New Trump travel ban could 'bar Pakistanis, Afghans' from entering US
A new travel ban by President Donald Trump could bar people from Afghanistan and Pakistan from entering the US as soon as next week based on a government review of countries' security and vetting risks, three sources familiar with the matter said.
The three sources, who requested anonymity, said other countries could also be on the list but did not know which ones.
The move harkens back to the Republican president's first term ban on travellers from seven majority-Muslim nations, a policy that went through several iterations before it was upheld by the Supreme Court in 2018.
Ban a 'stain on our national conscience'
Former President Joe Biden, a Democrat who succeeded Trump, repealed the ban in 2021, calling it "a stain on our national conscience.'
The new ban could affect tens of thousands of Afghans who have been cleared for resettlement in the US as refugees or on Special Immigrant Visas because they are at risk of Taliban retribution for working for the US during a 20-year war in their home country.
Trump issued an executive order on Jan.20 requiring intensified security vetting of any foreigners seeking admission to the US to detect national security threats.
That order directed several cabinet members to submit by March 21 a list of countries from which travel should be partly or fully suspended because their "vetting and screening information is so deficient."
Afghanistan will be included in the recommended list of countries for a complete travel ban, said the three sources and one other who also asked not to be identified.
The three sources said Pakistan also would be recommended for inclusion. The departments of State, Justice and Homeland Security and the Office of the Director for National Intelligence, whose leaders are overseeing the initiative, did not respond immediately to requests for comment.
One source pointed out that Afghans cleared for resettlement in the US as refugees or on the special visas first undergo intense screening that makes them "more highly vetted than any population" in the world.
Exemption may not be granted
The State Department office that oversees their resettlement is seeking an exemption for Special Immigrant Visa holders from the travel ban "but it's not assumed likely to be granted," the source said.
That office, the Coordinator for Afghan Relocation Efforts, has been told to develop a plan by April for its closure, Reuters reported last month.
The Taliban, who seized Kabul as the last US troops pulled out in August 2021 after two decades of war, are confronting an insurgency by Daesh's regional branch. Pakistan also is grappling with violent militants.
Trump's directive is part of an immigration crackdown that he launched at the start of his second term.
He previewed his plan in an October 2023 speech, pledging to restrict people from the Gaza Strip, Libya, Somalia, Syria, Yemen and "anywhere else that threatens our security."
Go to America 'as soon as you can'
Shawn VanDiver, the head of #AfghanEvac, a coalition of groups that coordinates evacuation and resettlement of Afghans with the US government, urged those holding valid US visas to travel as soon as possible if they can.
"While no official announcement has been made, multiple sources within the US government suggest a new travel restriction could be implemented within the next week," he said in a statement.
This "may significantly impact Afghan visa holders who have been awaiting relocation" to the US, he said.
There are some 200,000 Afghans who have been approved for US resettlement or have pending US refugee and Special Immigrant Visa applications.
