logo
We're being charged £1MILLION to fix 70ft wall that collapsed on our homes… even though it's NOT our fault

We're being charged £1MILLION to fix 70ft wall that collapsed on our homes… even though it's NOT our fault

The Sun30-05-2025
RESIDENTS on a quiet street are facing a shocking £1million repair bill – after a 70ft wall collapsed into their gardens through no fault of their own.
The huge retaining wall on Windmill Lane in Nottingham, crumbled without warning in February 2021, sending clouds of dust and tonnes of rubble crashing down behind six terraced homes.
9
9
9
Now, more than four years on, the damage remains – and homeowners say they're being forced to pay the price for a council-built structure that experts claim was 'not fit for purpose.'
'The wall was originally constructed in 2003, commissioned by Nottingham City Council to replace a crumbling Victorian structure,' Nottinghamshire Live reported.
Each household paid around £9,000 for the works at the time, and residents were relieved to see what they believed was a long-term solution.
But on the night of February 3, 2021, that sense of security collapsed – literally.
Finance manager Luke Drayton, 30, was at home when disaster struck. 'We both looked out the window and could see a cloud of dust.
You could see torches from other people who were all really scared just trying to see what had happened,' he recalled.
The street was evacuated, and residents weren't allowed back in until 8am the next morning.
Fortunately, no one was injured – but it could have been much worse.
'To this day, if you go to the edge of the garden, that is an unwise and unsafe thing to do,' Mr Drayton told NottinghamshireLive.
'It very easily could have cost someone their life. The council is very fortunate that was not the case.'
I'm fuming after nosy neighbours left note on my car asking my 'plans for parking', despite having a four-car driveway
Since the collapse, gardens behind numbers 147 to 157 have remained unusable and dangerous.
Residents have been quoted between £600,000 and £1million to fix the wall, in a neighbourhood where house prices range between £140,000 and £220,000.
'We all lost half of our gardens,' said Mr Drayton.
'The £1million cost is a no-go for everybody. There's been lots of tears and emotional distress.'
9
9
He described how one neighbour put her home up for auction for just £25,000, adding: 'She was so done with it, she was ready to take the loss and move on with her life.'
Another woman, who has since sold her home at a heavy loss, said she had paid nearly £10,000 for the wall's construction in 2003.
She later had to undergo talking therapy to cope with the stress.
'After four years of us all trying to resolve the problem, I decided to sell my property at auction – a financial risk, but one I was prepared to accept,' she said.
'The impact on us all has been quite profound.'
According to documents, the wall was designed, built and supervised under Section 78 of the Building Act 1984, with Nottingham City Council in charge of the project.
It was carried out by a company called Central High Rise Ltd.
Residents had no say in the contractor or the project's management, yet they were left footing the bill both then – and now.
Mr Drayton said: 'This was a council-controlled, council-commissioned project.'
But legal time limits have now expired.
According to an email from Sedgwick International UK to Mr Drayton, dated August 23, 2023: 'Your claim would, in any event, seem to be Statute barred, due to the expiry of the Limitation period.'
Nottingham City Council confirmed to residents it would take no further action, stating in April this year that the matter is considered private and falls to the homeowners.
'The Council no longer intervenes in boundary wall, fence, or other structural issues that are private matters between land/ property owners,' it said.
9
9
Residents hired two independent engineering firms to assess the site.
Reports from May 2021 and October 2022 concluded the replacement wall was poorly built and unsafe from the start.
One report stated: 'The replacement retaining wall was not fit for purpose and was a hazardous and dangerous structure from the day it was completed.'
It also said the wall had not been suitably designed by a qualified structural engineer, and blamed both design and construction faults for its failure.
Just 48 hours before the collapse, one homeowner reported a visible crack in the soil to the council after a gardener raised the alarm.
But they say they were told it was a private matter and not the council's concern.
After the collapse, they were told they should have reported it. 'But we did,' said one resident.
'I feel like we were failed from the beginning.'
According to residents, most insurance companies have refused to cover the repair costs, although around £60,000 was contributed to help clear debris.
Residents have also turned to Nadia Whittome, MP for Nottingham East, who has raised the matter with the council 'on a number of occasions.'
But no breakthrough has been made.
'I have tried, along with my neighbours, so hard for all this time to resolve the problem,' one woman said.
'It's been an emotional rollercoaster. It's not just bricks and rubble – it's our peace of mind.'
The Sun has approached Nottingham City Council for comment.
9
9
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Volunteer officer met alleged rape victim while posing as girl, 16, court told
Volunteer officer met alleged rape victim while posing as girl, 16, court told

The Independent

time22 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Volunteer officer met alleged rape victim while posing as girl, 16, court told

