Democrat Mikie Sherrill wins NJ gubernatorial primary, setting up showdown with Trump-backed GOP winner
MORRISTOWN, N.J. — Rep. Mikie Sherrill won New Jersey's Democrat gubernatorial primary on Tuesday night.
The Associated Press projects that Sherrill has won the primary, which tees up a competitive race against three-time gubernatorial candidate and former GOP state lawmaker Jack Ciattarelli to replace Democrat Gov. Phil Murphy, who is term-limited this year.
Sherill swept a crowded field of Democrat candidates, including Newark Mayor Ras Baraka, Jersey City Mayor Steve Fulop, New Jersey Education Association President Sean Spiller, former New Jersey Senate President Steve Sweeney and fellow U.S. Rep. Josh Gottheimer.
Democrat and Republican candidates often mentioned President Donald Trump's name on the New Jersey campaign trail as Democrats positioned themselves as the most anti-Trump and Republicans vied to be the most pro-Trump candidate. It was Ciattarelli who landed the Trump endorsement as Democrats worked to contrast the president's vision with their own.
Trump Not On Ballot, But President Front And Center In New Jersey's Primary For Governor
New Jersey is one of just two governor's races in 2025, along with Virginia. Both will be used by politicians and pundits to gauge how Americans are responding to Trump's second term ahead of the midterm elections next year.
Read On The Fox News App
Trump Front-and-center In Republican Primary For Governor As Early Voting Kicks Off
As they campaigned for the coveted nomination, Democrat candidates walked a fine line between building on Murphy's legacy and promising to change the status quo in Trenton. Like Murphy, Democrat candidates have rejected Trump's executive orders, his crackdown on illegal immigration and the Department of Government Efficiency spending cuts.
Acting as the last line of defense to a sweeping Republican agenda, Democrat governors have often rejected Trump's executive actions during his second term. By suing the Trump administration to unlock federal funds or refusing to comply with ICE deportations, Democrat governors, including many rumored to harbor 2028 presidential ambitions, are often leading the party's resistance to Trump.
Trump once again took center stage on Tuesday as Sherrill and Gottheimer were peppered with questions by the press about the protests and riots unfolding in Los Angeles.
When asked how she would handle the ongoing situation in Los Angeles differently from Gov. Gavin Newsom, Sherrill touted her military and law enforcement background and told Fox News Digital she would stand up "strongly in favor of keeping people here in the state safe," return safety to the streets and continue "speaking out against a president who is trying to create violence in the country."
Sherrill is a Navy veteran and served in the U.S. Attorney's Office in New Jersey as an outreach and re-entry coordinator, which she described as prosecuting federal cases and advising law enforcement on investigations.
"Governor Newsom surged law enforcement in, and what Trump seems to be doing is trying to add fuel to the fire and really make the situation violent and bad," Sherrill told reporters after casting her ballot in Montclair on Tuesday morning. "That's completely unacceptable."
Gottheimer said it was "outrageous" for Trump to send the National Guard to California without Newsom's request.
"The fact that the president, for the first time since 1965, sent troops in from the National Guard without a request from the governor is outrageous. It's just more chaos that we're used to having in this administration. It's not how I would approach this," Gottheimer told Fox News Digital after voting in Tenafly.
Democrat candidates threw their support behind Baraka last month after he was arrested for trespassing at an ICE facility in Newark. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) called it a "beyond bizarre political stunt," but Baraka has maintained that he did nothing wrong.
Last week, Baraka filed a lawsuit against Alina Habba, U.S. attorney for the District of New Jersey, and DHS Agent Ricky Patel "for false arrest, malicious prosecution, and defamation."
Trump outperformed in the Garden State in 2024, according to Fox News Voter Analysis.
While former Vice President Kamala Harris won New Jersey in 2024 as expected, Trump saw a nearly five-point improvement from his 2020 vote share, and Harris' support dropped by about five points. He gained across New Jersey, with his largest swings in the northeast corner of the state; Hudson and Passaic counties led the pack.
Ciattarelli lost by a hair to Murphy in 2021 and framed his candidacy as a referendum on the Democrat policies that have driven New Jersey for the past eight years.
