NYC Mayor Eric Adams helps save Trump-linked Bally's casino bid
Mayor Eric Adams put his chips on the table for Bally's.
The City Council voted to advance legislation Wednesday that would allow gaming operator Bally's to convert part of President Trump's former Bronx golf course into a casino — after the mayor intervened to help secure its passage.
The proposal — referred to as a home rule message — requires 34 votes from the council for passage without the mayor's backing. But only 26 votes are needed — a simple majority, if the mayor declares his support.
6 NYC Mayor Eric Adams held his weekly presser and media availability inside the Blue Room at City Hall on June 10, 2025.
Paul Martinka
At the 11th hour on Wednesday, Adams issued a formal message of support to the council, and the measure passed 32-12, with seven abstaining.
It means the bill can now be take up by the state Legislature.
If approved, it would allow the golf course property, currently designated as state parkland, to be repurposed as a casino complex.
Bally's will then be able to submit a bid for one of three covered downstate state casino licenses later this month.
6 Exterior of Bally's casino in Atlantic City on February 20, 2011.
LightRocket via Getty Images
The firm hopes to build a 500,000-square-foot casino on the Bronx site by its golf course — now called Bally's Golf Links at Ferry Point — along with a 500-room hotel with a spa and meeting space, retail shops, a 2,000-seat event center and two parking garages with capacity for up to 4,660 vehicles.
The City Council and Albany lawmakers recently approved such land use legislation allowing Mets owner Steve Cohen and Hard Rock to repurpose some of the lots around Citi Field for a casino complex.
Cohen's bill got little to no resistance from the council — but Bally's, with its Trump connection, did.
6 Democratic mayoral candidate Adrienne Adams speaks during a Democratic mayoral primary debate, Wednesday, June 4, 2025, in New York.
AP
As part of the deal to acquire the golf course at Ferry Point in 2023, Bally's agreed to provide the Trump Organization an additional $115 million if it wins a casino license.
As The Post previously reported, a council vote on Bally's proposal was postponed two weeks ago — provoking criticism from its CEO Soo Sim, who also fumed that lobbyists for rival bidder Cohen were allegedly whipping up votes against him.
Bronx Democrats back the project. But Councilwoman Kristy Marmarato, a Republican whose district includes Bally's Golf Link at Ferry Point, opposes it.
6 U.S. President Donald Trump waits for German Chancellor Friedrich Merz at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., June 5, 2025.
REUTERS
Her opposition triggered five of her GOP colleagues — including Council Minority Leader Joanne Ariola — to vote against the project that could benefit the president and his company.
During the vote, Marmarato said her constituents opposed the proposed casino and blasted 'outside interference' and 'special interests' lobbying.
City Hall insisted the mayor pushed for Bally's to get a fair hearing from the state Gaming Commission with its casino bid, and wasn't putting his thumb on the scale for the gaming operator or Trump.
6 New York Mayor Eric Adams speaks during a press conference on Public Safety at City Hall on June 03, 2025 in New York City.
Getty Images
'Mayor Adams supports a fair process with as many competitive casino bids in New York City as possible, each of which would bring good-paying union jobs and an economic boost to the community,' an Adams spokesman said.
'It does not matter which proposal is selected by the state so long as it's in New York City. We would be supportive of more than one selection in New York City, but that requires more than one competitive proposal.'
Bally's applauded the Council's action.
6 A general view of Bally's Casino on March 24, 2010 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
Getty Images
'We appreciate the City Council, including the Speaker and Bronx Delegation in particular, for recognizing the opportunity that this project can afford to the Bronx and the City as a whole. Their actions today allow us to move forward to the next step of making this happen for NYC,' said Christopher Jewett, Bally's senior vice president of corporate development.
He said Bally's has been a 'good neighbor' and will continue to work closely with elected officials and residents.