A volunteer Metropolitan Police officer accused of raping a woman was posing online as a 16-year-old girl when the pair began talking, a court has heard. Amersham Law Courts heard that James Bubb, who now identifies as a woman named Gwyn Samuels, allegedly raped the woman he was in an on-off relationship with between January 2018 and February 2023. On Monday, the trial heard the pair met on the online chat site Omegle while Bubb was posing as a teenage girl and that they had spoken about a sexual practice known as BDSM (bondage, discipline/domination, sadism/submission, and masochism). Jurors previously heard the woman had told police Bubb went on to use 'BDSM and kink as a way of creating control' throughout their relationship. The complainant, who cannot be named for legal reasons, told the court on Monday: 'When I met James on Omegle, I didn't know that it was James at first, they introduced themselves as a teenage girl so I was more concerned than anything else, and then kind of just talking to them about maybe this isn't what they should want to look at at their age.' She said: 'As I said, James first presented themselves as a 16-year-old girl.' Jurors previously heard the pair started talking when the complainant had 'just turned 18' and that she had been 'terrified' after Bubb had suggested 'knife-play' during their relationship. In her police interview, she said: 'When a guy is trailing a knife down you telling you the things he could do with it and you are terrified and you don't trust he would stop – the safe word means nothing.' During cross-examination, Adrian Amer, defending Bubb, asked: 'All the BDSM you had with James was completely consensual wasn't it?' 'No,' the alleged victim replied. Mr Amer continued: 'Did you introduce knife-play?' 'I did not introduce knife-play,' the woman said. Mr Amer asked: 'In your knife-play, sometimes you were blindfolded weren't you?' 'Yes,' the witness said. 'And James would use a blunt butter knife to run along your body, a blunt butter knife that's correct, isn't it?' Mr Amer asked. 'I have no way of knowing if it was a blunt butter knife, I was blindfolded,' the alleged victim said. Asked to describe the knife that Bubb would use during times where the alleged victim was not blindfolded, she said it was a 'large-ish knife' like the type 'used to cut vegetables'. Regarding the size of the knife, the woman indicated it was shorter than the length of an A4 piece of paper. The 27-year-old has denied one count of rape in relation to the complainant, and two counts of rape, two counts of sexual activity with a child, one count of assault of a child under 13 by penetration, one count of rape of a child under 13 and one count of assault by penetration in relation to another complainant. A not guilty verdict on one of the rape charges in relation to the second complainant was returned on Wednesday after the prosecution offered no evidence. All charges are alleged to have taken place between January 1 2018 and April 2 2024. The defendant, of High Street, Chesham, Buckinghamshire, denies all charges. The trial continues.

Dorset Police 'do not endorse' Bournemouth volunteer patrol group
Dorset Police 'do not endorse' Bournemouth volunteer patrol group

BBC News

time22 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Dorset Police 'do not endorse' Bournemouth volunteer patrol group

A police and crime commissioner (PCC) has said a group of volunteers patrolling Bournemouth at night is not endorsed by the Force describes itself as a voluntary community service set up to keep streets safe and "protect the most vulnerable".But Dorset PCC David Sidwick told the BBC: "I have had no contact with them. I have concerns about vetting, I have concerns about training, I have concerns about their administration."The group said it remained "committed to collaboration" with police and was working to resolve the issues. The decision not to endorse the group follows a multi-agency meeting on Chief Constable Mark Callaghan, of Dorset Police, said: "We have engaged with the group extensively and a review of their vetting processes has highlighted areas of significant concern. "The organisers have been unable to provide reassurance that this group has sufficient safeguards in place to ensure volunteers are adequately vetted, trained, and equipped to undertake high-visibility patrols in the community."He said there were "insufficient details in relation to the use of body-worn cameras, publishing of photographs of members of the public, administration and recording of any force used or first aid provided, and limited evidence of any training provided".He added: "We welcome the responsible use of volunteers, who wish to carry out public service and there are many ways in which this can be facilitated in a safe way, including becoming a Special Constable, joining the street pastor programme, or via established Watch schemes." Safeguard Force claimed it was asked to attend the meeting "at very short notice, with no agenda provided".It said the concerns raised were "primarily related to wording in documentation" and it was taking "immediate action" to resolve them."We remain committed to collaboration and are fully prepared for our next meeting as requested," it force said it had been carrying out its own high-visibility patrols in Bournemouth, with 289 foot patrols taking place in the past seven days, including the town centre, gardens and seafront, leading to arrests, dispersal notices, stop searches and anti-social behaviour incidents tackled. You can follow BBC Dorset on Facebook, X, or Instagram.

Arrest after car crashes into family's living room in Nottingham
Arrest after car crashes into family's living room in Nottingham

BBC News

time22 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Arrest after car crashes into family's living room in Nottingham

A man has been arrested after a car ploughed into a family's living room as they car crashed into the house in Flamsteed Road, Nottingham, at about 01:00 BST on Police said the driver fled the scene but a suspect was found shortly after, and they subsequently failed a breathalyser test.A spokesperson for the force said a 22-year-old man was arrested on suspicion of dangerous driving, drink-driving, criminal damage, aggravated vehicle taking. The man was also arrested on suspicion of driving without a valid licence and driving without the correct said the driver of the car reportedly lost control at a roundabout, before mounting a kerb and colliding with the house. The homeowners were asleep upstairs at the time and nobody was injured, but the house was left with significant damage, the force added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store