Fox News' Remy Numa contributed to this report. Original article source: Democrat Mikie Sherrill wins NJ gubernatorial primary, setting up showdown with Trump-backed GOP winner
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Congressman curses fellow lawmaker on House floor
WASHINGTON (NEXSTAR) – New York Democratic Congressman John Mannion cursed out Republican Congressman Mike Lawler on the House floor, Thursday. Video caught the congressman shouting as the rest of the House floor fell silent 'I said it loud enough for him to hear. I did, and he turned to me and then you see the exchange that occurred,' said Mannion. The congressman's outburst came shortly after California Senator Alex Padilla was forced out of a news conference in Los Angeles and handcuffed. Mannion defended his actions saying Republicans, like Lawler, are letting the president and the administration walk over the Constitution. 'He's not standing up to the president. He is ceding his authority, along with the other Republicans, to the president, as is the speaker of the House,' said Mannion. Todd Belt with George Washington University says the country is reaching a boiling point as these aren't the usual things lawmakers would say to each other. 'Tempers are really flaring up over what's going on with these Ice raids, and how members of Congress are being arrested and thrown to the ground and handcuffed,' said Belt. Belt says this could be the start of more to come on the House or Senate floor. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
DHS turns tables on Elizabeth Warren after calling for Noem to resign: 'Trying to revise history'
Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., joined the chorus of Democrats criticizing Department of Homeland Security Kristi Noem after Sen. Alex Padilla, D-Calif., was stopped by Secret Service agents after interrupting a DHS press conference in Los Angeles on Thursday. "It's time for Republican Senators to speak up. We need an independent investigation of this," Warren said on MSNBC's "All In with Chris Hayes" on Thursday night. "It is also time for Kristi Noem to resign. She needs to resign," she added. Kristi Noem Suspects 'Completely Inappropriate' Democratic Senator 'Wanted The Scene' Padilla was briefly placed in handcuffs and kicked out of the room by the Secret Service after he entered the press conference and attempted to ask the secretary a question in the middle of her remarks. He identified himself by name as a senator, but he was not wearing a security pin during the incident, according to the FBI. "Everything is on camera—Warren is trying to revise history on Senator Padilla's embarrassing conduct, but Americans can see with their own eyes," Assistant DHS Secretary Tricia McLaughlin stated. Read On The Fox News App Click Here For More Immigration Coverage "Senator Padilla entered a high-security federal facility under false pretenses and crashed an invite-only press conference as law enforcement are working around the clock to calm violent riots," McLaughlin continued. "There's no excuse for busting into a press conference and interrupting it. Had Senator Padilla asked for a meeting, Secretary Noem would have happily obliged, which she graciously did for 15 minutes after the press conference." 'Spectacle Of Himself': Senate Republicans Blast Alex Padilla After His Forcible Removal From Dhs Presser Padilla tried to manufacture a viral moment and it's embarrassing & disrespectful to law enforcement," she added. The Democrat and Noem did end up having a brief meeting where they exchanged phone numbers. Fox News reported that Noem described the meeting as "cordial and beneficial," and Padilla's office said it was "civil." The press conference addressed the civil unrest in the Los Angeles area as Immigration and Customs Enforcement continues to arrest illegal immigrants. Schiff Demands Noem's Resignation After Fellow Senator Forcibly Removed From Briefing "The Senator met with Secretary Noem this afternoon. He raised concerns with the deployment of military forces and the needless escalation over the last week, among other issues. And he voiced his frustration with the continued lack of response from this administration," Edgar D. Rodríguez, Deputy Communications Director for Padilla, posted to X. "It was a civil, brief meeting, but the Secretary did not provide any meaningful answers. The Senator was simply trying to do his job and seek answers for the people he represents in California," he added. Other Democrats, like California Sen. Adam Schiff and Rep. Eric Swalwell, have called on Noem to step down. Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski condemned how the incident was handled, whereas others, like sports commentator Stephen A. Smith, slammed the incident on his show, hypothetically asking Padilla, "You couldn't wait?"Original article source: DHS turns tables on Elizabeth Warren after calling for Noem to resign: 'Trying to revise history'
Miami Herald
37 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Why the US is stronger than you think – and what that means for a world on edge
