Luxon snaps back: 'I'm not taking any lectures from frickin Chris Hipkins'
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has challenged Labour to front up with any policy at all as he comes under pressure over National's struggling childcare support scheme.
The comment was made after Labour revealed just 153 families had received the maximum FamilyBoost rebate - well short of National's pre-election promise that 21,000 families would be eligible for the full amount.
Speaking on his way into a caucus meeting this morning, Luxon rejected Labour's characterisation of the policy as a failure.
"I'm not taking any lectures from frickin' Chris Hipkins or the Labour Party," he told reporters. "They have no idea what to do. They put us in this mess.
"You can stand on the other side and criticise as much as you like, but I don't see any policy from Labour."
Luxon said 60,000 families had received some support from the FamilyBoost policy and another 20,000 would soon be eligible due to recent tweaks to the eligibility settings.
"Isn't that great? We have put a programme in place which Labour didn't support, didn't vote, don't back, because they don't back low-and-middle-income working New Zealanders."
The former Labour government extended cheaper childcare to parents of two-year-olds, giving them access to 20 hours a week of free early childhood education.
On taking office, the coalition reversed that policy and instead rolled out its more targeted FamilyBoost scheme - a weekly rebate on childcare costs. 'Absolute flop'
Responding to Luxon's comments, Labour leader Chris Hipkins said National's refusal to admit the FamilyBoost scheme was "an absolute flop" showed it was completely out of touch.
"They're getting really desperate. On a daily basis, they're attacking me and attacking the Labour Party rather than talking about their own track record."
He defended Labour's lack of public policy, saying that would all be laid out in full before next year's general election.
"We're not even close to an election campaign at the moment," Hipkins said. "But unlike him, when we go into the election campaign next year, I will make sure that the policies that we have add up."
Labour wanted to see the government's next Budget before it outlined significant policies which would cost money, he said, and suggested a lot of policy work was under way in the background.
"The National Party desperately wants to talk about the Labour Party's policy at the moment because their own policies are turning into an absolute disaster zone."
National also came under criticism when it was in opposition for a paucity of policy heading into the 2023 election year, but it had released elements of its tax plan and several discussion documents indicating a direction of travel.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Luxon says New Zealand won't adopt UK's stance on Palestinian statehood yet
Britain's Prime Minister Keir Starmer (R) and New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon (L) speak during their bilateral meeting in April. Photo: AFP / Pool / Frank Augstein Prime Minister Christopher Luxon says he will speak to his British counterpart about the United Kingdom's new stance on Palestinian statehood, but says New Zealand won't be following its lead "at this stage". "Not at this point," Luxon told reporters on Wednesday. "Obviously, I will be talking with Sir Keir Starmer around his position, which is a conditional statehood." Earlier, UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer announced an intention to recognise a Palestinian state at the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) in September unless Israel agreed to key conditions, including a ceasefire in Gaza. In response, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Starmer was rewarding Hamas's monstrous terrorism and punishing its victims. In response to questions from RNZ, Luxon said New Zealand had long supported the eventual recognition of Palestinian statehood, but that the immediate focus should be on getting aid into Gaza rather than "fragmenting and talking about all sorts of other things that are distractions". "We need to put the pressure on Israel to get humanitarian assistance unfettered, at scale, at volume, into Gaza," he told RNZ. "You can talk about a whole bunch of other things, but for right now, the world needs to focus." New Zealand signed a separate joint statement with 14 other countries overnight expressing a willingness to recognise the state of Palestine as a necessary step towards a two-state solution. Luxon said while there were "slight differences" between various countries' positions, all were distressed by the lack of humanitarian assistance getting into Gaza. "We are a long way away," Luxon said. "We have very little influence, and we have very little trading connection with Israel in particular ... we have to send our messages and our concerns out in very unambiguous terms." During Parliament's Question Time on Wednesday afternoon, Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters said New Zealand steadfastly supported the establishment of a Palestinian state and the right of the Palestinian people to self determination. But he said the government first needed to see progress from Palestine, including representative governance, commitment to non-violence, and security guarantees for Israel. "If we are to recognise the state of Palestine, New Zealand wants to know that what we are recognising is a legitimate, representative, viable, political entity," Peters said. Peters also agreed with a contribution from ACT's Simon Court that recognising the state of Palestine before Hamas had returned hostages or laid down arms could constitute a "reward for acts of terrorism". "That's most likely how it'd be interpreted," Peters replied. Opposition parties have called on the government to move with more haste. On Wednesday, Labour leader Chris Hipkins said it was time for New Zealand to act: "We shouldn't wait for other countries to embarrass us into doing it." And Green co-leader Marama Davidson questioned what the government was waiting for. "What more do they need to see?" she said. "What more suffering do they need to actually see with their own eyes [before] doing something committed or definite like recognising Palestinian statehood?" Peters said the opposition parties were being "absolutist" and "naive." "They've got no idea what they're talking about," Peters said. "We would recognise, if we had a group legitimately to recognise." Last week, French President Emmanuel Macron said his country would formally recognise a Palestinian state during the next UNGA meeting. Norway, Spain, and Ireland did so last year. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
The Spinoff
5 hours ago
- The Spinoff
Echo Chamber: So, who's to blame for the cost of living?
