Starmer warns UK must prepare to fight against enemies as he orders biggest investment in guns & bombs since Cold War
In recent years, our stockpiles of guns and missiles have nearly run dry as we donated so many to Ukraine.
WAR FOOTING Starmer warns UK must prepare to fight against enemies as he orders biggest investment in guns & bombs since Cold War
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
SIR Keir Starmer today puts the country on a war footing — as he warns we must prepare to 'fight and win' against our enemies.
The Prime Minister is ordering the biggest investment in the production of guns and bombs since the Cold War.
Sign up for the Politics newsletter
Sign up
2
Defence Secretary John Healey said he has no doubt UK defence spending will rise to 3 per cent by 2034
Credit: Alamy
Writing in The Sun on Sunday, Sir Keir said Britain is facing a 'more dangerous world' and the time has come to 'transform how we defend these islands'.
He added: 'We will meet this moment head on — by mounting the kind of response not seen before in most of our lifetimes.
"We will restore Britain's war-fighting readiness as the central purpose of our Armed Forces.
"We are being directly threatened by states with advanced military forces.
'So we must be ready to fight and win. After all, the best way to prevent conflict is by preparing for it.'
Unveiling key details of the long-awaited Strategic Defence Review, he revealed the UK will move to wartime levels of arms production by building six new munitions factories.
This £1.5billion investment will create or support nearly 2,000 jobs across the country. Some 7,000 long-range weapons will also be bought.
It is the biggest rearmament programme the nation has seen in decades and will move the UK to an 'always-on' level of production.
In recent years, our stockpiles of guns and missiles have nearly run dry as we donated so many to Ukraine.
Kier Starmer vows to keep up economic pressure on Russia
And the PM said the world is more dangerous than it has been in generations as we face the threat of tyrants in Russia, Iran and North Korea.
He said this requires a 'fundamental shift' in Britain's military might, saying: 'It's time to bring together a whole of society effort to keep Britain safe.
'That means business, society, tech experts and more all working together.
"And it means seizing this opportunity to change our country for the better.'
Ministers have vowed to ramp up defence spending to 2.5 per cent of national income in 2027.
Defence Secretary John Healey said he has no doubt UK defence spending will rise to 3 per cent by 2034.
Overall, spending on weapons will hit £6billion by 2029.
Mr Healey said: 'We're strengthening the UK's industrial base to better deter our adversaries and make the UK secure at home and strong abroad.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Mongolia PM resigns after losing confidence vote that followed weeks of protests
Mongolia's prime minister has resigned after he failed to receive enough support in a vote of confidence in parliament, Mongolian media has reported. The country's embassy in Washington confirmed it. Prime minister Oyun-Erdene Luvsannamsrai received 44 votes, well short of the 64 needed, according to news site The vote early on Tuesday followed weeks of protests sparked by reports of lavish spending by the prime minister's son. Some called for the prime minister to step down. Before the vote, Oyun-Erdene warned the vote could lead to instability and shake Mongolia's fledgling democracy. 'If governance becomes unstable, the economic situation deteriorates, and political parties cannot come to consensus, it could lead the public to lose faith in parliamentary rule and potentially put our democratic parliamentary system at risk of collapse,' he said. He defended his integrity but acknowledged a mistake: 'dedicating too much time to major projects while paying insufficient attention to social and internal political matters.' Oyun-Erdene had held the post for four years and survived previous calls to step down. Last year, parliament was enlarged from 76 seats to 126 after electoral reforms. It resulted in a coalition government. Landlocked between Russia and China, Mongolia has struggled to become more democratic after its party-state era. A communist state during the cold war, it has been transforming into a democracy since the collapse of the Soviet Union. Protesters have said the country's mineral riches have benefited business interests and the wealthy, while many Mongolians still live in poverty. 'It's very difficult to build that foundation for democracy' at a time that Mongolia also must tackle economic problems, which are a major source of people's frustration, said Erin Murphy, deputy director and senior fellow of India and emerging Asian economics at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. 'We still have to see what happens next and how the new government plans to tackle these issues,' she said. While democracy is yet to thrive in Mongolia, 'it is taking root,' Murphy said.