Contrary to common belief in the last two decades, the U.S. is not in decline militarily, economically, or technologically - at least according to GZERO Media founder Ian Bremmer. In a speech delivered at the AICPA's annual conference, Bremmer detailed significant global geopolitical shifts and their implications, focusing on the role of the U.S. and the emergence of new populist trends. Bremmer, who also founded political risk research and consulting firm Eurasia Group, noted a major geopolitical shift over the past 20 years as the U.S. became asymmetrically more powerful than its allies such as Europe, Japan, South Korea, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. These allies, he said, have weakened demographically, technologically, and due to underinvestment in defense and productivity. "The United States is actually not in decline," he said. "Not militarily, not economically, certainly not technologically, and increasingly dangerous global order. The U.S. is in by far the most stable part of it geographically." Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter In fact, he noted that, currently, only two countries are technologically dominant: China in post-carbon energy (nuclear, solar, EVs, supply chains, critical minerals) and the U.S. in artificial intelligence (hyperscalers, chips, compute). At present, the primary driver of global uncertainty and geopolitical volatility that "feels so dangerous to people is that the most powerful country in the world has decided that they, we, do not want to play the leadership role by the old rules." From Bremmer's perspective, that means saying "no" to U.S.-led collective security, a global trade system shaped by Washington, and American-backed international law and democratic values. And this change, he said, "profoundly impacts U.S.-aligned democracies that relied on this leadership." Image source: Eric Tompkins on Unsplash Before reports emerged of Israeli strikes on Iran's nuclear and military sites, Bremmer said the U.S. was strategically using leverage to push Iran toward a nuclear enrichment deal – a key priority for President Trump. Bremmer noted Iran's weakened position, citing setbacks involving Hezbollah, Bashar al-Assad, and Hamas, along with Gulf States' support for a deal, as factors making an agreement more likely. He acknowledged the possibility of Israeli military action if Iran delays but maintained that a deal remains the expected outcome. Trump's recent warning of "even more brutal" attacks if Iran refuses a deal may further increase pressure on Tehran. According to Bremmer, Trump's success stems from identifying "exactly what the pain points are for the bulk of the American population: ending wars, achieving fair trade, and securing borders. "His positions on these issues," Bremmer said, "are more popular than the Democrats." To be fair, Bremmer said Trump has "almost no interest in the specifics of policy." And unlike in his first term, President Trump now appoints individuals fiercely loyal to him, not necessarily to the Republican party or establishment, Bremmer said. "They may be great, really smart, they may not, but they are going to be fiercely first and foremost loyal to [Trump]," said Bremmer. Related: These are the most tax-friendly states if you work in retirement The president also relies heavily on his own judgment, believes he is always right, externalizes blame, and is less concerned about market reactions. "He's completely convinced that he's right on these issues," said Bremmer. "If things go wrong, it is someone else. It is not him." What's more, his top advisers are much less likely to tell him when they disagree, leading to a lack of critical feedback. "Trump is less concerned about market reaction to what he is doing than he was [in his] first term," said Bremmer. "So, he's more willing to see a longer period of economic impact." And "he's much less aware that anything he's doing might be problematic because he's not hearing it from his top advisers." The new global driver is the U.S., the most powerful country, willing to use its leverage, not lead historically, and unconcerned about whether it causes pain in other parts of the world. That same approach is also reshaping global trade dynamics. Bremmer noted, for instance, that the International Trade Court's ruling against Trump's broad use of emergency tariff powers under AIPA will prolong uncertainty in global trade – something "markets hate" - as the case likely heads to the Supreme Court, with a decision expected by late fall or early winter. Regardless of court rulings, Bremmer predicted that blended U.S. global tariffs will rise to 12-15% (1940s levels), a cost not yet priced into markets. He said this would lead to supply chain disruptions, potentially resulting in empty shelves at retailers over the summer, causing panic and increasing trade tensions. "Most of the things out there that we buy are not yet affected by the supply chain challenge you're about to see," said Bremmer. "They will over the course of the summer. You won't get stuff on Amazon Prime. You'll go to Walmart. A lot of shelves will be empty. That will cause a level of panic and unease and anxiety." Bremmer also noted that Mexico is capitulating to U.S. demands on issues like fentanyl and illegal immigration due to its heavy reliance on the U.S. economy (over 80% of exports to the U.S.). And Canada, despite a new politically consequential prime minister, is structurally built for North-South trade with the U.S., making a significant