Cohen's team declined to comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
32 minutes ago
- USA Today
'Afraid' for court: Trump DOJ sues NY over immigration enforcement in state courthouses
'Afraid' for court: Trump DOJ sues NY over immigration enforcement in state courthouses Show Caption Hide Caption Three Democratic governors testify in House hearing over immigration New York Governor Kathy Hochul, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, and Illinois Governor JB Pritzker, testify on Capitol Hill over immigration policies. NEW YORK − The Trump administration on June 12 sued New York state for its law restricting federal immigration enforcement inside state courthouses. The lawsuit challenges a New York state law that blocks immigration officials from arresting people at or near New York courthouses. The complaint, filed in federal court in Albany, New York, alleges the law frustrates federal immigration enforcement at a venue - state courthouses - where authorities can safely make arrests. U.S. Justice Department lawyers said New York's law and policies restricting cooperation with federal immigration officers violated the Constitution's Supremacy Clause, which gives federal law precedence over state law. The lawsuit filed in federal court in Albany comes after the administration has increased immigration enforcement at workplaces and while people appeared for immigration court hearings. People have protested against the federal actions in cities across the country. Attorney General Pam Bondi blamed so-called 'sanctuary city policies' for violence seen in California. Sanctuary policies generally refers to those limiting local law enforcement from cooperating with federal immigration enforcement. The Justice Department has also sued four New Jersey cities for their laws. New York state had similar policies preventing agents from apprehending migrants, Bondi said in a statement. 'This latest lawsuit in a series of sanctuary city litigation underscores the Department of Justice's commitment to keeping Americans safe and aggressively enforcing the law,' she said. Justice Department lawyers challenged the 2020 state law preventing federal officials from arresting people for civil immigration violations at state courthouses without a signed judicial warrant. New York's 2020 law doesn't apply to federal courthouses or immigration court, according to the legislation's author, state Sen. Brad Hoylman-Sigal, a Manhattan Democrat who called the lawsuit 'baseless and frivolous." The Justice Department said in a news release that enforcement at courthouses reduces risk of people fleeing or dangerous situations, especially since there is enhanced screening inside court buildings. 'Ongoing assault' on rule of law in NY, state officials say State officials said federal agents entering local courthouses make communities unsafe by preventing people from accessing the judicial system. The law ensures New Yorkers can pursue justice without fear, Geoff Burgan, a spokesperson for state Attorney General Letitia James, said in a statement. 'Due process means nothing if people are too afraid to appear in court,' he said. James would defend the law and 'all of New York's laws, just as she will continue to defend the rights and dignity of all who call New York home,' Burgan said. Hoylman-Sigal, who authored the law, said the lawsuit was part of the administration's 'ongoing assault on the rule of law in New York.' To avoid conflicting with federal law or federal immigration authority, the law doesn't apply to federal courts or immigration courts, he said in a statement. Meanwhile, it allows U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to arrest people in local courthouses when they have 'actual, valid judicial warrants.' 'At a time when masked ICE officials are roaming the state and lawlessly detaining New Yorkers without any due process, the law preserves access to justice and participation in the judicial process,' he said. 'Sensitive' areas targets of immigration enforcement A contentious issue has been federal agents targeting people in 'sensitive" areas. Prior Department of Homeland Security guidelines banned enforcement in areas such as schools, places of worship and hospitals. When President Donald Trump took office in January, DHS overturned the longstanding policy to give agents discretion on such actions. The administration enacted another policy permitting enforcement at or near courthouses. Justice Department lawyers also challenged two New York executive orders restricting civil immigration arrests at state facilities, and a separate policy preventing state employees from sharing information to federal officers related to civil immigration enforcement. 'Through these enactments, New York obstructs federal law enforcement and facilitates the evasion of federal law by dangerous criminals, notwithstanding federal agents' statutory mandate to detain and remove illegal aliens,' the complaint said. The same day as the lawsuit, Gov. Kathy Hochul was one of three Democratic governors testifying before Congress about "sanctuary" policies and immigration enforcement. Hochul said her state has cooperated with ICE since she's taken office. "But we have to draw a line somewhere,' Hochul said. 'New York cannot deputize our state officers to enforce civil immigration violations, such as overstaying a visa.' The administration's attack on the 2020 law would turn courthouses 'into traps,' Donna Liberman, executive director of the New York Civil Liberties Union, said in a statement. It would further force immigrant communities into the shadows. An initial conference date for the lawsuit was scheduled for Sept. 10, court records showed. Contributing: Bart Jansen, USA TODAY Eduardo Cuevas is based in New York City. Reach him by email at emcuevas1@ or on Signal at emcuevas.01.
