Nation's Report Card spurs calls for change as reading and math scores circle the drain
Data released Wednesday in the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), commonly referred to as the Nation's Report Card, showed reading scores have fallen even further for fourth and eighth graders than they did in 2022, while math scores show only slight progress for fourth graders but still not enough to catch up to prepandemic numbers.
'These results are both heartbreaking and tragic,' said Alicia Levi, president and CEO of Reading is Fundamental. 'We need to take action. … We are calling on, leaders from all sectors, public and private, to join us in this fight.'
Increasing investment, preparing educators with new ways to teach subjects and acknowledging students are moving up grades without the fundamentals are all crucial for fixing the problems, according to experts.
Reading scores took the biggest hit, with the percentage of eighth graders able to read at NAEP's basic line at the lowest in the assessment's history.
The news is even worse for the lowest-performing students: Those in just the 10th and 25th percentiles for both fourth and eighth grade had the lowest scores since NAEP's first reading assessment in 1992.
Brandon Cardet-Hernandez, president of Mrs. Wordsmith, a group that seeks to improve children's literacy outcomes, called it 'a state of emergency.'
'We know that 70 percent of incarcerated people read below fourth grade level. We know that literacy is deeply tied to our economic opportunities and our health outcomes. So, particularly coming out of $190 billion in ESSER funds, it's a tough day to hear that we have not made progress and actually lost ground in our reading proficiency across the country,' Cardet-Hernandez said, referring to the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund (ESSER).
Seeking to combat the problem, numerous school districts and states in recent years have required educators to switch how they teach reading to a method called the 'science of reading.'
Previously, those educators used the 'balanced literacy' method, which focused on teaching students how to read using cues or context in the text. The science of reading instead focuses on ensuring students understand phonics when learning to read.
Whether NAEP's flagging scores are an indictment of the method cannot yet be determined, according to experts.
New York City, which holds the largest public school district in the country, switched to the science of reading in 2023, giving only one academic year between the concept's implementation and the NAEP's assessment.
'It's way too soon to have expected to see the trickle down from state level policy initiatives being implemented and then actually enacted at the school level in ways that would support faster development on the part of a student,' said Karyn Lewis, director of the Center for School and Student Progress at NWEA, an education research group.
'I think in education we are often way too reactionary and want to pull back before we have full evidence about whether a policy or an initiative is working,' Lewis added.
Math scores saw somewhat better outcomes, though they are little cause for celebration.
Fourth graders had a 2-point gain in math but were still unable to overcome the 5-point drop that was seen in the subject when the pandemic began. Eighth graders had no significant changes in their math scores.
Math has been assisted by extra federal dollars going toward tutors and after-school programs, and critics say that type of investment was not made for reading.
'We're not making the investment,' Levi said. 'I see today that there is such public and private sector investment in STEM — the idea that science and math and technology are the future and that we need to double, triple, quadruple our investment — and you are seeing the results of that is reading has been left behind.'
Experts say reading is also a harder subject to play catch-up on when students fall behind, and how teachers are trained for this problem needs to change.
'We know that math is made of more discrete skills that are probably much easier to target for intervention,' Lewis said. 'You can identify, for instance, that a student is struggling with long division, and then you know the specific steps to intervene there and get them caught up with that specific skill set. In contrast, reading is cumulative.'
Adult literacy has also fallen, according to numbers released last month.
The National Center for Education Statistics, part of the Department of Education, released data in December showing 28 percent of adults in the U.S. are ranked at the lowest levels of literacy, compared to 19 percent in 2017.
As students' progress through the grades, reading goes from a subject that is taught to a subject that is assumed. After third grade, students are expected to be expanding their knowledge through reading in new subjects, and educators are not expected to teach how to read the material.
'I think we are seeing the effects of the fact that early elementary students, early elementary teachers, they're the most well-prepared to teach those foundational skills,' said Lewis. 'And we've got students leaving those early elementary grades missing some of those foundational skills due to the school disruptions, and they're coming into the classroom of more advanced teachers who may not be prepared to support those foundational reading gaps.'
'I think we're seeing a mismatch between the needs of students and the preparation of our teacher workforce,' she added.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Boston Globe
26-07-2025
- Boston Globe
Kids still aren't going to school. Here are six big ideas to get absenteeism under control.