pivot away difficult due to its infrastructure and provincial power. Bremmer said Trump has realized "he's not getting a deal" with Putin. As a result, he's now prepared to continue supplying intelligence and weapons to Ukraine. Related: How the IRS taxes Social Security income in retirement Meanwhile, European allies are ramping up defense spending – NATO targeting 5% of GDP, the UK at 3.5%, and Canada at 2% - largely under pressure from Trump. "NATO will be stronger," Bremmer said. The downside: the war isn't ending anytime soon. Sanctions on Russia will remain, and Bremmer warned that Moscow is likely to escalate its attacks, "killing more Ukrainians." According to Bremmer, recent interactions, including a call between Trump and Xi Jinping, are stabilizing but do not represent a breakthrough. "I wouldn't call it positive," said Bremmer. "I would call it stabilizing. It's less negative than what we've seen for the last few months." The U.S., he said, remains focused on export controls for semiconductors and pressuring allies to choose the U.S. over China in advanced technology. But China is in a "wait and see" mode, believing that U.S. actions (undermining allies, making itself less attractive for high-skilled immigration) will ultimately benefit China long-term. "They know that this is going to cause more economic pain to China than the U.S.," said Bremmer. "But they also feel like they are politically stronger. They're more patient. They can wait the Americans out." So Bremmer's bottom line: "I do not believe that we are set for a U.S.-China breakthrough." While not a bond market expert, Bremmer said Trump's quick reversal on firing Fed Chair Powell shows that the bond market remains a "clear red line" for Trump, given the potential for severe fallout. "The one area where Trump was hit in the face hard by everyone and backed off completely was when he said, 'I'm thinking about firing Fed chair Powell,'" said Bremmer. "I think that that does say something – that even in this environment, where Trump is more willing to push and is getting less information, there still are some clear red lines. And this is a clear red line." Despite high debt, Bremmer said the U.S. benefits from its reserve currency status, technological dominance, and military umbrella, making it difficult for other countries to "derisk" from the U.S. Bremmer suggested that in the age of exploding AI, short-term spending as much as humanly possible might be market and geopolitically positive for the U.S., provided it's spent wisely (e.g., chips, education). While historically overdue for a recession (averaging every seven years post-WWII), the massive Covid stimulus and the unprecedented growth of AI capabilities (doubling every six months) could fundamentally alter economic cycles, making traditional definitions of recession less applicable, said Bremmer. It is "inconceivable," said Bremmer, for the U.S. to return to being a manufacturing economy as it once was. "The U.S. is not a manufacturing economy anymore," he said. Any new manufacturing will be driven by robotics, automation, and AI, requiring far fewer workers, which could ironically put more pressure on existing manufacturing labor. This shift is part of broader "incoherent, angry, anxious" movements that will focus on economic displacement. Bremmer suggested that likelihood of war in the near term is "very low." China aims to appear "more responsible and more stable" while the U.S. undermines its own allies. However, China will continue to squeeze Taiwan's leadership with military exercises and economic sanctions, said Bremmer. This remains a long-term concern, but not for the immediate future. Bremmer stated definitively that Trump has never said he will run again and is not running again, despite media questions. Bremmer also believes Elon Musk understands he "damaged his interests" by fighting with Trump, and "that getting into a long-term fight with Trump was unsustainable." And Musk, according to Bremmer, is expected to support Trump's political goals and candidates in the midterms. The Democratic Party is not expected to settle on a coherent platform until closer to 2028 due to a broad range of views among potential leaders, according to Bremmer. And the midterm elections will be a decision about Trump. While Trump is currently doing well on immigration and the economy, his economic standing is expected to weaken over the summer due to trade issues, said Bremmer. What's more, a much stronger push to the economic populist left is anticipated, a phenomenon not seen since the post-Gilded Age. According to Bremmer, current populism from the right is driven by disaffected industrial working-class men in former industrialized places like Appalachia, the Rust Belt, and former East Germany, focusing on manufacturing and anti-immigrant sentiment. Bremmer predicts an enormous spike of populism from the left in the next electoral cycle, driven by college-educated, urban, white-collar professionals losing jobs due to AI. This movement, he said, will be more progressive on cultural issues but strongly opposed to the "deep state," major corporations, banks, and technology companies. Got questions about retirement, email Stagflation Risks: Shield Your Retirement Portfolio The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
