Hong Kong justice minister downplays departure of foreign judges, says numbers ‘not main point'
Hong Kong's justice chief has downplayed the departure of foreign judges in recent years, saying it is not about their numbers but whether the judges have 'a good international reputation.'
Secretary for Justice Paul Lam told Cable News in an interview published on Monday that the city's foreign judges system was still effective.
'There are new [foreign] appointed judges who are willing to join. Would you say [the system] is useless?' Lam said in Cantonese.
'If they think they wouldn't make any contribution if they were to come here, [I] believe they would not come to Hong Kong to help,' he added.
The top official's comments follow a recent exodus of foreign judges from the city's top court.
The most recent departure was former Australian justice Robert French, who resigned in April and said the role of foreign judges in the court had become 'arguably cosmetic.'
In June, a New Zealand judge, William Young, joined the city's Court of Final Appeal (CFA). There are currently six overseas judges in the top court, compared with 15 at its peak.
Lam told Cable News that the number of foreign judges was 'not the main point.'
'It's about what type of people come, and whether they have a good international reputation,' he said.
The justice minister also dismissed Hong Kong's fall in the global rule of law index.
'Regarding human rights and freedoms, I believe that their ranking of Hong Kong… does not reflect the actual situation. This might be an issue of external perception,' he said, adding that Western countries often did not have a 'comprehensive' judgement of Hong Kong.
Top court exodus
Since the CFA's establishment in 1997, it has sporadically extended invitations to judges from other common law jurisdictions to join its panel. This practice has been regarded as a testament to the international community's trust in the city's judicial system.
Last year, however, the apex court lost five judges. Anthony Murray Gleeson from Australia did not renew his term when it ended in February 2024, citing old age; UK judges Jonathan Sumption and Lawrence Collins quit in June 2024 before their terms ended; while Canada's Beverley McLachlin and the UK's Nicholas Phillips did not extend their terms.
Sumption wrote an opinion piece for the Financial Times just days after his resignation, saying Hong Kong was 'slowly becoming a totalitarian state.' Judges operate in an 'almost impossible political environment created by China,' he said.
Before the recent string of departures, two British judges in 2022, Robert Reed and Patrick Hodge, quit the CFA, citing the erosion of political freedoms.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
HKFP
6 hours ago
- HKFP
Hong Kong justice minister downplays departure of foreign judges, says numbers ‘not main point'
Hong Kong's justice chief has downplayed the departure of foreign judges in recent years, saying it is not about their numbers but whether the judges have 'a good international reputation.' Secretary for Justice Paul Lam told Cable News in an interview published on Monday that the city's foreign judges system was still effective. 'There are new [foreign] appointed judges who are willing to join. Would you say [the system] is useless?' Lam said in Cantonese. 'If they think they wouldn't make any contribution if they were to come here, [I] believe they would not come to Hong Kong to help,' he added. The top official's comments follow a recent exodus of foreign judges from the city's top court. The most recent departure was former Australian justice Robert French, who resigned in April and said the role of foreign judges in the court had become 'arguably cosmetic.' In June, a New Zealand judge, William Young, joined the city's Court of Final Appeal (CFA). There are currently six overseas judges in the top court, compared with 15 at its peak. Lam told Cable News that the number of foreign judges was 'not the main point.' 'It's about what type of people come, and whether they have a good international reputation,' he said. The justice minister also dismissed Hong Kong's fall in the global rule of law index. 'Regarding human rights and freedoms, I believe that their ranking of Hong Kong… does not reflect the actual situation. This might be an issue of external perception,' he said, adding that Western countries often did not have a 'comprehensive' judgement of Hong Kong. Top court exodus Since the CFA's establishment in 1997, it has sporadically extended invitations to judges from other common law jurisdictions to join its panel. This practice has been regarded as a testament to the international community's trust in the city's judicial system. Last year, however, the apex court lost five judges. Anthony Murray Gleeson from Australia did not renew his term when it ended in February 2024, citing old age; UK judges Jonathan Sumption and Lawrence Collins quit in June 2024 before their terms ended; while Canada's Beverley McLachlin and the UK's Nicholas Phillips did not extend their terms. Sumption wrote an opinion piece for the Financial Times just days after his resignation, saying Hong Kong was 'slowly becoming a totalitarian state.' Judges operate in an 'almost impossible political environment created by China,' he said. Before the recent string of departures, two British judges in 2022, Robert Reed and Patrick Hodge, quit the CFA, citing the erosion of political freedoms.