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Gavin Newsom Brutally Mocks Trump's ‘This Is Not Good' Understatement
Donald Trump finally admitted there have been negative consequences to his immigration crackdown ― and California Gov. Gavin Newsom was ready to pounce. On his Truth Social platform Thursday, Trump saidhe'd been hearing complaints from 'our great Farmers and people in the Hotel and Leisure business' about his mass deportation agenda. 'Our very aggressive policy on immigration is taking very good, long time workers away from them, with those jobs being almost impossible to replace,' Trump acknowledged before claiming that 'Criminals' are now 'applying for those jobs.' 'This is not good,' he wrote, promising, 'Changes are coming!' Newsom ― who has been railing against the president since Trump called in the military to suppress immigrant rights protests in Los Angeles ― immediately shot back: 'Turns out, chasing hard working people through ranches and farms and snatching women and children off the streets is not good policy.' Turns out, chasing hard working people through ranches and farms and snatching women and children off the streets is not good policy. — Gavin Newsom (@GavinNewsom) June 12, 2025 A short time later, Newsom posted a video saying that Trump had once again reversed course on policy, a pattern that has inspired the phrase 'Trump Always Chickens Out,' or TACO. 'MAJOR WIN: Trump just reversed course on immigration. We're watching closely — and we'll hold him to it,' Newsom posted. 'This happened because you spoke up. Keep it going. Keep it peaceful. It's working.' MAJOR WIN: Trump just reversed course on watching closely — and we'll hold him to it. This happened because you spoke up. Keep it going. Keep it peaceful. It's working. — Gavin Newsom (@GavinNewsom) June 12, 2025 It's not clear that Trump, despite promising 'changes,' has actually reversed course on any of his policies toward immigrants. In the meantime, people on social media weren't exactly celebrating the president's epiphany. To be fair, Trump always seems surprised when something he does backfires. His budget, his tariffs, his deportations have all backfired for the same reason: incompetent execution. He just never has the discipline to do anything right — Patrick Strother (@PatrickStrother) June 12, 2025 Trump just realized how his terrible policy is hurting the American people. He caved just like he always do. — Ron Smith (@Ronxyz00) June 12, 2025 Immigration TACO. — Paul Graham (@paulg) June 12, 2025 Finally, someone had to spell it out for Trump and his MAGA minions—chasing hardworking people off farms and snatching families off streets isn't 'great policy,' it's a disgrace! The irony of Trump needing a reality check on what the rest of us have known for years is laughable.… — Peter (@_e_tto_) June 12, 2025 Trump is having a really hard time finding the criminals he so dearly longs to deport. So, he's going after the soft targets. People who can't afford to miss a single day's work, even if it means getting dragged from the fields they work in. — Deborah, My Friends Call Me Slayer🔥🐉⚔️🔥 (@drodvik52) June 12, 2025 You can't call them *criminals* one day and *essential workers* the they pick your food, clean your rooms, raise your children— they're not the threat. They're the kind of kingdom arrests the servants but pardons the kings who exploit them? — Digital Jesus (@0xDigital_Jesus) June 12, 2025 Gavin Newsom Savagely Corrects Sarah Huckabee Sanders Gavin Newsom Delivers Grim Predictions About Trump's Next Move Gavin Newsom Offers Blunt Reality Check On Who's Really 'Defending Insurrectionists' Gov. Newsom Files Restraining Order To Block Trump's Militarization Of LA
New York Times
32 minutes ago
- New York Times
A G.O.P. Plan to Sell Public Land Is Back. This Time, It's Millions of Acres.
Senate Republicans are resurrecting a plan to sell millions of acres of federal lands as part of President Trump's giant tax and spending bill, setting up a fight within the party. The proposal would require the Bureau of Land Management and the U.S. Forest Service to identify and sell between 2.2 million and 3.3 million acres of public lands across 11 Western states to build housing. Past efforts to auction off public land have enraged conservationists and have also proved contentious with some Republicans. A smaller proposal to sell around 500,000 acres of federal land in Utah and Nevada was stripped from the House version of the tax bill last month after opposition from Representative Ryan Zinke, Republican of Montana and a former interior secretary. 'This was my San Juan Hill; I do not support the widespread sale or transfer of public lands,' Mr. Zinke said last month. 'Once the land is sold, we will never get it back.' The new plan to sell public lands was included in draft legislation issued on Wednesday by the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee that is part of Mr. Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' The draft envisions raising as much as $10 billion by selling land for housing in Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming over the next five years. Notably, Mr. Zinke's home state of Montana was left off the list. Senator Mike Lee, the Utah Republican who leads the energy committee, said that the move would turn 'federal liabilities into taxpayer value, while making housing more affordable for hardworking American families.' Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