In question time, sometimes a question is not really a question. Or is it? Echo Chamber is The Spinoff's dispatch from the press gallery, recapping sessions in the House. Columns are written by politics reporter Lyric Waiwiri-Smith and Wellington editor Joel MacManus. No one can shut up about the cost of living. And fair enough – butter is, like, a million dollars, and tens of thousands of people who are essential to our health system are walking off the job today because they're still not paid enough for the work we applauded them for doing through the worst years of our lives. With all of this going on, the pro-growth (of the good kind, not the bad kind) government has been very keen to remind the nation of all the great work they've done to improve our lives. But, they're definitely not panicking or anything – they're just setting the record straight, of course. Which is why Monday's post-cabinet press conference began with ten minutes of prime minister Christopher Luxon and finance minister Nicola Willis rattling off a list of their pro-growth achievements this term. And why the minister kicked off Tuesday's question time session with patsies from National backbencher Suze Redmayne, reminding the House of the government's efforts in tax relief and Family Boost. But there was this annoying little voice that kept popping up (amid all the other heckling). Was it Karl Marx himself, risen from the dead to personally punish Willis? No, it was just Greens' co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick, on a mission to set her version of the record straight. 'Road user charges!' Swarbrick reminded the minister. How about putting a price-tag back on prescriptions? Or the price of butter? There was a distinct look of disgust from Swarbrick when Willis wrapped up. Up next was Labour leader Chris Hipkins, who questioned Luxon over – you guessed it – the cost of living crisis and nurses, but when he began a supplementary by using the word 'so', a smart aleck on the front bench thought they'd pull a fast one. 'Point of order, Mr Speaker,' said Act leader David Seymour. 'Speakers have ruled that you cannot begin with a word like 'so' … Usually a question must begin with a question word.' Well, Gerry Brownlee replied, the member used 'so does', and I've overlooked the 'so', so it does go – and haven't there been occasions when the minister himself has done the same thing? 'I got away with it,' Seymour quipped. 'Yeah, well, guess what's happening here,' Brownlee replied. Armed with a pile of notes, Luxon rejected Hipkins' characterisations and claims – but he seemed to lose his cool after so much back and forth. 'If you're really serious about the cost of living, will you support a rate cap on councils? Yes or no?' Luxon challenged his counterpart in red, but that earned him a cuff around the ear from the speaker. The prime minister cannot ask questions, Brownlee reminded him. 'It's a rhetorical one,' Luxon replied. 'Rhetorical or not, it's a question,' Brownlee countered. 'It was just a rhetorical answer,' Luxon grumbled. Not much achieved thus far. There were fisticuffs again when Labour's finance spokesperson Barbara Edmonds questioned Willis over whether the country was truly 'back on course' – kinda like 'back on track', but just a bit different. And again the minister rattled off a list of figures of where inflation was at in 2022 and 2023 under the Labour government to prove a point that the current state of inflation is simply all inherited and not really her fault, until Brownlee cut her off with 'that's enough'. 'Ruth Richardson would be proud,' Hipkins cried. Later, famed orator Shane Jones, minister for resources, struggled through his sentences despite NZ First MP Jamie Arbuckle giving him a wide open pass to boast about his portfolio, ahead of the final reading of the Crown Minerals Amendment Bill on Thursday. Though he did find his flow while trashing the 'unicorn-kissing, shallow green ideas' that led to 'the perfidy of the cancellation of the oil and gas industry by Jacinda Ardern' that he is trying to repeal (despite being a cabinet minister in the government which enforced the ban). But Labour MP Kieran McAnulty wasn't having a bar of it: point of order – but aren't these remarks a clear example of the very thing you've warned this government about multiple times, using questions to express their thoughts on previous policies? McAnulty kept going, but Brownlee cut him off by saying that while he agreed, it was fine to talk about 'factual matters', just as long as they're not attacking the opposition. 'Point of order,' Jones rose again. 'I'm very happy that you used the word 'factual'. It is a fact that the oil and gas industry was chilled, halted, as a consequence of a decision announced by so said woman' (aka his former colleague, Jacinda Ardern). A groan rippled through the House after that one. Jones is a minister who likes to bark out words like 'fiction!' when his opponents across the aisle are speaking about climate change, and 'mining!' at random intervals to remind the House of his dedication to the kaupapa. So Swarbrick gave Jones a taste of his own medicine when he came to boast about his plans to travel to Taupō – 'the heart of geothermal potential' – today to begin consultations to identify what 'red tape' might be 'blighting' the acceleration of the industry. 'Are you talking about the lobbyists?' she called. 'Tell us about your fossil fuel lobbyist mates.'