They have been stranded in Afghanistan and nearly 90 other countries – including about 20,000 in Pakistan – since January 20, when Trump ordered a 90-day freeze on refugee admissions and foreign aid that funds their flights.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Zawya
35 minutes ago
- Zawya
Gold retreats from near four-week peak as dollar ticks up
Gold prices fell on Tuesday, retreating from near a four-week high, as a modest rise in the dollar weighed on the metal, although uncertainty over the U.S.-China trade agreement kept investors cautious and limited the bullion's decline. Spot gold fell 0.5% to $3,362.57 an ounce, as of 0429 GMT, after hitting its highest level since May 8 earlier in the session. U.S. gold futures were down 0.3% to $3,386.60. The metal gained about 2.7% in the previous session, marking its strongest daily performance in more than three weeks. "Dollar recovered slightly and gold came down so it has been inversely correlated at this point of time," said Brian Lan, managing director at GoldSilver Central, Singapore. However, gold is still closely tracking developments around global trade, and while investors have slightly reduced their positions in gold, it is not to the extent seen in previous instances when tensions appeared to ease, said Lan. The U.S. dollar index recovered slightly from a six-week low. Trade-related uncertainty remains a key focus. U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping will likely speak this week, the White House said on Monday, days after Trump accused China of violating an agreement to roll back tariffs and trade restrictions. U.S. tariffs on imported steel and aluminum are scheduled to double to 50% on Wednesday, coinciding with the Trump administration's deadline for countries to submit their best offers in trade negotiations. The European Commission said on Monday it would make a strong case this week for the U.S. to reduce or eliminate tariffs despite Trump's decision to double import duties on steel and aluminum. Elsewhere, spot silver fell 1.9% to $34.12 an ounce, platinum edged up 0.1% to $1,064.66 and palladium was down 0.1% at $986.10. (Reporting by Anmol Choubey in Bengaluru; Editing by Rashmi Aich and Eileen Soreng)
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Trump's deals don't help the US, but you can profit anyway
Since my previous column detailing US President Donald Trump's tariff illogic, two US trade 'deals' plus talks have materialised. Many pundits point to these as 'proof' that Mr Trump's tariff chaos is solely leverage for deal making and freer trade ahead. Slow down. While no one can read Mr Trump's mind, don't overstate his talk or actions' positive impacts. Endless tariff flip-flopping chiefly fans rising uncertainty, which stocks always hate – hurting America worst. Let me show you – and where to uncover opportunities. First, you may not believe it, but stocks are intermediate and longer-term truthtellers, particularly big moves and spreads. Through May 23, non-US stocks returned 13.7 per cent this year in USD. China's gained 16.3 per cent, Europe 19.6 per cent and Mexico 29.1 per cent! Booming! And the US's S&P 500? Down 1 per cent. Striking lag! Seen differently: Of the 47 MSCI All-Country World Index (ACWI) countries, America's return fell from first over 2023-2024 to 43rd this year. A stunning shift. What happened? Mr Trump's on, off, back and forth whipsawing vacillations made funds flee America. Tariffs always hammer the imposing country most. Stocks know attempts to reduce trade deficits are senseless. A trade deficit means a capital account surplus by definition – that capital is foreign investment into America. Why is reversing that desirable? Why is the government intervening on prior successes – versus letting free markets sort out the most efficient use of capital – positive? How is policy that changes on a whim good? Stocks know it is bad. Stocks' truth-telling shows you exactly that. Markets weigh reality, not efforts aimed at discerning Mr Trump's 'true' goals. What 'deals' have emerged since April 9? Looking past Mr Trump's boastful bluster, only two materialised – Britain and China. Both are fluff. Britain's is a one-year, non-binding, cancellable agreement to mitigate a few tariffs until a full trade deal can happen – maybe. A deal to make a deal! It affects only a handful of industries. Crucially, Mr Trump's 10 per cent tariff remains on most UK goods. The China deal impresses, but only because expectations were incredibly low. Yes, it cuts 145 per cent tariffs on Chinese goods to 30 per cent, while China dropped retaliatory levies from 125 per cent to 10 per cent. Yet it lasts only 90 days – buying time – another deal to make a deal! Plus, tariffs on China remain 30 percentage points higher than in January. Both countries remain impaired, especially the US. Then, on May 16, Mr Trump boasted 150 nations now sought 'deals'. Flip-flopping again, he says there isn't time to negotiate them. His 'solution?' Simply telling nations 'soon' what rates they must pay – and perhaps offering chances to appeal. Didn't he already do just that on April 2's 'Liberation Day?' How did that work? Badly! How will this work? Will rates be higher or lower than after April 2? He hasn't said, further fanning uncertainty. Days later, he threatened the EU with new 50 per cent tariffs – and 25 per cent on Apple products – only to flip again days later, postponing EU tariffs through July 9 after plans to fast-track trade talks emerged. Does this show Mr Trump's talk and actions are somehow clever? That he plays 4D chess while we all play checkers? No! No one wins from crazy vacillations or the higher tariff 'deals' so far delivered. Meanwhile, legal challenges to Mr Trump's tariffs progress maybe killing some of this. And maybe real deals come, actually lowering trade barriers and uncertainty – a huge potential upside. Maybe not. But as my last column said, even if all tariffs return, the pain will be less than feared – bullish. Importers can readily skirt America's understaffed, overwhelmed tariff-collecting Customs and Border Protection staff through illegal and legal means. The latter include 'tariff splitting' – stripping out services-related costs like marketing to reduce goods' values – or storing imports in bonded warehouses. Or shipping in values under $800, skipping tariffs. And myriad illegal ways like misclassifying and undervaluing goods. Exporters can 'tranship' or re-export through lower tariff nations. Hence, China's April exports grew despite shipments to America tumbling 21 per cent. South-east Asia absorbed the difference – shipping them on. This drove surges in April re-exports to America – like Singapore's 113 per cent year-on-year spike! Vietnam and Taiwan enjoy similar surges. Manufacturers can even reship through Canada or Mexico, gaming the United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement tariff exemption. Chinese middlemen advertise such services on TikTok! Hence, while Uncle Sam's April total tariff collections rose, they missed administration forecasts by 75 per cent. That will persist. The good news? Tariff fear exceeds reality, especially outside America. That is bull market fuel – helping non-US stocks maintain their leadership, particularly in Canadian, Chinese and Mexican markets – and in Europe, as I predicted on February 3.
