We're being charged £1MILLION to fix 70ft wall that collapsed on our homes… even though it's NOT our fault
RESIDENTS on a quiet street are facing a shocking £1million repair bill – after a 70ft wall collapsed into their gardens through no fault of their own.
The huge retaining wall on Windmill Lane in Nottingham, crumbled without warning in February 2021, sending clouds of dust and tonnes of rubble crashing down behind six terraced homes.
9
9
9
Now, more than four years on, the damage remains – and homeowners say they're being forced to pay the price for a council-built structure that experts claim was 'not fit for purpose.'
'The wall was originally constructed in 2003, commissioned by Nottingham City Council to replace a crumbling Victorian structure,' Nottinghamshire Live reported.
Each household paid around £9,000 for the works at the time, and residents were relieved to see what they believed was a long-term solution.
But on the night of February 3, 2021, that sense of security collapsed – literally.
Finance manager Luke Drayton, 30, was at home when disaster struck. 'We both looked out the window and could see a cloud of dust.
You could see torches from other people who were all really scared just trying to see what had happened,' he recalled.
The street was evacuated, and residents weren't allowed back in until 8am the next morning.
Fortunately, no one was injured – but it could have been much worse.
'To this day, if you go to the edge of the garden, that is an unwise and unsafe thing to do,' Mr Drayton told NottinghamshireLive.
'It very easily could have cost someone their life. The council is very fortunate that was not the case.'
I'm fuming after nosy neighbours left note on my car asking my 'plans for parking', despite having a four-car driveway
Since the collapse, gardens behind numbers 147 to 157 have remained unusable and dangerous.
Residents have been quoted between £600,000 and £1million to fix the wall, in a neighbourhood where house prices range between £140,000 and £220,000.
'We all lost half of our gardens,' said Mr Drayton.
'The £1million cost is a no-go for everybody. There's been lots of tears and emotional distress.'
9
9
He described how one neighbour put her home up for auction for just £25,000, adding: 'She was so done with it, she was ready to take the loss and move on with her life.'
Another woman, who has since sold her home at a heavy loss, said she had paid nearly £10,000 for the wall's construction in 2003.
She later had to undergo talking therapy to cope with the stress.
'After four years of us all trying to resolve the problem, I decided to sell my property at auction – a financial risk, but one I was prepared to accept,' she said.
'The impact on us all has been quite profound.'
According to documents, the wall was designed, built and supervised under Section 78 of the Building Act 1984, with Nottingham City Council in charge of the project.
It was carried out by a company called Central High Rise Ltd.
Residents had no say in the contractor or the project's management, yet they were left footing the bill both then – and now.
Mr Drayton said: 'This was a council-controlled, council-commissioned project.'
But legal time limits have now expired.
According to an email from Sedgwick International UK to Mr Drayton, dated August 23, 2023: 'Your claim would, in any event, seem to be Statute barred, due to the expiry of the Limitation period.'
Nottingham City Council confirmed to residents it would take no further action, stating in April this year that the matter is considered private and falls to the homeowners.
'The Council no longer intervenes in boundary wall, fence, or other structural issues that are private matters between land/ property owners,' it said.
9
9
Residents hired two independent engineering firms to assess the site.
Reports from May 2021 and October 2022 concluded the replacement wall was poorly built and unsafe from the start.
One report stated: 'The replacement retaining wall was not fit for purpose and was a hazardous and dangerous structure from the day it was completed.'
It also said the wall had not been suitably designed by a qualified structural engineer, and blamed both design and construction faults for its failure.
Just 48 hours before the collapse, one homeowner reported a visible crack in the soil to the council after a gardener raised the alarm.
But they say they were told it was a private matter and not the council's concern.
After the collapse, they were told they should have reported it. 'But we did,' said one resident.
'I feel like we were failed from the beginning.'
According to residents, most insurance companies have refused to cover the repair costs, although around £60,000 was contributed to help clear debris.
Residents have also turned to Nadia Whittome, MP for Nottingham East, who has raised the matter with the council 'on a number of occasions.'