At that rate of decline, it will take another 21 years for the state's students to show up at their pre-pandemic rate. Related : Advertisement Is there any hope to turn things around? The Globe went looking for big ideas that might work. Here's what we found: Pay students for attendance Boston School Committee member Brandon Cardet-Hernandez has called for Think that's extreme? This approach has been The Detroit program, which officials recently decided to extend, caps out at $1,000 per student per year. That may sound exorbitant, but Massachusetts spends more than $21,000 per student per year; spending a fraction to make sure those students actually attend school could be worth it. Advertisement Cardet-Hernandez said it was missed opportunity to not use the state's federal pandemic relief funds on paying for attendance. Doing so would be an 'upfront investment' in the future of the region's students and economy. 'When we have young people who are years behind in literacy and math skills, is there an opportunity for us to think differently about our values and to create a financial incentive to grow those skills?' he asked. Related : Make kids get some sleep Tim Daly, chief executive officer of the education nonprofit EdNavigator, pointed to Sleep is a hard problem for schools to address — it happens when children are at home — but Daly had one idea for how schools could help: disabling school-issued devices. 'Sometimes when kids stay up too late, they're using the devices to 'do homework' but really they're using them to stream,' Daly said. 'Not only would [disabling them] prevent them that, [schools] can message to parents, when that goes off, it's time to go to sleep.' Some school-issued devices have restrictions on non-academic uses, but often those only apply on district internet, and committed children can get around them. Even if the devices are being used for homework, staying up late working on homework is bad for sleep. Parents can also restrict screentime, whether schools step in or not. 'The most important thing we need to do is help kids with their nighttime routines,' Daly said. Some districts have also moved high school start times later to better align them with adolescent sleep cycles. Advertisement Focus on the neediest students Lawrence Public Schools, a high-poverty district that serves large numbers of immigrants, has made major gains from its peak in 2022, when the majority of students were chronically absent. Its overall rate is higher than the state, but rapid progress has continued. As of March of this year, absenteeism was down to 21 percent, a 4.5 point improvement from 2024, and many groups — low income students, English learners, and Black students — have lower absenteeism rates than peers statewide. Ralph Carrero, the superintendent, said the district's Homeless/Newcomer Coalition was the key intervention. The coalition brings together more than a dozen of the city's social service agencies and nonprofits — housing, healthcare, transportation, food, and more. The members meet monthly to individually discuss every homeless or new-to-the-country immigrant student in the district and make sure their needs are being met, in and outside of school. 'It's not a formula, it's not a secret, it's paying attention,' Carrero said. The district has about 500 homeless students each year and many recent immigrants, so focusing on meeting their needs has a big impact on attendance. Get pediatricians involved Mary Beth Miotto, a pediatrician and former president of the state chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics, encourages her colleagues to consider school attendance a 'vital sign,' just like blood pressure. Because pediatricians are not part of the school system, Miotto has found she can have positive conversations with parents without unintentionally invoking the specter of truancy. Advertisement Absenteeism is highest among high-needs populations, including low income students, who may not have primary care physicians, so Miotto said everyone in the medical profession, including ER and urgent care doctors, should be asking about school attendance. 'We can pour all the money into schools and teachers, but if kids aren't showing up, it's not helping,' she said. Restructure schools around relationships Hedy Chang, founder and director of the nonprofit Attendance Works, praised Providence's Nathanael Greene Middle School, which cut its absenteeism rate from more than 50 percent in 2021-22 to 30 percent in 2023-24, about equal to its pre-pandemic level. Attendance experts swear by relationship-building, as students have to believe people will miss them when they're gone, but just deciding to build relationships isn't necessarily enough. The school's principal, W. Jackson Reilly, 'reorganized the school so relationship-building was built into how it operated,' Chang said. Students are divided into cohorts, with a specified team of teachers sticking to one of them, Chang said. Each cohort also had classrooms close to each other. Related : This meant that the students were face-to-face with the same group of classmates and teachers, every day, rather than bouncing around to far-flung parts of the school. Districts need to design schools so relationships don't depend on 'happenstance,' Chang said. Robert Balfanz, the director of the Everyone Graduates Center at Johns Hopkins University School of Education, suggested bringing in outside mentors, such as local college students, for a similar reason. 'If you're a school with 200 or 300 chronically absent kids, you're going to have to form some partnerships,' he said. 'Get more adults in the school.' Advertisement Even tutoring, which can be hamstrung by high absenteeism, In some cases, incentivize through consequences Absenteeism has risen in every type of district since the pandemic, and in some places, 'negative nudges' could help, Balfanz said. For example, he said, many high schoolers play hooky regularly but still turn in the assignments posted online by their teachers so their grades aren't negatively affected. Some of those students might attend regularly if their grades were on the line for attendance or if the homework wasn't online. 'The benefits of being in school are more than just the assignments,' Balfanz noted. 'If I'm on a four-day-a-week plan and think I can skate by, a more negative nudge might get me to make that fifth day.' But he warned the approach has risks: if a student is avoiding school due to bullying, for example, punitive options might instead drive them further away. Christopher Huffaker can be reached at

USA Today
22-07-2025
- USA Today
School cell phone bans are a distraction. The real crisis isn't in your kid's hand.
