Why Canadians are turning on Tim Hortons: A brewing identity crisis
Many Canadians are voicing frustration and even outrage over the company's deepening ties to the United States. What was once considered a beloved national treasure is now being criticized for losing its roots. With its parent company headquartered in Miami and a growing perception of American influence, Tim Hortons is facing a backlash that has some customers calling for a boycott and questioning what it truly means to be Canadian.
Tim Hortons' American ownership and loss of Canadian identity
Tim Hortons was founded in 1964 by hockey player Tim Horton and quickly grew into a staple of everyday Canadian life. However, its 2014 acquisition by Burger King, and the resulting formation of Restaurant Brands International, shifted its corporate structure. The company now has its principal executive offices in Miami, and 60 percent of its shares are held in the US. This shift has left many Canadians feeling the brand no longer represents them, despite its ongoing marketing campaigns claiming it is 'proudly Canadian.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Trade Bitcoin & Ethereum – No Wallet Needed!
IC Markets
Start Now
Undo
'
Public backlash and cultural disappointment
The criticism has been especially vocal online, with Reddit users and commentators expressing disgust over the chain's continued dominance in Canadian life. Some are angry that a company with American leadership is still seen as a Canadian cultural icon. One Reddit user called it 'embarrassing,' while others have accused Tim Hortons of destroying local food culture and selling out its identity. Despite efforts by the company to address concerns through public relations campaigns, many feel these gestures are hollow.
Local ownership vs
corporate control
While Tim Hortons argues it remains Canadian through its franchised business model, with profits going to local Canadian owners, critics are unconvinced. They point out that major corporate decisions are made in the US, and that the branding of "Canadian-ness" is more a marketing tactic than a reflection of values. Business experts say the situation is nuanced, but the symbolic weight of American control has ignited a strong emotional reaction among Canadians.
Tim Hortons trying to reclaim national pride
In February, Tim Hortons launched a campaign reaffirming its Canadian roots, but the move was met with skepticism. The company's press release titled 'Is Tim Hortons Canadian?' was widely seen as defensive rather than reassuring. Many Canadians now see Tim Hortons as a brand that has drifted too far from its origins, turning what was once a point of pride into a point of contention. Whether the company can win back public trust remains uncertain in a time when national identity feels more contested than ever.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
8 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump imposed "sanctions on India" to end Russia-Ukraine war: White House
US White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt on Tuesday (local time) said that US President Donald Trump imposed tariffs on India to deter Russia from pursuing the Ukraine conflict. Trump has doubled India's tariff to 50 per cent by imposing an additional 25 per cent levy on the previously announced 25 per cent. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads US White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said on Tuesday (local time) that President Donald Trump imposed fresh tariffs on India to deter Russia from continuing the Ukraine has doubled India's tariff rate to 50% by adding another 25% levy on top of the previously announced 25%.Leavitt, addressing a press briefing, explained that the sanctions were aimed at putting 'secondary pressure' on Moscow.'Look, the president has put tremendous public pressure to bring this war to a close. He's taken actions, as you've seen, sanctions on India and other actions as well. He's made himself very clear that he wants to see this war end, and he has scoffed at the ideas of others… that we should wait another month before any meeting takes place,' she comments came a day after Trump met Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at the White House, where the US leader expressed openness to a trilateral meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin to discuss ending the war. Trump described the meeting as 'a very successful day,' while Zelensky called it the 'best conversation' he had with him so stressed that Trump wants peace at the earliest.'The president wants to move and he wants to bring this war to an end as quickly as possible… With all of those European leaders leaving the White House, including the NATO Secretary General , they all agree that this is a great first step,' she said. 'It's a good thing that these two leaders are going to be sitting down together, and the president expects that to happen.'She added: 'I can assure you that the United States government and the Trump administration are working with both Russia and Ukraine to make that bilateral happen as we speak.'According to Leavitt, Trump's peace efforts prompted European leaders to rush to Washington within 48 hours of his recent meeting with Putin.'The President met with all of these European leaders at the White House 48 hours after sitting down with President Putin on American soil. In fact, there was so much progress… that every single one of them got on a plane 48 hours later and flew to the United States,' she said.'These leaders, who have this war in their backyard, are very grateful that the president took that call and that he was there to provide them with a readout of Russia's thinking… something that was not done by the previous administration at all,' she also reiterated the White House claim that the war would not have started had Trump been in office.'The president often says that this war would not have started if he were in office and Putin confirmed that,' a reporter noted. Leavitt replied: 'True. Do you accept that as true? The European leaders do. Well, and President Putin himself said that, by the way.'When asked about ensuring security guarantees beyond his presidency, Leavitt said Trump was focused on long-term peace.'Well, he understands the need for that, which he spoke to yesterday. It's why he's engaging in numerous discussions and conversations with both sides of this war with our European allies,' she highlighted Trump's personal involvement, noting his multiple interactions with Zelensky and European leaders.'The President himself was discussing with European leaders and NATO how to ensure lasting peace and bring an end to the conflict. He has expended an incredible amount of time, energy and effort into bringing this war to an end, and he remains determined to do that,' she added.