But no breakthrough has been made.
'I have tried, along with my neighbours, so hard for all this time to resolve the problem,' one woman said.
'It's been an emotional rollercoaster. It's not just bricks and rubble – it's our peace of mind.'
The Sun has approached Nottingham City Council for comment.
9
9
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
10 minutes ago
- Times
Labour's plan for illegal migrants explained — and is it working?
What you need to know Sir Keir Starmer has secured improved commitments from France on tackling small boats but this has yet to translate into action on the ground Labour believes a new bill going through the Lords would make a significant difference in its pledge to 'smash the gangs' Despite rejecting the Rwanda plan as a 'gimmick', the prime minister's plan for return hubs has a similar aim, but is still at an early stage Ministers are looking at tightening the rules around Article 8 of the ECHR, the right to family life, in asylum claims When Sir Keir Starmer entered No 10 almost a year ago he pledged to make good on Labour's election promise to 'smash the gangs' and succeed, where the Conservatives had failed, in securing Britain's borders against illegal migration. Yet so far this year almost 15,000 people have arrived in the UK in small boats — up 42 per cent on this time last year and a 95 per cent rise from the same point in 2023. This week ministers sought to blame the weather and insisted that their policies would be effective in making good on Starmer's pledge. But what exactly is the government doing, and how successful has it been? A new deal with France From the British side perhaps the most critical element of the government's small boats strategy has been to leverage Starmer's relationship with President Macron to persuade the French to take a more proactive approach to preventing small boats setting sail from French waters in the first place. At the start of the year the prime minister hosted Macron at Chequers, where the two leaders agreed to step up bilateral co-operation to prevent Channel crossings. This led to a formal agreement a month later under which the UK extended a £480 million deal to pay for policing French beaches in return for new measures to stem the flow of boats. In particular, Paris agreed to change the law to allow police officers to apprehend vessels in shallow waters and restore the offence of an 'illegal stay' in France, which would allow the police to arrest migrants and smugglers before they attempted a crossing. There was also a commitment by France to speed up the construction of a detention centre in Dunkirk — paid for by the British — which had become bogged down in planning rows. But, so far, these commitments have yet to materialise. The plan to enable police to intervene within 300m of the shore is yet to be implemented amid opposition from the officers themselves. There is also still slow progress on Dunkirk. Verdict: Ministers believe improved co-operation with France is as close as it comes to a silver bullet to stem the flow of boats. But while Starmer has won important commitments from Paris, which were never given to the last government, these commitments have yet to materialise into action on the ground. New legal powers to tackle smuggling gangs In January ministers published a bill that they claimed would give police anti-terrorism-style powers to 'identify, disrupt and prevent' organised immigration crime. The Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill, which is going through the House of Lords, will make it illegal to handle items suspected of being used for organised immigration crime, such as boat parts and engines, with a maximum punishment of 14 years in prison. Those found collecting information that could be used by people smugglers will face up to five years in jail. This would include researching routes or vessels online, or arranging departure points, dates and times. The new offences will be accompanied by additional powers for Border Force officers, police and the National Crime Agency. They will be allowed to seize and search the mobile phones of anyone arriving in the UK illegally if they believe it will help an investigation into who organised the journey. The information gathered will also be available to be used in cases brought overseas. Verdict: Senior policing figures believe the legislation will make a difference in their ability to dismantle the smuggling gangs — pointing out that the numbers involved are in the hundreds — and are vulnerable to a concerted attempt to dismantle their activities. However, as the bill is not yet law, at the moment it remains an aspiration. Return hubs In one of his first acts as prime minister Starmer scrapped the Conservative Party's plans to send migrants to Rwanda, branding it a waste of money and a 'gimmick'. However, he is now drawing up a policy that sounds remarkably similar — sending failed asylum seekers to 'return hubs' in the west Balkans. There is one significant difference: the Tories planned to send all those who came to the UK on small boats abroad, while Labour's plan is limited to those who have exhausted all avenues of appeal. But the intent is similar: to deter people from making the crossings in the first place. Verdict: The plans are at a very early stage, and it is not a given that countries will agree to host the return hubs. Albania has already ruled out doing so. There remain significant legal and political challenges to getting the scheme off the ground. There is broader support for the idea among some EU