Dorset Police 'do not endorse' Bournemouth volunteer patrol group
The decision not to endorse the group follows a multi-agency meeting on Friday.Assistant Chief Constable Mark Callaghan, of Dorset Police, said: "We have engaged with the group extensively and a review of their vetting processes has highlighted areas of significant concern. "The organisers have been unable to provide reassurance that this group has sufficient safeguards in place to ensure volunteers are adequately vetted, trained, and equipped to undertake high-visibility patrols in the community."He said there were "insufficient details in relation to the use of body-worn cameras, publishing of photographs of members of the public, administration and recording of any force used or first aid provided, and limited evidence of any training provided".He added: "We welcome the responsible use of volunteers, who wish to carry out public service and there are many ways in which this can be facilitated in a safe way, including becoming a Special Constable, joining the street pastor programme, or via established Watch schemes."
Safeguard Force claimed it was asked to attend the meeting "at very short notice, with no agenda provided".It said the concerns raised were "primarily related to wording in documentation" and it was taking "immediate action" to resolve them."We remain committed to collaboration and are fully prepared for our next meeting as requested," it added.The force said it had been carrying out its own high-visibility patrols in Bournemouth, with 289 foot patrols taking place in the past seven days, including the town centre, gardens and seafront, leading to arrests, dispersal notices, stop searches and anti-social behaviour incidents tackled.
You can follow BBC Dorset on Facebook, X, or Instagram.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
3 minutes ago
- The Independent
Aristocrat Constance Marten launches bid to overturn conviction for killing baby while on the run
Aristocrat Constance Marten has launched a bid to overturn her conviction for killing her newborn daughter while on the run from police. Baby Victoria perished in a 'thin and flimsy' tent after Marten and her partner Mark Gordon, a convicted rapist, took her off-grid to stop the infant from being taken into care. The parents are facing years in jail after they were both convicted of gross negligence manslaughter in a retrial this summer. In a separate trial last year, the couple were also found guilty of concealing their daughter's birth, child cruelty and perverting the course of justice by hiding her body in a rubbish-filled plastic shopping bag. An appeal bid following their first trial was previously rejected. However Marten, 38, has now lodged a fresh application at the Court of Appeal seeking permission to appeal her manslaughter conviction, according to court officials. Over the course of the two drawn-out trials, it emerged the couple had carefully concealed Marten's pregnancy with Victoria – their fifth child – before going on the run to stop her from being taken into care. Their first four children had been removed by a family court – a decision which the parents claimed was a miscarriage of justice driven by a 'corrupt' social services system. She gave birth in secret in a holiday cottage before they frantically travelled the country with the baby hidden inside Marten's coat – at first by road and later in taxis paid for with cash from her trust fund – after their car caught fire on the M61. They decided to settle 'off-grid' in the South Downs with little more than some sleeping bags and a cheap tent amid a nationwide manhunt after police found the remains of a placenta in their burnt-out car. But Victoria died after Marten fell asleep with her zipped inside her jacket as they sheltered in the tent in January 2023. After the unanimous guilty verdict for manslaughter was read out in July, Marten, wearing a blue top and dark trousers, later shouted 'it's a scam' from the dock. Gordon, 51, has previously served 22 years in a Florida prison for raping a woman armed with a knife and hedge clippers in a 1989 home invasion when he was 14 years old. A further charge against Gordon for failing to comply with his sex offender notification requirements while on the run was this week dropped by prosecutors. Prosecutor Joel Smith KC told the Old Bailey that in light of his recent conviction for manslaughter, the Crown Prosecution Service took the view that it was no longer in the public interest to pursue the charge. Gordon, who appeared by video-link from Belmarsh prison unrepresented by a lawyer, seemed uncertain when asked to enter a plea. Judge Mark Lucraft KC told him: 'If you plead not guilty that will bring proceedings to an end.' Gordon then responded: 'Of course, not guilty.' Mr Smith then offered no evidence and invited Judge Lucraft to formally acquit Gordon. The parents are due to be sentenced on 15 September.