Gulf Today
4 hours ago
- Gulf Today
Europe-US power struggle in Asia-Pacific
The annual Shangri-La Dialogue that Singapore hosts is a gathering of security and defence experts of south, south-east and east-Asia, along with the United States, European Union countries and China. It is a meeting point where new worldviews are enunciated if not new spheres of influence are carved out. At this year's Shangri-La, China stepped back as it were. There can only be speculation why it did so. India and Pakistan delegations represented by highest military personnel were present, avoiding running into each other in the corridors of the hotel. It was the Americans and the Europeans who seemed to have crossed swords at the conference. US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth has spelt the American position with regard to European powers. He said, 'We would much prefer that the overwhelming balance of European investment be on that that as we partner there, which we will continue to do, we're able to use our comparative advantage as an Indo-Pacific nation to support our partners here.' In plain language, Hegseth is saying that Europe has no place in the Indo-Pacific, even if it had in the earlier period colonialism in the 19h and early 20th centuries. Americans believe that they are victors in the Second World War in the Asian region, and therefore they have the right to assert Asia-Pacific to be its sphere of influence. It is blunt language indeed, characteristic of the Trump Administration. Surprisingly, Hegseth says that the American commitment in Europe will continue, and the Americans will continue to support the European countries. This is in contrast to the rhetoric of President Donald Trump that Europe must take care of itself, and America is not interested in leading NATO. Trump has been flip-flopping quite a lot, about tariffs and about security commitments. Unable to persuade Russian President Vladimir Putin to agree to a ceasefire with Ukraine, Trump feels that America has no option but to oppose Russia in Europe. The European counter to Hegseth formulation was ready. Kaja Kallas, the Estonian politician and European Union's High Representative for foreign affairs and security policy and Vice-President of the European Commission, said, 'It is a good thing we are doing more (in Europe), but what I want to stress is that the security of Europe and the security of the Pacific is very much interlinked.' She went on to say, 'If you are worried about China, you should be worried about Russia.' French President Emmanuel Macron emphasized that France remains an Indo-Pacific power. He referred to the French presence in New Caledonia and French Polynesia, and the 8,000 French soldiers in the region. Macron gave a political twist to the China factor, by countering the American approach of gathering all anti-China forces of the Indo-Pacific region. He said, 'We are neither China nor the US., we don't want to depend on either of them. We want to cooperate with both as far as we can, and we can cooperate for growth and prosperity and stability for our people and the world order, and I think this is exactly the same view of a lot of countries and a lot of people of this region.' It is not surprising that the Americans are not comfortable with the European presence in the Indo-Pacific region. But the Europeans see both economic and defence opportunities in Asia. An International Institute of Strategic Studies (ISS) of London in its report noted, 'European companies including Airbus, Damen, Naval Group and Thales have a long-standing presence in Southeast Asia, and other European actors have established themselves in the market in the last decade, including Italy's Fincantieri and Sweden's Saab.' There is competition now between Europe and America. China can watch the contest with amusement.