Time of India
15 minutes ago
- Time of India
Kairan Quazi's education and career: How a 16-year-old prodigy graduated early, left SpaceX, and is now joining Citadel Securities
Elon Musk 's youngest hire, Kairan Quazi, is trading rockets for trading algorithms. At just 16, the Bangladeshi-American prodigy has left SpaceX 's Starlink division after two years to join Citadel Securities in New York City as a developer. The move marks his entry into one of Wall Street's most competitive arenas, where engineering talent is increasingly being courted by finance giants vying with AI labs and Big Tech for the brightest minds. 'I felt ready to take on new challenges and expand my skill set into a different high-performance environment,' Quazi told Business Insider in an exclusive interview. But how did a teenager manage to leap from middle school to Wall Street in less than a decade? A childhood marked by acceleration Quazi's journey has been anything but conventional. Skipping from third grade directly to college at age nine, he enrolled at Las Positas College, where he graduated with highest honors in mathematics at just 11. By 14, he had already become the youngest graduate in Santa Clara University's 170-year history, completing a Bachelor of Science in Computer Science and Engineering cum laude, alongside graduate-level coursework in advanced algorithms, NLP, and data mining. During his undergraduate years, he combined academic rigor with teaching responsibilities, serving as a college tutor in calculus, statistics, and chemistry — an unusual role reversal for someone barely in his teens. From research labs to rocket science Even before completing his degree, Quazi built an impressive portfolio of research and industry experience. At age 10, he became the first undergraduate intern at Intel Labs' Human AI group, working on predictive speech generation platforms — a stint that stretched over three and a half years. He also delivered keynote addresses at the Linux Foundation North America Summit and SHIFT AI Global Conference. In 2022, he joined the cyber-intelligence startup as a machine learning intern, developing pipelines to detect disinformation threats across social media. But it was his leap to SpaceX in 2023 that placed him on a global stage. As a software engineer at Starlink, Quazi worked on network beam planning and optimization, designing production-critical systems that determine how satellites target internet beams worldwide. 'It required a deep understanding of low-latency, high-performance computing and real-time programming,' his LinkedIn profile notes. Why Wall Street over AI labs Given his track record, Quazi had no shortage of offers from leading AI labs and technology firms. But he chose Citadel Securities for its blend of intellectual complexity and speed. 'Quant finance offers a pretty rare combination: the complexity and intellectual challenge that AI research also provides, but with a much faster pace,' he explained to Business Insider . 'At Citadel Securities, I'll be able to see measurable impact in days, not months or years.' The firm's meritocratic approach also appealed to him. Unlike many institutions that might hesitate at his age, Citadel evaluated him solely on skill. Life beyond algorithms Moving to Manhattan represents more than just a career pivot. For the first time, Quazi will live independently, walking to work instead of relying on his mother to drive him to SpaceX's Redmond office — a reminder that despite his resume, he is still a teenager navigating milestones most reach much later. Lessons from Quazi's path For students and educators, Quazi's story is not just one of precocity but of possibility. His journey highlights how alternative educational pathways — early college, project-based learning, and industry immersion — can cultivate talent far earlier than traditional timelines allow. As Wall Street, Silicon Valley, and AI labs compete for minds like his, the deeper lesson is clear: The future belongs to those willing to blur the boundaries between age, discipline, and convention. TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us here. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
Time of India
20 minutes ago
- Time of India
71% of Americans see a jobless future losing to AI: Will Gen Z ever find stable jobs?
