists to protect controversial and unpopular speech," Terr says. "If the government could punish people for saying things that cause offense—or compel them to speak against their beliefs—it would hand officials of every political stripe a blank check to silence dissent. That puts everyone's rights at risk."
The post Colorado Bill Would Force Judges To Consider 'Misgendering' a Form of 'Coercive Control' in Custody Cases appeared first on Reason.com.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Critics Expose The Massive Constitutional Flaw In Donald Trump's Latest Threat
Donald Trump's threat to use 'very heavy force' on anyone who dares to protest his administration during the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary celebrations in Washington, D.C., on Saturday — which coincides with the president's 79th birthday — drew fierce blowback on social media. 'If there's any protester wants to come out, they will be met with very big force,' Trump told reporters on Tuesday. 'For those people, that want to protest, they're going to be met with very big force,' he reiterated. Trump claimed he hadn't 'even heard about a protest' being planned on the day. But he deployed his usual rhetoric against his critics, claiming they are just 'people who hate our country.' And he added again, 'They will be met with very heavy force.' Trump says anybody who protests the military parade on Sunday will be met with 'very heavy force' — Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) June 10, 2025 Critics reminded Trump of the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which states that: 'Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.' Former Trump aide Anthony Scaramucci, who is now a vocal critic of his onetime boss, slammed Trump for 'threatening state sponsored violence on citizens exercising their first amendment right' and called Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) to 'grow a backbone' and speak out to 'reject fascism.' Others agreed: Threatening state sponsored violence on citizens exercising their first amendment right. But @LeaderJohnThune is silent. Grow a backbone John and reject fascism. — Anthony Scaramucci (@Scaramucci) June 11, 2025 So much for the First Amendment — Sarah Longwell (@SarahLongwell25) June 10, 2025 The First Amendment specifically prohibits the government from using heavy force on citizens who protest the government. — Ron Filipkowski (@RonFilipkowski) June 10, 2025 But, hear me out here, what if the protesters attack the Capitol? Would we be cool with that? — Stephen Shewmaker (@sbshew) June 10, 2025 Ah yes, such a great confident leader he can't even handle peaceful protest — studio_dad (@studio_daddy) June 10, 2025 I've already said this but the people will stand up for what's right and they will be protesting there Saturday. It will be peaceful until they decide to use 'heavy force' - what a psycho. The president of the United States constantly threatening the American people. I've never… — Jenna (@jennaxkc) June 10, 2025 Surprise Departure Deals Blow To Slim GOP House Majority Rachel Maddow Reveals Sure Sign Trump Is 'Absolutely Panicking' Right Now Trump Reveals What's Next For That Tesla He Bought From Elon Musk
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Flag burning outside a barricaded Seattle federal building
Dozens of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) protesters face off with Federal police at the Henry M Jackson Federal Building on first street. The protest that started early Tuesday afternoon and has now continued into the night with no indication of protesters backing down. The group members alleged this confrontation began after immigration attorneys and the public weren't allowed in the building Tuesday morning. The anti-ICE group was seen throwing dozens of e-bikes and scooters in front of the Jackson Federal Building piling them up at doors and the exit to the building parking garage. The build-up of bikes and scooters that were zip tied together to create a barricade outside the building to slow down an ICE bus from leaving. This protest comes as Seattle's Police Chief said in a city police committee meeting Tuesday night, he vows to protect Seattle residents' First Amendment rights. He also spoke on how SPD will handle protests in response to immigration enforcement by the federal government. In the meeting on Tuesday, Barnes spoke about reducing crime and increasing community engagement with SPD. After, Barnes was asked how SPD would handle protests under his leadership in response the protest in Los Angeles and here in Seattle. Barnes said he would do everything he could to protect Seattle residents and their First Amendment rights. 'What that means is at some point, I will probably go to jail and be in prison because we have an administration that has threatened to jail politicians,' Barnes said. Mayor Bruce Harrell appointed Chief Barnes on Dec. 20 of last year. The safety committee meeting appearance was part of Barnes' confirmation as police chief. KIRO7 has reached out to ICE about this protest, and they've released a statement saying that they respect the constitutional rights of all people to peacefully protest and that the agency remains committed to performing it's immigration enforcement mission.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Community seeks clarity on First Amendment rights
EVANSVILLE, Ind. (WEHT) – Over 100 people gather to discuss the First Amendment, with the goal of leaving with a better understanding of their rights.'I wanted to find out what's going on', says Susan protests continue across the country, Evansville residents are seeking clarity on their fundamental Hansen is one of many who have questions. Hansen says, 'It seems like the current president is trying to revert back to the old, old school way of things and deny us our rights and our abilities, and even to constrict us and overrule and run everything and there's supposed to be a division of power, and he is violating that division of powers, that's what I feel like.'The First Amendment at its basic definition protects the freedom of religion, freedom of the press, freedom of speech, the right to peacefully assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of Professor Dr. James MacLeod, with the University of Evansville says, the First Amendment is the most says, 'Our students are certainty seeing what's been happening around the country to other students protesting over various issues and they are concerned about what would happen, what could happen on our campus.' McLeod adds, 'I'm sure that our students are concerned, deeply concerned by their friends and colleagues who are international students.'Attorney Charles Berger also served as a panelist, a man who's studied the Bill of Rights since he was in high emphasized how now is the time to have the in-depth says, 'They need to let their government know they're not happy with what's happening. They should peacefully assemble at the risk of being harmed. I mean, in order to preserve freedom, you have to take risk and if you're not willing to take risk, then you will lose your freedom.' The panel was hosted by BRIDGE, an organization that focuses on building respect and integrity in diverse greater Evansville. The League of Women Voters of Southwestern Indiana also help partner to make this event happen. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.