states and also in the UN. But even if the plans get off the ground, there is no guarantee it will work as a deterrent. Deal with other countries In December Starmer negotiated a deal with Germany, which agreed to tighten its laws to make it easier to prosecute those helping to smuggle migrants to the UK. Ministers said this was important because facilitating people-smuggling to a third country was not technically illegal in Germany. However, the law has not yet been enacted, and ministers need to win approval from the new German government for it to be put into place. Starmer has also recently announced a partnership with Albania, Kosovo and North Macedonia to detect and deter illegal migration operations. Verdict: The prime minister has made improving international co-operation to tackle smuggling gangs a big diplomatic priority for the government. But while the issue is a huge priority for the UK it is less important for other countries, and it remains to be seen how quickly and effectively diplomatic deals are converted into concrete action. The asylum backlog and hotels There are 8,000 more asylum seekers living in hotels than when Starmer pledged during the election campaign in June last year to 'end asylum hotels, saving the taxpayer billions of pounds'. The reality of how difficult that is has become clear. This month the National Audit Office said the cost of asylum accommodation would be three times higher than previously estimated and more than 38,000 migrants are being housed in hotels, costing the Home Office an estimated £5.5 million a day — while a further 66,000 migrants are in dispersal accommodation such as large houses, bedsits and flats across different local authorities. • Migrants will be put up in hotels for years yet, Treasury admits The vast majority are awaiting asylum decisions, so speeding up that process is seen as key. The Home Office has had some success — it has been increased by 52 per cent and 24,000 people have been removed from the country. Yvette Cooper, the home secretary, is also planning to change the law to introduce a mandatory 24-week legal deadline for all asylum appeals. Verdict: If decision-making can genuinely be sped up it will help not only to bring down the hotel bill, but could act as a deterrent for those considering making the journey across the Channel. Human rights laws Ministers will bring in a new framework for judges to work to when deciding whether to allow migrants to make claims for asylum using the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR). The most heavily used part of the ECHR, Article 8 — the right to family life — has been leveraged by murderers and paedophiles to stay in the country. Cooper revealed this week about 30 per cent of cases had been considered 'exceptional' by judges, and she wants to restrict that to a more narrow set of circumstances. • Kemi Badenoch would override ECHR on asylum for illegal migrants Verdict: Restricting the scope of Article 8 will save ministers from some embarrassing headlines but is unlikely to be enough on its own to fulfil the government's immigration pledges. An appetite to direct judges — and suggestions that the government could be open to reforming the ECHR — shows a willingness from Starmer and Cooper to step into an arena previously inhabited by the Tories and Reform UK. But as those on the right ramp up pressure for Britain to pull out of the convention altogether, the efforts may fall short.
The Sun
10 minutes ago
- The Sun
Half a million more kids will be entitled to free school meals in massive expansion of the scheme
HALF a million more kids will be entitled to free school meals under a massive expansion of the scheme, Sir Keir Starmer announced last night. Every child in a household on Universal Credit will now be eligible for state sponsored lunches, in a move that should lift 100,000 children out of poverty. 1 Expanding free school meals will save parents on benefits £500 per child every year, according to the Department for Education. Kids in UC households currently not eligible will be able to start claiming lunches from the start of the 2026 school year. The entitlement will apply in all settings where free school meals are available, including school-based nurseries and further-education settings. Most parents will be able to apply before the start of the new school year by providing a national insurance number. Education Secretary Bridget Philipson told The Sun the move is critical for ending the post-pandemic school attendance crisis and cracking down on bad behaviour. She said: 'What we're announcing is a game changer. 'This will make a big difference to children's attendance and behaviour at school because we know that if kids are hungry, they don't concentrate well. 'Sun will benefit directly from saving £500 per child per year.' Since 2018 kids have only been eligible for free meals if their household income is less than £7,400 per year. The major expansion comes ahead of the government's Child Poverty Taskforce publishing a ten-year strategy to drive down poverty. It also follows mounting pressure on the PM from rebel Labour MPs to scrap the two-child benefit cap. Sir Keir said: 'Working parents across the country are working tirelessly to provide for their families but are being held back by cost-of-living pressures. 'My government is taking action to ease those pressures. 'Feeding more children every day, for free, is one of the biggest interventions we can make to put more money in parents' pockets, tackle the stain of poverty, and set children up to learn.'