The Independent
3 minutes ago
- The Independent
Men, you've really got to hand it to the porn-blockers…
Poor old Pornhub. The UK's most visited pornography site is having a barren August and not just because its (mostly male) users are on holiday with the family. Following the introduction of new age verification rules, as part of the Online Safety Act – which requires users to prove how old they are by entering credit card details or using their bank account, mobile phone contract or facial recognition – traffic to Pornhub has almost halved. In the fortnight between July 24 (the day before the new legislation came in) and August 8, visitors to the site fell by 47 per cent, according to data experts Similarweb. Other adult sites have also reported drops in UK traffic. OnlyFans is apparently down 10 per cent, but that could be down to having banned Bonnie Blue. No word yet on whether the amount of laundry being done in the middle of the night has fallen, too. Let me be the first to say a tentative woohoo. I previously wrote in these pages how, ahead of the age verification kicking in, online forums had been flooded with men (and 73 per cent of UK porn users are male) angry that the trifling matter of keeping children safe was getting in the way of their unrestricted pleasure. Now? It seems possible that at least some of those chaps have cut themselves off. Sounds painful. If the side effect of protecting society's most vulnerable – the average age that children are thought to first view explicit porn in this country is just 13 – is that some men have had their own online habit broken? That's surely something to celebrate. University College London academics might say it can take between 18 to 255 days to form a new habit, but I bet their study didn't take into account the prospect of having to put your real details into a porn site and the potential for data leaks. I've interviewed porn-addicted men, who told me about the mindless scrolling, almost numb to what they were seeing, searching for ever darker material to get a kick. They wanted to stop but felt unable to tear themselves away – maybe the thought of having to enter their long card number was the breaker some have been waiting for. Not unlike (indulge me) my friend whose unstoppable M&S fashion habit was cut off by the cyberattack the retailer experienced this summer and which denied her access to its website for several weeks. Look, I'm not naive. I do realise that a lot of Pornhub's users will now be using VPNs (Virtual Private Networks), which disguise the location of their IP address and were the most downloaded thing on the UK Apple App Store in the days after the new rules came in. That makes data on UK visits to porn sites hard to pin down. Nor do we know exactly which users have stopped scrolling. Is it those accessing the most violent pornography day after day? Or the more casual viewer who doesn't rely on porn enough to bother going through age checks – easier just to knock it on the head. Still, I can't help wondering whether these men might not come to thank the likes of Baroness Kidron, who campaigned tirelessly to get this legislation passed. She's likened it to making children 'climb out of the window', rather than just giving them unrestricted access. If a few men are also reluctant to shimmy down the drainpipe? That's surely progress, however angry they might be.
The Sun
4 minutes ago
- The Sun
Disgraced Huw Edwards spotted with new beard & carrying bottles of Prosecco on birthday – year on from paedo conviction
DISGRACED Huw Edwards is seen clutching three miniature bottles of £3.35 Prosecco - as he breaks cover for a lonesome stroll on his birthday. Paedophile Edwards - sporting new grey facial hair and glasses - looked grim-faced as he was spotted on Monday, the day he turned 64. 7 7 7 7 Our exclusive pictures show the ex-BBC presenter holding his car keys, a parking receipt, a blue cap and three bottles of Tesco finest Prosecco Brut - £3.35 each at the supermarket - as he returned to his car. The fallen star, whose wife Vicky has filed for divorce, was wearing a wedding ring when he was seen in his native South Wales. It is the first time former News at Ten host Edwards has been seen since we revealed pictures of him spluttering on a vape in February. And an onlooker said: "Edwards looked very different, with glasses very grey hair and a beard and moustache. "He was dressed smartly but also looked like he had put on a bit of weight. "And he looked a shadow of his former cocky and super-confident self. "Edwards struck a very odd figure - and it was quite a peculiar sight seeing him heading back to his car with the mini-Prosecco bottles. It made me wonder who they were for, or if they were a gift to him. "Whatever the situation, Edwards looked a bit tragic - which he is. "He was quite near Swansea train station and looked like he could have been to see any remaining friends he has before heading off in his car. "There are a few nice places nearby including a hotel he could have come from. BBC failed to tackle 'unacceptable' stars' behaviour - as Huw Edwards victim's family called report 'too little too late' "Although he looked different he was very recognisable. "But considering who he is he looked pretty relaxed and was strolling about freely - not trying to hide his identity. "No-one bothered him though and he seemed comfortable being out and about. "He just looked like a middle-aged man going about his business, but it does make you sick when you consider what he's done." The star avoided prison, instead being handed a six-month suspended sentence, having resigned from the Beeb on "medical advice" in April 2024. Dad-of-five Edwards has since kept a largely low profile in his native Wales. It comes after The Sun revealed earlier this week that BBC staff are furious that bosses have failed to recoup his £200,000 salary earned amid the scandal. Executives formally requested last August that former newsreader Edwards, 63, return wages he received after his arrest on paedophile charges. After a Sun probe, using freedom of information laws, the broadcaster said: 'Huw Edwards has not r eturned any money paid to him by the BBC after his arrest, in respect of any of his work for either BBC public service or the BBC's commercial operations. 