Activist Starboard buys more Salesforce stock after first demanding change in 2022
The hedge fund reported owning 1.3 million shares in Salesforce on June 30, compared with 849,679 shares at the end of the first quarter when it boosted its stake by almost 52%.
The move comes as the company's stock price has lost nearly 30% since January and is off nearly 9% over the last 12 months.
Salesforce, which has a market value of $223 billion, came under intense pressure from a handful of activist investors in late 2022 and early 2023. But many who publicly pushed for changes cut their stakes or exited completely by the middle of 2023 after the company reported better results, added a new director to the board and made other changes.
Now the pressure may be increasing again with Starboard, which is known to revisit earlier investments if the company is seen as backsliding on promises, loading up on the stock.
While Salesforce's stock price gained nearly 100% in 2023, Starboard's chief executive, Jeffrey Smith, said late last year that the company still had room to become more efficient and profitable.
A Starboard spokesperson could not be reached for comment on Thursday.
The firm also increased its holding in drugmaker Pfizer (PFE.N), opens new tab by 10.5% to 8.5 million shares, less than a year after unveiling a $1 billion stake in the company and pushing it to improve performance.
At Autodesk (ADSK.O), opens new tab, where the hedge fund settled its fight with the software design company in April, Starboard cut its stake by nearly 27%, the filing shows.
While Thursday's filing is backward-looking, the so-called 13F filings, which detail what U.S. stocks a fund manager owned at the end of the previous quarter, are closely watched for possible investment trends.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Amazon issues final refund warning as major app closes down forever in DAYS – check now before it's too late
AMAZON is preparing to close down one of its biggest platforms after 14 years. But fear not, it's not the main shopping service of course. 2 Another area the tech giant has long tried to make inroads is via its own app store. Amazon Appstore acted as a third party alternative to Google Play, with more than 500,000 apps. But by Wednesday it will be no more on Android devices. It will continue to exist on Amazon Fire TVs and Amazon Fire tablets, where it's the main app store available. Amazon has been reminding users of the imminent closure on Android for sometime, urging people to check if they have any funds on the Amazon Appstore. Amazon Coins - which is also being discontinued - is a virtual currency to buy apps and more. If you've bought any in the past, it's your final chance to spend them or redeem a refund. People were already blocked from buying anymore Coins and the Appstore was no longer downloadable to new users. "Any Coins you have purchased that remain in your account after 20 August 2025 will be refunded." How to check if you have any Amazon Coins Now is the last chance to check if you have any unused Amazon Coins left on your account. You can see in your account by doing the following: Visit Amazon's website and sign-in From the menu at the top with your name, find Your Apps & Devices Select Your Coins Account from the options in the navigation bar August Prime Gaming: 12 Free Games Worth £112 for Amazon Prime Members 2
Geeky Gadgets
an hour ago
- Geeky Gadgets
ChatGPT-5 vs Claude vs Qwen : The Hidden Costs of Picking the Wrong AI Model
What if the future of app development hinged on the AI model you choose? With the rapid evolution of artificial intelligence, developers are faced with a critical question: which model delivers the best balance of speed, reliability, and cost-effectiveness? In the race to build smarter, faster applications, three contenders—ChatGPT-5, Claude, and Qwen—have emerged as frontrunners. Each features unique strengths, yet their differences could mean the success or failure of your next project. Imagine building a tool like 'Newsletter Digest,' a web app designed to summarize newsletters, only to discover that your chosen AI model struggles to deliver functional results. The stakes are high, and understanding these models' capabilities is no longer optional, it's essential. In this comparative overview, Rob Shocks explains how these AI models stack up in real-world scenarios, using the development of 'Newsletter Digest' as a case study. You'll uncover insights into their performance metrics, strengths, and limitations, as well as the hidden costs that could impact your budget. Whether you're a developer seeking reliability, a strategist prioritizing creativity, or someone chasing speed, this breakdown will help you navigate the trade-offs. By the end, you might find yourself rethinking what matters most in an AI partner: precision, adaptability, or efficiency? AI Model Comparison Summary Project Overview: Developing 'Newsletter Digest' 'Newsletter Digest' is a web application that connects to Gmail, aggregates newsletters, and summarizes key stories for users. It also allows users to view individual newsletters in a streamlined interface. The app was developed using a modern tech stack to ensure scalability, responsiveness, and ease of use: A React-based