Asia Times
12 hours ago
- Asia Times
Lee's election in S Korea: The time for wishful thinking has come
South Korea has a new President. President Lee Jae-myung is a lifelong leftist with an affinity for the People's Republic of China and North Korea, and has no great love for the United States. He has referred to American troops in South Korea as 'occupiers' and said China should do what it wants to Taiwan. Lee apparently likes North Korea enough to put money down. He currently faces charges for involvement in sending $8 million to North Korea while he was governor of Gyeonggi Province. His deputy has already been convicted. However, during the recent election campaign Lee talked up the US-ROK alliance and three-way US-ROK-Japan security cooperation. Thus, many American observers claim Lee is a pragmatist and a centrist, and will govern as such. Maybe. But as likely it reflects a tendency towards wishful thinking on the part of America's foreign policy class when a certain type of radical leader comes along. The same was said about Hugo Chavez in Venezuela, Turkey's Recep Erdogan, Solomon Islands' Manasseh Sogavare, Zimbabwe's Robert Mugabe, Nicaragua's Daniel Ortega and Cuba's Fidel Castro. Even Xi Jinping was mentioned as a reformer who just needed to solidify his position before liberalizing the PRC. But maybe these sort of men mean what they say beyond the soothing language intended for Western elites when on the verge of taking power. As for Lee, forget what he said on the campaign trial, and look at his new prime minister, Kim Min-seok. Kim was a Seoul National University radical student leader in the 1980s and joined the illegal occupation of the Seoul American Cultural Center in 1985. He was jailed for three years due to his anti-state and pro-North Korea activities. The Americans once refused to give him a visa, and he is said to have claimed the Americans were behind Covid. One recalls candidate Barack Obama who promised to 'unify' a divided United States. Once elected, he appointed Chicago political operative Rahm Emanuel as chief of staff. And America got Chicago politics at the national level. Rule #1 of Chicago politics: crush your opponents. Rule #2: do whatever it takes to keep power—forever. Don't expect centrist, conciliatory policies from Lee. Rather, we'll soon see Lee's pogrom against his opponents – to include anyone with the nerve to have called for honest elections. Lee's Democratic Party of Korea (DP) has an overwhelming majority in the national assembly – likely obtained by questionable means. He can do whatever he wants, and packing the Supreme Court appears on the menu. Lee's calls for 'restoring democracy' and unifying the nation in his inaugural speech give chutzpah a bad name. He and the DP spent the entire two years of Yoon's administration making it impossible for Yoon to govern and enact his policies. This went well beyond sharp-elbowed politics found in a normal country. Instead, it was intended to cause chaos. Nearly 30 impeachments of Yoon and his officials? Zeroing out Yoon's budget requests and more? Not exactly the behavior of a loyal opposition. Rather, Lee's election is one more episode in a years-long effort by South Korean radicals to establish single-party rule in South Korea – and align with the PRC, North Korea and even Russia. The original impeachment resolution against former president Yoon accused him of 'antagonizing North Korea, China, and Russia' and 'adhering to a bizarre Japan-centered foreign policy.' Sometimes people tell you what they really think – if you'll listen. Is this the end of the US-ROK alliance? It won't collapse tomorrow, and still has resilience. But any relationship is on shaky ground when key figures on one side dislike the other side – and would rather hook up with their partner's main rivals. Everything will get more difficult for Washington in Northeast Asia, and easier for Beijing, which has been pressuring and insinuating itself into South Korea for years. Perhaps hoping to make the best of things, the White House said the US-ROK alliance is 'ironclad' – and declared the election 'free and fair.' It did express general concern over 'Chinese interference' in democracies. The State Department similarly offered congratulations to President Lee. Free and fair election? South Korean citizens facing intimidation and lawsuits uncovered substantial evidence of widespread electoral irregularities (as they did for elections in 2020, 2022, and 2024). Did anyone at the US Embassy, the State Department or the White House even