The American workforce may be staring at its biggest disruption since the Industrial Revolution. A new Reuters/Ipsos poll has revealed that 71% of Americans believe artificial intelligence (AI) will cause 'too many people to be permanently unemployed,' fueling fears that the technology could erase jobs faster than it creates them. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The poll, conducted over six days and released on August 19, 2025, surveyed 4,446 adults and carries a margin of error of two percentage points. Its findings show widespread concern that AI is not merely another workplace tool but a force that could fundamentally reshape careers, industries, and even the social fabric of the country. For Gen Z—students and young professionals entering the job market—the implications are stark. They may be stepping into the most uncertain employment landscape in decades. Low unemployment, high anxiety Official numbers suggest stability. The US unemployment rate was 4.2% in July, a relatively low figure by historical standards. Yet the Reuters/Ipsos poll shows a growing perception gap: even as jobs exist today, Americans fear the long-term erosion of work opportunities due to AI. Unlike earlier waves of automation that primarily affected manufacturing and manual labor, AI threatens knowledge work—jobs in law, journalism, customer service, finance, and even medicine. These are the careers many Gen Z students are currently training for. 'People are not just worried about layoffs,' Reuters reported. 'They are worried that the work itself could vanish.' Democracy, security, and the human cost The survey also revealed anxieties that stretch far beyond the job market: Political Stability: 77% of Americans are worried about AI destabilising politics. One flashpoint was an AI-generated video showing former President Barack Obama being 'arrested' by Donald Trump. Though fake, the clip spread widely online, underscoring the potential of AI to blur the line between truth and manipulation in an election year. 77% of Americans are worried about AI destabilising politics. One flashpoint was an AI-generated video showing former President Barack Obama being 'arrested' by Donald Trump. Though fake, the clip spread widely online, underscoring the potential of AI to blur the line between truth and manipulation in an election year. Military Risks: Nearly half of respondents (48%) oppose the use of AI to determine military targets. Only 24% supported such deployment, reflecting discomfort with machines making life-and-death decisions. Nearly half of respondents (48%) oppose the use of AI to determine military targets. Only 24% supported such deployment, reflecting discomfort with machines making life-and-death decisions. Energy Demands: 61% expressed concern over the energy consumption of AI systems, which require vast computing power and could exacerbate climate challenges. 61% expressed concern over the energy consumption of AI systems, which require vast computing power and could exacerbate climate challenges. Human Relationships: Two-thirds of Americans worry people might begin to prioritize AI 'companions' over real human connections. With AI chatbots and virtual partners already on the market, this fear no longer belongs solely to the realm of science fiction. These concerns highlight AI's disruptive potential not just as an economic force but as a societal disruptor. Education in the crosshairs Education is emerging as a key battleground in the AI debate. According to the Reuters/Ipsos poll: 40% believe AI will harm learning outcomes, 36% think it will improve education, and 24% remain undecided. This split mirrors the uncertainty faced by students who wonder if their degrees will still hold value in a job market reshaped by algorithms. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Gen Z graduates, many of whom already juggle student debt, are asking whether they are preparing for roles that could soon be automated out of existence. The Gen Z dilemma For Gen Z, the AI question is not abstract—it's deeply personal. This generation is already grappling with rising housing costs, inflation, and gig-based employment structures. Now, they must also consider whether AI will undercut their chances at stable, long-term careers. Some experts argue that history offers hope. Just as the internet revolution created industries that were unimaginable in the 1990s, AI could give rise to new roles—from AI ethics officers to digital trust managers and climate-tech innovators. But as the Reuters report makes clear, most Americans aren't convinced that new opportunities will outweigh the losses. The specter of permanent unemployment looms larger than the promise of new industries. The road ahead What does this mean for policymakers, educators, and employers? The Reuters/Ipsos poll suggests three urgent takeaways:
