Hezbollah chief rejects disarmament as pressure on Lebanon grows
"Those who call for submitting arms practically demand submitting them to Israel ... We will not submit to Israel," Qassem said in a televised address.
Hezbollah emerged badly damaged from a war with Israel last year that eliminated most of the group's leadership, killed thousands of its fighters and left tens of thousands of its supporters displaced from their destroyed homes.
The U.S. is now pushing Lebanon to issue a formal cabinet decision committing to disarm Hezbollah before talks can resume on a halt to Israeli military operations in the country, five sources familiar with the matter told Reuters.
Hezbollah has publicly refused to hand over its arsenal in full, but has privately weighed scaling it back.
"Those who call for disarmament on a domestic, global or Arab level serve the Israeli project," Qassem said.
He also said the U.S. was demanding a removal of Hezbollah's missiles and drones because they "scare" Israel, accusing U.S. special envoy Thomas Barrack of calling for disarmament for the sake of Israel and not Lebanon's own security.
"Israel will not be able to defeat us and it will not be able to take Lebanon hostage," he added.
In early July, Barrack met Lebanese officials in Beirut to discuss the disarmament proposal. It would see Hezbollah fully disarmed within four months in exchange for the withdrawal of Israeli troops occupying several posts in south Lebanon and a halt to Israeli air strikes.
Hezbollah has been under pressure in recent months both within Lebanon and from Washington to completely relinquish its weaponry.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
19 minutes ago
- CNN
Madonna asks Pope Leo to visit Gaza ‘before it's too late'
Madonna has urged Pope Leo to visit Gaza in a humanitarian mission to help starving Palestinian children, saying 'there is no more time.' The American superstar, who was raised a Roman Catholic, pleaded with the new pontiff to visit the enclave in an Instagram post Monday and said: 'Most Holy Father. Please go to Gaza and bring your light to the children before it's too late. As a mother, I cannot bear to watch their suffering. The children of the world belong to everyone. You are the only one of us who cannot be denied entry.' Madonna said she was calling on Leo to visit Gaza because 'politics cannot affect change,' but 'consciousness can.' In the post, published on her son Rocco's birthday, Madonna said the best gift she could give to him is 'to ask everyone to do what they can to help save the innocent children caught in the crossfire in Gaza.' CNN has reached out to the Vatican for comment. Since his papacy began in May, the pope has been robust in his criticisms of Israel's war in Gaza, consistently voicing his concern for Palestinian civilians facing Israeli bombardment. 'I am following with great concern the dire humanitarian situation in Gaza, where the civilian population is suffering from severe hunger and remains exposed to violence and death,' he said in July, calling for a ceasefire. According to UNICEF, the United Nations' children's agency, more than 18,000 children have been killed in Gaza since the war began in October 2023. An average of 28 children have been killed a day there, the agency said last week. An Israeli blockade on aid to the enclave has resulted in what the World Health Organization (WHO) has called 'man-made mass starvation.' Madonna said that she is 'not pointing fingers, placing blame or taking sides.' 'Everyone is suffering. Including the mothers of the hostages. I pray that they are released as well,' she said. WHO director-general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus responded to Madonna's post on Monday, thanking her for her 'compassion, solidarity and commitment to care for everyone caught in the Gaza crisis, especially the children.' 'This is greatly needed. Humanity and peace must prevail,' he said. At least 222 people – including 101 children – have died from malnutrition since the beginning of the war, according to the Palestinian Ministry of Health. Ramesh Rajasingham, the head of the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), told a UN security council meeting Sunday: 'This is no longer a looming hunger crisis – this is starvation, pure and simple.' Israel tightly controls the flow of aid and personnel to the enclave. In a rare instance in July, Israel allowed two church leaders to visit after Israel struck Gaza's sole Catholic church, killing three people and wounding several others. The church had served as a shelter for Gaza's tiny Christian community throughout nearly two years of war. Since then, Gaza's starvation crisis has deepened, with images of emaciated children causing global alarm. 'We need the humanitarian gates to be fully opened to save these innocent children,' Madonna said. 'There is no more time. Please say you will go,' she wrote. Whether Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government would grant the pope entry to the enclave is not certain, but Madonna's appeal underlines growing condemnation of the 22-month war, which has caused tensions between Israel and its allies. Australia, Canada and France have announced plans to recognize a Palestinian state, with the United Kingdom conditionally saying last month that it will recognize a Palestinian state in September if Israel does not meet criteria that includes agreeing to a ceasefire in Gaza. Madonna's comments come as a growing number of artists, including Massive Attack, Brian Eno and most recently U2, have highlighted the humanitarian situation in Gaza. During a performance in late 2023, Madonna also criticized the Hamas-led October 7 attacks on Israel, and Israel's military response. She called the war 'heartbreaking.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The state-sponsored killing of journalists is another way to limit freedom of speech