BBC News
13 minutes ago
- BBC News
Free school meal rule change to make 500,000 more pupils eligible
Any child in England whose parents receive Universal Credit will be able to claim free school meals from September 2026, the government has on the credit will be eligible regardless of their income. Currently, their household must earn less than £7,400 a year to government says the change will make 500,000 more pupils eligible, which Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said would "help families who need it most". The Department for Education has set aside £1bn to fund the change up to has faced scrutiny over plans to tackle child poverty in recent weeks, and is yet to decide whether to scrap the two-child benefit cap. Ministers said the changes to free school meals would save parents £500 a year and "lift 100,000 children out of poverty".They have also pledged £13m to a dozen food charities across England to "fight food poverty", by redistributing food from farms which might otherwise go to waste. "Feeding more children every day, for free, is one of the biggest interventions we can make to put more money in parents' pockets, tackle the stain of poverty, and set children up to learn," said Sir Keir. The Institute for Fiscal Studies think tank said that while the rule change would cut child poverty to a degree and would be cheaper than making them universal, "other measures - such as lifting the two-child limit - would have a lower cost per child lifted out of poverty".The announcement has been largely welcomed by the education sector and organisations campaigning against child Harrison, chief executive of the Sutton Trust charity, said it was a "significant step towards taking hunger out of the classroom".Pepe Di'Iasio, general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders union, said it was "great news"."There is much more to be done - but this is a welcome step forward," he added. Kate Anstey, head of education policy at the Child Poverty Action Group, said the extension would cover "all children in poverty and those at risk of poverty", with the current criteria only accounting for around two-thirds of those called it a "game-changer for children and families", but called on the government to go further."We hope this is a sign of what's to come in the autumn's child poverty strategy, with government taking more action to meet its manifesto commitment to reduce child poverty in the UK," she Democrats spokesperson Munira Wilson said: "This can only be a first step. To end the cost of learning crisis, the government needs to commit to auto-enrolling eligible children for free school meals, lifting the two-child benefit cap, and capping uniform costs to truly change the lives of children in poverty."Last week, Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson said the government was looking at scrapping the two-child benefit cap, which prevents most families from claiming means-tested benefits for any third or additional children born after April said the policy had pushed people into poverty, but scrapping it would "cost a lot of money".Charities have called for the cap to be abolished in next week's spending government is expected to announce its decision in the autumn, when it publishes its child poverty Keir said he was "absolutely determined that we will drive down child poverty" during Prime Minister's Questions on Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch accused him of "causing confusion" over the policy. Who can claim free school meals? The total number of children registered for free school meals in England is about 2.1 million, or 24.6% of the total pupil population, according to the latest data. Families in England need to meet certain criteria for their children to be can include receiving Universal Credit but, until the changes are implemented next September, parents also must have a household income of less than £7,400 a year, after have to apply for their children to receive them and eligible children are not automatically February, MPs on the cross-party education committee called for that to said tens of thousands of eligible children were missing out on free school meals because their parents were not claiming them - often because of language barriers or difficulty with the administrative eligibility for free school meals varies across the primary school children in London and in Wales can access free Scotland, all children in the first five years of primary school are eligible, as well as all children from families receiving the Scottish Child Payment in Northern Ireland can apply if they receive certain benefits and are below an income threshold which is approximately double the current England level, at £15,000.