Banning phones won't turn back the clock on childhood. It will just widen the gap between the kids who have and the kids who don't. Dear parents, every August, we buy the pencils, we pack the lunches and we tell ourselves we're ready. But as another school year begins, I want to ask you to take a breath – and look past the headlines. Because if you believe what you're hearing, the biggest threat to our kids' future is in their pockets. Banning phones in schools, they say, will cure anxiety, raise test scores, restore childhood. I understand the instinct – I'm a father myself. But I've also been a teacher, a principal, a senior education advisor to former New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio who oversaw the country's largest school system – and now the president of an education company. And I'm telling you: this is a distraction. Of course we don't want kids using their phones throughout the school day without purpose and intentionality. But the real crisis isn't in your kid's hand. It's in their reading scores. Right now, one third of American eighth graders can't read at the National Assessment of Educational Progress "basic" testing benchmark. In some districts, the numbers are even worse. This isn't a new problem – it's just one we keep refusing to face head-on. Instead, we reach for easy fixes, fueled by nostalgia and fear. But banning phones won't turn back the clock on childhood. It will just widen the gap between the kids who have and the kids who don't. Opinion: My 4-year-old asked for a smartphone. Here's what I did next as a parent. Here's what I've seen in the classroom: when you take away cell phones, you don't create equity – you erase it. In underfunded schools, smartphones are calculators, translators, research tools and sometimes the only reliable internet connection a student has. For multilingual learners, for kids without Wi-Fi at home, that device is a lifeline. When we ban it, we're not protecting them – we're pulling up the ladder. Not all screens are created equal Let's be honest. The anxious generation isn't our kids – it's us. We're the ones struggling to navigate a changing world, grasping for control. But our children don't need us to fear the future. They need us to prepare them for it. That means leaning into digital literacy, not running from it. It means investing in the tools and teaching that help kids learn how to use technology wisely. And it means addressing the root of the problem – not the symptom – by giving every child access to the kind of reading instruction, books and support they need to thrive. Your Turn: Tablets, screen time aren't 'parenting hacks.' They're killing kids' attention spans. | Opinion Forum I believe in meeting kids where they are – because that's where real learning begins. Not all screens are created equal, and the goal isn't to eliminate technology but to use it wisely. There's a big difference between passive consumption and purposeful practice. Research shows that just 15 to 20 minutes a day of focused, high-quality reading can drive real progress – especially when it's supported by tools that are engaging, accessible and grounded in how kids actually learn. That's the idea behind many of the resources we build at Mrs Wordsmith, a company of which I'm president and where we use cell phones and other nontraditional approaches to teach students how to read. This school year, don't let the conversation get hijacked. Ask your school leaders the hard questions, such as how are you teaching reading? How are you using technology to support learning? And what are you doing to ensure every child has the skills and knowledge to thrive in school and beyond? Our kids deserve better than blanket bans and wishful thinking. They deserve an education built for the world they're actually going to live in. Brandon Cardet-Hernandez is a member of the Boston School Committee and the president of Mrs Wordsmith. You can read diverse opinions from our USA TODAY columnists and other writers on the Opinion front page, on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and in our Opinion newsletter.

Boston Globe
19-07-2025
- Boston Globe
2 ban or not 2 ban: Contrasting views on cellphones in schools
Making sure phones are off and put away at least gives teachers a chance to run the classroom free of technological distractions, and it gives kids more age-important interpersonal interactions than if their heads are constantly buried in their phones. Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up The one study Cardet-Hernandez cites about teens and depression relies on data gathered between 2009 and 2017 and could hardly be called conclusive (surely a few things have changed in social media and in American life since then). Advertisement Take it from someone who's in the classroom: The buzz about keeping phones out is justified. The push to diminish their stranglehold on kids' lives should take place at home, too. Max F. Roberts Natick The writer is a history teacher at Newton North High School. Students should learn how these devices can enhance their education Thank you to Brandon Cardet-Hernandez for his op-ed, Advertisement Legislators and other state officials also should do more to increase student time in classrooms and to develop high-stakes curriculum and testing for student success. They should also commit to increasing student opportunities to attend classrooms offering vocational and academic education. Right now, Ford Spalding Westwood The writer is a former member of the School Committee for the Minuteman Regional Vocational Technical High School in Lexington. Insidious distraction or lifeline to the world? Brandon Cardet-Hernandez's op-ed was paired with a counter op-ed by Jhilam Biswas, headlined Following is an edited sampling of comments on that piece by online readers: We are performing a giant experiment on the minds of children, one we mostly did not seek, that involves powerful tech companies employing behavioral and other techniques to get kids (and adults) viciously addicted to their devices. Can't be a good outcome. (Hanscome) Cellphones enable deep connections with people not in one's immediate vicinity as well as enabling contact in emergencies. This reflexive bashing of the digital world is ridiculous. (FNA) These devices and apps are designed to be addictive. Many adults have trouble putting them aside. For kids, they're normalizing being distracted. (greengrassofmass)