1News
5 hours ago
- 1News
Last-minute change puts oil and gas cleanup decisions in ministers' hands
The government is set to repeal the oil and gas ban this week, after a significant 11th-hour change handing discretionary powers to two ministers. A 25-page amendment was published at 5pm on Monday, leaving opposition MPs less than 23 hours to prepare for the debate. The change largely deals with the rules for decommissioning oil and gas fields, and who is responsible for paying for the cleanup. Taranaki's Tui oil field was abandoned in 2019 after its Malaysian owner Tamarind Taranaki went bust, costing taxpayers a total $293 million to clean up, with work concluding just last month. The government initially set aside up to $343.4m for the project. The Labour government in 2021 introduced a law to prevent the government being lumped with such costs again in future. ADVERTISEMENT Resources Minister Shane Jones has vowed to restart the oil and gas industry. He said the aim of the amendment was to close a loophole in that 2021 law. "It did not seem correct or moral that the Crown should be left with that liability and the people [at fault] - with some very shrewd manoeuverings of script - would escape liability. We have solved that problem," he told the House. The changes replace the process of going through the list of previous permit-holders to figure out who pays for decommissioning, instead putting that decision in the hands of the Resources Minister and the Finance Minister. The morning's headlines in 90 seconds, including UK set to recognise Palestine, fire closes another Auckland supermarket, and Australia's plan to clamp down on YouTube access. (Source: 1News) The amendment also removes several clauses from a previous amendment the minister made to the bill, which itself amends the Crown Minerals Act. Labour's Energy and Resources spokesperson Megan Woods led the 2021 law change in response to the Tui Oil Field debacle, and told the Parliament the changes showed the government capitulating to the industry's wishes. ADVERTISEMENT "They have bowed to the suggestions of the oil and gas companies and done what they wanted. They have further bowed to the interests of the oil and gas companies in taking eight months to sit with them, find out what they wanted and then bring a bill back to the House. This is not a government that is putting New Zealand first." Labour's Deborah Russell pointed out the Regulatory Impact Statement referred to consultation with affected stakeholders. pointed out the Regulatory Impact Statement referred to consultation with (Source: 1News) "Those consulted preferred ministerial discretion to the current act and approach in the bill. In other words, these shadowy participants in the oil and gas industry - a dying industry - who we don't know who they are, much prefer to be able to lobby a minister." Jones was unapologetic about those he consulted with. "Why would you not engage with the stakeholders, the risk-takers, the providers of what precious little gas we have, ruined by the cancel culture." He was unapologetic about a lack of consultation with others, including iwi. ADVERTISEMENT "So in the future the engagement will happen. This highly technical matter was not the subject of consultation in a detailed way, it was dealt with with a great deal of confidentiality. And in terms of providing a Māori dimension, I interviewed myself." The amendment passed with the coalition parties in support, with the opposition parties opposed. The third reading, which would see the oil and gas ban repealed, is expected on Thursday. A gas company warned investors would be cautious about coming back to New Zealand without broad political consensus - and with the opposition parties currently staunchly opposed that consensus seems vanishingly unlikely. The government also has a $200m fund set aside in this year's Budget to allow the government to co-invest in new gas fields. It last month pulled out of the Beyond Oil and Gas Alliance, an international coalition for phasing out fossil fuels, in a move the local World Wildlife Fund called an "international embarrassment". That was despite the Climate Minister, Simon Watts, previously saying New Zealand would not need to exit the group.