framework for building a dynamic and efficient front end. A React-based framework for building a dynamic and efficient front end. Tailwind CSS: A utility-first CSS framework that enabled clean, responsive design. A utility-first CSS framework that enabled clean, responsive design. Neon: A Postgres database solution for managing user and application data. A Postgres database solution for managing user and application data. Prisma: A database toolkit that simplified schema generation and management. A database toolkit that simplified schema generation and management. Clerk: A user authentication and management tool integrated with Stripe for seamless billing functionality. The core functionality of summarizing newsletters relied on the capabilities of Claude, GPT-5, and Qwen Coder. These models were tested for their ability to deliver a functional app, their speed, usability, and cost-effectiveness. Comparing the AI Models Claude (Opus 4.1 and Sonnet 4) Claude proved to be the most reliable and mature AI model for this project. It excelled in generating a fully functional app with minimal errors, particularly in tasks such as database schema generation and implementing app features. Its workflow required fewer corrective prompts, which significantly reduced development time. However, this high level of performance came at a premium, as Claude was the most expensive model in the comparison. For developers prioritizing reliability and efficiency, Claude offers a robust solution, albeit at a higher cost. GPT-5 GPT-5 demonstrated strong strategic thinking and versatility but fell short in implementation compared to Claude. While it made reasonable progress in building the app, it required more corrective prompts and encountered occasional errors during the setup process. The Cursor CLI, used to interact with GPT-5, is still in beta, which introduced some glitches and limited functionality. Despite these challenges, GPT-5 showcased its ability to handle complex tasks with guidance, making it a viable option for developers who can invest additional time in troubleshooting and refinement. Qwen Coder Qwen Coder stood out for its speed, delivering rapid responses during the development process. However, it struggled to produce a complete and functional app. Its outputs were often incomplete, and it frequently stopped abruptly, requiring significant manual intervention to fill in the gaps. While its speed is promising, Qwen's lack of reliability and functionality placed it behind both Claude and GPT-5 in this comparison. Developers seeking a balance between speed and reliability may find Qwen less suitable for complex projects. ChatGPT-5 vs Claude vs Qwen Watch this video on YouTube. Stay informed about the latest in AI Models Comparison by exploring our other resources and articles. Performance Metrics The three AI models were evaluated based on their overall performance in building 'Newsletter Digest.' The results revealed clear distinctions in their capabilities: Claude: Delivered the most reliable and functional app with minimal errors and a smooth workflow. Delivered the most reliable and functional app with minimal errors and a smooth workflow. GPT-5: Ranked second, offering decent progress but requiring more corrections and encountering occasional errors. Ranked second, offering decent progress but requiring more corrections and encountering occasional errors. Qwen: Ranked third, excelling in speed but failing to deliver a complete and reliable app. Claude's ability to produce a polished and functional app with fewer iterations made it the top performer, while GPT-5's versatility and Qwen's speed highlighted their respective strengths and limitations. Cost Analysis Cost is a significant factor when selecting an AI model, particularly for projects with budget constraints. Here's a breakdown of the pricing for each model: Claude (Opus 4.1): $15 per million input tokens, $75 per million output tokens. $15 per million input tokens, $75 per million output tokens. GPT-5: $0.125 per 1,000 input tokens, $0.10 per 1,000 output tokens. $0.125 per 1,000 input tokens, $0.10 per 1,000 output tokens. Qwen: Pricing varies but is generally more affordable than Claude and GPT-5. While Claude was the most expensive option, its superior performance justified the higher cost for this project. GPT-5 offered a more affordable alternative with slightly reduced effectiveness, while Qwen's lower cost reflected its limited functionality and reliability. Insights on Development Tools The development process also highlighted the importance of the tools used alongside the AI models. These tools played a critical role in streamlining the workflow and making sure a smooth development experience: Clerk: Simplified user authentication and integrated seamlessly with Stripe for billing, reducing the complexity of managing user accounts. Simplified user authentication and integrated seamlessly with Stripe for billing, reducing the complexity of managing user accounts. Cursor CLI: Provided access to multiple AI models but, as a beta tool, had limited features and occasional glitches that impacted usability. Provided access to multiple AI models but, as a beta tool, had limited features and occasional glitches that impacted usability. Neon (Postgres DB): Worked effectively for database management, especially when paired with Prisma for schema generation and maintenance. While most tools performed well, the beta status of Cursor CLI highlighted the need for further refinement to improve its reliability and feature set. Looking Ahead: Future Considerations As of August 2025, the AI landscape continues to evolve, with emerging models like Grok and Gemini showing potential to disrupt the market. Developers should remain vigilant for advancements in AI capabilities and pricing structures. For now, Claude remains the preferred choice for projects requiring maturity, reliability, and comprehensive functionality. GPT-5 offers a strong alternative for tasks that demand strategic thinking and creative input, while Qwen Coder's speed may appeal to developers working on less complex applications. Continued refinement of tools like Cursor CLI and exploration of new technologies will further enhance the app development process, paving the way for more efficient and innovative solutions. Media Credit: Rob Shocks Filed Under: AI, Top News Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Travel chaos as Air Canada suspends ALL operations
Air Canada has cancelled hundreds of flights and suspended all operations following a massive strike by unionized flight attendants. The airline was forced to ground planes after 10,000 staff walked out amid a bitter contract dispute. The industrial action began on Saturday at around 1am ET and immediately saw all 700 flights per day the airline offers cancelled. Around 130,000 people could be impacted for every day the strike continues. Air Canada is the foreign carrier with the largest number of flights to the U.S. Flight attendants are seeking changes which would see them be paid for time spent on the ground between flights and helping passengers board. The feud escalated Friday, after the union turned down the airline's request to enter into government-directed arbitration, which would eliminate its right to strike and allow a third-party mediator to decide the terms of a new contract. Canadian Union of Public Employees spokesman Hugh Pouliot confirmed the strike has started after no deal was reached and operations were halted shortly after. Air Canada said it planned to begin locking flight attendants out of airports as the walkout commenced. Canada's Federal Jobs Minister Patty Hajdu met with both the airline and union on Friday night and urged them to work harder to them to reach a deal 'once and for all'. 'It is unacceptable that such little progress has been made. Canadians are counting on both parties to put forward their best efforts,' Hajdu said in a statement posted on social media. Pouliot, the spokesman for the union, earlier said the union had a meeting with Hajdu and representatives from Air Canada earlier Friday evening. 'CUPE has engaged with the mediator to relay our willingness to continue bargaining - despite the fact that Air Canada has not countered our last two offers since Tuesday,' he said in a email. 'We´re here to bargain a deal, not to go on strike.' A complete shutdown will impact about 130,000 people a day, and some 25,000 Canadians a day may be stranded abroad. Air Canada operates around 700 flights per day. Montreal resident Alex Laroche, 21, and his girlfriend had been saving since Christmas for their European vacation. Their $8,000 trip with nonrefundable lodging is on the line as they wait to hear from Air Canada about the fate of their Saturday night flight to Nice, France. The length of the strike is yet to be determined, but Air Canada Chief Operating Officer Mark Nasr has said it could take up to a week to fully restart operations once a tentative deal is reached. Passengers whose travel is impacted will be eligible to request a full refund on the airline's website or mobile app, according to Air Canada. The airline said it would also offer alternative travel options through other Canadian and foreign airlines when possible. But it warned that it could not guarantee immediate rebooking because flights on other airlines are already full 'due to the summer travel peak.' Laroche said he considered booking new flights with a different carrier, but he said most of them are nearly full and cost more than double the $3,000 they paid for their original tickets. 'At this point, it´s just a waiting game,' he said. Laroche said he was initially upset over the union´s decision to go on strike, but that he had a change of heart after reading about the key issues at the center of the contract negotiations, including the issue of wages. 'Their wage is barely livable,' Laroche said. Air Canada and the Canadian Union of Public Employees have been in contract talks for about eight months, but they have yet to reach a tentative deal. Both sides say they remain far apart on the issue of pay and the unpaid work flight attendants do when planes aren´t in the air. The airline´s latest offer included a 38 percent increase in total compensation, including benefits and pensions over four years, that it said 'would have made our flight attendants the best compensated in Canada.' But the union pushed back, saying the proposed 8 percent raise in the first year didn´t go far enough because of inflation.