The life of journalist Anas al-Sharif is worth no more and no less than any other life lost during the war in Gaza, or in the terrorist atrocities, perpetrated by Hamas, that preceded it. But his targeted killing – alongside that of the four other Al Jazeera staff members who died with him – does raise further significant questions about the way in which Israel has conducted the war. That an accredited journalist who worked for Al Jazeera (and previously for Reuters) was specifically targeted by the Israel Defense Forces is a development that can only be looked upon with a degree of horror. His death was not the kind of inevitable collateral damage that can take place in any war; for want of a better word, Sharif was the subject of a state-sponsored assassination. The Israeli authorities say he was a terrorist, belonged to Hamas, and served as the leader of a cell. They've produced some documentary evidence, but this has not impressed the independent observers who've examined it, and it raises the question of why, if it was so compelling, it was not released sooner. It certainly does not give any lawful reason for his killing, still less that of his Al Jazeera colleagues – correspondent Mohammed Qreiqeh, cameramen Moamen Aliwa and Ibrahim Zaher, and their assistant Mohammed Noufal – none of whom has been claimed by the Israelis to have had any links to Hamas. Truth, as the old cliche goes, is the first casualty of war, and the fact is that Israel – unusually – has banned international journalists from covering the conflict. The Israeli authorities say it is not safe to do so, a grim irony given Sharif's fate. That, though, is not a matter for them to judge: it is one that should be left to the many news organisations, including The Independent, that have proudly dispatched brave journalists into even more hazardous environments over the course of many decades. Moreover, the Israeli policy has meant that the actions of the Israel Defense Forces cannot be independently monitored and reported on in the traditional manner. The images captured during recent aid flights and first reported by The Independent, of a moonscape where once were bustling neighbourhoods and olive groves, have, alongside the reportage of Sharif and his colleagues, given the world some idea of the disproportionate way in which Israel has acted. The result is that Israel stands accused of war crimes by the International Criminal Court, and the term 'genocide' is increasingly being used in connection with the denial of food and medicines to the people of Gaza. Absent the full measure of international scrutiny, journalists from Gaza itself have had to take on the responsibility of providing this essential function. They have willingly placed themselves in the line of fire to tell the world about the destruction of the Gaza Strip, and its human cost; to assess the extent of terrorist activity; and to draw attention to the plight of the hostages still cruelly held by Hamas. Wearing 'PRESS' flak jackets and helmets, they should have received the normal protections afforded to all journalists, and they might well have if they'd been, say, American or Saudi. The vast majority of the 232 or so journalists who have died in the war in Gaza have been Palestinian – a statistic that almost speaks for itself. According to the Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs' Costs of War project, more journalists have been killed in Gaza than in both world wars, the Vietnam war, the wars in Yugoslavia, and the United States' war in Afghanistan combined. As the exiled Palestinian writer Ahmed Najad has written in this newspaper, the death of Sharif is an attack on truth itself – and such attacks on freedom of speech and thought are sadly not confined to war zones. The arrest of hundreds of passive, peaceful protesters in London over the weekend shows how the effects of the war in Gaza, and the bitter arguments surrounding it, have spread across the world – or at least, to those parts where dissent is still possible and the press remains relatively uncontrolled by the state. It may well be the case, as ministers darkly hint, that Palestine Action is intent on carrying out activities that its supporters do not know about, but that still does not justify detaining elderly people whose only crime is to hold up a piece of cardboard with a message on it and exercise their right to free expression. A nation that seeks the support of its allies the world over will not succeed in drawing others to its cause by denying international reporters – and indeed, other countries' governments, and citizens – access to the truth. If Israel feels its actions are justified, then it must allow proper scrutiny of them, including coverage of the war it seems intent on perpetrating. The killing of journalists will never elicit anything other than shock from the international community. Benjamin Netanyahu would do well to remember this.
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
What to Know About Al Jazeera, the Broadcaster Targeted by Israel
The Israeli military said on Sunday that it had targeted an Al Jazeera journalist in a strike on Gaza City, accusing him of being a Hamas operative and a 'military terrorist.' Al Jazeera said the strike killed five of its journalists and denied Israeli claims that its reporters have ties to Hamas. It accused Israel of attempting to silence reporters before a planned offensive to take over Gaza City, which Israel announced on Friday. The network has said that Israel has fabricated evidence to support its accusations, and the attack on Sunday inflamed long-running tensions between the Israeli government and the Qatari network. Al Jazeera has faced similar criticism — and bans — from other Middle Eastern countries. Here is what to know about the broadcaster. Why is Al Jazeera criticized? Al Jazeera was founded in 1996 with funding from the government of Qatar and a mission to produce independent news, free of any influence, in Arabic. While it is a private business, it continues to receive financial support from the Qatari government. 'Media in the Arab world, till then, was characterized by state-controlled narratives that denied audiences the right to know and the right to be heard,' Al Jazeera says of the impetus for its creation. The network, which says it has 70 bureaus worldwide and more than 3,000 employees, was the first regional broadcaster to give airtime to Israeli officials and analysts, but it has also come under criticism from Israeli officials and the Palestinian Authority, which administers part of the West Bank. Both governments accusing Al Jazeera of supporting Hamas. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