'The BBC has asked for all the money paid to Huw Edwards by the BBC for the period November 2023 (arrest) and April 2024 (resignation) to be returned.' A BBC insider said: ' Everyone is raging about it — firstly at Huw, who is a disgrace, secondly that gutless bosses seem unwilling or unable to do anything about it.' Edwards left the BBC three months before he was charged with having indecent images of children. The mum who blew the whistle on Edwards after he paid her son £35,000 for sexual pictures in a separate case exposed by The Sun previously told us: 'Does this man not have an ounce of shame? "How can he keep this money after what he's done?' Meanwhile, a victim of Edwards earlier this summer lashed out at the BBC after it emerged bosses were warned of his behaviour as far back as 2012. Heavily redacted emails showed they received a complaint about the ex-News at Ten host amid the fallout over the Jimmy Savile sex abuse scandal. It also emerged execs were forced to keep a spreadsheet on their scandal-hit stars as they were so deluged by grievances. As reported by The Sun in May, emails show that an hour before his sentencing, a message was sent to BBC director-general Tim Davie from an ex-Beeb employee revealing a complaint had been made about Edwards' conduct in 2012. The author warned it was 'an area of potential risk to the corporation' but 'not necessarily a criminal allegation'. They wrote the complaint was 'most likely listed under the so-called 'C-List' if it's anywhere'. That is a reference to a spreadsheet of claims against BBC presenters created after Savile's crimes were exposed a year after his death. The C category was for 'non-high-risk actions' — cases which are not necessarily criminal, but included allegations of bullying and harassment. Davie replied three minutes later saying his team was 'looking into all the past allegations'. Paedo's pattern of behaviour By Scarlet Howes NIGHT after night he sternly delivered the most important news to the nation, with his authoritative style winning countless awards. But away from his famous desk, as we have discovered, Huw Edwards was a manipulative paedophile who used the same pattern of behaviour time and time again to feed his relentless desires. Some 437 days since the Sun's bombshell front page - Edwards today appeared in court to learn his fate, his once glittering career in ruins. Our exclusive that he paid a youngster thousands of pounds for sexual pictures made headlines around the globe and set into motion a series of events which plunged the BBC into crisis. And Edwards - at the time the BBC's highest earning newsreader - never again appeared on our screens. Today, a court heard Edwards paid a younger convicted paedophile £1,500 for child sex images and videos of children which he described as "amazing". The case centred on messages between sex offender Alex Williams, who was a teen when they struck up a relationship, and 63-year-old Edwards. We must be clear, the facts of that case are unrelated to our original story. But there are some alarming similarities in his exchanges with both young people - and a pattern of deeply disturbing behaviour. He made contact with both on social media, messaged them on WhatsApp, harassed them for pictures, and then gave them money. There were kisses involved and Christmas presents given. Chillingly, he even bought both of them, who are decades younger, a pair of trainers. And all in exchange for sexual pictures. Cash was used as leverage to the men, one homeless, the other a student, who could only dream of earning his top salary. What The Sun uncovered was a pattern of behaviour and had we not done so Edwards' could well have remained undetected. A TV producer who was harassed by Edwards urged BBC bosses to finally 'come clean' on the scandal. Edwards begged to meet him during lockdown and even invited him to his BBC-funded Windsor hotel at Prince Philip's funeral in April 2021. He told The Sun: 'These emails show the BBC has been mounting a full-scale covert operation to keep the details under wraps. 'The BBC has never wanted the truth to come out and people have had to push very hard for it to do so. But now BBC bosses should just come clean about the whole thing. 'For an organisation that constantly puts itself on a moral pedestal of truth, the lengths the BBC goes to in order to cover things up are staggering. 'The fact there were details of his unacceptable behaviour in 2012 is shocking — the BBC acted all along as if no one knew.' Edwards' divorce delayed In June, The Sun reported how Edwards' divorce had been delayed as the asking price for his family home was slashed by £750,000. His TV producer wife Vicky Flind filed for divorce days after he admitted possessing indecent images of children. Their six-bedroom detached mansion in Dulwich, south London was then put up for sale for £4.75 million last October. But no buyers were found, despite a £250,000 price cut in February. The property has attracted so little interest that online site Zoopla was urging 'be one of the first to view' - nine months after it went on sale. Agents have now reduced the price by a further £500,000, as the couple attempt to accelerate their split. The couple bought the six-bedroom home for £1.85 million in 2006 and it is mortgage-free - and 63-year-old Edwards expected to rake in more than £2 million from his share of the sale. But the plummeting price means the presenter - who earned £475,000 at the peak of his career - has already lost more than £300,000 he hoped to rake in last year. 7 7 7