examine the evidence? Or meet with the citizen's groups? Apparently not. The foreign press has been equally lazy. As have most analysts. Rather than investigating, just call it baseless conspiracy theories. This was a gut punch to pro-alliance South Koreans, already distressed that the Trump administration couldn't be bothered to make a favorable reference to consensual government and honest elections before the polling. So maybe the Trump administration is going to wish away the problem and pretend Lee isn't what he's been all his professional life, in hopes of keeping the alliance alive. But at some point a US administration is going to discover that Lee and South Korean leftists—just like Chavez, Erdogan, Ortega and others – mean what they say. And Washington may one day find that South Korea, once solidly with the US and democracies, is quite the opposite. And, furthermore, that a system has developed in the ROK so that even if the problematic 'leader' goes away, the country is stuck and cannot re-democratize. Washington still has cards to play if it wants to support consensual government in South Korea – and at the same time preserve the US-ROK alliance. Not least is that most South Koreans don't want to go where Lee and his 'jusapa' radicals want to take them. But having a good hand requires one to actually play it. Grant Newsham is a retired US Marine officer and former US diplomat. He was the first Marine liaison officer to the Japan Self-Defense Forces and is a fellow at the Center for Security Policy and the Yorktown Institute. He is the author of the book, When China Attacks: A Warning To America . This article was originally published by The Sunday Guardian. It is republished with permission.
HKFP
12 hours ago
- HKFP
Int'l Domestic Workers Day: Hong Kong urged to toughen loan regulations to combat ‘excessive borrowing'
A group of NGOs and a pro-establishment lawmaker have urged the government to impose limits on unsecured personal loans to combat 'excessive borrowing' among migrant domestic workers and teenagers in Hong Kong. Chrystie Lam, president of the local NGO Coalition of Global Home Service Sustainable Development, said at a press conference on Sunday afternoon that the group had noticed more and more foreign domestic workers were involved in 'excessive borrowing,' Commercial Radio reported. Lam suggested that the government should strengthen regulations governing unsecured personal loans provided by licensed money lenders, with the maximum repayment capped at 30 per cent of a foreign worker's monthly salary. Lam also recommended that the repayment period should be similar to the remaining duration of the foreign worker's contract. And lenders should not grant the loan if there are fewer than than six months left on the contract, Lam added. Edward Leung – a lawmaker and a member of the pro-Beijing party Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong (DAB) – and three local NGOs hosted a press conference on Sunday, the eve of International Domestic Workers Day. Leung said that, apart from domestic workers, teenagers in Hong Kong also suffered from 'excessive borrowing' as more and more online platforms target adolescents, according to a statement he issued. Public consultation to start in June Christopher Hui, the secretary for financial services and the treasury, announced last November that the government was planning to impose limits on loans that can be taken out at licensed money lenders. Hui said at the time that the government was working on a series of measures to combat 'excessive borrowing,' with a public consultation set to take place in the first half of 2025. The Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau said in response to a lawmaker's question in May that the public consultation will commence in June. However, authorities are yet to announce the start date for the public consultation. According to the Companies Registry, a total of 214 complaints were received about money lenders in 2024. The figure marks a significant increase compared to that of 2023, which saw 109 complaints throughout the year. HKFP reported last July that many domestic workers also fall victim to unlicensed online lenders. Workers said that extortionate interest rates and campaigns of harassment from lenders left them terrified. Some workers told HKFP that they had to borrow money because they had been overcharged with recruitment fees before they arrived to Hong Kong, and they suffered financial pressure usually as the main – or even sole – family breadwinners.