New European
2 hours ago
- New European
Britain enters a new nuclear age
Alongside an ambitious plan to build up to 12 new attack submarines, and to create jobs in six new ammunition factories, one of the most striking commitments is to enter discussions with the USA aimed at 'enhanced participation in Nato's nuclear mission'. This innocuous sounding sentence represents a big change in nuclear posture. Make no mistake: today's Strategic Defence Review marks the start of British rearmament. Not only does it signal the UK's commitment to increase defence spending to 3% of GDP, but to a type of spending designed to enhance the UK's strategic clout in the world. At present, only Belgium, Germany, Italy and the Netherlands host US-owned tactical nuclear bombs, with their aircraft designed to be 'dual capable' of delivering such bombs on target. The UK, which lacks tactical nuclear weapons, could now volunteer to do likewise, but would need to buy a different variant of the F-35 combat aircraft than the one that is flown from the Royal Navy's carriers. That would be a major change in nuclear policy – because the British deterrent has, since the 1990s, been strategic-only. As I've argued here before, we need a wider range of options because Putin is now making regular threats to use nukes against Nato, and tactical nukes against Ukraine – so it makes sense to place more of Nato's collective nuclear armoury closer to the front line, and distributed among a larger number of allies. Over and above deterring Russian aggression, almost everything Labour has announced today looks designed to achieve three things: to boost Britain's influence among its allies, to deliver high skilled jobs to places where they are scarce, and to get ahead of the game in the military technologies of the future. These don't only include drones – though the spectacular Ukrainian strike on Russia's strategic bomber fleet on Sunday shows that we've hardly even begun to understand their power. The technological arms race is now focused on niche areas of science – like nanotech, materials and quantum computing – and Labour, to its credit, has understood that it in any conflict with Russia it is the science labs of Oxbridge, Imperial and Edinburgh, not the 'playing fields of Eton', that might be decisive. Suggested Reading We must take a nuclear leap into the unknown Paul Mason For the armed forces, often bound by tradition and prone to inter-service rivalry, making the SDR work will be a challenge. Because in every domain of warfare – land, air, sea, space and cyberspace – they face the same problem: they are running decades-old kit designed for an era when Britain could choose which wars it fights, while at the same time moving to a completely new, digitally enabled way of fighting, in which technological change never stops. In this context, faced with a Russia that has turned itself into a war economy, and itself learned to innovate rapidly – deterrence comes down to showing Putin that our own industry, science and digital technology base could crank itself up to speed, and indeed surpass what Russia itself could achieve. For me, the most basic task of the SDR was to assess the scale of the Russian threat and offer the electorate an honest proposal of how to meet it – within our means. Though it might sound simple to achieve, it was not achieved at any point during 14 years of Conservative government, above all after 2020, when Boris Johnson and Dominic Cummings declared a 'tilt' of security priorities towards Asia, while systematically underfunding the ministry of defence. Labour reversed that stance, declaring from day one that its priority is: 'Nato First'. The SDR places maritime warfare as the highest priority and designates the Atlantic and the Arctic as the UK's prime areas of interest. There's been a row today over the precise form of words Keir Starmer is using – describing the 3% target in the 2030s as an ambition. I think it's clear that Labour means to find the money to achieve that – but it stands way outside the term of UK fiscal forecasting, and no chancellor would allow it to be stated as a firm commitment outside of a budget statement. The real question with the SDR is: do the capabilities match the threats? The answer is: only if you believe Russia can be deterred through Nato remaining cohesive and the UK leading an enhancement of continent-wide nuclear deterrence. If it cannot, then 3, 4 or even 5% won't be enough. In 1939, after seven years of rearmament, Britain's defence budget was 9% of GDP – and once war broke out it rose above 50%. Today's focus on the big stuff – submarines, which are the capital ships of the 21st century, and a £15bn upgrade to nuclear warheads – reflects Starmer's determination for this country to avoid any impression that it wants to be 'Little Britain'. With a cash-strapped treasury, it is a decision to spend on what's strategic, and rely on allies for that which is not. There is even the promise, thinking long term, to specify within this parliament a replacement for the Dreadnought submarines, currently being built at Barrow: and they don't even go out of service until 2050. I would like to have seen more spending and faster – above all because defence industrial investment is one of the surest ways to boost growth and social cohesion in communities that have seen too little of it. But until Labour can win the argument with the British people that they need to pay more tax, and tolerate more borrowing to fund defence, progress is going to be incremental. That, in turn, will depend on the outcome of Ukraine's peace negotiations with Russia. If they fail – and that looks likely – people may wake up to the fact that the prospect of endless war on our doorstep requires a change of attitude to defence. In that sense, the SDR was the start, not the end, of something.
South Wales Argus
2 hours ago
- South Wales Argus
Urgent repairs for hundreds of military homes in Wales
Around 800 Service Family Accommodation (SFA) properties in Wales are expected to benefit from a share of £1.5 billion in additional UK Government funding announced as part of an upcoming Strategic Defence Review. The investment is part of a wider £7 billion commitment to improve military housing across the UK during this parliamentary term. Jo Stevens, secretary of state for Wales, said: "The Armed Forces make a valued and vital contribution to Wales and our security. "I warmly welcome this action to address the urgent repairs and facilitate the development of new housing for service families across Wales. "Our 800 forces family homes will benefit from a much-needed investment uplift, as part of an overall £7 billion in funding this parliament." The funding will support urgent repairs such as fixing boilers, roofs, and tackling damp and mould, as well as the development of new housing for military families. Ms Stevens also highlighted ongoing support for veterans, saying: "Through initiatives such as the Reducing Veterans Homelessness programme and the establishment of an Armed Forces Commissioner for Wales, we continue to ensure that those who have served receive the support and recognition they deserve. "This is a UK Government delivering for veterans and their families." Defence Secretary John Healey said: "Our Armed Forces personnel make extraordinary sacrifices to serve our country. "For too long, many military families have lived in sub-standard homes, but this government is taking decisive action to fix the dire state of military accommodation and ensure that our heroes and their loved ones live in the homes they deserve." The funding will cover both SFA and single living accommodation and forms part of a broader Defence Housing Strategy, which includes a new Consumer Charter to improve standards and introduce clearer housing rights for military families. This includes improved property information, higher move-in standards, a named housing officer for every family, and access to a robust complaints system. The Strategic Defence Review will outline long-term plans to improve defence capabilities and infrastructure, aiming to strengthen the UK's security and deliver lasting improvements for armed forces personnel.
